‘What are you doing?’ and ‘How is it going?’ are foundational questions we can ask of agents. They elicit answers that illuminate aspects of well-doing, or felicitous action, by directing attention to an agent’s personal projects. Personal projects are constitutive elements of daily existence and are consequential for a happy and virtuous life. They have been studied within philosophy, especially in critiques of consequentialist theory. They have been studied by personality psychologists with a methodology, Personal Projects Analysis that measures the content, appraisal, dynamics, and impact of the projects being pursued by individuals. In contrast with more traditional ways of measuring personality, Personal Projects Analysis provides ‘thick’ descriptions of how happiness and virtue are embodied in daily action and embedded in social, physical, temporal, and value contexts. The methodology is designed to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration in contributing to the explanation and the enhancement of well-doing and the quality of lives.
AlbuquerqueIde LimaMPMatosM. (2013) The interplay among levels of personality: The mediator effects of personal projects between the Big Five and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies14(1): 235–250.
2.
AllportGW (1937) Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Oxford: Henry Holt.
3.
BetzlerM (2013) The normative significance of personal projects. In: KühlerMJelinekN (eds) Autonomy and the Self, pp. 101–126. New York and Berlin: Springer.
4.
BorsboomDMellenberghGJvan HeerdenJ (2004) The concept of validity. Psychological Review111(4): 1061–1071.
5.
CantorN (1990) From thought to behavior: ‘having’ and ‘doing’ in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist45: 735–750.
6.
ChambersNC (2007) Just doing it: Affective implications of project phrasing. In: LittleBRSalmela-AroKPhillipsSD (eds) Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing, pp. 145–169. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CostaPTMcCraeRR (1980) Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38(4): 668–678.
8.
DowdenC (2004) Managing to be ‘Free’: Personality, personal projects and well-being in entrepreneurs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
9.
FleesonWMalanosABAchilleNM (2002) An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as ‘good’ as being extraverted?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(6): 1409–1422.
10.
GeeT (1998) Individual and joint-level properties of personal project matrices: An exploration of the nature of project spaces. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
11.
KellyGA (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: W. W. Norton.
12.
KristjánssonK (2013) Virtues and Vices in Positive Psychology: A Philosophical Critique. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
LayCH (1986) At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality20: 474–495.
14.
LittleBR (1972) Psychological man as scientist, humanist and specialist. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality6: 95-116.
15.
LittleBR (1983) Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation. Environment and Behavior15: 273–309.
16.
LittleBR (1987a) Personal projects and fuzzy selves: Aspects of self-identity in adolescence. In: HonessTYardleyK (eds) Self and Identity: Perspectives across the Lifespan, pp. 230–245. New York: Routledge.
17.
LittleBR (1987b) Personality and the environment. In: StokolsDAltmanI (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, pp. 205–244. New York: Wiley.
18.
LittleBR (1989) Personal projects analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions, and the search for coherence. In: BussDCantorN (eds) Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, pp. 15–31. New York: Springer Verlag.
19.
LittleBR (1996) Free traits, personal projects and idio-tapes: Three tiers for personality psychology. Psychological Inquiry7(4): 340–344.
20.
LittleBR (1998) Personal project pursuit: Dimensions and dynamics of personal meaning. In: WongPTPFryPS (eds) The Human Quest for Meaning: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Clinical Applications, pp. 197–221. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
LittleBR (1999a) Personal projects and social ecology: Themes and variation across the life span. In: BrandtstadterJLernerRM (eds) Action and Self-Development: Theory and Research through the Life Span, pp. 197–221. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
LittleBR (1999b) Personality and motivation: Personal action and the conative evolution. In: PervinLAJohnOP (eds) Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, 2nd edn, pp. 501–524. New York: Guilford Press.
23.
LittleBR (2000a) Free traits and personal contexts: Expanding a social ecological model of well-being. In: WalshWBCraikKHPriceRH (eds) Person Environment Psychology: New Directions and Perspectives, 2nd edn, pp. 87–116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
LittleBR (2000b) Persons, contexts, and personal projects: Assumptive themes of a methodological transactionalism. In: WapnerSDemickJMinamiH. (eds) Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research: Underlying Assumptions, Research Problems and Methodologies, pp. 79–88. New York: Plenum.
25.
LittleBR (2005) Personality science and personal projects: Six impossible things before breakfast. Journal of Research in Personality39: 4–21.
