Open prisons play a vital role in offender rehabilitation and resettlement but absconds, temporary release failures (TRFs) and re-offences have damaging implications for the legitimacy of these institutions. Identifying and mitigating the risk for such ‘failures’ is crucial. The present study examined predictors of failure in a sample of 316 adult male prisoners in two open prisons in England and Wales. Almost one-third (n = 100) of the sample failed in open conditions, the greatest proportion (n = 83, 26.3%) instigated by the prison to maintain security and good order (security recall). Yet, only seven re-offended in the year following custodial release. Absconds, custodial re-offences, and TRFs were rare events. Regression analysis identified five factors predicting security recall. Current behaviour, rather than static/historical risk factors, more reliably predicted such failures. Behavioural monitoring and systemic policy re-evaluation are proposed as way of mitigating failures in open prisons.
AlexanderJ (2006) Patients’ feelings about ward nursing regimes and involvement in rule construction. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing13(5): 543–553.
2.
AndrewsDABontaJWormithJS (2006) The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency52(1): 7–27.
3.
AtkinsonDFMannRE (2012) Prison officers as observers of offence paralleling behaviours: An untapped resource?The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology23(2): 139–155.
4.
AutyKMLieblingA (2020) Exploring the relationship between prison social climate and reoffending. Justice Quarterly37(2): 358–381.
5.
BarnettGDHowardFF (2018) What doesn’t work to reduce reoffending?European Psychologist23(2): 111–129.
6.
BarnettGDWakelingHCHowardPD (2010) An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and Wales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment22(4): 443–470.
7.
BeedonDK (2020) Hope deferred, humanity diminished: An ethnographic enquiry into the improvement of pastoral care offered to those serving an indeterminate sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) [Unpublished doctorate thesis]. University of Birmingham.
8.
BeijersbergenKADirkzwagerAJNieuwbeertaP (2016) Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter?Criminal Justice and Behaviour43(1): 63–82.
9.
Berman-RobertsE (2015) A qualitative investigation into the context, motivation and potential risk factors of prisoners who fail to return when Released on Temporary Licence (RoTL) in open conditions. Unpublished manuscript.
10.
BontaJLAndrewsDA (2017) The psychology of criminal conduct, 6th ed.New York: Routledge.
11.
BurtGNOlverMEWongSCP (2016) Investigating characteristics of the nonrecidivating psychopathic offender. Criminal Justice and Behaviour43(12): 1741–1760.
12.
BussDMCraikKH (1983) The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review90(2): 105–126.
13.
ChantL (2015) It’s time to go: exploring prison life of those who abscond. An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
CheliotisLK (2008) Reconsidering the effectiveness of temporary release: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behaviour13(3): 153–168.
15.
ClarkDAFisherMJMcDougallC (1993) A new methodology for assessing the level of risk in incarcerated offenders. The British Journal of Criminology33(3): 436–448.
16.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd ed.New Jersey: Erlbaum.
17.
CullenAEJewellATullyJ, et al. (2015) A prospective cohort study of absconsion incidents in forensic psychiatric settings: Can we identify those at high-risk?PloS one10(9): 1–16.
EisenbergMJvan HornJEDekkerJM, et al. (2019) Static and dynamic predictors of general and violent criminal offence recidivism in the forensic outpatient population: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behaviour46(5): 732–750.
20.
EmiraliAO'RourkeRFriendshipC (2020) Desistance from absconding: “You’ve got to have hope”. The Journal of Forensic Practice22(4): 223–234.
21.
Eno LoudenJSkeemJL (2013) How do probation officers assess and manage recidivism and violence risk for probationers with mental disorder? An experimental investigation. Law and Human Behaviour37(1): 22–34.
22.
FieldA (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edn.London: Sage Publications.
23.
FlowersC (2014) Understanding the experiences of prisoners who have been returned from open conditions to a closed prison: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
24.
GendreauPLittleTGogginC (1996) A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal34(4): 575–608.
25.
GoodleyGPearsonDMorrisP (2022) Predictors of recidivism following release from custody: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law28(7): 703–729.
26.
GreenBCarrollABrettA (2010) Structured risk assessment in community forensic mental health practice. Australasian Psychiatry18(6): 538–541.
27.
HarrellFEJrLeeKLMarkDB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine15(4): 361–387.
28.
HarrisMEdgarKWebsterR (2020) ‘I’m always walking on eggshells, and there’s no chance of me ever being free’: The mental health implications of imprisonment for public protection in the community and post-recall. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health30(6): 331–340.
29.
HeffernanRWegerhoffDWardT (2019) Dynamic risk factors: Conceptualization, measurement, and evidence. Aggression and Violent Behavior48: 6–16.
30.
HillierJMewsA (2018) The re-offending impact of increased release on temporary licence. London: Ministry of Justice.
31.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons (2014) Release on Temporary Licence (RoTL) failures.London: HMIP.
32.
HoALesneskiEHsuKH (2018) What we don’t know may hurt us: An examination of systematic bias in offender risk assessments. Deviant Behavior39(12): 1566–1577.
