Globalisation has driven the pursuit of more active citizenship forms. Many governments see educational policies as critical to preparing young citizens with the necessary skills, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours to thrive in a changing global context. However, what active citizenship education is and means varies across countries. Little is known about how active citizenship is conceptualised in educational policies in Singapore and the kinds of citizens these policies and programmes aim to nurture. This article draws on an analysis of 20 Singapore policy texts, such as political speeches, press releases, and curriculum documents, to examine the kind of Singaporean citizens the Singapore government seeks to nurture. We argue that globalisation provides a critical context for local conceptualisations of citizenship, but the active Singapore citizen is not an individualistic nor a universal neoliberal citizen subject. In line with Asian conceptions of citizenship, which posit that ‘good’ people make good citizens, active citizenship in Singapore has a prevailing focus on ‘good’ character and an active citizen who prioritises the well-being of the collective, yet caught in a paradoxical pursuit of a neoliberal citizen.
BennR (2000) The genesis of active citizenship in the learning society. Studies in the Education of Adults32(2): 241–256. DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2000.11661433
3.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4.
BrownW (2005) Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
5.
DaviesI (2017) Book review: what kind of citizen? Educating our children for the common good, New York and London, Teachers College Press. Journal of Social Science Education16(1): 81. DOI: 10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v16-i1-1599
6.
DengZGopinathanSLeeCK-E (2013) Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum: From Policy to Classroom. Berlin, Germany: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4_2
7.
DeweyJ (1916) Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press.
8.
FreireP (1972) Education: domestication or liberation?Prospects2(2): 173–181.
9.
GehaCHorstC (2019) Exporting ‘active citizenship’: foreign support for citizenship education in the Arab world. Citizenship Studies23(5): 486–501. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2019.1604629
10.
GopinathanS (2015) Singapore Chronicles: Education. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies & Straits Times Press.
11.
GopinathanSChiongC (2018) Being rooted, living global: citizenship and education in the Singapore city-state. In: PetersonAStahlGSoongH (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_18-1
12.
GopinathanSMardianaAB (2013) Globalization, the state and curriculum reform. In: DengZGopinathanSLeeCK-E (eds). Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum: From Policy to Classroom. Singapore: Springer, 15–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4_2
13.
GopinathanSSharpeL (2004) New bearings for citizenship education in Singapore. In: LeeWOGrossmanDLKennedyKJ, et al. (eds). Citizenship education in Asia and the Pacific: Concepts and Issues. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 119–133. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-7935-1
14.
HanC (2000) National education and ‘active citizenship’: implications for citizenship and citizenship education in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education20(1): 63–72. DOI: 10.1080/0218879000200106
15.
HanC (2015) Educating for active citizenship: youth organisations and alternative forms of citizenship education in Hong Kong and Singapore. In: VickersEKumarK (eds), Constructing Modern Asian Citizenship. England, UK: Routledge, pp. 240–262.
16.
HarberC (1992) Democratic Learning and Learning Democracy: Education for Active Citizenship:[special Report]. UK: Education Now.
17.
HeaterD (1999) What Is Citizenship?Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
18.
HoekstraMS (2019) Creating active citizens? Emotional geographies of citizenship in a diverse and deprived neighbourhood. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space37(3): 480–497. DOI: 10.1177/2399654418789408
19.
HvindenBJohanssonH (2007) What do we mean by active citizenship?Citizenship in Nordic Welfare States: Dynamics of Choice, Duties and Participation in a Changing Europe. England, UK: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203933527
20.
IsinEF (2008) Theorizing acts of citizenship. In EF Isin. In: NielsenGM (ed). Acts of citizenship. London, UK: Zed Books, 15–43.
21.
JansenTChioncelNDekkersH (2006) Social cohesion and integration: learning active citizenship. British Journal of Sociology of Education27(2): 189–205. DOI: 10.1080/01425690600556305
KennedyKJ (2019) Civic and Citizenship Education in Volatile Times: Preparing Students for Citizenship in the 21st Century. Berlin, Germany: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6386-3
24.
KennellyJ (2009) Good citizen/bad activist: The cultural role of the state in youth activism. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies31(2–3): 127–149. DOI: 10.1080/10714410902827135
25.
