This study explores how gang membership transitions among adolescents are related to changes with regard to peers, conventional social bonds and problem behaviour. The data come from two longitudinal studies, one conducted in the United States (the Rochester Youth Development Study) and one in the Netherlands (the NSCR School Study). In both countries, gang membership appears to be relatively short-lived, with one year as the modal length of gang membership. Also, in both countries, the results show a consistent pattern in which joining a gang is related to an increasing exposure to negative peer influences, a weakening of conventional bonds and increasing levels of delinquency and substance use. Leaving a gang is associated with the opposite pattern of change.
AkersRL (1998) Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
2.
AndersonE (1990) Street Wise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BallRACurryGD (1995) The logic of definition in criminology: Purposes and methods for defining ‘gangs’. Criminology33: 225–245.
4.
BattinSRHillKGAbbottRD (1998) The contribution of gang membership beyond delinquent friends. Criminology36: 93–115.
5.
BendixenMEndresenIMOlweusD (2006) Joining and leaving gangs: Selection and facilitation effects on self-reported antisocial behaviour in early adolescence. European Journal of Criminology3: 85–114.
6.
BloklandANieuwbeertaP (eds) (2006) Developmental and Life Course Studies in Delinquency and Crime: A Review of Contemporary Dutch Research. The Hague: Boom Legal Publishers.
7.
DanneferD (1984). Adult development and social theory: A paradigmatic appraisal. American Sociological Review49:100–116.
8.
DeckerSHLauritsenJ (2002) Leaving the gang. In: HuffCR (ed.) Gangs in America (3rd edition). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DeckerSHVan WinkleB (1996) Life in the Gang. Family, Friends, and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DeckerSHWeermanFM (2005) European Street Gangs and Troublesome Youth Groups. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
11.
ElderGH (1994) Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly57: 4–15.
12.
EsbensenF-AHuizingaD (1993) Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology31: 565–589.
13.
EsbensenF-AWeermanFM (2005) A cross-national comparison of youth gangs and troublesome youth groups in the United States and the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminology2: 5–37.
14.
EsbensenF-AWinfreeLTJrHeNTaylorTJ (2001) Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang and why does it matter?Crime and Delinquency47: 105–130.
15.
FarringtonDP (ed.) (2005) Integrated Developmental and Life-Course Theories of Offending (Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 14). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
16.
GattiUHaymozSSchadeeHMA (2011) Deviant youth groups in 30 countries: Results from the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study. International Criminal Justice Review21: 208–224.
17.
GattiUTremblayREVitaroFMcDuffP (2005) Youth gangs, delinquency, and drug use: A test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypotheses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry46: 1178–1190.
18.
GordonRALaheyBBKawaiELoeberRStouthamer-LoeberMFarringtonDP (2004) Antisocial behaviour and youth gang membership: Selection and socialization. Criminology42: 55–87.
19.
HaymozSMaxsonCKilliasM (2014) Street gang participation in Europe: A comparison of correlates. European Journal of Criminology11(6): 659–681.
20.
HillKGHawkinsJDCatalanoRFKostermanRAbbottRD (1996) The longitudinal dynamics of gang membership and problem behavior. Paper presented at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.
21.
HirschiT (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
HuizingaDElliottDS (1986) Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology2: 293–327.
23.
HuizingaDSchumannKF (2001) Gang membership in Bremen and Denver: Comparative longitudinal data. In: KleinMWKernerH-JMaxsonCLWeitekampEGM (eds) The Eurogang Paradox: Street Gangs and Youth Groups in the U.S. and Europe. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
24.
KleinMW (1995) The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
KleinMW (2009) The Street Gangs of Euroburg. A Story of Research. New York: iUniverse.
26.
KleinMWMaxsonCL (2006) Street Gang Patterns and Policies. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
KleinMWWeermanFMThornberryTP (2006) Street gang violence in Europe. European Journal of Criminology3: 413–437.
28.
KrohnMDThornberryTP (1999) Retention of minority populations in panel studies of drug use. Drugs & Society14: 185–207.
29.
