Deliberative theory has served two purposes in recent studies of education policy-making at the community level in the US: as a lens through which to examine existing practices, and as an ideal toward which to strive.These studies, though, overlook a prior and important theoretical question: should deliberative theory be applied to education policy-making? In this article, I explore this question from an egalitarian perspective. I criticize the prevailing assumption that deliberative decision-making is an egalitarian way to make education policy, by underscoring how it fails in this instance on its own terms. I argue that deliberating about education policy is especially problematic compared to deliberations about other social goods, owing to the unique relationship between education and political equality in public fora. I also highlight two features of American education — de facto segregation, and the availability of exit options — that further challenge the appropriateness of using deliberative processes for education policy-making. Given the current state of educational politics, I conclude by pointing to the benefits of school finance litigation and its rights-based approach, which establishes educational entitlements that apply across communities.
Berliner, D.C. (2006) `Our impoverished view of education reform', Teachers College Record108(6): 949-95.
2.
Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Bohman, J. (1998) `The coming of age of deliberative democracy', The Journal of Political Philosophy6(4): 400-25.
4.
Bohman, J. (2002) `Deliberative democracy and effective social freedom: capabilities, resources, and opportunities', in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 321-48. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Brighouse, H. (1996). `Egalitarianism and equal availability of political influence', Journal of Political Philosophy4(2): 118-41.
6.
Chambers, S. (2003) `Deliberative democratic theory', Annual Review of Political Science6: 307-26.
7.
Christiano,T. (1996) The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Boulder, CO:Westview Press .
8.
Cohen, J. (2002a) `Deliberation and democratic legitimacy', in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 67-91. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Cohen, J. (2002b) `Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy' , in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 407-437. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Conover, P.J. and Searing, D.D. (2000). `A political socialization perspective', in L.M. McDonnell, P. M. Timpane and R. Benjamin (eds), Rediscovering the Democratic Purposes of Education, pp. 91-124. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
11.
Cook, F.L. and Jacobs, L.R. (1998) `Deliberative democracy in action: evaluation of americans discuss social security'. Washington DC: Report to the Pew Charitable Trusts.
12.
Estlund, D. (2002) `Beyond fairness and deliberation: the epistemic dimension of democratic authority', in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 173-204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Feuerstein, A. (2002) `Elections, voting, and democracy in local school district governance', Educational Policy16(1): 15-36.
14.
Fung, A. (2004) Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Fung, A. (2005) `Deliberation before the revolution: toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world', Political Theory33 (2): 397-419
16.
Goodin, R.E. (2003) Reflective Democracy. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
17.
Gutmann, A. (1999) `Deliberative democracy and majority rule: reply to Waldron', in H.H. Koh and R.C. Slye (eds), Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights, pp. 227-34. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
19.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a DiscourseTheory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Hayward, C.R. (2004) `Doxa and deliberation', Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy7(1): 1-24
22.
Hibbing, J.R. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) Stealth Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Hirschman, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Knight, J. and Johnson, J. (2002) `What sort of equality does deliberative democracy require?', in J.Bohman and W.Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 279-319. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Kober, N. (2006) A Public Education Primer. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
26.
Koski, W.S. and Reich, R. (2006) `When "adequate" isn't:The retreat from equity in educational law and policy and why it matters', Emory Law Journal56(3): 545-617.
27.
Labaree, D. (1997) `Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals', American Educational Research Journal34(1): 39-81.
28.
Lawrence, C.R. III (2005) `Forbidden conversations: on race, privacy, and community', Yale Law Journal114(6): 1353-403.
29.
Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J.S. and Plane, D.L. (1999) `Deliberative polling and policy outcomes: Electric utility issues in Texas.'Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management , Washington, DC.
30.
McDonnell, L.M. and Weatherford, S.M. (2000a) Practical Deliberation in Local School Districts: A South Carolina Experiment. Los AngelesCenter for the Study of Evaluation, University of CaliforniaLos Angeles.
31.
McDonnell, L.M. and Weatherford, S.M. (2000b) `Seeking a new politics of education', in L.M. McDonnell, P.M. Timpane and R. Benjamin (eds), Rediscovering the Democratic Purposes of Education , pp. 174-206. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
32.
Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Nie, N.H., Junn, J. and Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996) Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Orfield, G. and Lee, C. (2005) Why Segregation Matters: Poverty and Educational Inequality. Cambridge, MA:The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
35.
Posner, R. (2003) Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Rosenberg, S.W. (2007) `Types of discourse and the democracy of deliberation' , in S.W. Rosenberg (ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, pp.130-58. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
37.
Ryan, S., Bryk,A.S., Lopez, G. and Williams, K.P. (1997) Charting Reform: LSCs - Local Leadership at Work . Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
38.
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973) 411 US 1.
39.
Sanders, L.M. (1997) `Against deliberation', Political Theory25(3): 347-76.
40.
Scheingold, S.A. (2004) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
41.
Schlozman, K.L., Page, B.I.,Verba, S. and Fiorina, M.P. (2005) `Inequalities of political voice', in L.R. Jacobs and T. Skocpol (eds), Inequality and American Democracy, pp. 19-87. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
Schumpeter, J. (1947) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
43.
Shapiro, I. (1999) `Enough of deliberation: Politics is about interests and power', in S. Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, pp. 28-38. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Waldron, J. (1993) Liberal Rights: Collected Papers, 1981-1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Weatherford, S.M. and McDonnell, L.M. (2007) `Deliberation with a purpose: Reconnecting communities and schools', in S.W. Rosenberg (ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? , pp. 184-215. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
47.
Young, I.M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
