The blending of different rubbers is one of the effective methods to achieve required performance properties in their final products. This article reviews the thermodynamic considerations of rubber–rubber blends and their filled systems. Factors affecting the rubber blend morphology (i.e. distribution mechanism of fillers, curatives and other compounding ingredients) and preparation techniques for rubber–rubber blends emphasizing their advantages and disadvantages are well discussed in this review. Microscopy is the field of interest to all material scientists. In the case of rubber blends, microscopy is an essential tool in order to understand the morphology, that is, size, shape and distribution of phases and filler particles in the rubber–rubber blend. In this review, selected scientific reports based on optical microscopy, electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy in rubber–rubber blends are discussed. Rubber material is a complex macromolecule; it has significant proportion of fillers, processing aids and curing agents; therefore, only a very few studies have been reported on the microscopic aspects of filled rubber–rubber blends. In particular, influence of rubber blend composition, fillers (micro and nano length scales) and processing additives on the morphology of rubber blends systems has not been systematically reviewed and discussed in the scientific literature. Therefore, in the present scenario, this review was thought of, which deals with the essential background to rubber–rubber blends, miscibility and morphological characterization of various rubber blend systems by microscopy. It is very important to add that although there is scattered information on these aspects in the scientific literature, to date a comprehensive review has not been published. The pros, cons, artefacts and the new challenges on the use of microscopy for the characterization of rubber–rubber blends are also discussed here.
GhilarducciACervenySSalvaH, et al.Influence of the blend composition in the internal friction of NR/SBR compounds. Heidelberg: KGK-Kautschuk und Gummi Kunststoffe, 2001, pp. 382–386.
2.
ZhangYGeSTangB, et al.Effect of carbon black and silica fillers in elastomer blends. Macromolecules2001; 34: 7056–7065.
3.
FujimotoKYoshimiyaN. Blends of 1,4 PBD with NR or SBR. Rubber Chem Technol1968; 41: 669–677.
4.
SawyerLCGrubbDT. Polymer microscopy. New York: Springer Science, 1996.
5.
MichlerGH. Electron microscopy of polymers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
6.
AndoITA. Solid state NMR of polymers. Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1998.
7.
BhowmickAKStephensHL (eds). Handbook of elastomers. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2001.
8.
MutzM. Thermodynamics, phase segregation, polymer morphology, and interface/interphases in polymer nanocomposites. In: ThomasSRouxelDPonnammaD (eds.), Spectroscopy of polymer nanocomposites. UK: Elsevier, 2016, pp. 65–87.
9.
FenouillotFCassagnauPMajestéJC. Uneven distribution of nanoparticles in immiscible fluids: morphology development in polymer blends. Polymer (Guildf)2009; 50: 1333–1350.
10.
PomposoJARuiz De LuzuriagaAEtxeberriaARodriguezJ. Key role of entropy in nanoparticle dispersion: polystyrene-nanoparticle/linear-polystyrene nanocomposites as a model system. Phys Chem Chem Phys2008; 10: 650–651.
11.
GinzburgVV.Nanoparticle/polymer blends: theory and modeling. In: IsayevAI (ed.), Encyclopedia of polymer blends, Volume 1: Fundamentals. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2010, pp. 233–263.
12.
YuriSL. Polymer reinforcement. Canada: Chem Tech publishers, 1995, pp. 50.
13.
MondalSKhastgirD. Evaluation of carbon black distribution in different phases of compatible blend of EVA/NBR through electrical, mechanical and morphological test. Polym Test2017; 59: 404–413.
14.
VoLTGiannelisEP. Compatibilizing poly(vinylidene fluoride)/nylon-6 blends with nanoclay. Macromolecules2007; 40: 8271–8276.
GoochJW. Incompatibility. In: GoochJW (ed.), Encyclopedic dictionary of polymers. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 2007, p. 517.
18.
Sae-OuiPSuchivaKThepsuwanU, et al.Effects of blend ratio and SBR type on properties of silica filled SBR/NR tire tread compounds. Rubber Chem Technol2016; 89: 240–250.
19.
RolandCBohmG. Macromolecular diffusion and the autoadhesion of polybutadiene. Macromolecules1985; 18: 1310–1314.
20.
