The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of coffee shop availability on the prevalence and intensity of cannabis use, as well as the effectiveness of the ‘separation of markets’ policy. A convenience sample of nightlife visitors and a sub-selection of previous year cannabis users were used for analyses on cannabis and hard drugs use. Logistic regression analyses showed that coffee shop proximity does not seem to be linked to prevalence of cannabis use or intensity of use. In addition, proximity of coffee shops does not seem to be linked directly to hard drugs use.
AbbottMWVolbergRA (2000) Taking the Pulse on Gambling and Problem Gambling in New Zealand. A Report on Phase One of the 1999 National Prevalence Survey. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Internal Affairs.
2.
AbrahamMDKaalHLCohenPDA (2002) Licit and Illicit Drug Use in the Netherlands, 2001. Amsterdam: CEDRO/Mets.
3.
AkersR (1984) Delinquent behaviour, drugs and alcohol: What is the relationship?Today’s Delinquent3: 19–47.
4.
BaumeisterSETossmannP (2005) Association between early onset of cigarette, alcohol and cannabis use and later drug use patterns: An analysis of a survey in European metropolises. European Addiction Research11(2): 92–98.
5.
BenschopAHarrisonLDKorfDJEricksonPG (2006) Different concepts of ethnicity in a cross-Atlantic study of violence and drug use among deviant youth. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research12(1): 61–78.
6.
BernascoWBlockR (2011) Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48(1): 33–57.
7.
BielemanBNijkampR (2010) Coffeeshops in Nederland: Aantallen coffeeshops en gemeentelijk beleid 1999–2009. Groningen: Intraval.
8.
BlonigenDM (2010) Explaining the relationship between age and crime: Contributions from the developmental literature on personality. Clinical Psychology Review., Electronic; 30(1), 89–100.
9.
BroekhuizenJRavenJDriessenFMHM (2006) Handhaving en Naleving van de Coffeeshopregels in 2004. Utrecht: Bureau Driessen.
10.
ChuangY (2005) Effects of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and convenience store concentration on individual level smoking. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Electronic59(7): 568–573.
11.
CohenLCVilaBJ (1996) Self-control and social control: An exposition of the Gottfredson-Hirchi/Sampson-Laum Debate. Studies on Crime & Crime Prevention. Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention5(2): 125–151.
12.
CohenLEFelsonM (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44(4): 588–608.
13.
CohenPDAKaalHL (2001) The Irrelevance of Drug Policy: The Patterns and Careers of Experienced Cannabis Use in the Populations of Amsterdam, San Fransisco and Bremen. Amsterdam: CEDRO/UVA.
14.
CornishDClarkeR (1986) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer.
15.
EricksonPGButtersJEKorfDJHarrisonLDCousineauM (2006) Weapons and violence among male delinquents: An international comparative study. International Annals of Criminology44(1/2): 125–151.
16.
FelsonM (2006) Crime and Nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
GersteinDRMurphySVolbergRAToceMTHarwoodHPalmerA. (1999) Gambling Impact and Behavior Study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
18.
HenriksenLFeigheryECWangYFortmannSP (2004) Association of retail tobacco marketing with adolescent smoking. American Journal of Public Health94(12): 2081–2083.
19.
KorfDJ (2002) Dutch coffee shops and trends in cannabis use. Addictive Behaviors27: 851–866.
20.
KorfDJNabbenTBenschopA (2003) Antenne 2002. Trends in Alcohol, Tabak en Drugs bij Jonge Amsterdammers. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.
21.
LeatherdaleSTStrathJM (2007) Tobacco retailer density surrounding schools and cigarette access behaviors among underage smoking students. Annals of Behavioral Medicine33(1): 105–111.
22.
LovatoCY (2007) The impact of school smoking policies and student perceptions of enforcement on school smoking prevalence and location of smoking. Health Education Research, Electronic22(6): 782–793.
23.
LynskeyMT (2003) Escalation of drug use in early-onset cannabis users vs co-twin controls. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association289(4): 427–433.
24.
LynskeyMTVinkJMBoomsmaDI (2006) Early onset cannabis use and progression to other drug use in a sample of Dutch twins. Behavior Genetics36(2): 195–200.