KennellyJLlewellynK (2011) Educating for active compliance: discursive constructions in citizenship education. Citizenship Studies15(6-7): 897–914. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2011.600103
26.
LawsonH (2001) Active citizenship in schools and the community. Curriculum Journal12(2): 163–178. DOI: 10.1080/09585170110050828
27.
LeeWO (2015) Future-oriented citizenship: a possible citizenship model starting from the case of Singapore. Citizenship Teaching & Learning10(1): 95–108. DOI: 10.1386/ctl.10.1.95_1
28.
ListerR (2007) Why citizenship: where, when and how children?Theoretical Inquiries in Law8(2): 693–718.
29.
MarshallTH (1950) Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
McLaughlinTH (1992) Citizenship, diversity and education: a philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education21(3): 235–250. DOI: 10.1080/0305724920210307
MitchellK (2003) Educating the national citizens in neoliberal times: from the multicultural self to the strategic cosmopolitan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers28(4): 387–403.
RoseN (1999) Powers of freedom: reframing political thought Powers of Freedom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
RoseNO'MalleyPValverdeM (2006) Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science2(1): 83–104. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
51.
SahaLJ (2000) Education and active citizenship: prospects and issues. Educational Practice and Theory22(1): 9–20. DOI: 10.7459/ept/22.1.02
52.
SaidEW (1983) The World, the Text, and the Critic. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
53.
SimJB-Y (2011) ‘Simple ideological “dupes” of national governments’? teacher agency and citizenship education in Singapore. In: KennedyKJLeeWOGrossmanDL (eds), Citizenship Pedagogies in Asia and the Pacific. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 221–242. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0744-3_11
54.
SimJB-Y (2013) National education: framing the citizenship curriculum for Singapore schools. In: DengZGopinathanSLeeCK-E (eds), Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum from Policy to Classroom. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 67–83. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4_2
55.
SimJB-YChowLT (2019) Confucian thinking in Singapore’s citizenship education. Journal of Moral Education48(4). DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2018.1556155
56.
SimJB-YKrishnasamyM (2016) Building a democratic society: exploring Singapore students understandings of democracy. Asian Education and Development Studies5(1): 37–58. DOI: 10.1108/AEDS-07-2015-0033
57.
SimJB-YChuaSKrishnasamyM (2017) “Riding the citizenship wagon”: citizenship conceptions of social studies teachers in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education63: 92–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.002
58.
SpringJ (2008) Research on globalization and education. Review of Educational Research78(2): 330–363. DOI: 10.3102/0034654308317846
59.
StewartA (1995) Two conceptions of citizenship. British Journal of Sociology46(1): 63–78. DOI: 10.2307/591623
60.
TanJ (2013) Aims of schooling for the twenty-first century: the desired outcomes of education. In: DengZGopinathanSLeeCK-E (eds), Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum from Policy to Classroom. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 33–47. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4_2
61.
TanK (2017) Governing Global-City Singapore: Legacies and Futures after Lee Kuan Yew. England, UK: Routledge.
62.
ThianWL (2019) How to be Singaporean: becoming global national citizens and the national dimension in cosmopolitan openness. Globalisation, Societies and Education17(4). DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2019.1573659
63.
TurnerBS (1990) Outline of a theory of citizenship. Sociology24(2): 189–217.
64.
TurnerBS (1997) Citizenship studies: a general theory. Citizenship Studies1(1): 5–18.
65.
TurnerBS (2009) T.H. Marshall, social rights and English national identity. Citizenship Studies13(1): 65–73. DOI: 10.1080/13621020802586750
66.
VeugelersW (2021) How globalisation influences perspectives on citizenship education: from the social and political to the cultural and moral. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education51(8): 1174–1189. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2020.1716307
67.
WestheimerJKahneJE (2004) What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal41(2): 237–269. DOI: 10.3102/00028312041002237
68.
WoodBEBlackR (2018) Globalisation, cosmopolitanism and diaspora: what are the implications for understanding citizenship?International Studies in Sociology of Education27(2-3): 184–199. DOI: 10.1080/09620214.2017.1415161
69.
ZajdaJ (2022) Globalisation, Ideology, and Human Rights. Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature(pp. 1–9). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90590-3_11
