The ‘no-excuses’ model of education has become one of the most prominent educational alternatives for urban youth. Recently, notable no-excuses charter schools have begun a concerted effort to develop students’ character strengths, striving to increase their chances of future success. In this article, we situate the no-excuses approach in the context of two prototypical positions in the history of character education: the ‘Traditional’ approach, stressing habit formation and the inculcation of virtuous character traits, and the ‘Progressive’ approach, dedicated to autonomous reasoning in determining moral codes. We identify two central limitations of the no-excuses approach. First, it combines incompatible components from both positions: the Traditional emphasis on a meticulous management of student conduct, together with the Progressive aspiration to cultivate autonomous decision-making. Second, while both Traditionalists and Progressives strive to develop character in light of moral values or principles, the no-excuses model is characterized by an instrumentalist conceptualization of character strengths as means towards achieving the goal of college completion. Consequently, this approach compromises the two central mechanisms that support the internalization of character strengths – practice in autonomous decision-making, and habituation in the service of principles. These shortcomings are further accentuated by the vast divergences between the no-excuses setting and future contexts in which character strengths are to be applied.
AdamsR (2006) A Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2.
AngristJDDynarskiSMKaneTJ. (2012) Who benefits from KIPP?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management31(4): 837–860.
3.
ArthurJKristjánssonKHarrisonT. (2016) Teaching Character and Virtue in Schools. New York: Routledge.
4.
BaloghA (2016) A narrative inquiry of Charter School social work and the ‘No Excuses’ behavior model. Columbia Social Work Review7: 19–25.
5.
Ben-PorathS (2013) Deferring virtue: The new management of students and the civic role of schools. Theory and Research in Education11(2): 111–128.
6.
Ben-PorathSDishonG (2015) Taken out of context: Defending civic education from the situationist critique. Philosophical Inquiry in Education23(1): 22–37.
7.
BerkowitzMWBierMC (2014) Research-based fundamentals of the effective promotion of character development in schools. In: NucciLNarvaezDKrettenauerT (eds) Handbook of Moral and Character Education, pp. 248–260. New York: Routledge.
8.
BrykALeeVHollandP (1993) Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
CarrD (1991) Educating the Virtues: An Essay on the Philosophical Psychology of Moral Development and Education. New York: Routledge.
10.
CarrD (1999) Cross questions and crooked answers: Contemporary problems of moral education. In: HalsteadJMcLaughlinT (eds) Education in Morality, pp. 24–43. New York: Routledge.
CreminL (1957) The Republic and the School: Horace Mann on the Education of Free Men. New York: Teachers College.
13.
CurrenR (2014) Motivational aspects of moral learning and progress. Journal of Moral Education43(4): 484–499.
14.
DeweyJ (1959) Moral Principles in Education. New York: Philosophical Library.
15.
DuckworthALSeligmanME (2005) Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science16(12): 939–944.
16.
DuckworthALTsukayamaE (2015) Domain specificity in self-control. In: MillerCBFurrRMKnobelA (eds) Character: New Directions from Philosophy, Psychology, and Theology, pp. 393–411. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
DuckworthALGrantHLoewB. (2011) Self-regulation strategies improve self-discipline in adolescents: Benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intentions. Educational Psychology31(1): 17–26.
18.
DweckC (2006) Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Ballantine Books.
19.
ElsonR (1964) Guardians of Tradition: American Schoolbooks of the Nineteenth Century. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
20.
GolannJW (2015) The paradox of success at a No-Excuses school. Sociology of Education88(2): 103–119.
21.
GoodmanJF (2013) Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price?Educational Researcher42(2): 89–96.
22.
GoodmanJFLesnickH (2001) The Moral Stake in Education: Contested Premises and Practices. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
23.
GutekG (1986) Education in the United States: An Historical Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
HuntTMullinsM (2005) Moral Education in America’s Schools: The Continuing Challenge. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
25.
HutchinsW (1924) The children’s morality code. Journal of the National Education Association13: 292.
26.
KaestleCF (1983) Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780–1860. New York: Hill & Wang.
KohlbergL (1975) Moral education for a society in moral transition. Education Leadership33: 46–54.
29.
KristjánssonK (2006) Habituated reason: Aristotle and the ‘paradox of moral education’. Theory and Research in Education41: 101–122.
30.
KristjánssonK (2015) Aristotelian Character Education. London: Routledge.
31.
KuppermanJJ (1999) Virtues, character and moral dispositions. In: CarrDSteutelJ (eds) Virtue Ethics and Moral Education, pp. 199–209. London: Routledge.
32.
LackB (2009) No excuses: A critique of the knowledge is power program (KIPP) within charter schools in the USA. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies7(2): 126–153.
33.
LapsleyD (2016) On the prospects for Aristotelian character education. Journal of Moral Education45(4): 502–515.
34.
LickonaTDavidsonM (2005) Smart & Good High Schools: Integrating Excellence and Ethics for Success in School, Work, and beyond. Cortland, NY: Center for the 4th and 5th Rs/Character Education Partnership.
35.
McClellanBE (1999) Moral Education in America: Schools and the Shaping of Character from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
MarantoRRitterG (2014) Why KIPP is not corporate: KIPP and social justice. Journal of School Choice8(2): 237–257.
37.
NarvaezD (2005) Integrative ethical education. In: KillenMSmetanaJ (eds) Handbook of Moral Development, pp. 703–733. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38.
Nichols-BarrerIGleasonPGillB. (2015) Student selection, attrition, and replacement in KIPP middle schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis38: 5–20.
39.
NucciLTurielE (2009) Capturing the complexity of moral development and education. Mind, Brain, and Education3(3): 151–159.
40.
PellegrinoJWHiltonML (eds) (2013) Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
41.
PeshkinA (1986) God’s Choice: The Total World of a Fundamentalist Christian School. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
PetersRS (1981) Moral Development and Moral Education. London: George Allen & Unwin.
43.
PetersonCSeligmanME (2004) Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
RushB (1786) A Plan for the Establishment of Public Schools. Philadelphia, PA: Dobson.
46.
SeligmanMECsikszentmihalyiM (2000) Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist55(1): 5–14.
47.
SondelB (2016) ‘No Excuses’ in New Orleans: The silent passivity of neoliberal schooling. The Educational Forum80(2): 171–188.
48.
ThernstromAThernstromS (2003) No Excuses: Closing the Racial Gap in Learning. New York: Simon & Schuster.
49.
ToughP (2013) How Children Succeed. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
50.
ToughP (2016) Helping Children Succeed: What Works and Why. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
51.
TuttleCCGleasonPKnechtelV. (2015) Understanding the Effect of KIPP as It Scales: Volume I: Impacts on Achievement and Other Outcomes. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
52.
TyackD (1974) The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
WebsterN (1790 [1965]) On the education of youth in America. In: RudolphF (ed.) Essays on Education in the Early Republic, pp. 41–77. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
WesterhoffJH (1978) Mcguffey and His Readers: Piety, Morality, and Education in Nineteenth-century America. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
55.
WhitmanD (2008) Sweating the Small Stuff: Inner-city Schools and the New Paternalism. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute.
56.
WynneEA (1991) Character and Academics in the Elementary School. New York: Teachers College Press.
57.
YeagerDSDweckCS (2012) Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist47(4): 302–314.
