Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Collaboration with an enemy during an armed conflict is as old as warfare itself. As a sociopolitical phenomenon it is hard to define, capture and deal with. In essence, collaboration entails assisting the enemy, in the sense that civilians or combatants belonging to one party to the conflict assist the opposing side by, for example, providing information, helping in administration of occupied territories or engaging in propaganda. However, boundaries of collaboration as a type of criminal behavior, as well as its distinction from other forms of interaction with the enemy, pose a serious legal issue that is challenging to resolve. Ever since the beginning of the Russian–Ukrainian war in 2014, collaboration with the Russian occupying forces has been a widespread social phenomenon. Ukraine criminalized collaboration only after the full-scale invasion of Russian troops in 2022. By mapping the current legal landscape of such criminalization and its implementation by the criminal justice system, this article analyses the contentious boundaries of this prohibition and questionable practices of its enforcement. Using the case study of Ukraine, it aims to open a discussion on the effectiveness of criminalization and prosecution of collaborators as the means to protect national security during warfare.

Keywords

Collaborative activity criminalization criminal legislation occupation prosecution Ukraine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antoniuk

(2021) Derzhavna zrada i kolaboratsiina diialnist. Slovo Natsionalnoi Shkoly Suddiv Ukrainy 4(37): 56–68. in Ukrainian.

Antoniuk

(2022) Criminal and legal assessment of collaborationism: A change of views in connection with Russia's military aggression against Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 3(15): 1–9.

Banasik

(2016) Russia’s hybrid war in theory and practice. Journal on Baltic Security 2(1): 157–182.

Berkhoff

(2004) Harvest of Despair: Life and Death in Ukraine under Nazi Rule. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Böhler

Młynarczyk

(2018) Collaboration and resistance in wartime Poland (1939–1945) – A case for differentiated occupation studies. Journal of Modern European History 16: 225–246.

Brandts

(2000) Dealing with the holocaust and collaboration: The Dutch experience of criminal justice and accountability after World War II. Crime, Law and Social Change 34: 211–236.

Case № 127/21065/22. Vinnytsia City Court of Vinnytsia Region. (28 March 2022) The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109884474

Case № 202/5640/23. Industrial District Court of Dnipro city. (31 March 2023). The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109927033

Case № 295/3993/22. Bogunsky District Court of Zhytomyr. (10 May 2022) The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104226998

10.

Case № 310/1226/17. Berdiansk City District Court of Zaporizhzhia Oblast. (05 June 2019) The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82258024

11.

Case № 467/286/22. Pervomaiskyi City District Court of Mykolaiv Region. (15 February 2023) The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108979435

12.

Case № 574/369/22. Buryn district court of Sumy region. (21 December 2022) The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107991214

13.

Case № 631/219/22. Novovodolazhsky District Court of Kharkiv Region. (20 April 2022) The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104894305

14.

Case № 759/7443/17. Sviatoshynskyi District Court of Kyiv. (27 January 2020). The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87172507

15.

Case № 950/974/22. Lebedynskyi district court of Sumy region. (03 August 2022). The unified state register of court decisions. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105542282

16.

Chivvis

(2017) Hybrid war: Russian contemporary political warfare. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 73(5): 316–321.

17.

Darcy

(2019) To Serve the Enemy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

18.

Deak

(2015) Europe on Trial: The Story of Collaboration, Resistance, and Retribution during World War II. 1st ed. London, UK: Routledge. DOI 10.4324/9780429493874.

19.

Draft Law on Amendments to Some Legislative Acts (On Establishing Criminal Liability for Collaborative Activity). Available at: itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/CardByRn?regNum=5144&conv=9 (in Ukrainian).

20.

Drumbl

Holá

(2024) Informers Up Close – Stories from Communist Prague. London, UK: Oxford University Press.

21.

Dudai

(2022) Penality in the Underground: The IRA's Pursuit of Informers. London, UK: Oxford University Press.

22.

Fridman

(2018) Russian “Hybrid Warfare”. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

23.

Galeotti

(2016) Hybrid war Or Gibridnaya Voina? Getting Russia’s non-linear military challenge right. Lulu.com.

24.