InoueTShomuraFOugizawaT, et al.Covulcanization of polymer blends. Rubber Chem Technol1985; 58: 873–884.
21.
MarkJEErmanBEirichFR. The science and technology of rubber. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005, pp. 321–396.
IsayevAI. Encyclopedia of polymer blends, volume 2 : processing. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2011, pp. 163–204.
24.
LimperA. Mixing of rubber compounds. Munich: Hanser Publishers, 2012, pp. I–XI.
25.
FujimakiTOshimaN. Rubber composition for high performance tire tread. US Patent, 1984.
26.
RiyajanSA. Preparation of natural rubber composites. In: ThomasSRajishaKMariaHChanCHPothenL (eds) Natural rubber materials volume 2: blends and IPNs. Cambridge: RSC Publishing, 2014, pp. 366–368.
27.
JoseLJosephR. Latex stage blending of natural rubber and poly(vinyl chloride) for improved mechanical properties. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater2005; 54: 387–396.
28.
SatyanarayanaMSBhowmickAKDinesh KumarK. Preferentially fixing nanoclays in the phases of incompatible carboxylated nitrile rubber (XNBR)-natural rubber (NR) blend using thermodynamic approach and its effect on physico mechanical properties. Polym (United Kingdom)2016; 99: 21–43.
29.
CorishPJ. Fundamental studies of rubber blends. Rubber Chem Technol1967; 40: 324–340.
30.
RathiAHernándezMGarciaSJ, et al.Identifying the effect of aromatic oil on the individual component dynamics of S-SBR/BR blends by broadband dielectric spectroscopy. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys2018; 56: 842–854.
31.
ChangYShinYChunH, et al.Effects of trans-polyoctylene rubber (TOR) on the properties of NR/EPDM Blends. J Appl Polym Sci1998; 73: 749–756.
32.
YehiaAAIsmailMNHefnyYA, et al.Mechano-chemical reclamation of waste rubber powder and its effect on the performance of NR and SBR vulcanizates. J Elastomers Plast2004; 36: 109–121.
VisakhPM.Chitin in rubber based blends and micro composites. In: Rubber based bionanocomposites. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 5–7.
37.
HarratsC. Multiphase polymer-based materials multiphase polymer-based materials an atlas of phase morphology at the nano and micro scale. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
38.
GroeninckxGThomasSHarratsC. Micro- and nanostructured polymer blends: state of the art, challenges, and future prospects. London: Taylor & Francis. 2006.
39.
SirisinhaCBaulek-LimcharoenSThunyarittikornJ.Changes in morphology and properties of NR–NBR blends. Effect of viscosity ratio modified by liquid natural rubber and epoxidised liquid natural rubber. Plast Rubber Compos2001; 30: 314–317.
40.
VisakhPMSabuTArupKC, et al.Advances in elastomers I: blends and interpenetrating networks. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–494.
41.
HassanderH. Electron microscopy methods for studying polymer blends-comparison of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Rubber Chem Technol1985; 5: 27–36.
42.
LiuXDongXLiuW, et al.Morphology evolution and dynamic relaxation behavior of solution-polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber/polyisoprene/silica ternary composites influenced by shear. Polym (United Kingdom)2018; 145: 416–425.
43.
LipińskaMImielaM. Morphology, rheology and curing of (ethylene-propylene elastomer/hydrogenate acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber) blends reinforced by POSS and organoclay. Polym Test2019; 75: 26–37.
44.
MathaiAEThomasS, Morphology, mechanical and viscoelastic properties of nitrile rubber/epoxidized natural rubber blends. J Appl Polym Sci2005; 97: 1561–1573.
45.
MarschPAVoetAPriceLD. Electron microscopy of heterogeneous elastomer blends. Rubber Chem Technol1967; 40: 359–370.
46.
HessWMVegvariPCSworRA. Carbon black in NR/BR blends for truck tires. Rubber Chem Technol1985; 58: 350–382.
47.
SmithRWAndriesJ. New methods for electron microscopy of polymer blends. Rubber Chem Technol1974; 47: 64–78.
InoueT. Morphology of polymer blends. In: UtrakiLA (ed.) Polymer blends handbook, volume 1. Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, pp. 547–556.
50.