KrohnMDThornberryTP (2008) Longitudinal perspectives on adolescent street gangs. In: LibermanAM (ed.) The Long View of Crime: A Synthesis of Longitudinal Research. New York: Springer, 128–160.
30.
KrohnMDWardJTThornberryTPLizotteAJChuR (2011) The cascading effects of adolescent gang involvement across the life course. Criminology49: 991–1028.
31.
MatsudaKEsbensenF-ACarsonDC (2012) Putting the ‘gang’ in ‘Eurogang’: Characteristics of delinquent youth groups by different definitional approaches. In: EsbensenF-AMaxsonCL (eds) Youth Gangs in International Perspective: Results from the Eurogang Program of Research. New York: Springer, 271–287.
32.
MatsudaKMeldeCTaylorTJFrengAEsbensenF-A (2013) Gang membership and adherence to the ‘code of the streets’. Justice Quarterly30: 440–468.
33.
MedinaAriza JJCebullaAAldridgeJShuteJRossA (2014) Proximal adolescent outcomes of gang membership in England and Wales. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51: 168–199.
34.
MeldeCEsbensenF-A (2011) Gang membership as a turning point in the life course. Criminology49: 513–552.
35.
MeldeCEsbensenF-A (2014) The relative impact of gang status transitions: Identifying the mechanisms of change in delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(3): 349–376.
36.
NaCPaternosterR (2012) Can self-control change substantially over time? Rethinking the relationship between self-and social control. Criminology50: 427–462.
PyroozDC (2014) From colors and guns to caps and gowns? The effects of gang membership on educational attainment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51: 56–87.
39.
PyroozDDeckerS (2011) Motives and methods for leaving the gang: Understanding the process of gang desistance. Journal of Criminal Justice39: 417–425.
40.
PyroozDCDeckerSHWebbVJ (2014) The ties that bind: Desistance from gangs. Crime and Delinquency60: 491–516.
41.
PyroozDCSweetenGPiqueroAR (2013) Continuity and change in gang membership and gang embeddedness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50: 272–299.
42.
SampsonRJLaubJH (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
SharpCAldridgeJMedinaJ (2006) Delinquent Youth Groups and Offending Behaviour: Findings from the 2004 Offending, Crime and Justice Survey. London: Home Office.
44.
SweetenGPyroozDCPiqueroAR (2013) Disengaging from gangs and desistance from crime. Justice Quarterly30: 469–500.
45.
ThornberryTP (1987) Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology25: 863–892.
46.
ThornberryTPKrohnMD (2005) Applying interactional theory to the explanation of continuity and change in antisocial behaviour. In: FarringtonDP (ed.) Integrated Developmental and Life-Course Theories of Offending. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 183–210.
47.
ThornberryTPKrohnMDLizotteAJChard-WierschemD (1993) The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behaviour. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30: 55–87.
48.
ThornberryTPKrohnMDLizotteAJSmithCATobinK (2003) Gangs and Delinquency in Developmental Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Van GemertFPetersonDLienI-L (2008) Street Gangs, Migration and Ethnicity. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
50.
WassermanSFaustK(1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WeermanFMBijleveldCCJH (2007) Birds of different feathers: School networks of serious delinquent, minor delinquent and non-delinquent boys and girls. European Journal of Criminology4: 357–383.
52.
WeermanFMHarlandPVan der LaanPH (2007) Misbehaviour at school and delinquency elsewhere: A complex relationship. Criminal Justice Review32: 358–379.
53.
WeermanFMMaxsonCEsbensenF-AAldridgeJVan GemertFMedinaJ (2009) Eurogang Program Manual: Background, development, and use of the Eurogang tools in multi-site, multi-method comparative research. URL (accessed 6 June 2014): http://www.umsl.edu/ccj/Eurogang/EurogangManual.pdf.
54.
YoungJTNBarnesJCMeldrumRCWeermanFM (2011) Assessing and explaining misperceptions of peer delinquency. Criminology49: 599–630.
55.
YoungJTNRebellonCJBarnesJCWeermanFM (2014) Unpacking the black box of ‘how peers matter’ using the integrative model of personal influence. Criminology52: 60–86.
