Do people comply with the law because they fear the consequences? Guided by the theoretical framework of Situational Action Theory we argue that most people abide by the law not because they fear the consequences but because they do not perceive crime as an ‘action alternative’. We propose that the potential influence of threats of punishment on people’s law abidance is specific to those who regularly are motivated and consider committing acts of crime. Using data from the Peterborough Adolescent and Young Adult Development Study (PADS+) we empirically explore the relationships between crime propensity, deterrence perceptions and crime involvement for four specific types of crime: shoplifting, theft from cars, vandalism and assault. The findings support the notion that the influence of deterrence perceptions on an individual’s crime involvement is dependent on his or her crime propensity. Moreover, and crucially, results suggest that deterrence perceptions are largely irrelevant for those who lack a propensity to commit acts of crime (or specific acts of crime).
Andenaes J. ( 1974) Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
2.
Beccaria C. ( 1972) On crimes and punishment. New York : Macmillan.
3.
Bentham J. ( 1970) An introduction of the principles of morals and legislation (ed. HLA Hart). London: Methuen .
4.
Gottfredson M. and Hirschi T. ( 1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Horney J. and Marshall LH ( 1992) Risk perceptions among serious offenders. The role of crime and punishment. Criminology30: 575-594.
6.
Kroneberg C., Heintze I. and Mehlkop G. ( 2010) The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation. Criminology48: 259-294.
7.
McCullagh P. and Nelder JA ( 1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. New York: Chapman & Hall.
8.
Nagin DS ( 1998) Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice. An Annual Review of Research23.
9.
Nagin DS and Paternoster R. ( 1993) Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review27: 467-496.
10.
Nagin DS and Paternoster R. ( 1994) Personal capital and social control. The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology32: 581-603.
11.
Nagin DS and Pogarsky G. ( 2003) An experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology41: 167-193.
12.
Paternoster R. ( 1987) The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly4: 173-217.
13.
Piquero AR and Tibbetts SG ( 1996) Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision-making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly13: 481-510.
14.
Pratt TC, Cullen FT, Blevins KR, Daigle LE and Madensen TD ( 2006) The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis . In: Cullen FT, Wright JP and Blevins KR (eds) Taking stock: The status of criminological theory . Advances in Criminological Theory15. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction .
15.
Sampson R., Raudenbush S. and Earls F. ( 1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277(5328): 918-924.
16.
Von Hirsch A., Bottoms AE, Burney E. and Wikström P-OH ( 1999) Criminal Deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
17.
Wang P., Cockburn IM and Puterman ML ( 1998) Analysis of patent data: A mixed Poisson regression model approach. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics16: 27-36.
18.
Wikström P-OH ( 2004) Crime as alternative. Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In: McCord J (ed.) Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory13. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
19.
Wikström P-OH ( 2005) The social origins of pathways in crime: Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes . In: Farrington DP (ed.) Integrated developmental and life course theories of offending. Advances in Criminological Theory14. New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction.
20.
Wikström P-OH ( 2006) Individuals, settings and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In: Wikström P-OH and Sampson RJ (eds) The explanation of crime: Contexts, mechanisms and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Wikström P-OH ( 2007) Deterrence and deterrence experiences: Preventing crime to the threat of punishment. In: Shoham SG (ed.) International comparative handbook of penology and criminal justice. Oxford. Taylor & Francis.
22.
Wikström P-OH ( 2010) Explaining crime as moral action. In: Hitlin S and Vaysey S (eds) Handbook of the sociology of morality. New York : Springer Verlag.
23.
Wikström P-OH ( 2011) Does everything matter? Addressing the problem of causation and explanation in the study of crime. In: McGloin JM, Sullivan CJ and Kennedy LW (eds) When crime appears: The role of emergence. London: Routledge .
24.
Wikström P-OH and Sampson RJ ( 2003) Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In: Lahey BB , Moffitt TE and Caspi A (eds) Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency . New York: Guilford Press.
25.
Wikström P-OH and Butterworth D. ( 2006) Adolescent crime: Individual differences and lifestyles . Cullompton: Willan Publishing .
26.
Wikström P-OH and Treiber K. ( 2007) The role of self-control in crime causation: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. European Journal of Criminology4.
27.
Wikström P-OH and Treiber K. ( 2009) What drives persistent offending: The neglected and unexplored role of the social environment. In: Savage J (ed.) The development of persistent criminality . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
28.
Wikström P-OH, Oberwittler D., Treiber K. and Hardie B. ( 2011) Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Wright BRE, Caspi A., Moffitt T. and Paternoster R. ( 2004) Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency41: 180-213.
30.
Zimring FE and Hawkins GJ ( 1973) Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
