This study aims to examine the association between drug law enforcement and rates of serious violence. A police crackdown on a large and stable cannabis market in Copenhagen disrupted established hierarchies among criminal groups and spurred renewed competition. In the five-year period after the crackdown in 2004 there were more homicides and attempted homicides in Denmark than in any five-year period for the previous 20 years. In the Copenhagen region we found 19 shootings that had a connection to known cannabis sellers or cannabis-selling locations. No such episodes were known prior to the crackdown. We estimate a fixed-effects (within) regression model for all Danish municipalities for the period 2000–9 (N = 2110, 269 groups). We find that there has been a significant relationship (p = .001) between drug arrests and charges for serious violence the following year, after correcting for demographic and social covariates found to be correlated with violence.
AndreasPWallmanJ (2009) Illicit markets and violence: What is the relationship?Crime, Law and Social Change52(3): 225–229.
3.
BaumerE (1994) Poverty, crack and crime: A cross-city analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency31(3): 311–327.
4.
BaumerELauritsenJRosenfeldRWrightR (1998) The influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary, and homicide rates. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency35(3): 316–240.
5.
BeckerG (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy76(2): 169–217.
6.
BeckerGGrossmanMMurphyK (2001) The simple economics of the war on drugs. Mimeo, University of Chicago Department of Economics.
7.
BensonBLLeburnISRasmussenDW (2001) The impact of drug enforcement on crime: An investigation of the opportunity cost of police resources. Journal of Drug Issues31(4): 989–1006.
8.
BensonBLRasmussenDWKimI (1998) Deterrence and public policy: Trade-offs in the allocation of police resources. International Review of Law and Economics18(1): 77–100.
9.
BlumsteinA (1995) Youth, Violence, Guns, and Illicit Drug Markets. National Institute of Justice Research Preview. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
10.
BlumsteinARivaraFPRosenfeldR (2000) The rise and decline of homicide – and why. Annual Review of Public Health21: 505–541.
11.
BrownsteinHTaylorB (2007) Measuring stability of illicit drug markets: Why does it matter?Drug and Alcohol Dependence90(1): 52–60
12.
BrownsteinHCrimminsSSpuntB (2000) A conceptual framework for operationalizing the relationship between violence and drug market stability. Contemporary Drug Problems27: 867–890.
13.
BrownsteinHBaxiHGoldsteinPRyanP (1992) The relationship of drugs, drug trafficking, and drug traffickers to homicide. Journal of Crime and Justice15(1): 25–44.
14.
BrummHJCloningerDO (1995) The drug war and the homicide rate: A direct correlation?Cato Journal14(3): 509–518.
15.
CohenJCorkDEngbergJTitaG (1998) The role of drug markets and gangs in local homicide rates. Homicide Studies2(3): 241–262.
16.
CoomberRMaherL (2006) Street-level drug market activity in Sydney’s primary heroin markets: Organization, adulteration practices, pricing, marketing and violence. Journal of Drug Issues36(3): 719–754.
17.
Copenhagen Police (2005) Virksomhedsberetning [Annual Report]. Copenhagen: Københavns Politi.
18.
DornNMurjiKSouthN (1992) Traffickers: Drug Markets and Law Enforcement. London: Routledge.
19.
DürrT (2004) Endelig analyse af den samlede mængde [Final analysis of aggregate amount]. Copenhagen Police (unpublished).
20.
EckJ (1995) A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces. In: EckJWeisburdD (eds) Crime and Place. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 67–93.
21.
EckJGershJ (2000) Drug trafficking as a cottage industry. In: NatarajanMHoughM (eds) Illegal Drug Markets: From Research to Prevention Policy. Crime Prevention Studies series, Vol. 11. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 241–271.
22.
FajnzylberPLedermanDLoayzaN (2002) Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics45(1): 1–40.
23.
FriedmanM (1991) The war we are losing. In: KraussMBLazearEP (eds) Searching for Alternatives: Drug-Control Policy in the United States. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 53–67.
24.
GoldsteinP (1985) The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues15(4): 143–174.
25.
GoldsteinPBrownsteinHHRyanP (1992) Drug-related homicide in New York: 1984 and 1988. Crime & Delinquency38(4): 459–476.
26.
GoldsteinPBrownsteinHHRyanPBellucciPA (1989) Crack and homicide in New York City, 1988: A conceptually based event analysis. Contemporary Drug Problems16(4): 651–687.
27.
GolubAJohnsonBDunlapE (2005) Subcultural evolution and illicit drug use. Addiction Research and Theory13(3): 217–229.
28.
HansenH-B (2003) Notat om den politimæssige indsats på Christiania [Memorandum on Policing in Christiania]. Copenhagen: Københavns Politi.
29.
HarcourtBELudwigJ (2007) Reefer madness: Broken windows policing and misdemeanor marijuana arrests in New York City, 1989–2000. Criminology and Public Policy6(1): 165–181.
