Morphological variation of urban tissues, which evolve through the optimisation of multiple conflicting objectives, benefit significantly from the application of robust metaheuristic search processes that utilise search and optimisation mechanisms for design problems that have no clear single optimal solution, as well as a solution search space that is too large for a ‘brute-force’ manual approach. As such, and within the context of the experiments presented within this article, the rapidly changing environmental, climatic and demographic global conditions necessitates the utilisation of stochastic search processes for generating design solutions that optimise for multiple conflicting objectives by means of controlled and directed morphological variation within the urban fabric.
JongKAD. Evolutionary computation: a unified approach. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2016, p. 268.
3.
BooyGHendriksRJJSmuldersMJMet al. Genetic diversity and the survival of populations. Plant Biol2000; 2(4): 379–395.
4.
SchemskeDWHusbandBCRuckelshausMHet al. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology1994; 75(3): 584–606.
5.
LandeR. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science1988; 241(4872): 1455–1460.
6.
Den BoerPJSzyszkoJVermeulenR. Spreading the risk of extinction by genetic diversity in populations of the Carabid beetle Pterostichus oblongopunctatus F. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Neth J Zool1992; 43(3): 242–259.
7.
GauseGF. Problems of evolution. New Haven, CT: The Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1947.
8.
BattyM. Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005, p. 592.
9.
BettencourtLMLoboJHelbingDet al. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2007; 104(17): 7301–7306.
10.
BettencourtL. The kind of problem a city is: new perspectives on the nature of cities from complex systems theory. SFI working paper, Santa Fe Institute, www.santafe.edu/media/workingpapers/13-03-008.pdf (2013, accessed December 2013).
11.
JacobsJ. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage, 1961, p. 458.
12.
WrightS. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. In: Proceedings of the 6th international congress on genetics, Brooklyn botanic garden, New York, 24–31 August1932, pp. 356–366.
13.
HollandJH. Outline for a logical theory of adaptive systems. J ACM1962; 9(3): 297–314.
14.
RechenbergI (1965) Cybernetic solution path of an experimental problem. Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough p. Library Translation 1122.
15.
FogelLJOwensAJWalshMJ. Artificial intelligence through simulated evolution. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
GoldbergDE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
18.
FonsecaCMFlemingPJ. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on genetic algorithms, Urbana, IL, 7–21 July1993, pp. 416–423. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
19.
HornJNafpliotisNGoldbergDE. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, Orlando, FL, 27–29 June1994, pp. 82–87. New York: IEEE.
20.
SrinivasNDebK. Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput1994; 2(3): 221–248.
21.
ZitzlerE. Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1999.
KnowlesJDCorneDW. Approximating the nondominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy. Evol Comput2000; 8(2): 149–172.
24.
DebKAgrawalSPratapAet al. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: International conference on parallel problem solving from nature, Paris, 18–20 September2000, pp. 849–858. Berlin: Springer.
25.
DebK. Recent advances in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Berlin: Springer, 2017.
26.
RosenbergRS. Simulation of genetic populations with biochemical properties. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Harbour, MI, 1967.
27.
BattyMLongleyPA. Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. London: Academic Press, 1994, p. 448.
28.
BattyM. The new science of cities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013, p. 496.
29.
GoodmanD. A history of the future. 1st ed. New York: Monacelli Press, 2008, p. 288.
KernL. Reshaping the boundaries of public and private life: gender, condominium development, and the neoliberalization of urban living. Urban Geogr2007; 128(7): 657–681.
33.
CorbettMJXieFLevinsonD. Evolution of the second-story city: the Minneapolis Skyway System. Environ Plan B Plan Des2009; 136(4): 711–724.
JohanssonE. Influence of urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort in a hot dry climate: a study in Fez, Morocco. Build Environ2006; 41(10): 1326–1338.
44.
El GarouaniAMullaDJEl GarouaniSet al. Analysis of urban growth and sprawl from remote sensing data: case of Fez, Morocco. Int J Sustain Built Environ2017; 6(1): 160–169.
45.
LukeS. Essentials of metaheuristics. 2nd ed.Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press, 2011, p. 230.
46.
MakkiMNavarroDFarzanehA. The evolutionary adaptation of urban tissues through computational analysis. In: Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe conference, eCAADe, Vienna, 16–18 September2015, pp. 563–571.
