This study uses a combination of Danish administrative register and survey data on a representative sample aged 18–64 (N = 11,114) to investigate the importance of social bonds to a romantic partner. Results show that people with strong social bonds to their romantic partner offend significantly less than people with weak social bonds to their partner. The study finds no difference in offending between people with weak social bonds to their partner and people without a partner. Additionally, one result shows that strong social bonds matter less for the risk of offending if a person is aged over 30; however, this result is mainly suggestive.
AndersenSHAndersenLHSkovPE (2015) Effect of marriage and spousal criminality on recidivism. Journal of Marriage and Family77(2): 496–509.
2.
BersaniBFLaubJHNieuwbeertaP (2009) Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter?Journal of Quantitative Criminology25(1): 3–24.
3.
BloklandAAJNieuwbeertaP (2005) The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology43(4): 1203–1240.
4.
CapaldiDMKimHKOwenLD (2008) Romantic partner’s influence on men’s likelihood of arrest in early adulthood. Criminology46(2): 267–299.
5.
CobbinaJEHuebnerBMBergMT (2012) Men, women, and post-release offending: An examination of the nature of the link between relational ties and recidivism. Crime and Delinquency58(3): 331–361.
6.
CraigJFosterH (2013) Desistance in the transition to adulthood: The roles of marriage, military, and gender. Deviant Behavior34: 208–223.
7.
ForrestW (2014) Cohabitation, relationship quality, and desistance from crime. Journal of Marriage and Family76: 539–556.
8.
GardnerMSteinbergL (2005) Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology41(4): 625–635.
9.
GiordanoPCCernkovichSARudolphJL (2002) Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology107(4): 990–1064.
10.
HirschiT (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
HorneyJOsgoodDWMarshallIH (1995) Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review60(5): 655–673.
12.
KingRDMassogliaMMacMillanR (2007) The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology45(1): 33–65.
13.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (1993) Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology31(3): 301–325.
14.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
LaubJHNaginDSSampsonRJ (1998) Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review63(2): 225–238.
16.
LeverentzAM (2006) The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support and hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency43(4): 459–488.
17.
LyngstadTHSkardhamarT (2013) Understanding the marriage effect: Changes in criminal offending around the time of marriage. Gemass Working Paper No. 2.
18.
MonsbakkenCWLyngstadTHSkardhamarT (2012) Crime and the transition to marriage: The roles of gender and partner’s criminal involvement. Discussion Papers No. 678, Statistics Norway.
19.
Rhule-LouieDMMcMahonRJ (2007) Problem behavior and romantic relationships: Assortative mating, behavior contagion, and desistance. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review10(1): 53–100.
20.
SampsonRJLaubJH (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points though Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
SampsonRJLaubJHWimerC (2006) Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology44(3): 465–508.
22.
SavolainenJ (2009) Work, family and criminal desistance: Adult social bonds in a Nordic welfare state. British Journal of Criminology49: 285–304.
23.
SchellenMVApelRNieuwbeertaP (2012) ‘Because you are mine, I walk the line’? Marriage, spousal criminality, and criminal offending over the life course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology28: 701–723.
24.
SiennickSEStaffJOsgoodDWSchulenbergJEBachmanJGVanEseltineM (2014) Partnership transitions and antisocial behavior in young adulthood: A within-person, multi-cohort analysis. Journal in Research in Crime and Delinquency51(6): 735–758.
25.
SimonsRLStewartEGordonLCCongerRDElderGH (2002) A test of the life-course explanation for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology40(2): 401–430.
26.
TheobaldDFarringtonDP (2009) Effects of getting married on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males. European Journal of Criminology6(6): 496–516.
27.
WarrM (1998) Life-course transitions and desistance form crime. Criminology36(2): 183–216.
28.
WoodwardLJFergussonDMHorwoodLJ (2002) Deviant partner involvement and offending risk in early adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry43(2): 177–190.
29.
WyseJJBHardingDJMorenhoffJD (2014) Romantic relationships and criminal desistance: Pathways and processes. Sociological Forum29(2): 365–385.
30.
Zoutewelle-TerovanMVGeestVVDLiefbroerACBijleveldC (2014a) Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behavior for men and women. Crime and Delinquency60(8): 1209–1234.
31.
Zoutewelle-TerovanMVGeestVVDBijleveldCLiefbroerAC (2014b) Associations in criminal behavior for married males and females at high risk of offending. European Journal of Criminology11(3): 340–360.
