Prison-based Therapeutic Community treatment (TC) is offered in many countries and has proven effective in reducing substance use and sustaining abstinence as well as reducing criminal recidivism. However, the need for prison-based treatment is not always met. Drawing on cross-sectional self-report survey data (n = 420) conducted in six Danish prisons, this study employed bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression to explore whether access to social and criminal capital – prior to and outside prison – is associated with entering prison-based TC. Results show that individuals with problematic substance use, who were not in TC, had fewer resources than TC participants. Furthermore, social capital showed as a positive predictor and criminal capital as negative predictor of TC participation.
AndersonCNCochranJCTomanEL (2022) Social capital and its impacts on prison life: Is visitation a conduit?Crime & Delinquency68(4): 644–683.
2.
AslanL (2018) Doing time on a TC: How effective are drug-free therapeutic communities in prison? A review of the literature. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities39(1): 26–34.
3.
BakerTMitchellMMGordonJA (2022) Prison visitation and concerns about reentry: Variations in frequency and quality of visits are associated with reentry concerns among people incarcerated in prison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology66(12): 1263–1284.
4.
BayerPHjalmarssonRPozenD (2009) Building criminal capital behind bars. Peer effects in juvinile corrections. The Quarterly Journal of Economics124(1): 105–147.
5.
BelenkoSHouserKA (2012) Gender differences in prison-based drug treatment participation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology56(5): 790–810.
6.
BelenkoSPeughJ (2005) Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence77(3): 269–281.
7.
BennettTHollowayKFarringtonD (2008) The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior13(2): 107–118.
8.
BouchardMNguyenH (2010) Is it who you know, or how many that counts? Criminal networks and cost avoidance in a sample of young offenders. Justice Quarterly27(1): 130–158.
9.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJE (ed) Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenword Press, 241–258.
11.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
BoyleRE (2025) The ideal client: Selecting candidates for drug treatment in prison. The British Journal of Criminology65(2): 423–439.
15.
BrunoRMatthewsAJToppL, et al. (2009) Can the severity of dependence scale be usefully applied to ‘ecstasy’?Neuropsychobiology60(3-4): 137–147.
16.
BuktenAVirtanenSHesseM, et al. (2024) The prevalence and comorbidity of mental health and substance use disorders in Scandinavian prisons 2010–2019: A multi-national register study. BMC Psychiatry24(1): 95.
17.
CanalesDDCampbellMAWeiR, et al. (2014) Prediction of general and violent recidivism among mentally disordered adult offenders: Test of the level of service/risk–need–responsivity (LS/RNR). Criminal Justice and Behavior41(8): 971–991.
18.
Caputo-LevineDD (2013) The yard face: The contributions of inmate interpersonal violence to the carceral habitus. Ethnography14(2): 165–185.
19.
CloudWGranfieldR (2008) Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use & Misuse43(12–13): 1971–1986.
CohenSDoyleWJSkonerDP, et al. (1997) Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA277(24): 1940–1944.
22.
CookAP (2017) Capital and punishment: A novel model of reoffending. Corrections2(1): 1–19.
23.
CooperJAOnyekaICardwellC, et al. (2023) Record linkage studies of drug-related deaths among adults who were released from prison to the community: A scoping review. BMC Public Health23(1): 26.
24.
DammAPGorinasC (2020) Prison as a criminal school: Peer effects and criminal learning behind bars. The Journal of Law and Economics63(1): 149–180.
25.
Danish Authority of Social Services (Social- og Boligstyrelsen) (2020) National guidelines for social substance use treatment. Report, Frederiksberg Bogtrykkeri, Odense C, September.
26.
de AndradeDRitchieJRowlandsM, et al. (2018) Substance use and recidivism outcomes for prison-based drug and alcohol interventions. Epidemiologic Reviews40(1): 121–133.
27.
EMCDDA (2022) Prison and drugs in Europe: current and future challenges. Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, January.
28.
FaderJJ (2016) Criminal family networks: Criminal capital and cost avoidance among urban drug sellers. Deviant Behavior37(11): 1325–1340.
29.
FarhoudianARazaghiEHooshyariZ, et al. (2022) Barriers and facilitators to substance use disorder treatment: An overview of systematic reviews. Substance Abuse16: 11782218221118462.
30.
