Building, demolishing, and rebuilding new structures, instead of renovating vacant buildings for adaptive reuse, generates a significant amount of waste. Quickly assessing if and how a building can house a new function can be time-consuming. We developed a method that automates this process using a graph-based strategy in which both the building and the functional program are represented by attributed graphs. Specifically, the new method performs a node matching strategy based on the properties of the nodes and the topological structure of the graphs by which each empty room is filled with an activity of the new function.
HerthogsPDebackerWTunçerB, et al.Quantifying the Generality and Adaptability of Building Layouts Using Weighted Graphs: The SAGA Method. Buildings2019; 9: 44. DOI: 10.3390/buildings9040092.
2.
SanchezBHaasC. A novel selective disassembly sequence planning method for adaptive reuse of buildings. J Clean Prod2018; 183: 998–1010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.201.
3.
PupoRPinheiroÉMendesG, et al.A design teaching method using shape grammars, Graphica; 2007.
4.
ArvinSAHouseDH. Modeling architectural design objectives in physically based space planning. Autom ConStruct2002; 11: 213–225, DOI: 10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00099-6.
5.
MerrellPSchkufzaEKoltunV. Computer-generated residential building layouts. ACM Trans Graph2010.
6.
NauataNChangK-HChengC-Y, et al.Relational generative adversarial networks for graph-constrained house layout generation, House-GAN; 2020, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2003.06988.
7.
HuRHuangZTangY, et al.Graph2Plan: Learning Floorplan Generation from Layout Graphs. ACM Trans Graph2020; 39. DOI: 10.1145/3386569.3392391.
8.
ShekhawatKUpasaniNBishtS, et al.A tool for computer-generated dimensioned floorplans based on given adjacencies. Autom ConStruct2021: 127. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103718.
9.
ShekhawatKLohaniRDasannacharyaC, et al.Automated generation of floorplans with non-rectangular rooms. Graphical Models2023; 127: 101175, DOI: 10.1016/j.gmod.2023.101175.
10.
ŚlusarczykGStrugBPaszyńskaA, et al.Semantic-driven Graph Transformations in Floor Plan Design. Comput Aided Des2023; 158: 103480, DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2023.103480.
11.
SunJWuWLiuL, et al.WallPlan: Synthesizing Floorplans by Learning to Generate Wall Graphs. ACM Trans Graph2022; 41: 1–14, DOI: 10.1145/3528223.3530135.
12.
IsaacSSadeghpourFNavonR. Analyzing building information using graph theory. In: Proceedings of the 30th international symposium on automation and Robotics in construction and mining (ISARC 2013): building the future in automation and Robotics,Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2013.
13.
OstwaldMJ. The mathematics of spatial configuration: revisiting, revising and critiquing justified plan graph theory. Nexus Netw J2011; 13: 445–470. DOI: 10.1007/s00004-011-0075-3.
14.
HillierBHansonJGrahamH. Ideas are in things: an application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environ Plann Plann Des1987; 14: 363–385, DOI: 10.1068/b140363.
15.
GraslTEconomouA. Spatial Similarity Metrics: Graph theoretic distance measurement and floor plan abstraction. Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures (CAADFutures)2007; 2007: 251-263.
16.
van TreeckCRankE. Dimensional reduction of 3D building models using graph theory and its application in building energy simulation. Eng Comput2007; 23: 109–122. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-006-0053-7.
17.
PorterSTanTTanT, et al.Breaking into BIM: performing static and dynamic security analysis with the aid of BIM. Autom ConStruct2014; 40: 84–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.002.
18.
EastmanCLeeJ-mJeongY-s, et al.Automatic rule-based checking of building designs. Autom ConStruct2009; 18: 1011–1033. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.07.002.
19.
SalamaW. Design of concrete buildings for disassembly: an explorative review. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment2017; 6: 617–635, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.03.005.
20.
SharmaDGuptaNChattopadhyayC, et al.DANIEL: a deep architecture for automatic analysis and retrieval of building floor plans. In: 14th IAPR international Conference on Document analysis and Recognition (ICDAR).Kyoto, Japan, 2017, 420–425.
21.
EisenstadtVAroraHZieglerC, et al.Comparative evaluation of tensor-based data representations for deep learning methods in architecture. In: Proceedings of the 39th eCAADe Conference Novi Sad, Serbia, 2021, 45–54.
22.
Sa-ngawongTCooharojananoneN. A modified graph representation for room layout matching using spectral embedding. In: 2019 23rd International computer science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC). Phuket, Thailand, 2019, 24–29.
23.
BaglivoJAGraverJE. Incidence and symmetry in design and architecture. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
24.
WesselRBlümelIKleinR. The room connectivity graph: shape retrieval in the architectural domain. In: The 16th international Conference in central Europe on computer Graphics, visualization and computer vision 2008. Plzen, Czech Repubic, 2008.
25.
SpelemanJMoeresL-L. Een toekomst voor de parochiekerken in de 20ste-eeuwse gordel van Gent. Master's thesis. Ghent University, 2020.
26.
BöhmCBerchtoldSKeimDA. Searching in high-dimensional spaces - index structures for improving the performance of multimedia databases. ACM Comput Surv2001; 33: 322–373. DOI: 10.1145/502807.502809.
27.
JinS. Topological network alignment based on graphlet degree signature. Master's thesis. The University of Southern Mississippi, 2013.
