Although private security guards are a visible presence and come into contact with the general public, very little is known about citizens’ trust in and satisfaction with private security agents who act not only in the capacity of service providers but as agents of crime prevention. Given the rapid increase in the employment of security guards in Portugal in recent years, the goal of this study is to assess citizens’ level of trust in and satisfaction with private security agents in Portugal and whether factors such as citizens’ contact experience and their perceptions about the professionalism, imagery, civility and accountability of private security guards influence their confidence in them. Findings from a sample of 163 respondents from the city of Porto suggest that professionalism and accountability appear to be good predictors of citizens’ confidence as measured by trust in and satisfaction with private security guards.
BorduaDJTifftLL (1971) Citizen interviews, organizational feedback, and police-community relations decisions. Law and Society Review6(2): 155–182.
2.
BradfordBJacksonJStankoEA (2009) Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society19(1): 20–46.
3.
ButtonM (2007) Security Officers and Policing: Powers, Culture, and Control in the Governance of Private Space. Hampshire: Ashgate.
4.
CastroJAgraC (2007) Violence, leisure and actors. An empirical study in Porto. In: RecasensA (ed.) Violence between Young People in Night-time Leisure Zones. A European Comparative Study. Brussels: Vubpress, 115–139.
DeanD (1980) Citizen ratings of the police: The difference contact makes. Law and Policy2(4): 445–471.
9.
De WaardJ (1999) The private security industry in international perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research7(2): 143–174.
10.
EngelRS (2005) Citizens’ perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency42: 445–481.
11.
FrankJSmithBVNovakKJ (2005) Exploring the basis of citizens’ attitudes toward the police. Police Quarterly8: 206–228.
12.
HobbsDHadfieldPListerS. (2003) Bouncers: Violence and Governance in the Night-time Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
JacksonJBradfordB (2010) What is trust and confidence in police?Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice4(3): 241–248.
14.
JohnstonL (1992) The Rebirth of Private Policing. London: Routledge.
15.
LivingstoneKHartJ (2003) The wrong arm of the law? Public images of private security. Policing and Society13(2): 159–170.
16.
LöfstrandCH (2013) Private security policing by ‘ethnic matching’ in Swedish suburbs: Avoiding and managing accusations of ethnic discrimination. Policing and Society 25(2): 150–169.
17.
ManzoJ (2009) Security officers’ perceptions on training. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice51(3): 381–410.
18.
ManzoJ (2010) How private security officers perceive themselves relative to police. Security Journal23(3): 192–205.
19.
MarxGT (1987) The interweaving of public and private police in undercover work. In: ShearingCDStenningPC (eds) Private Policing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 172–193.
20.
NallaMKHerauxCG (2003) Assessing goals and functions of private security. Journal of Criminal Justice31: 237–247.
21.
NallaMHwangE (2004) Assessing professionalism, goals, images, and nature of private security in South Korea. Asian Policing2(1): 104–121.
22.
NallaMKLimSS (2003) Students’ perceptions of private police in Singapore. Asian Policing1(1): 27–47.
23.
NallaMNewmanG (1990) A Primer in Private Security. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.
24.
NallaMKMeskoGSotlarA. (2006) Professionalism, goals, and the nature of private police in Slovenia. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security8(3 and 4): 309–322.
25.
NallaMKOmmiKMurthyS (2013) Nature of work, safety, and trust in private security in India: A study of citizen perceptions of security guards. In: UnnithanNP (ed.) Crime and Justice in India. New Delhi: Sage, 226–243.
26.
National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1976) Private Security: Report of the Task Force on Private Security. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
27.
ReisigMDParksRB (2000) Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly17(3): 607–630.
28.
RegoliRMCrankJPCulbertsonRG (1989) The consequences of professionalism among police chiefs. Justice Quarterly6(1): 47–67.
29.
RigakosGS (2002) The New Parapolice: Risk Markets and Commodified Social Control. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
30.
RodriguesN (2011) A Segurança Privada em Portugal – Sistema e Tendências. Coimbra: Almedina.
31.
SarreR (1998) Accountability and the private sector: Putting accountability of private security under the spotlight. Security Journal10(2): 97–102.
32.
ShearingC (1992) The relation between public and private policing. In: TonryMMorrisN (eds) Crime and Justice. Vol. 15: Modern Policing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 399–434.
33.
ShearingCDStenningPC (1981) Modern private security: Its growth and implications. In: TonryMMorrisN (eds) Crime and Justice. Vol. 3: An Annual Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 193–245.
34.
ShearingCDStenningPC (1983) Private security: Implications for social control. Social Problems30(5): 493–506.
35.
ShearingCDStenningPCAddarioSM (1985) Public perceptions of private security. Canadian Police College Journal9(3): 225–253.
36.
SklanskyDA (2006) Private police and democracy. American Criminal Law Review43(1): 89–105.
37.
SkoganWG (2006) Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society16(2): 99–126.
38.
SkoganWG (2009) Concern about crime and confidence in the police: Reassurance or accountability?Police Quarterly12(3): 301–318.
39.
StenningPC (2000) Powers and accountability of private police. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research8(3): 325–352.
40.
SunshineJTylerTR (2003) The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review37(3): 555–589.
41.
ThibautJWalkerL (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
TylerTR (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
TylerTRHuoY (2002) Trust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage.
44.
Van StedenRDe WaardJ (2013) ‘Acting like chameleons’: On the McDonaldization of private security. Security Journal26(3): 294–309.
45.
Van StedenRNallaMK (2010) Citizen satisfaction with private security guards in the Netherlands: Perceptions of an ambiguous occupation. European Journal of Criminology7(3): 214–234.
46.
Van StedenRSarreR (2007) The growth of private security: Trends in the European Union. Security Journal20: 222–235.
47.
WakefieldA (2003) Selling Security: The Private Policing of Public Space. London: Willan.