FazelSYoonIAHayesAJ (2017) Substance use disorders in prisoners: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis in recently incarcerated men and women. Addiction112(10): 1725–1739.
31.
Fernández-CalderónFVidal-GinéCLópez-GuerreroJ, et al. (2016) Reliability, convergent and structural validity and cut-off score of the Severity of Dependence Scale for recreational ketamine users. Addictive Behaviors60: 1–7.
32.
FrankVADahlHVHolmKE, et al. (2015) Inmates’ perspectives on prison drug treatment. Probation Journal62(2): 156–171.
33.
GallagherEM (1990) Emotional, social, and physical health characteristics of older men in prison. International Journal of Aging & Human Development31(4): 251–265.
34.
GossopMDarkeSGriffithsP, et al. (1995) The severity of dependence scale (SDS): Psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction90(5): 607–614.
35.
GottfredsonDCKearleyBWBushwaySD (2008) Substance use, drug treatment, and crime: An examination of intra-individual variation in a drug court population. Journal of Drug Issues38(2): 601–630.
36.
GranfieldRCloudW (2001) Social context and ‘natural recovery’: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Substance Use & Misuse36(11): 1543–1570.
37.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
38.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39.
HallerMB (2014) Indsat i behandling: Om indsattes erfaringer med misbrugsbehandling. In: ThylstrupBHMPedersenMUFrederiksenK (eds) Misbrugsbehandling – Organisering, Indsatser Og Behov. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 147–160.
40.
HallerMB (2018) Kontrol af virkeligheden Rusmidler og oplevelser af tid i et dansk fængsel. Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom og Samfund28: 43–62.
Iraurgi CastilloISaizFGRojasÓL, et al. (2010) Estimation of cutoff for the severity of dependence scale (SDS) for opiate dependence by ROC analysis. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría38(5): 270–277.
43.
IrwinJCresseyDR (1962) Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems10(2): 142–155.
44.
Justitsministeriet (2021) Skrivelse om behandlingsgaranti for indsatte stofmisbrugere: To Kriminalforsorgens områdekontorer. Direktoratet for kriminalforsorgen (SKR nr 9724 af 24/09/2021).
45.
KaiserKAPiqueroAKeenaL, et al. (2022) Assessing the institutional barriers and individual motivational factors to participation in prison-based programs. Crime & Delinquency70(3): 870–893.
46.
KayeSDarkeS (2002) Determining a diagnostic cut-off on the severity of dependence scale (SDS) for cocaine dependence. Addiction97(6): 727–731.
47.
KolindTFrankVADahlHV, et al. (2012) Prison drug treatment in Denmark: A historical outline and an analysis of the political debate. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs29(6): 547–560.
48.
KolindTFrankVALindbergO, et al. (2013) Prison-based drug treatment in Nordic political discourse: An elastic discursive construct. European Journal of Criminology10(6): 659–674.
49.
KrishnanMOrfordJBradburyC, et al. (2001) Drug and alcohol problems: The users’ perspective on family members’ coping. Drug and Alcohol Review20(4): 385–393.
50.
LaffertyLChambersGMGuthrieJ, et al. (2015) Indicators of social capital in prison: A systematic review. Health & Justice3(1): 7.
51.
LaffertyLChambersGMGuthrieJ, et al. (2018) Measuring social capital in the prison setting: Lessons learned from the inmate social capital questionnaire. Journal of Correctional Health Care24(4): 407–417.
52.
LaffertyLTreloarCButlerT, et al. (2016) Unlocking dimensions of social capital in the prison setting. Health & Justice4(1): 9.
53.
LarsenBØLarsenKSBergerNP (2025) High- or low-risk prisoner, high- or low-risk ex-offender? Assessing the predictive validity of the level of service/risk-need-responsivity (LS/RNR) instrument among different subgroups of Danish prisoners. European Journal of Criminology22(2): 204–229.
54.
LawrinsonPCopelandJGerberS, et al. (2007) Determining a cut-off on the severity of dependence scale (SDS) for alcohol dependence. Addictive Behaviors32(7): 1474–1479.
55.
LiuSPickettJTBakerT (2016) Inside the black box: Prison visitation, the costs of offending, and inmate social capital. Criminal Justice Policy Review27(8): 766–790.
56.