TinkerAJJonesKP. Blends of natural rubber novel techniques for blending with speciality polymers. London: Chapman & Hall, 1998.
51.
VargheseHBhagawanSSSomeswaraS, et al.Morphology, mechanical and viscoelastic behaviour of blends of nitrile rubber and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. Pergmnon Eur Polym J1995; 00163057: 56–9.
52.
LeHHDasABasakS, et al.Effect of different ionic liquids on the dispersion and phase selective wetting of carbon nanotubes in rubber blends. Polymer (Guildf )2016; 105: 284–297.
53.
NieHLiuDLiuC, et al.Morphology evolution in solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber (SSBR)/trans-1,4-polyisoprene (TPI) blends: SSBR particle formation, TPI crystal nucleation, growth and polymorphic form. Polymer (Guildf )2017; 117: 11–16.
54.
ArayapraneeWRempelGL. A comparative study of the cure characteristics, processability, mechanical properties, ageing, and morphology of rice husk ash, silica and carbon black filled 75: 25 NR/EPDM blends. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 109: 932–941.
Lucia ConzattiMG.Microscopy of natural rubber composites and nanocomposites. In: ThomasSRajishaKMariaHChanCHPothenL (eds.), Natural rubber materials volume 2: blends and IPNs. Cambridge: RSC, 2014, pp. 653–657.
58.
KoshyATKuriakoseBThomasS. Studies on the effect of blend ratio and cure system on the degradation of natural rubber – ethylene-vinyl acetate rubber blends. Polym Degrad Stab1992; 36: 137–147.
59.
KoshyATKuriakoseBThomasS, et al.Studies on the effect of blend ratio and crosslinking system on thermal, X-ray and dynamic mechanical properties of blends of natural rubber and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. Polymer (Guildf )1993; 34: 3428–3436.
60.
SidkeyMAYehiaAAEl MalakNAA, et al.Compatibility studies on some rubber blend systems by ultrasonic techniques. Mater Chem Phys2002; 74: 23–32.
61.
GeorgeSCNinanKNGroeninickxG, et al.Styrene-butadiene rubber/natural rubber blends: morphology, transport behavior, and dynamic mechanical and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci2000; 78: 1280–1303.
62.
VarkeyJTAugustineSGroeninckxG, et al.Morphology and mechanical and viscoelastic properties of natural rubber and styrene butadiene rubber latex blends. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys2000; 38: 2189–2211.
63.
DubeyKABhardwajYKChaudhariCV, et al.Radiation-processed styrene–butadiene-co-ethylene–propylene diene rubber blends compatibility and swelling studies. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 99: 3638–3649.
64.
KhalafAIWardAARozikNN. Investigation of physical properties and morphology of compatibilized EPDM/EVA blends. J Plast Compos Mater2017; 30: 1–16.
65.
ChiuHLiWTsaiP, et al.A study of rheological behavior and compatibility of NR/BR blends a study of rheological behavior and compatibility of NR/BR blends. Polym Plast Technol Eng2006; 2559: 845–855.
66.
HusseinIAChaudhryRASharkhBFA. Study of the miscibility and mechanical properties of NBR/HNBR blends. Polym Eng Sci2004; 44: 2346–2352.
67.
ArayapraneeWRempelGL. Properties of NR/EPDM blends with or without methyl methacrylate-butadiene-styrene (MBS) as a compatibilizer. Int J Mater Struct Reliab2007; 5: 1–12.
68.
NorimanNZIsmailHRashidA. Curing characteristics and mechanical and morphological properties of styrene butadiene rubber/virgin acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (SBR/vNBR) and styrene butadiene rubber/recycled acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber. Polym Plast Technol Eng2008; 47: 1016–1023.
69.
NorimanNZIsmailHRashidAA. Characterization of styrene butadiene rubber/recycled acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (SBR/NBRr) blends: the effects of epoxidized natural rubber (ENR-50) as a compatibilizer. Polym Test2010; 29: 200–208.
70.
TanrattanakulVPetchkaewA. Mechanical properties and blend compatibility of natural rubber–chlorosulfonated polyethylene blends. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 99: 127–140.
71.