GOLAW. (2022) Criminal liability for collaboration with the Russian Federation. Available at: https://golaw.ua/insights/publication/kriminalna-vidpovidalnist-za-spivpraczyu-z-rf/#what-punishment-is-provided-for-cooperation-with-the-aggressor-state.

25.

Golczewski

(2003) Die Kollaboration in der Ukraine. In: Dieckmann

Quinkert

Tönsmeyer

(eds) Kooperation und Verbrechen: Formen der “Kollaboration” im östlichen Europa 1939–1945. Göttingen: Wallstein, 151–182.

26.

Gordon Bertram

(1993) The morphology of the collaborator: The French case. Journal of European Studies 23(1): 1–25.

27.

Hai-Nyzhnyk

(2017) Osnovni zasady Stratehii deokupatsii ta reintegratsii Krymu v konteksti natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy: shtrykhy do problemy y napriamky rozv’iazannia. Kyiv: MP Lesia (in Ukrainian).

28.

Hirschfeld

Willmot

(1988) Nazi rule and Dutch collaboration. The Netherlands under German occupation: 1940–1945. German Studies Review 12(2): 89.

29.

Horn

Imlay

(2014) In The Politics of Industrial Collaboration during World War II: Ford France, Vichy and Nazi Germany. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Ivanel

(2015) Puppet states: A growing trend of covert occupation. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 18: 43–65.

31.

Kalkhun

(2023) Zakon pro kolaboratsiinu diialnist v Ukraini (n.d.). Available at: https://justtalk.com.ua/post/zakon-pro-kolaboratsijnu-diyalnist-v-ukraini-#_ftn6. (in Ukrainian).

32.

Karchevskyy

(2022) Protydiia zlochynnosti v ukraini u formati data science. Visnyk Luhanskoho Derzhavnoho Universytetu Vnutrishnikh Sprav Imeni E.O. Didorenka 2(98): 202–227.

33.

Karchevskyy

(2025) Countering crime in Ukraine: infographics: interactive guide. https://crimedatalab.org/ (in Ukrainian).

34.

Kharytonova

Shmeltser

(red) (2022) Mizhnarodni standarty prav liudyny u kryminalnomu pravi: komparatyvna perspektyva. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian).

35.

Kladnik

(2021) Retribution against collaborators of the occupiers after the end of the Second World War: The concept of “national honour”. Studia Historica Slovenica 21. 10.32874/shs.2021-06.

36.

Kravchuk

Bondarenko

(2022) Kolaboratsiina diialnist: Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do novoi statti 111-1 KK. Yurydychnyi Naukovyi Elektronnyi Zhurnal 3: 198–204. in Ukrainian.

37.

Leonov

(2023) Kolaboratsionizm: ochevydnyi zlochyn z neochevydnymy oznakamy. Available at: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/3741121-kolaboracionizm-ocevidnij-zlocin-z-neocevidnimi-oznakami.html (in Ukrainian).

38.

Levanon

(2012) Criminal prohibitions on membership in terrorist organizations. New Criminal Law Review 15: 224–276..

39.

Lukashova

(2023) Sud, proshchennia chy spivchuttia. Yak Ukraina karaie za kolaboratsionizm i chomu potribni zminy. Available at: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2023/05/29/7404264/ (in Ukrainian).

40.

Luyten

(1998) Prosecution, society and politics: The penalization of economic collaboration in Belgium after the second world war. Crime, History and Societies 2(1): 111–133.

41.

Luyten

(2014) Dealing with collaboration in Belgium after the second world war: From penal law to purge. Storia E Problemi Contemporanei: 85–100..

42.

Maliuk

(red) (2023) Zlochynna kolaboratsiia v umovakh zbroinoi ahresii: praktych. poradnyk z kryminalno-pravovoi otsinky ta rozmezhuvannia. Kyiv: Alerta (in Ukrainian).

43.

Marin

(2022) Kryminalno-pravovi variatsii derzhavnoi zrady u kryminalnomu kodeksi ukrainy. Pravo Ukrainy 11: 60–75. in Ukrainian.

44.

Marples David

(2018) Decommunization, memory laws, and “builders of Ukraine in the 20th century”. Acta Slavica Iaponica, Tomus 39: 1–22.

45.

McClintock

(2015) Projects of punishment in postwar Poland: War criminals, collaborators and traitors, and the reconstruction of the nation . Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the Division of the Social Sciences. University of Chicago.