LokdamNTStavsethMRSkjaervøI, et al. (2024) Treatment utilization among people with drug use disorders in prison: A national longitudinal cohort study. Health & Justice12(1): 46.
57.
LoughranTANguyenHPiqueroAR, et al. (2013) The returns to criminal capital. American Sociological Review78(6): 925–948.
58.
LowtonKChibaG (2021) Assessing the clinical utility of the severity dependence scale for benzodiazepine use disorder. South African Journal of Psychiatry27(1): 1571.
59.
McCarthyBHaganJ (1995) Getting into street crime: The structure and process of criminal embeddedness. Social Science Research24(1): 63–95.
60.
McCarthyBHaganJ (2001) When crime pays: Capital, competence, and criminal success. Social Forces79(3): 1035–1060.
61.
McCaughran-ContrerasCFernandoSSikoraM, et al. (2021) Substance use and overdose risk: Documenting the perspectives of formerly incarcerated persons in the Fraser east region of BC. Harm Reduction Journal18(1): 77.
62.
MeyerCLTangneyJPStuewigJ, et al. (2014) Why do some jail inmates not engage in treatment and services?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology58(8): 914–930.
63.
MitchellMMSpoonerKJiaD, et al. (2016) The effect of prison visitation on reentry success: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice47: 74–83.
64.
MorselliCTremblayPMcCarthyB (2006) Mentors and criminal achievement. Criminology (Beverly Hills)44(1): 17–43.
65.
NguyenH (2020) On the conceptualization of criminal capital. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency57(2): 182–216.
66.
NguyenHLoughranTAPaternosterR, et al. (2017) Institutional placement and illegal earnings: Examining the crime school hypothesis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology33(2): 207–235.
67.
PierceMHayhurstKBirdSM, et al. (2015) Quantifying crime associated with drug use among a large cohort of sanctioned offenders in England and Wales. Drug and Alcohol Dependence155: 52–59.
68.
RichardsonJZiniV (2020) Are prison-based therapeutic communities effective? Challenges and considerations. International Journal of Prisoner Health17(1): 42–53.
SandbergS (2008) Street capital: Ethnicity and violence on the streets of Oslo. Theoretical Criminology12(2): 153–171.
71.
SandbergSPedersenW (2009) Street capital: Black cannabis dealers in a white welfare state.
72.
SeidAKThylstrupBHenriksenSH, et al. (2024) Met and unmet prison-based treatment needs for people who are incarcerated with a history of substance use disorder: A nationwide cohort study. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment159: 209264.
73.
ShammasVL (2018) Bourdieu’s five lessons for criminology. Law and Critique29(2): 201–219.
74.
ShammasVLSandbergS (2016) Habitus, capital, and conflict: Bringing Bourdieusian field theory to criminology. Criminology and Criminal Justice16(2): 195–213.
75.
SkogensLvon GreiffN (2014) Recovery capital in the process of change—differences and similarities between groups of clients treated for alcohol or drug problems. European Journal of Social Work17(1): 58–73.
SturgessDWoodhamsJTonkinM (2016) Treatment engagement from the perspective of the offender: Reasons for noncompletion and completion of treatment—A systematic review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology60(16): 1873–1896.
78.
SwansonCLeeC-BSansoneFA, et al. (2012) Prisoners’ perceptions of father-child relationships and social support. American Journal of Criminal Justice37(3): 338–355.
79.
SwiftWCopelandJHallW (1998) Choosing a diagnostic cut-off for cannabis dependence. Addiction93(11): 1681–1692.
80.
The Danish Enforcement of Sentences Act (2023) The Danish Enforcement of Sentences Act: The Danish Ministry of Justice Consolidation Act No. 201 of 28/02/2023.
81.
ToppLMattickRP (1997) Choosing a cut-off on the severity of dependence scale (SDS) for amphetamine users. Addiction92(7): 839–845.
82.
TuranovicJJTascaM (2019) Inmates’ experiences with prison visitation. Justice Quarterly36(2): 287–322.
83.
van de BaanFCMontanariLRoyuelaL, et al. (2021) Prevalence of illicit drug use before imprisonment in Europe: Results from a comprehensive literature review. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy29(1): 1–12.
84.
YangK (2007) Individual social capital and its measurement in social surveys. Survey Research Methods1(1): 19–27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