BoonsongKSeadanMLopattananonN. Compatibilization of natural rubber (NR) and chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) blends with zinc salts of sulfonated natural rubber. Songklankarin J Sci Technol2008; 30: 491–499.
72.
PhiriyawirutMLuamlamS. Influence of poly (vinyl chloride) on natural rubber/chlorosulfonated polyethylene blends. Open J Org Polym Mater2013; 2013: 81–86.
73.
SumaNJosephRGeorgeKE. Improved mechanical properties of NR/EPDM and NR/butyl blends by precuring EPDM and butyl. J Appl Polym Sci1993; 49: 549–557.
74.
PhiriyawirutMLimwongwatthanananTKaemramS, et al.Natural rubber/fluoro elastomer blends: effect of third component on cure characteristics, morphology, mechanical properties, and automotive fuel swelling. Open J Polym Chem2013; 3: 79–85.
75.
VisconteLLYMartinsAFSuarezJCM, et al.Different preparative modes for the incorporation of additives in NR/SBR blends. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 93: 483–489.
BotrosSH. Preparation and characteristics of NR/EPDM rubber blends. Polym Plast Technol Eng2002; 41: 341–359.
78.
SirqueiraASSoaresBG. Mercapto-modified copolymers in elastomer blends. IV. The compatibilization of natural rubber/EPDM blends. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 83: 2892–2900.
79.
El-SabbaghSH. Compatibility study of natural rubber and ethylene-propylene diene rubber blends. Polym Test2003; 22: 93–100.
80.
SaadALGEl-SabbaghS. Compatibility studies on some polymer blend systems by electrical and mechanical techniques. J Appl Polym Sci2000; 9: 60–71.
81.
JosephRGeorgeKEFrancisDJ. Scanning electron microscopy examination of the fracture surface of NR/SBR and NR/BR blends. Int J Polym Mater1988; 12: 111–123.
82.
NaskarTNityanandaTB. Polymer blend: a novel method for the preparation of a natural rubber-carboxylated nitrile rubber blend. J Appl Polym Sci1994; 52: 1007–1014.
83.
ShoushtariZNaseriAJalali-AraniA. A comparison between the effects of gamma radiation and sulfur cure system on the microstructure and crosslink network of (styrene butadiene rubber/ethylene propylene diene monomer) blends in presence of nanoclay. Radiat Phys Chem2015; 115: 68–74.
84.
AzizliMJAbbasizadehSHoseiniM, et al.Influence of blend composition and organic cloisite 15A content in the structure of isobutylene–isoprene rubber/ethylene propylene diene monomer composites for investigation of morphology and mechanical properties. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 1–13.
85.
PrasertsriSLagardeFRattanasomN, et al.Raman spectroscopy and thermal analysis of gum and silica-filled NR/SBR blends prepared from latex system. Polym Test2013; 32: 852–861.
86.
TavakoliMKatbabAANazockdastH. NR/SBR/organoclay nanocomposites: effects of molecular interactions upon the clay microstructure and mechano-dynamic properties. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 123: 1853–1864.
87.
ZareiMNaderiGBakhshandehGR, et al.Ternary elastomer nanocomposites based on NR/BR/SBR: effect of nanoclay composition. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 127: 2038–2045.
88.
PerezLDSierraLLopezBL. Effect of the filler characteristics on the miscibility of styrene-butadiene rubber and nitrile-butadiene rubber blends. Polym Eng Sci2008; 48: 1986–1993.
89.
MarkoviGRadovanoviBSimendiJB. Thermostability and surface morphology of nano- and micro-filled NBR/CSM and CR/CSM rubber blends. J Serbian Chem Soc2004; 69: 167–173.
90.
LeonDPerezBLL. Thermal characterization of SBR/NBR blends reinforced with a mesoporous silica. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 125: E328–E333.
91.
PalKRajasekarRKangDJ, et al.Influence of carbon blacks on butadiene rubber/high styrene rubber/natural rubber with nanosilica: morphology and wear. Mater Des2010; 31: 1156–1164.
92.
AndidehMNaderiGGhoreishyMHR, et al.Effects of nanoclay and short nylon fiber on morphology and mechanical properties of nanocomposites based on NR/SBR. Fibers Polym2014; 15: 814–822.
93.