30.
HoeyerT (1999) Den store nordiske rockerkrig [The Great Nordic Biker-War]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
31.
InciardiJ (1990) The crack violence connection within a population of hard-core adolescent offenders. In: Drugs and Violence: Causes, Correlates, and Consequences. Monograph Series 103. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse Research, 92–111.
32.
KilmerBPaculaR (2009) Estimating the size of the global drug market – A demand side approach. In: ReuterPTrautmannF (eds) A Report on Global Illicit Drug Markets 1998–2007. Brussels: European Commission.
33.
KleimanMR (1989) Marijuana – Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control. New York: Greenwood Press.
34.
KleimanMR (1997) The problem of replacement and the logic of drug enforcement. Drug Policy Analysis Bulletin3: 8–10.
35.
KuziemkoILevittSD (2004) An empirical analysis of imprisoning drug offenders. Journal of Public Economics88(9–10): 2043–2066.
36.
KyvsgaardB (2004) Youth justice in Denmark. Crime and Justice31: 349–390.
37.
LandKMcCallPCohenL (1990) Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space?American Journal of Sociology95(4): 922–963.
38.
LattimorePKTrudeauJRileyJLeiterJEdwardsS (1997) Homicide in Eight U.S. Cities: Trends, Context, and Policy Implications. NCJ 167262. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
39.
LevittSD (1998) Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: Deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error?Economic Inquiry36(3): 353–372.
40.
McCallPParkerKMacDonaldJ (2008) The dynamic relationship between homicide rates and social, economic, and political factors from 1970 to 2000. Social Science Research37(3): 721–735.
41.
MacCounRKilmerBReuterP (2003) Drugs and Crime Linkages. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Special Report.
42.
MertonR (1938) Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review3: 672–682.
43.
MironJA (1999) Violence and the U.S. prohibitions of drugs and alcohol. American Law and Economics Review1(1): 78–114.
44.
MironJA (2001) Violence, guns, and drugs: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Law and Economics44(2): 615–633.
45.
MoellerK (2009) Police crackdown on Christiania in Copenhagen. Crime, Law and Social Change52(4): 337–346.
46.
MoellerK (2010) Policy displacement and disparate sanctioning from policing cannabis in Denmark. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention11(2): 135–150.
47.
MoellerK (2012) Costs and revenues in street-level cannabis dealing. Trends in Organized Crime15(1): 31–46.
48.
National Police (2009) Statusrapport for 2008 om kriminalitet forøvet af rockere og bander [Status Report for 2008 on Crime Committed by Bikers and Gangs]. Copenhagen: Rigspolitiet.
49.
OuseyGCLeeMR (2002) Examining the conditional nature of the illicit drug market–homicide relationship: A partial test of the theory of contingent causation. Criminology40(1): 73–102.
50.
PapachristosA (2009) Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide in Chicago. American Journal of Sociology115(1): 74–128.
51.
PedersenMLLindstadJM (2012) The Danish Gang-Joining Project: Methodological issues and preliminary results. In EsbensenF-AMaxsonCL (eds) Youth Gangs in International Perspective: Results from the Eurogang Program of Research. New York: Springer.
52.
RasmussenDWBensonBL (1994) The Economic Anatomy of a Drug War: Criminal Justice in the Commons. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
53.
RasmussenDWBensonBLSollarsDL (1993) Spatial competition in illicit drug markets: The consequences of increased drug law enforcement. Review of Regional Studies23: 219–236.
54.
ReuterP (1983) Disorganized Crime – The Economics of the Visible Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
ReuterP (2009) Systemic violence in drug markets. Crime, Law and Social Change52(3): 275–284.
56.
ShawCMcKayH (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
ShepardEMBlackleyPR (2005) Drug enforcement and crime: Recent evidence from New York State. Social Science Quarterly86(2): 323–342.
58.
ShepardEMBlackleyPR (2007) The impact of marijuana law enforcement in an economic model of crime. Journal of Drug Issues37(2): 403–424.
Statistics Denmark (2008) Indvandrere i Danmark [Immigrants in Denmark 2008]. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark.
61.
StevensABewley-TaylorD (2009) Drug Markets and Urban Violence: Can Tackling One Reduce the Other? Rep. No. 15. Oxford: The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme.
62.
StortiCGrauweP (2008) Modelling disorganized crime: The cannabis market. Bulletin on Narcotics: Measurement Issues in Drug Policy Analysis, Vol. LX. Vienna: UNODC, 79–100.
63.
ThygesenK (2004) Generel rapport Christiania [General Report on Christiania]. Copenhagen: Københavns Politi.
64.
WerbARowellGGuyattGKerrTMontanerJWoodE (2011) Effect of drug law enforcement on drug market violence: A systematic review. International Journal of Drug Policy11(2).
65.
YoungJ (1999) The Exclusive Society. London: Sage.
66.
ZimringFEHawkinsG (1997) Crime Is Not the Problem: Lethal Violence in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