33.
Home Office (2006) Offender assessment system OASys user manual. London: Home Office.
34.
HosmerDWJrLemeshowSSturdivantRX (2013) Applied logistic regression. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
35.
HowardPDDixonL (2012) The construction and validation of the OASys violence predictor: Advancing violence risk assessment in the English and Welsh correctional services. Criminal Justice and Behaviour39(3): 287–307.
36.
HowardPDDixonL (2013) Identifying change in the likelihood of violent recidivism: Causal dynamic risk factors in the OASys violence predictor. Law and Human Behaviour37: 163–174.
KatsiyannisAWhitfordDKZhangD, et al. (2018) Adult recidivism in the United States: A meta-analysis 1994–2015. Journal of Child and Family Studies27(3): 686–696.
39.
LeBelTPBurnettRMarunaS, et al. (2008) The chicken and egg of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology5(2): 131–159.
40.
LipseyMWWilsonDB (1998) Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In: LoeberRFarringtonD (eds) Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 313–341.
41.
MartinKMcGeownMWhitehouseM, et al. (2018) Who’s going to leave? An examination of absconding events by forensic inpatients in a psychiatric hospital. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology29(5): 810–823.
42.
MastrobuoniGTerlizzeseD (2022) Leave the door open? Prison conditions and recidivism. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics14(4): 200–233.
43.
McDougallCPearsonDAWilloughbyH, et al. (2013) Evaluation of the ADViSOR project: Cross-situational behaviour monitoring of high-risk offenders in prison and the community. Legal and Criminological Psychology18(2): 205–228.
44.
McSweeneyTTurnbullPJBowlingB (2011) Fight or flight? Absconders, fugitives, and European law enforcement responses. London: Institute for Criminal Policy Research.
45.
MerolaM (2015) Young offenders’ experiences of an indeterminate sentence. The Journal of Forensic Practice17(1): 55–68.
46.
MewsA (2014) Analysis on the impact of absconding incident history as a predictor of future absconding incidents. London: Ministry of Justice.
47.
MezeyGDurkinCDodgeL, et al. (2015) Never ever? Characteristics, outcomes, and motivations of patients who abscond or escape: A 5-year review of escapes and absconds from two medium and low secure forensic units. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health25(5): 440–450.
48.
Ministry of Justice (2009) OGRS 3: The revised offender group reconviction scale. London: Ministry of Justice.
Ministry of Justice (2013a) Transforming rehabilitation: A summary of evidence on reducing reoffending. London: Ministry of Justice.
53.
Ministry of Justice (2013b) Analysis of the impact of employment on reoffending following release from custody, using Propensity Score Matching. London: Ministry of Justice.
54.
MischelWShodaY (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review102(2): 246–268.
55.
National Offender Management Service (2015a) Release on temporary licence: (PSI 13/2015; PI 10/2015). London: National Offender Management Service.
56.
National Offender Management Service (2015b) Enhanced behaviour monitoring: (PSI 24/2015; PI 16/2015). London: National Offender Management Service.
OstermannMHyattJMDeWittSE (2020) The influence of technical violation revocations on parole efficacy: Employing competing risks survival analysis to address methodological challenges. Journal of Criminal Justice43(3): 323–341.
59.
PapworthM (2015) An interpretative phenomenological analysis of prisoners’ experiences of absconding from an open prison. Unpublished manuscript.
60.
PearsonDAMcDougallC (2017) Serious offenders: Using evidence to predict and manage the risk. Behavioural Sciences & the Law35(3): 239–252.
61.
PicksleyL (2016) A qualitative investigation into the experiences of prisoners in an open prison who abscond or fail to return when released on temporary licence (ROTL). Unpublished manuscript.
62.
RobertsDLCoidJW (2010) Personality disorder and offending behaviour: Findings from the national survey of male prisoners in England and Wales. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology21(2): 221–237.
63.
SalgadoJF (2018) Transforming the area under the normal curve (AUC) into Cohen’s d, Pearson’s r pb, odds-ratio, and natural log odds-ratio: Two conversion tables. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context10(1): 35–47.
64.
SchaeferL (2016) On the reinforcing nature of crime and punishment: An exploration of inmates’ self-reported likelihood of reoffending. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation55(3): 168–194.
65.
SimpsonAIPenneySRFernaneS, et al. (2015) The impact of structured decision making on absconding by forensic psychiatric patients: Results from an AB design study. BMC Psychiatry15(1): 103–115.
66.
SkettSGoodeIBartonS (2017) A joint NHS and NOMS offender personality disorder pathway strategy: A perspective from 5 years of operation. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health27: 214–221.
67.
TylerNMilesHLKaradagB, et al. (2019) An updated picture of the mental health needs of male and female prisoners in the UK: Prevalence, comorbidity, and gender differences. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology54(9): 1143–1152.
68.
WeberRP (1990) Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
69.
WilkieTPenneySRFernaneS, et al. (2014) Characteristics and motivations of absconders from forensic mental health services: A case-control study. BMC Psychiatry14(1): 91–104.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
