Several studies on burglary concern the psychological impact on victims of burglary. However, little research exists on changes in behavior with regard to burglary experiences. The present analysis focuses on choice behavior after a burglary by differentiating moving and safety precaution behavior as well as passivity. Here, a sample of N = 1329 victims of burglary from five big cities in Germany is used. The main findings indicate that psychological strain, age, housing condition, household income, social cohesion, and social disorganization are relevant predictors of choice behavior after a burglary. As such, different cost and benefit aspects will be considered as explanations for behavioral reactions.
BaierDRaboldSBartschTPfeifferC (2012) Viktimisierungserfahrungen in der Bevölkerung. Wohnungseinbruchsdiebstahl und Körperverletzungen im Vergleich/Teil 2: Befunde des KFN-Viktimsurvey 2011 [Victimization experiences in the public. Burglary and personal injury in comparison/Part 2: Findings of the KFN-Victim Survey 2011]. Kriminalistik66(12): 730–738.
2.
BeatonACookMKavanaghMHerringtonC (2000) The psychological impact of burglary. Psychology, Crime & Law6(1): 33–43.
3.
ColemanJS (1991) Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie [Foundations of Social Theory]. Munich: Oldenbourg.
4.
DeegenerG (1996) Psychische Folgeschäden nach Wohnungseinbruch. Erfahrungen von Opfern nach Einbruchdiebstahl und Raubüberfall [Psychological Impacts of Burglary. Experiences of Victims of Burglary and Robbery]. Mainz: Weisser Ring Verlag.
5.
DreißigackerABaierDWollingerGRBartschT (2015) Die Täter des Wohnungseinbruchs: Sind es die ‘Osteuropäer’, die ‘professionellen Banden’ oder die ‘Drogenabhängigen’? [The burglary offenders: Are they ‘East Europeans’, ‘professional gangs’, or ‘drug addicts’?]. Kriminalistik69(5): 307–311.
6.
DuganL (1999) The effect of criminal victimization on a household’s moving decision. Criminology37(4): 903–930.
7.
FernauSHellmannDF (2014) Sexueller Missbrauch Minderjähriger durch katholische Geistliche in Deutschland [Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Clergy in Germany]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
8.
GreenbergMSRubackRB (1992) After the Crime: Victim Decision Making. New York: Plenum Press.
9.
HarthASchellerG (2012) Das Wohnerlebnis in Deutschland. Eine Wiederholungsstudie nach 20 Jahren [Experience of Home Living in Germany. A Replication Study after 20 Years]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
10.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
KaslSVHarburgE (1972) Perceptions of the neighborhood and the desire to move out. Journal of the American Institute of Planners38(5): 318–324.
12.
KecskesR (1994) Abwanderung, Widerspruch, Passivität. Oder: Wer zieht wann um? [Exit, voice, loyalty. Or: Who is moving when?]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie23(2): 129–144.
13.
McNeeleySStutzenbergerA (2013) Victimization, risk perception, and the desire to move. Victims & Offenders8(4): 446–464.
14.
MaguireM (1980) The impact of burglary upon victims. British Journal of Criminology20(3): 261–275.
15.
MietheTDMcDowallD (1993) Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Social Forces71(3): 741–759.
16.
MuthénLKMuthénBO (2010) Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
17.
ReuleckeJ (1997) Die Mobilisierung der ‘Kräfte und Kapitale’: Der Wandel der Lebensverhältnisse im Gefolge von Industrialisierung und Verstädterung. In: ReuleckeJ (ed.) Geschichte des Wohnens: 1800–1918. Das bürgerliche Zeitalter [History of Living. The Bourgeois Era]. Stuttgart: DVA, 15–144.
18.
SampsonRJGrovesWB (1989) Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganizational theory. American Journal of Sociology94(4): 774–802.
19.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSWEarlsF (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277(5328): 918–924.
20.
Schubert-LustigS (2011) Wohnungseinbruch – Folgen für die Betroffenen [Burglary – Impacts on victims]. Polizei und Wissenschaft15(3): 9–22.
21.
ShawCMcKayHH (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
SkoganWG (1990) Disorder and Decline. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
WardJTNoblesMRYoustinTJCookCL (2014) Placing the neighborhood accessibility–burglary link in social-structural context. Crime & Delinquency60(5): 739–763.
24.
Wilcox RountreePLandKC (1996) Burglary victimization, perceptions of crime risk, and routine activities: A multilevel analysis across Seattle neighborhoods and census tracts. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency33(2): 147–180.
25.
WollingerGRDreißigackerABlauertKBartschTBaierD (2014) Wohnungseinbruch: Tat und Folgen. Ergebnisse einer Betroffenenbefragung in fünf Großstädten [Burglary: Offense and Consequences. Findings of a Victim Survey in Five Big Cities]. Hannover, Germany: Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony. URL (accessed 19 July 2016): http://www.kfn.de//wp-content/uploads/Forschungsberichte/FB_124.pdf.
26.
XieMMcDowallD (2008) Escaping crime: The effects of direct and indirect victimization on moving. Criminology46(4): 809–884.
