Traditional apprenticeship models struggle to scale as the construction industry faces a growing shortage of skilled workers and an aging workforce. This study evaluates the potential and strategies of Large Language Models (LLMs) to support apprentices in learning hands-on construction tasks through real-time, conversational instruction. Drawing on prior research in conversational AI and intelligent tutoring systems, we conduct a comparative analysis of LLM-based guidance versus traditional video demonstrations in controlled masonry tasks. Through a mixed-methods approach, we assess task performance, interaction patterns, and participants’ self-reported confidence and understanding. Findings from our exploratory comparative study suggest that LLMs can deliver relevant, adaptive, and context-aware procedural guidance. However, limitations emerged in conveying tacit knowledge and adapting tool use to the specific task context. The results underscore the importance of interface design and instructional modality in sustaining engagement. This work offers early insights into the design of scalable, AI-assisted learning systems for skilled trades.
DanielEIOshodiOSGyohLet al.Apprenticeship for craftspeople in the construction industry: a state-of-the-art review. Educ + Train2020; 62(2): 159–183. URL. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2019-0041
4.
ZhangZWongMOPanW. Virtual reality enhanced multi-role collaboration in crane-lift training for modular construction. Autom ConStruct2023; 150: 104848. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104848.
5.
KharvariFKaiserLE. Impact of extended reality on architectural education and the design process. Autom ConStruct2022; 141: 104393. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104393.
6.
WuWTeseiAAyerS, et al.Closing the skills gap: construction and engineering education using mixed reality – a case study. In: 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–5. URL. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658992.
7.
WangRLoweRNewtonSet al.Task complexity and learning styles in situated virtual learning environments for construction higher education. Autom ConStruct2020; 113: 103148. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103148.
8.
Eiris-PereiraRGheisariM. Building intelligent virtual agents as conversational partners in digital construction sites. Construction Research Congress 2018. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 200–209. URL. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481264.020
LiebAGoelT. Student interaction with NewtBot: an LLM-as-tutor chatbot for secondary physics education. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp. 1–8. URL. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3647957
KimCYLeeCPMutluB. Understanding large-language model (LLM)-powered human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 371–380. URL. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610977.3634966. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03217, ArXiv:2401.03217 [cs].
13.
ZhangCChenJLiJet al.Large language models for human–robot interaction: a review. Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics2023; 3(4): 100131. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.birob.2023.100131.
14.
SakaATaiwoRSakaNet al.GPT models in construction industry: opportunities, limitations, and a use case validation. Dev Built Environ2024; 17: 100300. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100300.
15.
SakaABOyedeleLOAkanbiLAet al.Conversational artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: a review of present status, challenges and opportunities. Adv Eng Inform2023; 55: 101869. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101869.
16.
JiangGChenJ. Efficient fine-tuning of large language models for automated building energy modeling in complex cases. Autom ConStruct2025; 175: 106223. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106223.
17.
NimkulratNGrothC (eds). Craft and Design Practice from an Embodied Perspective. Taylor & Francis, 2024. URL. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003328018. (Accepted: 2024-06-27T15:45:37Z).
18.
BaberC. Is expertise all in the mind? How embodied, embedded, enacted, extended, situated, and distributed theories of cognition account for expert performance. In: WardPMaarten SchraagenJGoreJ, et al. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Expertise. Oxford University Press, 2019. URL. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795872.013.11
CheatleAJacksonS. (Re)collecting craft: reviving materials, techniques, and pedagogies of craft for computational makers. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact2023; 7(CSCW2): 1–23. URL. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610041
22.
O’BrienCMalafourisL. Feeling how. In: Craft and Design Practice from an Embodied Perspective. 1 ed.Routledge, 2024, pp. 52–65. URL. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003328018-7
23.
JiHHuPEL-ZanfalyD. Reshaping craft learning: insights from designing an AI-Augmented MR system for wheel-throwing. Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. DIS ’25. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 2549–2573. URL. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715336.3735844
ZangBWangTLuoD. The embodied interaction with XR metaverse space based on pneumatic actuated structures. In: YanCChaiHSunT, et al. (eds). Phygital Intelligence. Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 190–200. Series title: computational design and robotic fabrication, URL. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8405-3_16
26.
IbrahimRPour RahimianF. Comparison of CAD and manual sketching tools for teaching architectural design. Autom ConStruct2010; 19(8): 978–987. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.003.
JelodarMB. Generative AI, large language models, and ChatGPT in construction education, training, and practice. Buildings2025; 15(6): 933. URL. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060933.
29.
DongYZhanZHuYet al.AI BIM coordinator for non-expert interaction in building design using LLM-driven multi-agent systems. Autom ConStruct2025; 180: 106563. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106563.
30.
UddinSMJAlbertAOvidAet al.Leveraging ChatGPT to aid construction hazard recognition and support safety education and training. Sustainability2023; 15(9): 7121. URL. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097121.
31.
XuFNguyenTDuJ. Augmented reality for maintenance tasks with ChatGPT for automated text-to-action. J Construct Eng Manag2024; 150(4): 04024015. URL. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14142
32.
HussainRSabirALeeDYet al.Conversational AI-based VR system to improve construction safety training of migrant workers. Autom ConStruct2024; 160: 105315. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105315.
33.
SabirAHussainRPedroAet al.Personalized construction safety training system using conversational AI in virtual reality. Autom ConStruct2025; 175: 106207. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106207.
34.
Sh Said SAA. Artificial intelligent (AI) in construction industry: the talent gap/Dr Sheikh Ali Azzran sh said. RISE: Catalysing Global Research Excellence2023; 3: 1–5, URL. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/87479/
35.
GhimirePKimKAcharyaM. Opportunities and challenges of generative AI in construction industry: focusing on adoption of text-based models. Buildings2024; 14(1): 220. URL. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010220.
36.
WangRERibeiroATRobinsonCD, et al.Tutor CoPilot: a Human-AI approach for scaling real-time expertise, 2025. URL. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.03017, ArXiv:2410.03017 [cs].
37.
BaillifardAGabellaMLavenexPBet al.Effective learning with a personal AI tutor: a case study. Educ Inf Technol2025; 30(1): 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12888-5
MonteiroVMataLPeixotoF. Intrinsic motivation inventory: psychometric properties in the context of first language and mathematics learning. Psicol Reflexão Crítica2015; 28(3): 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528302
FisherMOppenheimerDM. Who knows what? Knowledge misattribution in the division of cognitive labor. J Exp Psychol Appl2021; 27(2): 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000310.Place:US
VirziRA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough?Hum Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society1992; 34(4): 457–468. URL. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400407
46.
GuNKimMJMaherML. Technological advancements in synchronous collaboration: the effect of 3D virtual worlds and tangible user interfaces on architectural design. Autom ConStruct2011; 20(3): 270–278. URL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.10.004.
47.
LiangJZhongXZhaoSet al.Building-graph-AI: graph neural networks learning and generating 3D detailed and layered building models. Int J Architect Comput2025; 23(3): 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771251352946
