This article presents a method to visualize high-dimensional parametric design spaces with applications in computational design processes and interactive optimization. The method extends Star Coordinates using a triangulation-based interpolation with Barycentric Coordinates. It supports the understanding of design problems in architectural design optimization by allowing designers to move between a high-dimensional design space and a low-dimensional Performance Map. This Performance Map displays the characteristics of the fitness landscape, develops designers’ intuitions about the relationships between design parameters and performance, allows designers to examine promising design variants, and delineates promising areas for further design exploration.
ImbertFFrostKSFisherA. Concurrent geometric, structural and environmental design: Louvre Abu Dhabi. In: HesselgrenLSharmaSWallnerJ. (eds) Advances in architectural geometry 2012. Vienna: Springer, 2013, pp. 77–90.
6.
BradnerEIorioFDavisM. Parameters tell the design story: ideation and abstraction in design optimization. In: Proceedings of the symposium on simulation for architecture & urban design, Tampa, FL, 13–16 April 2014, p. 26. San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation International.
7.
WortmannTCostaANanniciniG. Advantages of surrogate models for architectural design optimization. AI EDAM2015; 30: 471–481.
8.
ChenKWJanssenPSchlüterA. Analysing populations of design variants using clustering and archetypal analysis. In: Real time—Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on education and research in computer aided architectural design in Europe, Vienna, 16–18 September 2015, pp. 251–260, eCAADe and TU Wien.
9.
PressWHTeukolskySAVetterlingWT. Numerical recipes 3rd edition: the art of scientific computing. 3rd ed.Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
10.
StasiukDThomsenMRThompsonEM. Learning to be a vault—implementing learning strategies for design exploration in inter-scalar systems. In: Fusion—Proceedings of the 32nd eCAADe conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, 10–12 September 2014, pp. 381–390, eCAADe and Northumbria University.
11.
HoffmanPGrinsteinG. Introduction to data visualization. In: FayyadUGrinsteinGGWierseA (eds) Information visualization in data mining and knowledge discovery. London: Academic Press, 2002, pp. 21–45.
12.
De OliveiraMCFLevkowitzH. From visual data exploration to visual data mining: a survey. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2003; 9: 378–394.
13.
Rubio-SanchezMRayaLDiazF. A comparative study between RadViz and Star Coordinates. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2016; 22: 619–628.
Van WijkJJVan LiereR. HyperSlice: visualization of scalar functions of many variables. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on visualization ’93, San Jose, CA, 25–29 October 1993, pp. 119–125. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
16.
RadfordADGeroJS. On optimization in computer aided architectural design. Build Environ1980; 15: 73–80.
17.
AshourYKolarevicB. Optimizing creatively in multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the symposium on simulation for architecture & urban design, Alexandria, VA, 12–15 April 2015, pp. 128–135. San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation International.
18.
KozielSCiaurriDELeifssonL. Surrogate-based methods. In: KozielSYangX-S (eds) Computational optimization, methods and algorithms. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 33–59.
19.
WortmannTNanniciniG. Black-box optimization for architectural design: an overview and quantitative comparison of metaheuristic, direct search, and model-based optimization methods. In: ChienS-FSeungyeonCSchnabelMA. (eds) Living systems and micro-Utopias. Hong Kong: CAADRIA, 2016, pp. 177–186.
HeinrichMKAyresP. For time-continuous optimisation. In: ChienS-FSeungyeonCSchnabelMA. (eds) Living systems and micro-Utopias: towards continuous designing, proceedings of the 21st CAADRIA. Hong Kong: CAADRIA, 2016, pp. 373–382.
22.
TakagiH. Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation. P IEEE2001; 89: 1275–1296.
