This paper presents a critical account of the extent and the ways in which learner-centred education approaches are used as a tool for enhancing adult learning in distance learning universities as well as the conditions and restrictions they face. The exploration is illustrated by qualitative data from interviews with eight adult educators and 16 adult learners/students and adopts a case study approach within a phenomenological mode. In this study, learner-centred education approaches are seen as being at one end of the educational practice continuum and comprise of a number of elements, namely: motivation, epistemology, techniques and relationships that are used as a conceptual framework to guide data analysis and interpretation. Findings reveal the partial and unintentional use of learner-centred education approaches in the distance learning programmes explored and make recommendations for the implementation of learner-centred education in the teaching of adults in distance education universities.
BergerP.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality.
Garden City, NY:
Doubleday.
2.
BernsteinB. (1990). Class, codes and control, volume IV. The structuring of pedagogic discourse.
London, UK:
Routledge.
3.
BlaschkeL. M. (2012).
Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,
13(1), 56–71. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1076/2087 (23 October 2018).
4.
BlaschkeL. M. (2014). Moving students forward in the PAH continuum: Maximizing the power of the social web. In BlaschkeL. M.KenyonC.HaseS. (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning (pp. 49–62).
Seattle, WA:
Amazon.com Publishing.
BlaschkeL. M.HaseS. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners. In Gros.B. (Ed.), The future of ubiquitous learning (pp. 25–40).
Berlin, Heidelberg:
Springer-Verlag.
7.
BrookfieldS. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices.
Milton Keynes, UK:
OU Press.
8.
BrymanA. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research.
London, UK:
Unwin Hyman.
9.
CanningN.CallanS. (2010).
Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice,
11(1), 71–82.
10.
Christidou, V., Gravani, M. N., Hatzinikita, V. (2012). Distance learning material for adult education: The case of the OUC. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 4, 33--46.
CormierD. (n.d). Dave’s educational blog: Building a better rhizome. [blog]. Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/ (30 November 2018)
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
14.
EberleJ.ChildressM. (2005). Using heutagogy to address the needs of online learners (Distance learning). In P. Rogers, G. Berg, J. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice, & K. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning. (pp. 2239–2245). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
15.
FreireP. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed.
London, UK:
Penguin.
16.
Gravani, M. N., & John, P. D. (2005). ‘Them and us’: Teachers’ and tutors’ perceptions of a ‘new’ professional development course in Greece. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 35(3), 303--319.
17.
Gravani, M. N., & Karagiorgi, Y. (2014). Underpinning principles of adult learning in the face to face (f2f) meetings employed by distance-teaching universities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 20(1), 53--67.
18.
Gravani, M. N. (2015). Adult learning in a distance education context: Theoretical and methodological challenges. International Journal of LifelongEducation, 34 (2), 172--193.
19.
Gravani M.N. (2018). Use of technology at the Open University of Cyprus (OUC) to support adult distance learners: To what extent is being informed by the learner-centred education (LCE) paradigm? In: Anjana (Eds), Technology for efficient learner support services in distance education (pp. 173--188). Singapore: Springer.
20.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretative theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
GreeneM. (1978). Landscape of learning.
New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
KelmanH. C. (1982). Ethical issues in different social science methods. In T. L. Beauchamp, R. R. Faden, R. J. Wallace, Jr., & L. Walters (Eds.), Ethical issues in social research (pp. 40–98). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
KnowlesM. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy.
New York, NY:
Cambridge Books.
32.
KnowlesM. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species.
Houston, TX:
Gulf Publishing Co.
33.
LionarakisA. (2001). For which distance education do we talk about? In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Panhellenic conference of open and distance education (volume 2, pp. 185–194). Athens, Greece: Propobos (In Greek).
34.
MacknessJ.BellF.FunesM. (2016).
The rhizome: A problematic metaphor for teaching and learning in a MOOC. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,
31(1), 78–91.
MezirowJ. (1997).
Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,
74, 5–12.
37.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.
London, UK:
Sage.
38.
PetersO. (1998). Learning and teaching in distance education. Pedagogical analyses and interpretations in an international perspective.
London, UK:
Kogan Page.
39.
Punch, K. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.
40.
RashidM. (2009).
Status of face-to-face instruction in distance education at AIOU. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,
10(2), 142–149.
41.
RogersC. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s.
Columbus, OH:
Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
42.
SchweisfurthM. (2013a).
Learner-centred education in international perspective. Journal of International and Comparative Education,
2(1), 1–8.
43.
SchweisfurthM. (2013b). Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development?.
London, UK:
Routledge.
44.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.
New York, NY:
Basic Books, Inc.
45.
Van ManenM. (1984).
Practising phenomenological writing. Phenomenology and Pedagogy,
2(1), 36–73.
46.
YiayliS.YiaylisG.KoutsoumbaM. (2010).
Autonomy in learning in a distance educational environment. Open Education: The Journal of Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology,
2(1&2), 92–105.
