To examine whether, and if so how, male-based theories of desistance also apply to female offenders, this article reviews 44 studies on female desistance. Where available, gender differences in desistance are considered. Having children and supportive relationships is found to be important for females, in addition to economic independence, the absence of drugs and individual agency. Gender differences are found for the influence of children, supportive relationships, employment and the absence of criminal peers. This review shows that male-based theories of desistance seem applicable to females as well. Furthermore, results underscore the importance of considering how individual and social factors interact during the process of desistance. Implications for future research and for strategies for promoting desistance are discussed.
*BakkenNW (2009) Making it on the outside: Gender differences in the desistance process among drug involved offenders. PhD thesis, University of Delaware, USA.
2.
*BarryM (2010) Youth transitions: From offending to desistance. Journal of Youth Studies13: 121–136. DOI: 10.1080/13676260903233712
3.
*BendaBB (2005) Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology49: 325–342. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X04271194
4.
BelknapJ (1996) The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
5.
BergmanLRAndershedAK (2009) Predictors and outcomes of persistent or age-limited registered criminal behavior: A 30-year longitudinal study of a Swedish urban population. Aggressive Behavior35(2): 164–178. URL (accessed 8 July 2015): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19177554.
6.
*BersaniBELaubJHNieuwbeertaP (2009) Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter?Journal of Quantitative Criminology25(1): 3–24. doi 10.1007/s10940-008-9056-4.
7.
BlockRCBloklandAAJVan der WerffCVan OsRNieuwbeertaP (2010) Long-term patterns of offending in women. Feminist Criminology5(1): 73–107. DOI: 10.1177/1557085109356520.
8.
BloklandAAJNieuwbeertaP (2005) The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology43(4): 1203–1240. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00037.x.
9.
*BroidyLMCauffmanEE (2006) Understanding the Female Offender. Report NCJ 216615, National Institute of Justice, USA, December.
10.
*BuiHNMorashM (2010) The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women’s success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation49(1): 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/10509670903435381.
11.
CarmichaelSGoverARKoons-WittBInabnitB (2005) The successful completion of probation and parole among female offenders. Women and Criminal Justice17(1): 75–97. DOI: 10.1300/J012v17n01_04.
12.
*CobbinaJE (2009) From prison to home: Women’s pathways in and out of crime. PhD thesis, University of Missouri, USA.
13.
*CobbinaJE (2010) Reintegration success and failure: Factors impacting reintegration among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation49(3): 210–232. DOI: 10.1080/10509671003666602.
*CraigJFosterH (2013) Desistance in the transition to adulthood: The roles of marriage, military, and gender. Deviant Behavior34: 208–223. DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2012.726173.
16.
*De LiSMacKenzieDL (2003) The gendered effects of adult social bonds on the criminal activities of probationers. Criminal Justice Review28: 278–298. DOI: 10.1177/073401680302800205.
*DohertyEEEnsmingerME (2013) Marriage and offending among a cohort of disadvantaged African Americans. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50: 1–28. DOI: 10.1177/0022427811423106.
19.
FarrallSSharpeGHunterBCalverleyA (2011) Theorizing structural and individual-level processes in desistance and persistence: Outlining an integrated perspective. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology44: 218–234. DOI: 10.1177/0004865811405136.
20.
FarringtonDP (2007) Advancing knowledge about desistance. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice23: 125–134. DOI: 10.1177/1043986206298954.
21.
FarringtonDPWikströmPOH (1994) Criminal careers in London and Stockholm: A cross-national comparative study. In: WeitekampEGMKernerHJ (eds) Cross-national Longitudinal Research on Human Development and Criminal Behavior. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 65–89.
22.
*ForrestW (2007) Adult family relationships and desistance from crime. PhD thesis, Florida State University, USA.
23.
*GiordanoPCCernkovichSAHollandDD (2003) Changes in friendship relations over the life course: Implications for desistance from crime. Criminology41(2): 293–328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00989.x.
24.
*GiordanoPCCernkovichSARudolphJ (2002) Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology107: 990–1064. DOI: 10.1086/343191.
25.
*GiordanoPCLongmoreMASchroederRDSeffrinPM (2008) A life-course perspective on spirituality and desistance from crime. Criminology46(1): 99–132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00104.x.
26.
*GiordanoPCSchroederRDCernkovichSA (2007) Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-Meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology112(6): 1603–1661. DOI: 10.1086/512710.
27.
*GiordanoPCSeffrinPMManningWDLongmoreMA (2011) Parenthood and crime: The role of wantedness, relationships with partners, and SES. Journal of Criminal Justice39(5): 405–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.006.
28.
GottfredsonMHirschiT (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
GrahamJBowlingB (1995) Young People and Crime. London: Home Office.
30.
*GriffinMLArmstrongGS (2003) The effect of local life circumstances on female probationers’ offending. Justice Quarterly20: 213–239. DOI: 10.1080/07418820300095511.
31.
*GunnisonEK (2001) Understanding female desistance from crime: Exploring theoretical and empirical relationships. PhD thesis, University of Cincinnati, USA.
32.
HaynieDLDooganNJSollerB (2014) Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology52(4): 688–722. DOI: 10.1080/07418820300095511.
33.
*HerreraVMWiersmaJDClevelandHH (2010) Romantic partners’ contribution to the continuity of male and female delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence21(3): 608–618. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00693.x.
34.
*HuebnerBMDeJongCCobbinaJE (2010) Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly27: 225–254. DOI: 10.1080/07418820902870486.
35.
*JamiesonJMcIvorGMurrayC (1999) Understanding Offending among Young People. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.
36.
