In this presidential address I reflect on the theme of the 2015 annual European Society of Criminology meeting by addressing and discussing the issue of the overwhelming number of crime causation theories in criminology, as well as providing a brief assessment of their quality. The discipline possesses a mixture of hundreds of perspectives, definitions, ideas, sketches, multiple factors, theories and single hypotheses that are partly true and partly untrue, and none are completely true or untrue. It will be argued that, among other factors, criminologists in fact apply hardly any rule to distinguish between true and untrue theories. I sketch the evolution of the discipline and some of its features that led to the current state of affairs. With these issues in mind I raise the question of whether this situation is good or bad for criminology. A future challenge for the discipline will be a stronger commitment by criminological researchers to design more epistemological and methodological studies to limit further proliferation of criminological theories and improve their quality. To reach that reduction, three strategies will be discussed.
AgnewR (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology30: 47–87.
2.
AgnewR (2006) Pressured into Crime. An Overview of General Strain Theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
3.
AgnewR (2011) Toward a Unified Criminology. Integrating Assumptions about Crime, People, and Society. New York & London: New York University Press.
4.
AgnewR (2014) Social control and crime: Moving beyond the assumption of simple self-interest. Criminology52: 1–32.
5.
AgnewR (2016) A theory of crime resistance and susceptibility. Criminology54: 181–211.
6.
AkersRL (2009) Social Learning and Social Structure. A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
AkersRLJensenGF (eds) (2003) Social Learning Theory and the Explanation of Crime: A Guide for the New Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
BeckerH (1963) Outsiders. Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press.
10.
BeckerGS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy76: 169–217.
11.
BeirneP (1987) Adolphe Quételet and the origins of positivist criminology. American Journal of Sociology92: 1140–1169.
12.
BernardTJ (1990) Twenty years of testing theories: What have we learned and why. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency27: 325–347.
13.
BernardTJSnipesJB (1996) Theoretical integration in criminology. In: TonryM (ed.) A Review of Research. Vol 20. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 301–348.
14.
BernardTJSnipesJBGerouldAL (2010) Vold’s Theoretical Criminology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
BierstedtR (1978) Sociological thought in the eighteenth century. In: BottomoreTNisbetR (eds) A History of Sociological Analysis. London: Heineman, 3–38.
16.
BlalockHMJ (1979) Measurement and conceptualization problems: The major obstacle of integrating theory and research (the Presidential Address). American Sociological Review44: 881–894.
17.
BruinsmaGJN (1992) Differential association theory reconsidered: An extension and its empirical test. Journal of Quantitative Criminology8: 29–50.
18.
BruinsmaGJN (2014a) Assessing the differential association theory. In: BruinsmaGJNWeisburdD (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer, 4845–4852.
19.
BruinsmaGJN (2014b) Fragmentation and schools in European criminology. A plea for more mutual communication and debateNewsletter of the European Society of Criminology13: 2–3.
20.
BruinsmaGJN (2014c) History of criminological theories: Causes of crime. In: BruinsmaGJNWeisburdD (eds) The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer, 2137–2148.
21.
BruinsmaGJN (2015) Epistemological questions in criminology we cannot ignore. Newsletter of the European Society of Criminology14: 2–4.
22.
BruinsmaGJN (2016, in press) The emergence of deterrence theory in the age of enlightenment. In: CullenFTNaginDSCohenCL (eds) Deterrence, Choice, and Crime: Contemporary Perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ, & London: Transaction Publishers.
23.
BruinsmaGJNWeisburdD (2014a) History of geographic criminology I: The 19th century. In: BruinsmaGJNWeisburdD (eds) The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer, 2159–2163.
24.
BruinsmaGJNWeisburdD (eds) (2014b) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10 Volumes. New York: Springer.
25.
BurkheadMD (2006) The Search for the Causes of Crime. A History of the Theory in Criminology. Jefferson & London: McFarland.
26.
ColeS (1975) The growth of scientific knowledge. Theories of deviance as a case study. In: CoserLA (ed.) The Idea of Social Structure. Papers in the Honor of Robert Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace, 175–220.
27.
CornishDBClarkeRV (eds) (1986) The Reasoning Criminal. Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28.
CullenFT (2011) Beyond adolescence-limited criminology: Choosing our future – the American Society of Criminology 2010 Sutherland Address. Criminology49: 287–330.
29.
CullenFTMessnerSF (2007) The making of criminology revisited. An oral history of merton’s anomie paradigm. Theoretical Criminology11: 5–37.
30.
CullenFTWilcoxP (eds) (2010) Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, & London: Sage.
31.
CullenFTWilcoxP (eds) (2013) Oxford Handbook of Criminological Theory. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
De FleurMJQuinneyR (1966) A reformulation of Sutherland’s differential association theory and a strategy for empirical verification. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency3: 1–22.
33.
DooleyBD (2010) Whither criminology? On the state of criminology’s paradigm. Dissertation, St. Louis.
34.
DucpétiauxE (1827) De la justice de prévoyance, et particulierement de l’influence de la misere et de l’aisance, de l’ignorance et de l’instruction sur le nombre des crimes. Brussels: J.J. de Cautaerts.
35.
DurkheimE (1964 [1893]) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.
36.
ElliottDS (1985) The assumption that theories can be combined with increased explanatory power: Theoretical integrations. In: MeierRF (ed.) Theoretical Methods in Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 123–149.
FletcherJ (1848) Moral and educational statistics of England and Wales. Journal of Statistical Society of London11: 344–366.
