The objective of the article is to establish the significance of a simulation laboratory especially simulation exercises for continuing education students in lean manufacturing course. Subsequently, identify the influence and analysis of these simulation exercises in exploring, understanding and implementing lean strategies in various contexts. The research is carried out through the following steps: enhancing the course handout and course outcomes, identifying the various lean concepts and proposing relevant exercises, mapping the course outcomes with the proposed exercises, identifying the appropriate simulation tool and developing the proposed exercises, deciding the mode of simulation laboratory offering, offering the selected critical exercises in simulation laboratory, conducting a critical review of simulation exercises with a team of experts and performing a comparative study on the student performance. The study has identified that there was a significant improvement in the performance of the students after participating in the simulation laboratory, especially in achieving the course outcomes. This was established by the analysis of the various examination scores, feedback on simulation exercises and instructors. This attempt is the first of its kind to analyse the student performance after incorporating simulation laboratory in a lean manufacturing course. The focus is on evaluating student performance based on the scores in the examinations. A population of 488 students enrolled in a masters’ degree programme is considered in the analysis 234 (without simulation lab) and 254 (with simulation lab).
AdamM.HofbauerM.StehlingM. (2020). Effectiveness of a lean simulation training: Challenges, measures and recommendations. Production Planning & Control. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1742375
2.
AnandG.KodaliR. (2010). Development of a framework for implementation of lean manufacturing systems. International Journal of Management Practices, 4(1), 95–116.
3.
ArnheiterE. (2014). Teaching lean management using experiential methods to improve learning. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 5(4), 344–362.
4.
BadurdeenF.MarksberryP.HallA.GregoryB. (2010). Teaching lean manufacturing with simulations and games: A survey and future directions. Simulation & Gaming, 41(4), 465–486.
5.
BagchiS.RitzoC. (2008, December 8–10). A full-factory simulator as a daily decision-support tool for 300 mm wafer fabrication productivity. Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 2021–2029), IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2008.4736297
6.
BhamuJ.SangwanK. S. (2016). A framework for lean manufacturing implementation. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 25(3), 313–333.
7.
BhasinS.BurcherP. (2006). Lean viewed as a philosophy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(1), 56–72.
8.
BourgaultM. (2012). Developing professional competencies using a Living Lab approach: An exploratory study in the field of management education. International Journal of Product Development, 17(1–2), 76–93.
9.
BurawatP. (2019). The relationships among transformational leadership, sustainable leadership, lean manufacturing and sustainability performance in Thai SMEs manufacturing industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36(6), 1014–1036.
10.
CalyamP.BerrymanA.WellingD.MohanS.RamnathR.RamnathanJ. (2014). VDPilot: Feasibility study of hosting virtual desktops for classroom labs within a federated university system. International Journal of Cloud Computing, 3(2), 158–176.
11.
ChenT.-C. T.WangY.-C.Al-RefaieA. (2015). Establishing a factory simulation system for cloud-based simulation services. International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services, 4(1), 62–72.
12.
ChoiB.ParkB.RyuH. (2004). Virtual factory simulator framework for line prototyping. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 3(1), 5–20.
13.
CranefieldJ.YoongP.JeonS. S.LeeG.LampotangS.StanleyY. W.SuS. Y. W. (2007). An integrated e-learning system for simulation-based instruction of anaesthesia machines. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(1), 106–120.
14.
CudneyE.CornsS. M.GadreA. (2014). Virtual modelling for simulation-based lean education. International Journal Lean Enterprise Research, 1(1), 3–21.
15.
De JongT.SotiriouT. S.GilletD. (2014). Innovations in STEM education: The Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments, 1(3), 1–16.
16.
De la Torre, L., Sanchez, J. P., Sanchez, J., Dormido, S., Yuste, M., Carreras, C. (2010). The Virtual and Remote Laboratory for Snells Law at the FisLabs Portal. MPTL-GIREP-ICPE, Reims (France), August 2010.
17.
De la Torre, L., Sanchez, J., Dormido, S., Sanchez, J. P., Yuste, M., Carreras, C. (2011a). Two web-based laboratories of the FisLabs network: Hooke's and Snell's laws. European Journal of Physics, 32, 571–584, February 2011.
18.
De la TorreL.HeradioR.SanchezJ.DormidoS.SanchezJ. P.CarrerasC.YusteM. (2011b, September). A thin lens virtual and remote laboratory at the New FisLabs Portal. MPTL-HSCI.
19.
De ZanG.De ToniA.FornasierA.BattistellaC. (2015). A methodology for the assessment of experiential learning lean: The Lean Experience Factory case study. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(4), 332–354.
20.
DelagoL. C.MachadoM. E.de BritoF. O.LandgrafG. C.de Andrade SchroederM.TorezzanC. (2016, December). Learning lean philosophy through 3D game-based simulation. Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 3385–3392). IEEE Press.
21.