25.
MacCounRReuterP (1997) Interpreting Dutch cannabis policy: Reasoning by analogy in the legalization debate. Science278: 47–52.
26.
MacCounRReuterP (2001) Evaluating alternative cannabis regimes. British Journal of Psychiatry178: 123–128.
27.
MonshouwerKVan DorsselaerSGorterAVerdurmenJVolleberghW (2004) Jeugd en Riskant Gedrag. Kerngegevens uit het Peilstationsonderzoek 2003. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut.
28.
MonshouwerKSmitFDe GraafRVan OsJVolleberghW (2005) First cannabis use: Does onset shift to younger ages? Findings from 1988 to 2003 from the Dutch National School Survey on Substance Use. Addiction100(7): 963–970.
29.
MorselliCRoyerM (2008) Criminal mobility and criminal achievement. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency45(1): 4–21.
30.
PokornySBJasonLASchoenyME (2003) The relation of retail tobacco availability to initiation and continued smoking. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology32(2): 193–204.
31.
PopovaSGiesbrechtNBekmuradovDPatraJ (2009) Hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets: Impacts on alcohol consumption and damage: A systematic review. Alcohol & Alcoholism44(5): 500–516.
32.
ReinarmanCCohenP (2007) Lineaments of cannabis culture: Rules regulating use in Amsterdam and San Francisco. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice10(4): 393–410.
33.
ReubandKH (1995) Drug use and drug policy in Western Europe: Epidemiological findings in a comparative perspective. European Addiction Research11(1–2): 32–41.
34.
RoomRTurnerNEIalomiteanuA (1999) Community effects of the opening of the Niagara casino. Addiction94: 1449–1466.
35.
SévignySLadouceurRJacquesCCantinottiM (2008) Links between casino proximity and gambling participation, expenditure, and pathology. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors22(2): 295–301.
36.
SifaneckSJReamGLJohnsonBDDunlapE (2007) Retail marijuana purchases in designer and commercial markets in New York City: Sales units, weights, and prices per gram. Drug & Alcohol Dependence90Suppl 1: S40.
37.
SnookB (2004) Individual differences in distance travelled by serial burglars. Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling1(1): 53–66.
38.
StevensonC (2008) Cannabis supply in Northern Ireland. Perspectives from users. In: KorfDJDecorteTFountainJKrausLMoskalewiczJ (eds) Cannabis in Europe: Dynamics in Perception, Policy and Markets. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers, 124–136.
39.
Van DaeleSBekenTV (2011) Outbound offending: The journey to crime and crime sprees. Journal of Environmental Psychology31(1): 70–78.
40.
Van der PoelADoekhieJVerdurmenJWoutersMKorfDJVan LaarM (2010) Feestmeter 2008–2009. Uitgaan en middelengebruik onder bezoekers van party’s en clubs. Utrecht: Trimbos-Instituut.
41.
Van EttenMLNeumarkYDAnthonyJC (1997) Initial opportunity to use marijuana and the transition to first use: United States, 1979–1994. Drug and Alcohol Dependence49: 1–7.
42.
Van LaarMVan Ooyen-HoubenM (eds) (2009) Evaluatie van het Nederlandse drugsbeleid. Utrecht and The Hague: Trimbos-Instituut and WODC.
43.
Van RooijAJSchoenmakersTMVandeMheenD (2011) Nationaal Prevalentie Onderzoek Middelengebruik 2009: De kerncijfers. Rotterdam: IVO.
44.
WerseB (2008) Retail markets for cannabis-users, sharers, go-betweens and stash dealers. In: KorfDJDecorteTFountainJKrausLMoskalewiczJ (eds) Cannabis in Europe: Dynamics in Perception, Policy and Markets. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publisher, 106–123.
45.
WestJHBlumbergEJKelleyNJHillLSipanCLSchmitzKERyanSClappJDHovellMF (2010) Does proximity to retailers influence alcohol and tobacco use among Latino adolescents?Journal of Immigrant Minority Health12: 626–633.
46.
WoutersMKorfDJ (2009) Access to licensed cannabis supply and the separation of markets policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Drug Issues39(3): 627–651.