26.
LittleBR (2006) Personality science and self-regulation: Personal projects as integrative units. Applied Psychology: An International Review55(3): 419–427.
27.
LittleBR (2007) Prompt and circumstance: The generative contexts of personal projects analysis. In: LittleBRSalmela-AroKPhillipsSD (eds) Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing, pp. 3–49. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
LittleBR (2010) Opening space for project pursuit: Affordance, restoration and chills. In: ThompsonCWAspinallPBellS (eds) Innovative Approaches to Researching Landscape and Health: Open Space: People Space 2, pp. 163–178. New York: Routledge.
29.
LittleBR (2011) Personality science and the northern tilt: As positive as possible under the circumstances. In: SheldonKMKashdanTBStegerMF (eds) Designing Positive Psychology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward, pp. 228–247. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
LittleBRCoulombeS (in press) Personal projects analysis. In:International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.Oxford: Elsevier.
31.
LittleBRGeeTL (2007). The methodology of Personal Projects Analysis: Four modules and a funnel. In: LittleBRSalmela-AroKPhillipsSD (eds) Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing, pp. 375–400. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
LittleBRJosephMF (2007) Personal projects and free traits: Mutable selves and well beings. In: LittleBRSalmela-AroKPhillipsSD (eds) Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing, pp. 375–400. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
LittleBRRyanTJ (1979) A social ecological model of development. In: IshwaranK (ed.) Childhood and Adolescence in Canada, pp. 273–301. Toronto, ON, Canada: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
34.
LittleBRSalmela-AroKPhillipsSD (eds) (2007) Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
LomaskyLE (1987) Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
McGregorILittleBR (1998) Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74: 494–512.
37.
McKeenNA (1984) The personal projects of pregnant women. Unpublished Bachelor Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
38.
MartennsonS (1977) Childhood interaction and temporal organization. Economic Geography53: 99–115.
39.
MatsubaMK (2000) Caring for their community: Study of moral exemplars in transition to adulthood. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
40.
NoftleEESchnitkerSARobinsRW (2011) Character and personality: Connections between positive psychology and personality psychology. In: SheldonKMKashdanTSteigerMF (eds) Designing the Future of Positive Psychology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward, pp. 207–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
OmodeiMMWearingAJ (1990) Need satisfaction and involvement in personal projects: Toward an integrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(4): 762–769.
42.
OzerDJBenet-MartínezV (2006) Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology57: 401–421.
43.
PalysTSLittleBR (1983) Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal project systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44: 1221–1230.
44.
PetersonCSeligmanMEP (2004) Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press; Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Available at: www.viacharacter.org
45.
PhillipsSDLittleBRGoodineLA (1997) Reconsidering gender and public administration: Five steps beyond conventional research. Canadian Public Administration40(4): 563–581.
46.
PychylTALittleBR (1998) Dimensional specificity in the prediction of subjective well-being: Personal projects in pursuit of the PhD. Social Indicators Research45: 423–473.
47.
RobertsBWJacksonJJFayardJV. (2009) Conscientiousness. In: LearyMRHoyleRH (eds) Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior, pp. 257–273. London: Guilford Press.
48.
RyanRMDeciEL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology52: 1141–1166.
49.
RyanRMCurrenRRDeciEL (2013) What humans need: Flourishing in Aristotelian philosophy and self-determination theory. In: WatermanSAlanS (eds) The Best within Us: Positive Psychology Perspectives on Eudaimonia, pp. 57–75. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
Salmela-AroKLittleBR (2007) Relational aspects of project pursuit. In: LittleBRSalmela-AroKPhillipsSD (eds) Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing, pp. 375–400. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
SheldonKMKasserT (1998) Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24(12): 1319–1331.
52.
SugiyamaTWard ThompsonC (2005) Environmental support for outdoor activities and older people’s quality of life. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 19: 3-4.
53.
TiberiusV (2010) The Reflective Life: Living with Our Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
VallacherRRWegnerDM (1987) What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review94: 3–15.
55.
WilliamsB. (1981) Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers (1973-1980). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
WilsonEO (1998) Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.
57.
ZelenskiJMSantoroMSWhelanDC (2012) Would introverts be better off if they acted more like extraverts? Exploring emotional and cognitive consequences of counterdispositional behavior. Emotion12(2): 290–303.