DengizB.AkbayK. (2000). Computer simulation of a PCB production line: Meta-modeling approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 63(2), 195–205.
22.
DessoukyM.VermaS.BaileyD.RickelJ. (2001). A methodology for developing a web-based factory simulator for manufacturing education. IIE Transactions, 33(3), 167–180.
23.
DormidoS. (2002). Control learning: Present and future. IFAC Annual Control Reviews, 28, 115–136.
24.
DormidoS.EsquembreF.FariasG.SánchezJ. (2005). Adding interactivity to existing Simulink models using easy java simulations. Proceedings 44th IEEE CDC-ECC’05 (pp. 4163–4168).
25.
Dormido, R., Vargas, H., Duro, N., Sánchez, J., Dormido-Canto, S., Farias, G., Esquembre, F., Dormido, S. (2008) Development of a Web-based Control Laboratory for Automation Technicians: The Three Tank System. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(1), 35–44.
26.
DurningS. J.DongT.RatcliffeT.SchuwirthL.ArtinoA. R.BouletJ. R.EvaK. (2016). Comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 91, 583–599.
27.
EamonnL. (2001). Flexsim modeling environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 15(7), 1667–1670.
28.
EliassonJ. B.SniderB. R.BischakD. P. (2009). Active learning in an undergraduate management science course through the use of a mobile computer lab. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 3(2), 104–118.
29.
FariasG. (2010). Adding interactive human interfaces to engineering software [PhD thesis]. Computer Science and Automatic Control Department, UNED.
30.
FariasG.De KeyserR.DormidoS.EsquembreF. (2010). Developing networked control labs: A Matlab and easy Java simulations approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57(10), 3266–3275.
31.
FariasG.DormidoS.EsquembreF. (2011). Interactive human interfaces with engineering software. Proceedings of the 18th IFAC (pp. 8509–8514).
GangL.ShengminA.JunjunL. (2009). The optimization and simulation of automobile spread production line. Industrial Engineering, 11(6), 71–76.
34.
GomesD. F.LopesM. P.de CarvalhoC. V. (2013). Serious games for lean manufacturing: The 5S game. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 8(4), 191–196.
35.
GomesL.BogosyanS. (2009). Current trends in remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions Industrial Electronics, 56(12), 4744–4756.
36.
GrodotzkiJ.OrteltT. R.TekkayaA. E. (2018). Remote and virtual labs for engineering education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI project at the TU Dortmund University. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, 1349–1360.
37.
HinesP.HolwegM.RichN. (2004). Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(10), 994–1011.
38.
HoulahanC. J. (1994), Reduction of front-end loading of inventory: Making the airframe industry lean through better inventory management [master’s thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
39.
Jasti, N. V. K. &nd Sharma, A. (2014), Lean manufacturing implementation using value stream mapping as a tool: A case study from auto components industry. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(1), 89–116.
40.
JastiN. V. K.KodaliR. (2015). Lean production: Literature review and trends. International Journal of Production Research, 53(3), 867–885.
41.
JastiN. V. K.KodaliR. (2016a). An empirical study for implementation of lean principles in Indian manufacturing industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(1), 183–207.
42.
JastiN. V. K.KodaliR. (2016b). Development of a framework for lean production system: An integrative approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 230(1), 136–156.
43.
JastiN. V. K.KotaS.KaleS. M. (2020). Development of a framework for Lean Enterprise. Measuring Business Excellence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/MBE-07-2018-0050
44.
JastiN. V. K.KotaS.SangwanK. S. (2019). An application of value stream mapping in auto-ancillary industry: A case study. TQM Journal, 32(1), 162–182.
45.
JastiN. V. K.KotaS.VenkataramanP. B. (2020). An impact of simulation labs on engineering students’ academic performance: A critical investigation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JEDT-03-2020-0108
46.
Jian-QingW.Yan-JunS.Yong-JiangL. (2009). Simulation and optimization of magnesium smelting process based on Flexsim. Industrial Engineering Journal, 12(2), 78–81.
47.
JinQ.DengK. (2011). Spare parts inventory simulation for auto 4S shops based on Flexsim. College of Mechanical Engineering, 4–9.
48.
JinaJ.BhattacharyaA. K.WaltonA. D. (1997). Applying lean principles for high product variety and low volumes: Some issues and propositions. Logistics Information Management, 10(1), 5–13.
49.
KulkarniV.KulkarniS.SatishJ. G.GaitoneV. N. (2017). Attainment of major competencies of programme-specific outcome in industrial engineering and simulation lab through open-ended experiment. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 27(3), 183–197.
50.
KumarR.PandeN. (2018). Assessing learning style preference of working professional cohorts in India: An empirical study using Honey–Mumford’s learning style questionnaire. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 16(3), 245–226.
51.
LeeJ.HanS.YangJ. (2011). Construction of a computer-simulated mixed reality environment for virtual factory layout planning. Computers in Industry, 62(1), 86–98.
