Building Information Modeling (BIM) adoption in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry remains a complex process, particularly in developing countries. This study proposes a BIM transition framework, structured around six components: motivations, inputs, enablers, obstacles, benefits, and impacts, to ease BIM implementation. Through expert interviews in the AEC sector, 46 critical factors were identified and evaluated. Findings show that client requirements are a primary motivation, while investment in software and hardware is a key input, especially emphasized by Construction firms. Top management support is the most influential enabler, whereas its absence is a major obstacle. Results also implied that Construction companies give more importance to inputs than Engineering and Architectural companies. Overall, AEC companies experience differences in implementing BIM, and the BIM transition process proposed in this paper will help companies understand the BIM success factors, as well as their relative importance for BIM adoption.
NBS. National BIM report 2014. National Building Specification, 2014.
2.
EadieROdeyinkaHBrowneM, et al.An analysis of the drivers for adopting building information modelling. J Inf Technol Constr2013; 18: 338–352.
3.
ChanDWMTimothyOOHoAML. Perceived benefits of and barriers to building information modelling (BIM) implementation in construction: the case of Hong Kong. J Build Eng2019; 25: 2352–2362.
BrydeDMartíBJürgenM. The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). Int J Proj Manag2013; 31(7): 971–980.
6.
JinRCmhCLlewellynT, et al.BIM investment, returns, and risks in China’s AEC industries. J Constr Eng Manag2017; 143(12): 04017089.
7.
GhaffarianhoseiniATookeyJNaismithN, et al.Building information modelling (BIM) uptake: clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 75: 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.083
8.
ChiuWLaiJ. Building information modelling for building services engineering: benefits, barriers and conducive measures. Eng Constr Archit Manag2020; 27(9): 32–2252. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2018-0460
9.
RogersE. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed.Free Press, 2003.
10.
AhmedAKassemM. A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: conceptual development, empirical validation and application. Autom Constr2018; 96: 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.017
ChenYYinYBrowneGJ, et al.Adoption of building information modeling in Chinese construction industry: the technology-organization-environment framework. Eng Constr Archit Manag2019; 26(9): 1878–1898. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2017-0246
13.
DengYLiJWuQ, et al.Using network theory to explore BIM application barriers for BIM sustainable development in China. Sustainability2020; 12(8): 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083190
14.
MomMTsaiMHHsiehS. Developing critical success factors for the assessment of BIM technology adoption: part II. Analysis and results. J Chin Inst Eng2014; 37(7): 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2014.888798
SoltaniS. The contributions of building information modelling to sustainable construction. World J Eng Technol2016; 4: 193–199. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2016.42018
17.
MatosBCruzCBrancoF. Digitalization and procurement in construction projects: an integrated BIM-based approach. J Inf Technol Constr2024; 29: 400–423. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2024.019
18.
MohammedHHilalM. Improving building information modeling (BIM) implementation throughout the construction industry. J Eng2024; 30(2): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2024.02.06
19.
NdwandweMKuotchaWMkandawireT. Building information modeling: implementation challenges in the Malawian construction industry. Front Built Environ2024; 10: 1474032. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1474032
20.
MishraAHasanAJhaK. A holistic evaluation of BIM implementation barriers in the Indian construction industry: pre- and post-adoption perspectives. Int J Constr Educ Res2024; 20: 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2024.2320108
21.
McGrawHill-Construction. Smart market report the business value of BIM in North America: Multi-year trend analysis and user ratings (2007-2012). McGraw Hill Construction, 2012.
22.
ZhuKKraemerKXuS. The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on E-Business. Manage Sci2006; 52(10): 1557–1576. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487
23.
HameedMStevCStephenS. A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations. J Eng Technol Manage2012; 29(3): 358–390.
24.
TornatzkyLFleischerM. The process of technology innovation. Lexington Books, 1990.
25.
BakerJ. The technology–organization–environment framework. Springer, 2012.
MaXChanALiY, et al.Critical strategies for enhancing BIM implementation in AEC projects: perspectives from Chinese practitioners. J Constr Eng Manag2020; 146(2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001748
28.
WonJLeeGDossickC, et al.Where to focus for successful adoption of building information modeling within organization. J Constr Eng Manage2013; 139(11): 04013014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000731
29.
MunirMKiviniemiAJonesS. Business value of integrated BIM-Based asset management. Eng Constr Archit Manag2019; 26(6): 1171–1191. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-03-2018-0105
30.