39.
GoffCGeisG (2008) The Michael–Adler Report (1933): Criminology under the microscope. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences44: 350–363.
40.
GottfredsonMRHirschiT (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
GuerryA-M (1832) La statistique comparée de l’etat de l’instruction et du nombre des crimes. Revue Encyclopédique55: 414–424.
42.
HeathcoteF (2003 [1980]) Social disorganisation theories. In: FitzgeraldMMcLennanGPawsonJ (eds) Crime and Society. Readings in History and Theory. London: Routledge, 341–370.
43.
HedströmP (2005) Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
HendersonCR (1914) The Cause and Cure of Crime. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co.
KernerH-J (1998) The global growth of criminology. Annales Internationales de Criminologie36: 27–42.
47.
KlimaR (1971) Theorienpluralismus in der soziologie. In: DiemerA (ed.) Der Methoden- en Theoriepluralismus in den Wissenschaften. Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain, 198–219.
48.
LakatosI (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: LakatosIMusgraveA (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–196.
49.
LaubJH (2006) Edwin Hardin Sutherland and the Michael–Adler Report: Searching for the soul of criminology seventy years later. Criminology44: 235–258.
50.
LemertEM (1967) Human Deviance, Social Problems and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
LombrosoC (2006 [1878]) Criminal Man (translated and with a new introduction by GibsonMHan RafterN). Durham, NC, & London: Duke University Press.
53.
MarshI (2004) Criminal Justice. An Introduction to Philosophies, Theories and Practice. London & New York: Routledge.
54.
MeadGH (1974 [1934]) Mind, Self & Society from a Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist.Vol. 1 (ed. and with an introduction by MorrisCW), 19th edn.Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
55.
MertonRK (1938) Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review3: 672–682.
56.
MessnerSFKrohnMDLiskaAE (eds) (1989) Theoretical Integration in the Study of Crime and Deviance: Problems and Prospects. New York: State University of New York Press.
57.
MichaelJAdlerMJ (1933) Crime, Law and Social Science. New York: Harcourt Brace.
58.
NyeFI (1958) Family Relationships and Delinquent Behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.
59.
OppK-D (1974) Abweichendes Verhalten und Gesellschaftsstruktur. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
60.
OppK-D (2002) Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Einführung in Probleme ihrer Theoriebildung und praktischen Anwendung, 5., überarbeitete Auflage ed. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
61.
OppK-D (2005) Explanations by mechanisms in the social sciences. Problems, advantages and alternatives. Mind & Society4: 163–178.
62.
ParsonsT (1950) The prospects of sociological theory. Presidential Address of the American Sociological Society December 1949. American Sociological Review15: 3–16.
63.
PearsonFSWeinerNA (1985) Toward an integration of criminological theories. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology76: 116–150.
64.
PhillipsonC (1970 [1923]) Three Criminal Law Reformers. Beccaria, Bentham, Romilly. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
65.
PiqueroAR (ed.) (2015) The Handbook of Criminological Theory. Chicester: Wiley & Sons.
66.
PopperKR (1974) Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 4th edn.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
67.
PopperKR (1975) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 8th edn.London: Hutchinson.
68.
PrattTCCullenFT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology38: 931–964.
69.
PrattTC. (2010) The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly27: 765–802.
70.
QuételetA (1984 [1831]) Research on the Propensity for Crime at Different Ages (translated and with an introduction by SylvesterSF). Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.
71.
RawsonRW (1839) An inquiry into the statistics of crime in England and Wales. Journal of the Statistical Society of London2: 316–344.
72.
RecklessWC (1940) Criminal Behavior. New York & London: McGraw-Hill.
73.
RecklessWC (1961) The Crime Problem, 3rd edn.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
74.
ReissJr AJ (1951) Delinquency as the failure of personal and social controls. American Sociological Review16: 196–207.
75.
RossEA (1918 [1901]) Social Order: A Survey of the Foundations of Order. New York & London: Macmillan.
76.
SampsonRJ (2012) Great American City. Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
77.
SampsonRJGrovesWB (1989) Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology94: 774–802.
78.
SullivanCJMcGloinJM (2014) Looking back to move forward: Some thoughts on measuring crime and delinquency over the past 50 years. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51: 445–466.
79.
SutherlandEH (1947) Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
80.
ThomasWI (1966) On Social Organization and Social Personality. Selected Papers (ed. and with an introduction by JanovitzM). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
81.
ThornberryTP (2012) Criminological theory: Past achievements and future challenges. In: LoeberRWelshBC (eds) The Future of Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press, 46–54.
82.
TittleCR (1995) Control Balance. Toward a General Theory of Deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
83.
TobyJ (1957) Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science48: 12–17.
84.
WeisburdD (2015) The 2014 Sutherland Address: The law of crime concentrations and the criminology of place. Criminology53: 133–157.
85.
WeisburdD. (2016) Place Matters: Criminology for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86.
WeisburdDPiqueroAR (2008) How well do criminologists explain crime? Statistical modelling in published studies. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice. A Review of Research. Vol. 37. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 453–502.
87.
WikströmP-OH (2006) Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In WikströmP-OHSampsonRJ (eds) The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms, and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–107.
88.
WikströmP-OHTreiberK (2007) The role of self-control in crime causation: Beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. European Journal of Criminology4: 237–264.
89.
WolfgangMEFiglioRMThornberryTP (1978) Evaluating Criminology. New York: Elsevier.
