This study explores the conditions under which polarization and depolarization occur with respect to public opinion on education issues. I analyze experimental and nonexperimental survey data to gauge the effects of informational and experiential stimuli on education policy preferences. I focus on heterogeneous effects by political party identification that result in increased or decreased polarization. I find evidence that the provision of education spending data has depolarizing consequences, but the effects of ideologically moderate policy endorsements vary by issue and year. I also find tentative evidence in favor of a link between having children in the household and reduced polarization.
AbramowitzA. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
BafumiJ.ShapiroR. Y. (2009). A new partisan voter. The Journal of Politics, 71, 1-24.
3.
BaliV. A. (2016). Evolving trends in public opinion on the quality of local schools. Educational Policy, 30, 688-720.
4.
BullockJ. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105, 496-515.
5.
BushawW. J.LopezS. J. (2011). Betting on teachers: The 43rd annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes towards the public schools. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
6.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
CannonC. L.BarhamF. E. (1993). Are you and your public polls apart? What those national poll results really mean. Executive Educator, 15(10), 41-42.
8.
ChingosM. M.HendersonM. B.WestM. R. (2012). Citizen perceptions of government service quality: Evidence from public schools. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7, 411-445.
9.
CohenG. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808-822.
10.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
11.
DruckmanJ. N.PetersonE.SlothuusR. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107, 57-79.
12.
ElamS. M. (1995). How America views its schools: The PDK/Gallup Polls, 1969-1994. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
13.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. C. (2010). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
14.
GerberA.GreenD. P. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 189-210.
15.
GreenD. P.SchicklerE.PalmquistP. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
HenigJ. R.HoustonD. M.LyonM. A. (2017). From NCLB to ESSA: Lessons learned or politics reaffirmed? In HessF. M.EdenM. (Eds.), The Every Student Succeeds Act: What it means for America’s schools, systems, and states (pp. 29-42). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
17.
JeritJ.BarabasJ. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74, 672-684.
18.
KeithB. E.MaglebyD. B.NelsonC. J.OrrE.WestlyeM. C. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
20.
LovelessT. (1997). The structure of public confidence in education. American Journal of Education, 105, 127-159.
21.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
McGuinnP. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
24.
McGuinnP. (2017). From ESEA to NCLB: The growth of the federal role and the shift to accountability. In HessF. M.EdenM. (Eds.), The Every Student Succeeds Act: What it means for America’s schools, systems, and states (pp. 13-28). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
25.
PageB. I.ShapiroR. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
26.
PetersonP. E.HendersonM.WestM. R. (2014). Teachers versus the public: What Americans think about schools and how to fix them. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
PopkinS. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
29.
ReckhowS.GrossmanM.EvansB. C. (2015). Policy cues and ideology in attitudes toward charter schools. Policy Studies Journal, 43, 207-227.
30.
RhodesJ. H. (2012). An education in politics: The origins and evolution of No Child Left Behind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
SchuelerB. E.WestM. R. (2016). Sticker shock: How information affects citizen support for public school funding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 90-113.
32.
ShapiroR. Y.Bloch-ElkonY. (2006, May). Political polarization and the rational public. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
33.
ShapiroR. Y.KilibardaA.SinozichS.McClellanO. (2016, May). American public opinion and partisan conflict: Education’s exceptionalism?Paper presented at Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government for “The Politics of Education Policy: An International Perspective.” Retrieved from https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/pepg/conferences/politics-of-education-2016/home.html
34.
TaberC. S.CannD.KucsovaS. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31, 137-155.
35.
TaberC. S.LodgeM. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769.
36.
WolbrechtC.HartneyM. T. (2014). “Ideas about interests”: Explaining the changing partisan politics of education. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 603-630.
37.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