52.
LiQ. (2011). Simulation and optimization about automatic sorting system based on Flexsim. Logistics Technology, 34(3), 78–79.
53.
LikerJ. K. (2003). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw Hill.
54.
MacDuffieJ. P.SethuramanK.FisherM. L. (1996). Product variety and manufacturing performance: Evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study. Management Science, 42(3), 350–369.
55.
McManusH. L.RebentischE.MurmanE.StankeA. (2007, June 11–14). A “Teaching lean thinking principles through hands-on simulations”. Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
56.
MakranskyG.PetersenG. B. (2019). Investigating the process of learning with desktop virtual reality: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 134(June), 15–30.
57.
Morales-MenendezR.Ramírez-MendozaR. A.GuevaraA. J. V. (2019). Virtual/remote labs for automation teaching: A cost effective approach. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 52(9), 266–271.
58.
MorisM.NgA.SvenssonJ. (2008). Simplification and aggregation strategies applied for factory analysis in conceptual phase using simulation. Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference (Vol. 6, pp.1913–1921).
59.
NandanaW.de MelW. (2016). Integrated laboratory experiment setup to empower the engineering education in distance mode. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 13–23.
60.
NiY.LiJ.HeW.YaoJ. (2011). An systematic modeling and simulation study on WIP optimization in semiconductor assembly and test factory. Advanced Materials Research, 201–203, 1086–1092.
61.
OhnoT. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large scale production. Productivity Press.
62.
PanW.MurrayP.CottonD.GarmstonH. (2012). Integrating research-informed teaching into sustainable construction education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7(1), 94–117.
63.
PantelidisV. S. (1997). Virtual reality and engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 5(1), 3–12.
64.
PantelidisV. S. (2009). Virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education Special Issue, 59–70.
65.
PavnaskarS.GershensonJ.JambekarA. (2003). Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools. International Journal of Production Research, 41(13), 3075–3090.
66.
Poling, D. A. & Hupp, J. M. (2009) Active Learning Through Role Playing: Virtual Babies in a Child Development Course. College Teaching, 57:4, 221–228.
67.
PrinceM.FelderR. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.
68.
Rasika NandanaW.de MelW.PriyankaraH. (2015). Expanding the frontiers of engineering education in open and distance learning by an online laboratory platform. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 10(1), 65–76.
69.
RobinsonS.RadnorZ. J.BurgessN.WorthingtonC. (2012). SimLean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(1), 188–197.
70.
SahooA. K.SinghN. K.ShankarR.TiwariM. K. (2008). Lean philosophy: Implementation in a forging company. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(5), 451–462.
71.
SangwaN.SangwanK. (2018). Development of an integrated performance measurement framework for lean organizations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 41–84.
72.
ShahR.WardP. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 785–805.
73.
ShannonP. W.KrumwiedeK. R.StreetJ. N. (2010). Using simulation to explore lean manufacturing implementation strategies. Journal of Management Education, 34(2), 280–302.
74.
ShihS. C.ChaoC.-A. (2007). An interdisciplinary curriculum model for extended lean enterprise systems education: Addressing the changing workplace and labour market. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 2(1), 73–102.
75.
SinghJ.SinghH.SinghG. (2018). Productivity improvement using lean manufacturing in manufacturing industry of Northern India: A case study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(8), 1394–1415.
76.
StierK. W. (2003). Teaching lean manufacturing concepts through project-based learning and simulation. Journal of Industrial Technology, 19(4), 1–6.
77.
TajS.BerroL. (2006). Application of constrained management and lean manufacturing in developing best practices for productivity improvement in an auto-assembly plant. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3/4), 332–345.
78.
TewoldeberhanT. W.VerbraeckA.HlupicV. (2010). Implementing a discrete-event simulation software selection methodology for supporting decision making at Accenture. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(10), 1446–1458.
79.
TiwariS.DubeyR.TripathiN. (2011). The journey of lean. Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies, 2(2), 200–208.
80.
TortorellaG.Cauchick-MiguelP. (2018). Teaching lean manufacturing at a postgraduate level: Integrating traditional teaching methods and problem-based learning approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(3), 301–323.
81.
WanH.ChenF.SayginC. (2008). Simulation and training for lean implementation using web-based technology. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics, 3(1), 1–14.
82.
Wang, J., Guo, D. and Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry pedagogy on students' inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658–669.
83.
WolfT. (2010). Assessing student learning in a virtual laboratory environment. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 216–222.
84.
WomackJ. P.JonesD. T.RoosD. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. Rawson Associates.
85.
WuT.-T.WuY.-T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
86.
YadavA.ShaverG.MecklP. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55–64.
87.
ZhuX.ZhangR.ChuF.HeZ.LiJ. (2014). A Flexsim-based optimization for the operation process of cold-chain logistics distribution centre. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 12(2), 270–278.