46.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. (n.d.) Key Q&A on Russia’s agression. Available at: https://mfa.gov.ua/en/key-questions-answers-on-russias-agression.

47.

Mitsilegas

(2023) The criminalisation of travel as a global paradigm of preventive (in) justice: Lessons from the EU response to ‘foreign terrorist fighters. New Journal of European Criminal Law 14(2): 183–205.

48.

Movchan

(2022) «Voienni» novely Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: pravotvorchi ta pravozastosovni problemy. Kyiv: Norma prava. in Ukrainian.

49.

Myslyvyi

(2023) «Latentnist» sub’iektyvnykh oznak kolaboratsiinoi diialnosti u sudovykh vyrokakh. V: Kolaboratsionizm na tymchasovo okupovanykh terytoriiakh: problemy pravovoi otsinky, harantuvannia prav i svobod liudyny ta reintehratsii terytorii: materialy nauk.-prakt. kruhl. stolu: 17–21 (in Ukrainian).

50.

Payne

Foster

(2017) Russian strategy expansion, crisis and conflict. Comparative Strategy 36(1): 1–89.

51.

Penter

(2005) Collaboration on trial: New source material on soviet postwar trials against collaborators. Slavic Review 64(4): 782–790.

52.

Penter

(2008) Local collaborators on trial: Soviet war crimes trials under stalin (1943–1953). Cahiers du Monde Russe 49(2/3): 341–364.

53.

Pysmenskyy

(2020) Kolaboratsionizm yak suspilno-politychne yavyshche v suchasnii Ukraini (kryminalno-pravovi aspekty). Sievierodonetsk (in Ukrainian).

54.

Pysmenskyy

(2022) Kolaboratsiina diialnist u sferi osvity: Problemy tlumachennia ta vdoskonalennia kryminalnoho zakonu. Pravo Ukrainy 11: 49–59. in Ukrainian.

55.

Pysmenskyy

(2023a) Karanist kolaboratsiinoi diialnosti: Yakykh zmin potrebuie KK? V: Natsionalna bezpeka ukrainy v umovakh informatyzatsii ta hlobalizatsii suspilnykh protsesiv: Suchasni zahrozy ta kryminalno-pravove rehuliuvannia. In: Materialy VII Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, pp.102–108. in Ukrainian.

56.

Pysmenskyy

(2023b) Pomylkova kryminalno-pravova polityka ukrainy shchodo kolaboratsii z vorohom ta yii naslidky. V: Aktualni pytannia kryminalno-pravovoi kvalifikatsii, dokumentuvannia ta rozsliduvannia kolaboratsionizmu: materialy II Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, 175–181 (in Ukrainian).

57.

Radin

(2017) Hybrid warfare in the Baltics: Threats and potential responses. Available at: https://rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1577.html.

58.

Rubashchenko

Shulzhenko

(2024a) Denial of aggression against Ukraine or occupation of its territory: A new case among the denial crimes. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 7(4): 11–37.

59.

Rubashchenko

Shulzhenko

(2024b) Reflections on the legal features of collaborationist activity: Theory and practice in terms of the Russian occupation of Ukrainian territory. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 7(3): 10–40.

60.

Rudakova

(2018) Civilian collaboration in occupied Ukraine and Crimea, 1941–1944: A study in motivation. In: Doctoral Thesis. Perth, Australia: The University of Western Australia.

61.

Rumer

(1994) Eurasia letter: Will Ukraine return to Russia? Foreign Policy (96): 129. DOI: 10.2307/1149221.

62.

Sawicki

Cyprian

(1946) Prawo polskie w walce z hitleryzmem i kolaboracjonizmem. DPP 11/12(listopad-grudzień): 18–19.

63.

Sayapin

(2018) International law on the use of force: Current challenges. In: Sadat

(ed) Seeking Accountability for the Unlawful Use of Force. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 277–281.

64.

Seemann

(2024) The Quislings. Cambridge University Press.

65.

Shaikan

Datsko

Ivaniuk

, et al. (2020) Collaborationism and war crimes as phenomena in the information society. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 129: 116–126.

66.

Shevel

(2016) The battle for historical memory in postrevolutionary Ukraine. Current History, 115(783): 258–263. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48614187.

