In this study, it is aimed to develop an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model that can estimate tread width values based on the physical characteristics of people and suitable for comfort and safety needs. The input values were obtained by measuring the height, step, and shoe sole lengths of the sample group of 200 people. For the tread width value to be used as output value, a prototype stair model in which different step sizes can be experienced was used. The tread width value obtained by using the test data in the developed ANFIS model was compared with the tread width value obtained from the experimental study. It has been concluded that the ANFIS model developed as a result of the comparison can be used as an efficient tool in estimating the value of stair tread width, which can meet people’s physical comfort needs.
Agyefi-MensahSKpammaZEHaganDE. Stair step geometry compliance with standard specifications for safety and usability: a study of selected university buildings in Ghana. Int J Building Pathol Adaptation2020; 40: 20–39.
9.
TemplerJ. The Staircase: Studies of Hazards, Falls, and Safer Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992b, p. 216.
PaulsJ. The pathology of everyday things–stairways–revisited. In: Proceedıngs of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting, San Diego, USA, 30 September–4October 2013, pp. 580–584.
12.
JohnsonDAPaulsJ. Systemic stair step geometry defects, increased injuries, and public health plus regulatory responses. In: Contemporary ergonomics and human factors. England, UK: Routledge. 2010, pp. 453–461.
13.
NovakACKomisarVMakiBE, et al.Age-related differences in dynamic balance control during stair descent and effect of varying step geometry. Appl Ergon2016; 52: 275–284.
14.
ArcheaJCollinsBLStahlFI. Guidelines for Stair Safety (NBS. Building Science Series-120). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979, p. 119.
15.
KocabaşŞ. Evaluation of Circulation Paths in Public Buildings in Terms of Accessibility: Re-functioned Public Historic Buildings in the Nicosia Walled City. PhD Thesis. Gazimağusa, North Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University, 2013.
16.
AllenE. How Buildings Work: The Natural Order of Architecture. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 270.
17.
MakiBE. Handrails. In: International Conference on Stairway Usability and Safety, Toronto, Canada, 9–10 June, 2011.
18.
KimKSteinfeldE. The effects of glass stairways on stair users: an observational study of stairway safety. Saf Science2019; 113: 30–36.
19.
AckermansTMAFrancksenNCCasana-EslavaRV, et al.Stair negotiation behaviour of older individuals: do step dimensions matter?J Biomech2020; 101: 109616. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109616.
20.
LawrenceBASpicerRSMillerTR. A fresh look at the costs of non-fatal consumer product injuries. Inj Prev2015; 21(1): 23–29.
21.
FosterRJHotchkissJBuckleyJG, et al.. Safety on stairs: influence of a tread edge highlighter and its position. Exp Gerontol2014; 55: 152–158.
22.
JacobsJV. A review of stairway falls and stair negotiation: lessons learned and future needs to reduce injury. Gait & Posture2016; 49: 159–167.
23.
TemplerJArcheaJChenHH. Study of factors associated with risk of work-related stairway falls. J Saf Res1985; 16: 183–196.
24.
BergerSETheuringCAdolphKE. How and when infants learn to climb stairs. Infant Behav Development2007; 30: 36–49.
25.
JohnsonD. Error in stair measurements. Ergon Des The Q Hum Factors Appl2005; 13(2): 18–22.
26.
TopraklıA. Investigation of Stair Accidents for Turkey. In: KayaLG (ed) New Horizons in Architecture Planning and Design. Ankara: Gece Publishing, 2019, pp. 9–30.
27.
PaulsJL. Review of stair-safety research with an emphasis on Canadian studies. Ergonomics1985; 28(7): 999–1010.
28.
TemplerJ. Stair Shape and Human Movement. Ann Arbor, MI: U.M.I. Dissertation Information Service, 1974.
29.
IrvineCHSnookSHSparshattJH. Stairway risers and treads: acceptable and preferred dimensions. Appl Ergon1990; 21(3): 215–225. DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(90)90005-i.
30.
ArslanMErkanI. A model for evaluating the user satisfaction of human movements on stairs through the ergonomic design approach. Theor Issues Ergon Sci2020; 22(6): 1–22.
31.
SloanGD. Perception and cognition. In: International Conference on Stairway Usability d Safety (ICSUS), Summaries Provided by Panel Participants, Toronto, June 9–10 2011.
32.
PaulsJL. Perception and cognition. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Stairway Usability and Safety (ICSUS), Summaries Provided by Panel Participants, Toronto, June 9–10 2011. available at:, http://web.me.com/bldguse
33.
KayaÖÖzokAF. Tasarimda Antropometrinin Önemi. Mühendislik Bilimleri Ve Tasarım Dergisi2017; 5: 309–316, (in Turkish).
34.
TemplerJ. The Staircase: History and Theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992a, p. 204.
35.
HodgsonFT. Common-Sense Stair Building and Handrailing. Chicago: Frederick J. Drake and CO., 1903, p. 190.
36.
ChuecaP. Staircases: Selection and Details. Barcelona: Links International, 2008, p. 240.
37.
PallasmaaJ. Stairways of the Mind. Int Forum Psychoanalysis2000; 9(1–2): 7–18.
38.
Duyarİ. İnsanın Fiziksel Boyutlarındaki Değişmeler ve Ergonomik Açıdan Önemi. Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları. In: 5. Ergonomi Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 15-17 Kasım 1995, pp. 180–189. İstanbul (in Turkish).
39.
HalfordVCohenHH. An evaluation of the differ-ent styles of footwear worn at the time of a stair fall. Nottingham, U.K: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Ergonomics Society, 2008, pp. 27–32.
40.
AyataTÇamEYıldızO. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) application to investigate potential use of natural ventilation in new building designs in Turkey. Energy Convers Management2007; 48(5): 1472–1479.
LohmanT.G.RocheA.F.MartorellR. (eds). Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. IL: Human Kinetics; 1988, p. 177.
43.
PheasantS. Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996, p. 352.
44.
GüleçEAkınGSağırM, et al.Anadolu İnsanının Antropometrik Boyutları. Proje No: 20030901018. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi, 2006. (in Turkish).
45.
ArslanM. Measurement of user satisfaction in vertical pedestrian movements. Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering2019; 17: 019–032.
