Public opinion has been studied as an important influence in criminal policy and legislation. Different ways of measuring public preferences have been proposed. The aim of this study is to compare attitudes toward sex offenders when assessed through surveys and deliberative polls. An experimental design was used, with treatment and control groups and multiple observations. The results of the multivariate analyses show that the attitudes measured through deliberative polls are less punitive and more stable over time. The implications of this study for future research and the potential of deliberative polling in informing criminal policy are discussed.
BrownS (2008) Attitudes towards sexual offenders and their rehabilitation: a special case? In: WoodJGannonT (eds) Public Opinion and Criminal Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
ChurchWTWakemanEEMillerSLClementsCBSunF (2008) The Community Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders Scale: the development of a psychometric assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice18: 251–259.
4.
Conejo TovarMMora GonzálezJA (2008) Percepciones sociales de los centros penitenciarios y de las penas de prisión. Boletín criminológico, No. 105.
5.
Díez RipollésJL (2004) El nuevo modelo penal de la seguridad ciudadana. Revista electrónica de ciencia penal y criminología06-03. URL: http://criminet.ugr.es/recpc.
6.
FishkinJS (1995) The Voice of the People. New York: Vail-Baillou Press.
7.
FishkinJSLuskinRCJowellR (2000) Deliberative polling and public consultation. Parliamentary Affairs53: 657–666.
8.
FreibergA (2003) The four pillars of justice: a review essay. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology36(2): 223–230.
9.
GrayJM (2008) What shapes public opinion of the criminal justice system? In: WoodJGannonT (eds) Public Opinion and Criminal Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan, 49–72.
10.
GreenDA (2006) Public opinion versus public judgment about crime: Correcting the ‘comedy of errors’. British Journal of Criminology46: 131–154.
11.
HansonRKGordonAHarrisAJRMarquesJKMurphyWQuinseyVLSetoMC (2002) First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment14: 169–194.
12.
HoughMParkA (2002) How malleable are attitudes to crime and punishment? Findings from a British deliberative poll. In: RobertsJVHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 163–183.
13.
HowittD (1998) Crime, the Media and the Law. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
IndermaurDHoughM (2002) Strategies for changing public attitudes to punishment. In: RobertsJHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion around the Globe. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 198–214.
15.
JorbaL (2009) Deliberación y preferencias ciudadanas: un enfoque empírico. La experiencia de Córdoba. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
16.
Larrauri PijoanE (2009) La economía política del castigo. Revista electrónica de ciencia penal y criminología11-06. URL: http://criminet.ugr.es/recpc.
17.
MarteacheNMartínezMPérezM (2010) Comparación entre opinión pública y ‘opinión pública meditada’ en relación a la delincuencia sexual. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica8. URL (accessed 20 September 2011): http://www.criminologia.net/pdf/reic/an08-2010/a82010art7.pdf.
18.
MaxfieldMGBabbieE (2009) Basics of Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
19.
Medina-ArizaJ (2006) Politics of crime in Spain, 1978–2004. Punishment & Society8(2): 183–201.
20.
Mirrlees-BlackC (2001) Confidence in the Criminal Justice System. Findings from the 2000 British Crime Survey. Research Findings 137. London: Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.
SimonJ (2007) Governing Through Crime. How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
VaronaD (2008) Ciudadanos y actitudes punitivas: un estudio piloto de población universitaria española. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica6. URL (accessed 20 September 2011): http://www.criminologia.net/pdf/reic/an06–2008/a62008art1.pdf.
28.
WelchMPriceEAYankeyN (2002) Moral panic over youth violence: Wilding and the manufacture of menace in the media. Youth & Society34: 3–30.
29.
WoodJ (2008) Why public opinion of the criminal justice system is important. In: WoodJGannonT (eds) Public Opinion and Criminal Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 49–72.
30.
WoodJGannonT (2008) Public Opinion and Criminal Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
31.
YankelovichD (1991) Coming to Public Judgement: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
32.
ZgobaKM (2004) Spin doctors and moral crusaders: the moral panic behind child safety legislation. Criminal Justice Studies17(4): 385–404.