KazemianL (2007) Desistance from crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice23(1): 5–27. DOI: 10.1177/1043986206298940.
37.
*KingRDMassogliaMMacMillanR (2007) The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology45(1): 33–65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00071.x.
38.
*KreagerDAMatsuedaRLEroshevaEA (2010) Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology48(1): 221–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00184.x.
39.
KurlychekMCBushwaySDBrameR (2012) Long-term crime desistance and recidivism patters – Evidence from the Essex County convicted felon study. Criminology50(1): 71–103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00259.x.
40.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (2001) Understanding desistance from crime. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–69.
41.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
42.
LaubJHNaginDSSampsonRJ (1998) Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review63: 225–238. URL (accessed 8 July 2015): http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657324.
43.
LeBelTPBurnettRMarunaSBushwayS (2008) The chicken and egg of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology5: 131–159. DOI: 10.1177/1477370807087640.
*LeverentzAM (2006b) The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency43: 459–488. DOI: 10.1177/0022427806293323.
46.
LiJDelvecchioEMiconiDSalcuniSDi RisoD (2014) Parental attachment among Chinese, Italian, and Costa Rican adolescents: A cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences71: 118–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.036
47.
LoeberRLeBlancM (1990) Toward a developmental criminology. In: MorrisNTonryM (eds) Crime and Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 375–473.
*MakariosMSteinerBTravisLF (2010) Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior37: 1377–1390. DOI: 10.1177/0093854810382876.
50.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
51.
*MichalsenV (2011) Mothering as a life course transition: Do women go straight for their children?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation50(6): 349–366. DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2011.589887.
52.
*MichalsenV (2013) A cell of one’s own? Incarceration and other turning points in women’s journeys to desistance. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X13498211.
*MonsbakkenCWLyngstadTHSkardhamarT (2013) Crime and the transition to parenthood: The role of sex and relationship context. British Journal of Criminology53: 129–148. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azs052.
55.
O’BrienP (2001) Making It in the Free World: Women in Transition from Prison. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
PearsonJCChildJT (2007) A cross-cultural comparison of parental and peer attachment styles among adult children from the United States, Puerto Rico, and India. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research36(1): 15–32. DOI: 10.1080/17475750701265258.
58.
*PelissierBMMCampSDGaesGGSaylorWGRhodesW (2003) Gender differences in outcomes from prison-based residential treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment24(2): 149–160. DOI: 10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00353-7.
59.
PiqueroAR (2004) Somewhere between persistence and desistance: The intermittency of criminal careers. In: ImmarigeonRMarunaS (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 102–125.
60.
Price-WolfJ (2014) Social support, collective efficacy, and child physical abuse: Does parent gender matter?Child Maltreatment. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/1077559514562606.
61.
*RobbinsCAMartinSSSurrattHL (2009) Substance abuse treatment, anticipated maternal roles, and reentry success of drug-involved women prisoners. Crime & Delinquency55: 388–411. DOI: 10.1177/0011128707306688.
62.
SampsonRJLaubJH (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
63.
SampsonRJLaubJHWimerC (2006) Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology4: 465–508. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00055.x.
64.
*SchramPJKoons-WittBAWilliamsFPMcShaneMD (2006) Supervision strategies and approaches for female parolees: Examining the link between unmet needs and parolee outcome. Crime & Delinquency52: 450–471. DOI: 10.1177/0011128705281845.
65.
SeltzerJA (2000) Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 1247–1268. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01247.x.
66.
SiennickSEOsgoodDW (2008) A review of research on the impact on crime of transitions to adult roles. In: LibermanAM (ed.) The Long View of Crime: A Synthesis of Longitudinal Research. New York: Springer, 161–187.
67.
*SimonsRLBarrAB (2012) Shifting perspectives: Cognitive changes mediate the impact of romantic relationships on desistance from crime. Justice Quarterly. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2012.704388.
68.
*SimonsRLStewartEGordonLCCongerRDElderGH (2002) A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology40: 401–434. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00961.x.
*SommersIBaskinDRFaganJ (1994) Getting out of the life: Crime desistance by female street offenders. Deviant Behaviour15: 125–149. DOI: 10.1080/01639625.1994.9967964.
71.
SpjeldnesSGoodkindS (2009) Gender differences and offender reentry: A review of the literature. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation48: 314–335. DOI: 10.1080/10509670902850812.
72.
*TaylorA (2008) Substance use and abuse. Affilia23(2): 167–178. DOI: 10.1177/0886109908314328.
73.
*TrotterCMcIvorGSheehanR (2012) The effectiveness of support and rehabilitation services for women offenders. Australian Social Work65: 6–20. DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2011.641985.
74.
*UggenCKruttschnittC (1998) Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review32(2): 339–366. DOI: 10.2307/827766.
75.
*Van SchellenMApelRNieuwbeertaP (2012) ‘Because you’re mine, I walk the line’? Marriage, spousal criminality, and criminal offending over the life course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology28: 701–723. DOI: 10.1007/s10940-012-9174-x.
76.
*VerbruggenJBloklandAAJVan der GeestVR (2012) Effects of employment and unemployment on serious offending in a high-risk sample of men and women from ages 18 to 32 in the Netherlands. British Journal of Criminology52(5): 845–869. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azs023.
77.
*Zoutewelle-TerovanMVVan der GeestVRLiefbroerACBijleveldCCJH (2012) Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behavior for men and women. Crime & Delinquency. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/|0011128712441745.
78.
*ZurholdHMoskalewiczJSanclementeCSchmiedGShewanDVertheinU (2011) What affects reintegration of female drug users after prison release? Results of a European follow-up study. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation50(2): 49–65. DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2011.546221.