Amuda-YusufG. Critical success factors for building information modelling implementation. Constr Econ Build2018; 18(3): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v18i3.6000
Becerik-GerberBJazizadehFLiN, et al.Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Constr Eng Manage2012; 138: 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000433
34.
WuWMayoGMcCuenT, et al.Building information modeling body of knowledge. I: background, framework, and initial development. J Constr Eng Manag2018; 144(8): 04018065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001518
35.
AhankoobAManleyKHonC, et al.The impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) maturity and experience on contractor absorptive capacity. Archit Eng Des Manag2018; 14(5): 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2018.1467828
36.
PeansupapVWalkerD. Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organizations: a micro analysis. Constr Innov2005; 5(3): 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170510815221
AlshawiMLouEKhosrowshahiF, et al.Strategic positioning of IT in construction: the way forward. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 2010.
39.
RashidianSDrogemullerROmraniS. An integrated building information modelling, integrated Project delivery and lean construction maturity model. Archit Eng Des Manag2024; 20(6): 1454–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2024.2383718
40.
LiuYvanNederveenSHertoghM. Understanding effects of BIM on collaborative design and construction: an empirical Study in China. Int J Proj Manag2017; 35(4): 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.007
41.
TsaiMLaiKHsuW. A Study of the institutional forces influencing the adoption intention of RFID by suppliers. Inf Manag2013; 50(1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.05.006
42.
ChoiTEbochK. The TQM paradox: relations among TQM practices, plant performance, and customer satisfaction. J Oper Manag1998; 17: 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00031-x
43.
DiMaggioPPowellW. The Iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev1983; 48(2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
44.
TeoHWeiKBenbasatI. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Q2003; 27(1): 19–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036518
45.
OzorhonBKaraciganA. Drivers of BIM implementation in a high rise building Project. In: Proceedings of the. Springer International Publishing, 2020.
46.
BernsteinPPittmanJ. Barriers to the adoption of building information modeling in the building industry. Autodesk Building Solutions2004.
47.
LiaoLTeoE. Managing critical drivers for building information modelling implementation in the Singapore construction industry: an organizational change perspective. Int J Constr Manag2019; 19(3): 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1423165
KoseogluOKeskinBOzorhonB. Challenges and enablers in BIM-Enabled digital transformation in mega projects: the istanbul new airport project case study. Buildings2019; 9(5): 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9050115
50.
RogersJChongHPreeceC. Adoption of building information modelling technology (BIM): perspectives from Malaysian engineering consulting services firms. Eng Constr Archit Manag2015; 22(4): 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-05-2014-0067
OlawumiTChanDWongJ, et al.Barriers to the integration of BIM and sustainability practices in Construction Projects: a Delphi survey of international experts. J Build Eng2018; 20: 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.017
53.
Hamma-adamaMKouiderT. Comparative analysis of BIM adoption efforts by developed countries as precedent for new adopter countries. Curr J Appl Sci Technol2019; 36(2): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2019/v36i230224
54.
OzenerOTezelEKilicZ, et al.Trends of building information modeling adoption in the Turkish AEC industry. In: Advances in Building Information Modeling. Springer, 2020.
55.
LiJKassemMCiribiniA, et al.A proposed approach integrating DLT, BIM, IOT and smart contracts: demonstration using a simulated installation task. International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC), 2019.
56.
SacksREastmanCLeeG, et al.BIM handbook - a guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. : John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
SakaAChanDSiuF. Drivers of sustainable adoption of building information modelling (BIM) in the Nigerian construction small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Sustainability2020; 12(9): 3710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093710
LuoLYanZYangD, et al.BIM application in the whole life cycle of construction projects in China. In: Construction Research Congress 2018: Sustainable Design and Construction and Education. New Orleans, 2018.
61.
RankinJLutherR. The innovation process: adoption of information and communication technology for the construction industry. Can J Civ Eng2006; 33(12): 1538–1546. https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-128
62.
MutaiA. Factors influencing the use of building information modelling (BIM) within leading construction firms in the United States of America. Terre haute. Indiana State University, 2009. PhD Thesis.
63.
GirginkayaAMaqsoodU. A roadmap for BIM adoption and implementation in developing countries: the Pakistan case. Archnet-IJAR2019; 14(1): 112–132.
64.
NewtonKChilesheN. Awareness, usage and benefits of building information modelling (BIM) adoption—the case of the South Australian construction organisations. In: 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2012.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