67.

Shvets

(red) (2022) Kolaboratsiina diialnist: zahalni zasady kryminalno-pravovoi kvalifikatsii. Kharkiv: Pravo (in Ukrainian).

68.

Shymko

Babadzhanova

(2024) Exploring the motivations and personality traits of pro-Russian collaborationists in Ukraine. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology: 1–20. 10.1177/0306624X241240707.

69.

Snyder

(2017) On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Oxford, UK: Bodley Head.

70.

Sotsiolohichna hrupa «Reitynh» (23–26 hrudnia 2022 r.). (n.d.) Pravovyi zakhyst postrazhdalykh vid voiennykh zlochyniv Rosii. Available at: https://ratinggroup.ua/files/ratinggroup/reg_files/rg_ukraine_justice_022023.pdf (in Ukrainian).

71.

Struve

(2015) Deutsche Herrschaft, ukrainischer Nationalismus, antijüdische Gewalt. Der Sommer 1941 in der Westukraine, München.

72.

Tamm

(1989) The trial of collaborators in Denmark after the second world war. In: Takala

Tham

(eds) Crime and Control in Scandinavia During the Second World War. Oxford, UK: Norwegian University Press, 136–154.

73.

Ukrainske radio. (2023) Khto pratsiuvatyme v Krymu pislia deokupatsii y koho vvazhaty kolaborantom: vidpovidaie Tamila Tasheva. Available at: https://ukr.radio/schedule/play-archive.html?periodItemID=3449941 (in Ukrainian).

74.

U.S. Department of State. Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations. (n.d.) On the beginning and development of Russian aggression against Ukraine, see: Countering Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. Available at: https://dos-cso.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Cascade/index.html?appid=8dad6c865bed491ead3190c7ffb2fafe.

75.

Van Der

Geenen

(2015) Preventing terrorism in the courtroom–the criminalisation of preparatory acts of terrorism in The Netherlands. Security and Human Rights 26(2-4): 162–192.

76.

Van Sliedregt

(2009) European approaches to fighting terrorism. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law. 20: 413.

77.

Veljovski

Taneski

Dojchinovski

(2017) The danger of “hybrid warfare” from a sophisticated adversary: The Russian “hybridity” in the Ukrainian conflict. Defense & Security Analysis 33(4): 292–307.

78.

Venice Commission. (2015) Opinion no. 823/2015 ODIHR Opinion no. FOE-UKR/280/2015 Available at: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2015)041-e

79.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (Legislation of Ukraine). (n.d.) The criminal code of Ukraine. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14?lang=en#Text.

80.

Vračar

Ćurčić

(2018) The evolution of European perception of the term “hybrid warfare”. Vojno Delo 70(1): 5–21.

81.

Whitehall

(2020) The nadir of vital interests: Hannah arendt and the Franco-German armistice 1940. Leiden Journal of International Law 34: 23–44.

82.

Yaffa

(2023) The hunt for Russian collaborators in Ukraine. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/02/06/the-hunt-for-russian-collaborators-in-ukraine.

83.

Yak pratsiuie zakonodavstvo pro prytiahnennia do vidpovidalnosti za kolaboratsiinu diialnist? Discussion paper. (n.d.). Available at: https://justtalk.com.ua/post/yak-pratsyue-zakonodavstvo-pro-prityagnennya-do-vidpovidalnosti-za-kolaboratsijnu-diyalnist-discussion-paper (in Ukrainian).

84.

Zaitsev

(2020) Problemy kvalifikatsii derzhavnoi zrady na suchasnomu etapi. Visnyk Luhanskoho Derzhavnoho Universytetu Vnutrishnikh Sprav Imeni E. O. Didorenka 1(89): 79–89. in Ukrainian.

85.

Zaitsev

(2023) Collaborative activity as a type of treason (based on the materials of court practice from 2014 to 2022). Naukovyi Visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Pravo 2(78): 174–179. in Ukrainian.

86.

Zhyhlei

Legenchyk

Syvak

(2020) Hybrid war as a form of modern international conflicts and its influence on accounting development. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 11(1): 191–205.

Exploring criminalization and prosecution of wartime collaboration – The case of Ukraine

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References