ValentıJLCarreteroJArroyoM, et al.Morphology/behaviour relationship of nanocomposites based on natural rubber/epoxidized natural rubber blends. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 1330–1339.
94.
KantalaCWimolmalaESirisinhaC, et al.Reinforcement of compatibilized NR/NBR blends by fly ash particles and precipitated silica. Polym Adv Technol2009; 20: 448–458.
95.
RajiVVRamakrishnanSSukumarR, et al.Kaolin modified with sodium salt of rubber seed oil as a reinforcing filler for blends of natural rubber, polybutadiene rubber and acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber. Polym Int2015; 64: 1585–1593.
96.
MohanTPKuriakoseJKannyK. Effect of nanoclay reinforcement on structure, thermal and mechanical properties of natural rubber-styrene butadine rubber (NR-SBR). J Ind Eng Chem2011; 17: 264–270.
97.
ThomasSRanimolS.Rubber nanocomposites preparation, properties and applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010, pp. 259–263.
GuZ. Preparation, characterization, and application of NR/SBR/organoclay nanocomposites in the tire industry. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 119: 1185–1194.
104.
KimSKKangJHChoeYS, et al.Structure and properties of the organoclay filled NR/BR nanocomposites. Macromol Res2006; 14: 187–193.
105.
GuZSongGLiuW, et al.Preparation and properties of styrene butadiene rubber/natural rubber/organo-bentonite nanocomposites prepared from latex dispersions. Appl Clay Sci2009; 46: 241–244.
106.
StephenRRanganathaiahCVargheseS, et al.Gas transport through nano and micro composites of natural rubber (NR) and their blends with carboxylated styrene butadiene rubber (XSBR) latex membranes. Polymer (Guildf)2006; 47: 858–870.
107.
MariaHJLyczkoNNzihouA, et al.Stress relaxation behavior of organically modified montmorillonite filled natural rubber/nitrile rubber nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci2014; 87: 120–128.
108.
QingguoWJinghuiXIEJinliangQ, et al.Good dispersion of hydrophilic nanoscale silica in rubber matrix and the effects on rubber nanocomposites. Sci China Technol Sci2012; 55: 652–658.
109.
DasAStockelhuberKWKluppelM, et al.Modified and unmodified multiwalled carbon nanotubes in high performance solution-styrene–butadiene and butadiene rubber blends. Polymer (Guildf)2008; 49: 5276–5283.
110.
ZhangH. EPDM-rubber in blends with NR/BR-elastomers for ozone-resistant tyre sidewall applications. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, 2009.
111.
SahakaroKRabinNDuttaJ, et al.Blending of NR/BR/EPDM by reactive processing for tire sidewall applications. III. Assessment of the blend ozone- and fatigue-resistance in comparison with a conventional NR/BR compound. J Appl Polym Sci2007; 103: 2555–2563.
112.
AyacheJBeaunierLBoumendilJJ, et al.Cryoultramicrotmy. In: AyacheJLucBJacquelineBGabrielleEDanieleL (eds.), Sample preparation handbook for transmission electron microscopy. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 108–117.
CappellaBGeussMKluppelM, et al.Filler-reinforced elastomers scanning force microscopy. Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
115.
PandeyKNSetuaDKMathurGN. Determination of the compatibility of NBR-EPDM blends by an ultrasonic technique, modulated DSC, dynamic mechanical analysis, and atomic force microscopy. Polym Eng Sci2005; 45: 1265–1276.
116.
Razavi-NouriMKaramiMNaderiG. Rheological behavior and morphology of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) blends filled by various organoclay contents. Appl Clay Sci2017; 145: 1–10.
117.
MonfaredAJalali-AraniA.Morphology and rheology of (styrene-butadiene rubber/acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber) blends filled with organoclay: the effect of nanoparticle localization. Appl Clay Sci2015; 108: 1–11.
Holger SchonherrGJV. Atomic force microscopy in practice. In: Schonherr HHVancsoGJ (ed.), Scanning force microscopy of polymers. Heidelberg Dordrecht London, NY: Springer, 2010, pp. 25–73.
120.
Combined Atomic Force Microscopy & Raman Spectroscopy – TERS and Co-Located AFM-Raman Systems. https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=2943 (accessed 21 October 2011).
