This article examines how and why marketization of policing may occur in a historically state-centred policing context in the absence of governmental policy promoting privatization and marketization. In Sweden, a community-level marketization is increasingly becoming the new norm. It is a result of a political mobilization by the private security industry, characterized by an association of private security with the public interest in safety, an absence of national political decision-making, and pragmatic local initiatives to increase public safety, but it results in the dispersion of political decision-making that fails to ensure democratic governance of policing and security provision.
HajerM (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences36: 175–195.
8.
HermanssonK (2018) Den svenska tryggheten. En studie av en kriminalpolitisk symbol [Public safety in Sweden: A study of a crime policy symbol]. Sociologisk forskning55(2–3): 179–202.
9.
JonesTNewburnT (eds) (2006) Plural Policing: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
LarssonBLetellMThörnH (2012) Transformations of the Swedish Welfare State: From Social Engineering to Governance?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
LoaderIWalkerN (2006) Necessary virtues: The legitimate place of the state in the production of security. In: WoodJDupontB (eds) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–195.
ShearingC (2006) Reflections on the refusal to acknowledge private governments. In: WoodJDupontB (eds) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–32.
Svenska Dagbladet (2017) Låt vakter ta över en del av polisens job [Let private security officers take over some of the police’s work tasks]. Svenska Dagbladet, 28December. URL (accessed 5 October 2019): https://www.svd.se/lat-vakter-ta-over-en-del-av-polisens-jobb.
18.
Svenska Dagbladet (2018) Vakter måste ges verktyg att möta grovt våld [Guards must be given tools to deal with serious violence]. Svenska Dagbladet, 2January. URL (accessed 5 October 2019): https://www.svd.se/vakter-maste-ges-verktyg-att-mota-grovt-vald.
Swedish Government Official Investigations (1995) Trygghet mot brott – Rollfördelning och samverkan [Safe against Crime: Roles and Cooperation]. (Report No. SOU 1995:146). Stockholm: Fritzes.
22.
Swedish Government Official Investigations (2002) Polisverksamhet i förändring [Police operations in change]. (Report No. SOU 2002:70). Stockholm: Fritzes.
23.
Swedish Government Official Investigations (2015) Med fokus på kärnuppgifterna. En angelägen anpassning av Polismyndighetens uppgifter på djurområdet [Focusing on Core Tasks: An Urgent Adaption of the Police Authority’s Tasks in the Animal Area]. (Report No. SOU 2015:3). Stockholm: Fritzes.
Swedish Ministry of Justice (1996) Allas vårt ansvar. Ett nationellt brottsförebyggande program [Everyone’s Responsibility: A National Crime Prevention Programme]. Stockholm: Ministry of Justice.
26.
TerpstraJ (2017) Not just one node among many – plural policing in a state-dominated context: The case of Austria. Policing and Society27(1): 68–81.
27.
TerpstraJVan StokkomB (2015) Plural policing in comparative perspective: Four models of regulation. European Journal of Policing Studies2(3): 325–343.
28.
TerpstraJVan StokkomBSpreeuwersR (2013) Who Patrols the Streets? An International Comparative Study of Plural Policing. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
29.
ThelinK (2016) Med Polisen i Centrum – Varför Polisreformen Kommer att Slå Fel och Vad Vi Borde Göra Istället [With the Police in the Center – Why the Police Reform Will Fail and What We Should Do Instead]. Stockholm: Timbro.
WhiteA (2011) The new political economy of private security. Theoretical Criminology16(1): 85–101.
32.
WoodJDupontB (2006) Introduction: Understanding the governance of security. In: WoodJDupontB (eds) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–10.
