Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using theories of representation and democratic education, this article examines the impetus of parent trigger policies in the United States and their potential effects on public good goals for public education. The article also uses theories of representation and responsible democratic governance to assess the parent trigger policies, or what are often called parent empowerment laws, enacted in seven states.

Keywords

Common good democratic governance parent trigger policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Mintrom

(2010) Responsibility and school governance. Educational Policy 24(3): 439–464.

American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) (2013a) About ALEC. Available at: http://www.alec.org/about-alec/ (accessed 18 October 2103).

American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) (2013b) Parent Trigger Act. Available at: http://www.alec.org/model-legislation/parent-trigger-act/ (accessed 18 October 2013).

Ash

(2013) L.A. school board approves parent-trigger guidance. Ed Week, 11 September. Available at: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/charterschoice/2013/09/la_school_board_approves_parent-trigger_guidance.html (accessed 1 October 2013).

Bast

Pullmann

(2012) The Parent Trigger: Justification and Design Guidelines. Chicago, IL: The Heartland Institute. Available at: https://www.heartland.org/policy-documents/parent-trigger-justification-and-design-guidelines (accessed 1 October 2013).

Center for Education Organizing (2013) Parent trigger: No silver bullet. A policy brief, Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Brown University. Available at: http://annenberginstitute.org/pdf/ParentTriggerPolicyBrief.pdf (accessed 1 October 2013).

Frankenberg

Siegel-Hawley

Wang

(2011) Choice without equity: Charter school segregation. Education and Policy Analysis Archives 19(1): 1–94.

Parent Revolution (2013) Our funders. Available at: http://parentrevolution.org/content/our-funders (accessed 1 October 2013).

Pitkin

(1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

10.

Rapp

Eckes

(2007) Dispelling the myth of ‘white flight’: An examination of minority enrollment in charter schools. Educational Policy 21(4): 615–661.

11.

Reckhow

(2013) Follow the Money: How Foundation Dollars Change Public School Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Stone

(2012) The Policy Paradox. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

13.

The Heartland Institute (2013) The Heartland Institute: About. Available at: http://heartland.org/about (accessed 1 October 2013).

Parent trigger policies,representation,and the public good

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References