This article will focus on abstracting and generalising a well-studied paradigm in visual, event-related potential based brain–computer interfaces, for the spelling of characters forming words, into the visually encoded discrimination of shape features forming design aggregates. After identifying typical technologies in neuroscience and neuropsychology of high interest for integrating fast cognitive responses into generative design and proposing the machine learning model of an ensemble of linear classifiers in order to tackle the challenging features that electroencephalography data carry, it will present experiments in encoding shape features for generative models by a mechanism of visual context updating and the computational implementation of vision as inverse graphics, to suggest that discriminative neural phenomena of event-related potentials such as P300 may be used in a visual articulation strategy for modelling in generative design.
ArbibMA. Neurons, schemas, persons and society? Revisited. In: JeannerodMAulettaG (eds) Brains top down. Singapore: World Scientific, 2012, pp. 57–87.
5.
KappenmanESLuckSJ. The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (Oxford library of psychology). New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
6.
KutasMKiangMSweeneyK. Potentials and paradigms: event-related brain potentials and neuropsychology. In: FaustM (ed.) The handbook of the neuropsychology of language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 543–564.
7.
CutellicPLotteF. Augmented iterations. In: Proceedings of the 31st eCAADe conference 2013 Computation and Performance, vol. 1, Delft, 18–20 September, pp. 393–401. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
8.
CutellicP. Le Cube d’Après, integrated cognition for iterative and generative designs. In: ACADIA 14: design agency: proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the association for computer-aided design in architecture 2014, Los Angeles, CA, 23–25 October 2013, pp. 473–478. Toronto, ON, Canada: Riverside Architectural Press.
9.
WolpawJRBirbaumerNMcFarlandDJet al. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol2002; 113(6): 767–791.
10.
BergerH. über das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr1929; 87: 527–570.
11.
SwartzBEGoldensohnES. Timeline of the history of EEG and associated fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1998; 106(2): 173–176.
12.
RamadanRAVasilakosAV. Brain computer interface: control signals review. Neurocomputing2017; 223: 26–44.
VidalJJ. Toward direct brain-computer communication. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng1973; 2: 157–180.
15.
VidalJJ. Real-time detection of brain events in EEG. Proc IEEE1977; 65(5): 633–641.
16.
Van ErpJBFLotteFTangermannM. Brain-computer interfaces: beyond medical applications. Computer2012; 45(4): 26–34.
17.
BlankertzBAcqualagnaLDähneSet al. The Berlin brain-computer interface: progress beyond communication and control. Front Neurosci2016; 10: 530.
18.
FarwellLDonchinE. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1988; 70(6): 510–523.
19.
LotteFCongedoMLécuyerAet al. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. J Neural Eng2007; 4(2): R1–R13.
20.
LuckSJ. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.
21.
PolichJ. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol2007; 118(10): 2128–2148.
22.
SuttonSBrarenMZubinJet al. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science1965; 150(3700): 1187–1188.
23.
SquiresNKSquiresKCHillyardSA. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1975; 38(4): 387–401.
RuggMDColesMGH. Electrophysiology of mind event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 (OCLC: 613467849).
26.
DonchinESpencerKWijesingheR. The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng2000; 8(2): 174–179.
27.
VapnikVNChervonenkisAY. A class of algorithms for pattern recognition learning. Avtomat I Telemekh1964; 25(6): 10.
28.
BoserBEGuyonIMVapnikVN. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM workshop on computational learning theory, Pittsburgh, PA, 27–29 July 1992, pp. 144–152. New York: ACM Press.
29.
SchölkopfBSmolaAJ. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond (Adaptive computation and machine learning). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001.
30.
ThulasidasMGuanCWuJ. Robust classification of EEG signal for brain–computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2006; 14(1): 24–29.
BlinnJF. A generalization of algebraic surface drawing. ACM Trans Graph1982; 1(3): 235–256.
37.
LorensenWEClineHE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH 87), pp. 163–169. New York: ACM, https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=37422
38.
SharbroughFChatrianGELesserRet al. American electroencephalographic society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol1991; 8(2): 200–202.
39.
LotteFBougrainLCichockiAet al. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a 10 year update. J Neural Eng2018; 15(3): 031005.
