Workplace silence behavior and its consequences on nurses: A new Egyptian validation scale of nursing motives

Abstract

Background

Workplace silence behavior is a social collective phenomenon. It refers to nurses choosing to withhold their ideas, opinions and concerns about critical issues in their workplace. Workplace silence behavior poses a threat to organizational ethics and success. It also has adverse effects on the performance of nurses in health organizations. Underlying nursing causes of silence behaviors could be related to individual, social and organizational attributes in health care settings.

Objectives

The study aimed to develop a new Egyptian validation scale for measuring nursing motives of workplace silence behavior and identify consequences of workplace silence behavior on nurses.

Methods

A cross-sectional correlational study was implemented using questionnaires on workplace silence behavior, nursing motives and nurses' consequences, collected from 332 nurses working in critical and toxicology care settings of Alexandria Main University Hospital.

Results

Egyptian scale was shown to be a good fit model of exploratory (36 nursing motives emerged in six dimensions with total variance of 73.3%) and confirmatory factor analysis tests (X² = 1381.47, NNFI =0. 90, CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.057). It also had high reliability tests with coefficient of alpha (0.85), Pearson (0.75) and Kendall coefficient of 0.72. High level of workplace silence behaviors showed a negative association with organizational dis-identification, fair citizenship behavior, and fair nurses' performance and declined reporting of patient adverse events. It also appeared to be in a positive association with higher levels of cynicism.

Conclusion

The Egyptian scale was proved to be reliable and valid for measuring the underlying nursing causes of silence behaviors in the hospital workplace. Measuring nursing motives of workplace silence behaviors will help nurse managers to reduce negative outcomes of workplace silence behaviors and improve organizational outcomes.

Keywords

Motives silence behavior workplace nurses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yurdakul

Beşen

Erdoğan

The organizational silence of midwives and nurses: reasons and results. J Nurs Manag 2016; 24: 686–694.

Kosarek

JG.

Relationships of the nursing practice environment, nursing silence behaviors, and nurse perceived patient safety PhD Thesis, University of the Texas, USA, 2018.

Farzi

Irajpour

Saghaei

, et al. Causes of medication errors in intensive care units from the perspective of healthcare professionals. J Res Pharm Pract 2017; 6: 158–165.

Seren

Topcu

Bacaksiz

, et al. Organisational silence among nurses and physicians in public hospitals. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27: 1440–1451.

Daşcı

Cemaloğlu

The development of the organizational silence scale: validity-reliability study. Int J Human Sci 2016; 13: 32–45.

Vakola

Bouradas

Antecedents and consequences of organizational silence: an empirical investigation. Employee Relati 2005; 27: 441–458.

Tan

Organizational justice as a predictor of organizational silence. Educ Res Rev 2014; 9: 1190–1202.

Knoll

van Dick

Do I hear the whistle…? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates. J Bus Ethics 2013; 113: 349–362.

Alparslan

Can

Erdem

Reasons for employee silence behavior: developing and validating a scale for nurses. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi 2015; 18: 183–204.

10.

Van Dyne

Ang

Botero

Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. J Manage Stud 2003; 40: 1359–1392.

11.

Brinsfield

CT.

Employee silence: investigation of dimensionality, development of measures, and examination of related factors. PhD Thesis, University of The Ohio State, USA, 2009.

12.

Khan

Kaleem

Ullah

Relationship between organizational silence and citizenship behavior – mediating role of commitments: evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa universities. Pakistan J Appl Econ 2016; : 281–297. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/87ee/25b56368e3cf4a5e06b1090dec1f0b7c05e0.pdf (accessed 10 July 2019).

13.

Caylak

Altuntas

Organizational silence among nurses: the impact on organizational cynicism and intention to leave work. J Nurs Res 2017; 25: 90–98.

14.

Aeen

Zarei

Matin

HZ.

Do the organizational rumours emphasize the influence of organizational silence over organizational commitment?

J Social Issues Human 2014; 2: 88–92.

15.

Erigüç

Özer

Turaç

SI.

The causes and effects of the organizational silence: on which issues the nurses remain silent?

Int J Manage Econ Bus 2014; 10: 131–153.

16.

Dean

Brandes

Dharwadkar

Organizational cynicism. Acad Manage Rev 1998; 23: 341–352.

17.

Cheney

Tompkins

PK.

Coming to terms with organizational identification. Central States Speech J 1987; 38: 1–15.

18.

Dutton

Dukerich

Harquail

CV.

Organizational images and member identification. Admin Sci Q 1994; 39: 239–263.

19.

Koys

DJ.

The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: a unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychol 2001; 54: 101–115.

20.

Booth-Butterfield

Individual differences in the communication of humorous messages. South Commun J 1991; 56: 205–218.

21.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Hospital survey on patient safety culture, www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospital/index.html (2017, accessed 10 July 2019).

22.

MacCallum

Browne

Sugawara

HM.

Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1996; 1: 130–149.

23.

Hoyle

RH.

Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., 1995.

24.

Jain

Sharma

Service quality model: model fit indices results. Int J Eng Res Technol 2012; 1: 1–12.

25.

Maxfield

Grenny

Lavandero

, et al. The silent treatment – why safety tools aren’t enough to save lives. Provo, UT: Vital Smarts, www.silentreatmentstudy.com (2010, accessed 10 July 2019).

26.

Kerlinger

FN.

Foundations of Behavioural Research. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1994.

27.

Suhr

Principal component analysis vs. exploratory factor analysis. University of Northern Colorado, https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/sugi30/203-30.pdf (accessed 15 October 2019).

28.

Chumney

Principal components analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis, www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Principal-Components-Analysis-%2C-Exploratory-Factor. Chumney/6c84e70824d24acb63d44dad93c9a19194a30011 (accessed 15 October 2019).

29.

Field

Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. London and New Delhi: SAGE publications Ltd, 2013.

30.

Rietveld

Van Hout

Statistical Techniques for the Study of Language and Language Behaviour. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1993.

31.

Gaur

SS.

Statistical Methods for Practice and Research: A Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. 2nd ed. London, New Delhi, Washington: SAGE Publications, 2009.

32.

Kaiser

An index of factorial simplicity.

Pschometrika 1974; 39: 31–36.

33.

Fleiss

Levin

Paik

MC.

Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2004.

34.

Brown

TA.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press, 2006.

35.

Brown

Chorpita

Barlow

DH.

Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. J Abnorm Psychol 1998; 107: 179–192.

36.

Floyd

Widaman

KF.

Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 286–299.

37.

Worthington

Whittaker

TA.

Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counsel Psychol 2006; 34: 806– 838.

38.

Hurley

Scandura

Schriesheim

, et al. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives. J Organiz Behav 1997; 18: 667–683.

39.

Singh

Vik

Chinapaw

, et al. Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the ENERGY-child questionnaire on energy balance‑related behaviours and their potential determinants: the ENERGY-project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 136.

40.

Bolarinwa

AO.

Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J 2015; 22: 195–201.