This article investigates father and offspring criminal careers by employing the semi-parametric, group-based trajectories methodology. The findings demonstrate that children of sporadic and chronic offenders have significantly more convictions than children of non-offenders. However, contrary to expectations based on taxonomic and intergenerational theories, chronic offending fathers do not have more chronic offending children than sporadic fathers. The results demonstrate strong intergenerational transmission of criminal behaviour, but it is the fathers having a conviction rather than their conviction trajectory that is related to offspring convictions.
AnanthCVPlattRWSavitzDA (2005) Regression models for clustered binary responses: Implications of ignoring the intracluster correlation in an analysis of perinatal mortality in twin gestations. Annals of Epidemiology15: 293–301.
2.
BanduraA (1973) Aggression: a Social Learning Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BanduraA (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BesemerS (2011) Intergenerational transmission of criminal behaviour: Conviction trajectories of fathers and their children. Paper presented at the 16th World Congress – International Society of Criminology, Kobe, Japan.
5.
BijleveldCCJH (2005) Delinquency over five generations. Paper presented at the Institute of Criminology Cambridge Lecture Series, 20 October.
6.
BijleveldCCJHWijkmanM (2009) Intergenerational continuity in convictions: a five-generation study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health19: 142–155.
7.
BloklandAAJNaginDSNieuwbeertaP (2005) Life span offending trajectories of a Dutch conviction cohort. Criminology43: 919–954.
8.
BursikRJ (1980) The dynamics of specialization in juvenile offenses. Social Forces58: 851–864.
9.
BushwaySDThornberryTPKrohnMD (2003) Desistance as a developmental process: a comparison of static and dynamic approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology19: 129–153.
10.
D’UngerAVLandKCMcCallPLNaginDS (1998) How many latent classes of delinquent/ criminal careers? Results from mixed Poisson regression analyses. American Journal of Sociology103: 1593–1630.
11.
EgglestonEPLaubJHSampsonRJ (2004) Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology20: 1–26.
12.
FarringtonDP (1995) The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry36: 929–964.
13.
FarringtonDP (1999) A criminological research agenda for the next millennium. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology43: 154–167.
14.
FarringtonDP (2003) Key results from the first forty years of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. In: ThornberryTPKrohnMD (eds) Taking Stock of Delinquency: an Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies. New York: Kluwer, 137–183.
15.
FarringtonDP (2011) Families and crime. In: WilsonJQPetersiliaJ (eds) Crime and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 130–157.
16.
FarringtonDPWelshBC (2007) Saving Children from a Life of Crime. Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
FarringtonDPWestDJ (1990) The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development: a long-term follow-up of 411 London males. In: KernerH-JKaiserG (eds) Kriminalitat: Personlichkeit, Lebensgeschichte und Verhalten [Criminality: Personality, Life History and Criminal Behaviour]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 115–138.
18.
FarringtonDPBarnesGCLambertS (1996) The concentration of offending in families. Legal and Criminological Psychology1: 47–63.
19.
FarringtonDPCoidJWWestDJ (2009) The development of offending from age 8 to age 50: Recent findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Monatsschrift fur Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform [Journal of Criminology and Penal Reform]92: 160–173.
20.
FarringtonDPCoidJWHarnettLJolliffeDSoteriouNTurnerR. (2006) Criminal Careers up to Age 50 and Life Success up to Age 48: New Findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Home Office Research Study No. 299. London: Home Office.
21.
FarringtonDPJolliffeDLoeberRStouthamer-LoeberMKalbLM (2001) The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys’ delinquency. Journal of Adolescence24: 579–596.
22.
FergusonT (1952) The Young Delinquent in His Social Setting: a Glasgow Study. London: Oxford University Press.
23.
FergussonDMHorwoodLJNaginDS (2000) Offending trajectories in a New Zealand birth cohort. Criminology38: 525–552.
24.
FieldA (2005) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (and Sex, Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll), 2nd edn.London: Sage.
25.
FisherGRossS (2006) Beggarman or thief: Methodological issues in offender specialisation research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology39: 151–170.
26.
GoodmanLA (2007) On the assignment of individuals to latent classes. Sociological Methodology37: 1–22.
27.
Gorman-SmithDTolanPHLoeberRHenryDB (1998) Relation of family problems to patterns of delinquent involvement among urban youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology26: 319–333.
28.
HabermanSJ (1973) The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics29: 205–220.
29.
HanleyJANegassaAEdwardesMD deBForresterJE (2003) Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology157: 364–375.
30.
JonesBLNaginDS (2007) Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods & Research35: 542–571.
31.
JonesBLNaginDSRoederK (2001) A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods & Research29: 374–393.
32.
KazdinAE (1997) Parent management training: Evidence, outcomes, and issues. Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry36: 1349–1356.
33.
LemertEM (1967) Human Deviance, Social Problems, & Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
LiangK-YZegerSL (1993) Regression analysis for correlated data. Annual Review of Public Health14: 43–68.
35.
LipsitzSRLairdNMHarringtonDP (1991) Generalized estimating equations for correlated binary data: Using the odds ratio as a measure of association. Biometrika78: 153–160.
36.
MaguireM (2007) Crime data and statistics. In: MaguireMMorganRReinerR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–301.
37.
MoffittTE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100: 674–701.
38.
MoffittTECaspiARutterMSilvaPA (2001) Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviour: Conduct Disorder, Delinquency, and Violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
NaginDS (2004a) A semi-parametric, group-based approach for analysing trajectories of developement: a non-technical overview. In: BruinsmaGElffersHDe KeijserJ (eds) Punishment, Places and Perpetrators: Developments in Criminology and Criminal Justice Research. Collumpton, Devon: Willan, 247–259.
40.
NaginDS (2004b) Response to ‘methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories’. Journal of Quantitative Criminology20: 27–35.
41.
NaginDS (2005) Group-Based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
NaginDSLandKC (1993) Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed poisson model. Criminology31: 327–362.
43.
NaginDSTremblayRE (2005a) Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or a useful statistical fiction?Criminology43: 873–904.
44.
NaginDSTremblayRE (2005b) What has been learned from group-based trajectory modeling? Examples from physical aggression and other problem behaviors. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science602: 82–117.
45.
NaginDSFarringtonDPMoffittTE (1995) Life-course trajectories of different types of offenders. Criminology33: 111–139.
46.
PiqueroAR (2008) Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In: LibermanAM (ed.) The Long View of Crime: a Synthesis of Longitudinal Research. New York: Springer, 23–78.
47.
PiqueroARFarringtonDPBlumsteinA (2007) Key Issues in Criminal Career Research. New Analyses of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
PiqueroARSullivanCJFarringtonDP (2010) Assessing differences between short-term, high-rate offenders and long-term, low-rate offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior37: 1309–1329.
49.
PiqueroARBlumsteinABrameRHaapanenRMulveyEPNaginDS (2001) Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research16(1): 54–74.
50.
RheeSHWaldmanID (2002) Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin128: 490–529.
51.
RoweDCFarringtonDP (1997) The familial transmission of criminal convictions. Criminology35: 177–201.
52.
SampsonRJLaubJH (2005) A general age-graded theory of crime: Lessons learned and the future of life-course criminology. In: FarringtonDP (ed.) Integrated Developmental and Life-Course Theories of Offending. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 165–181.
53.
ShermanLW (1993) Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: a theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30: 445–473.
54.
SkardhamarT (2010) Distinguishing facts and artifacts in group-based modeling. Criminology48(1): 295–320.
55.
SlutskeWSLyonsMJTrueWREisenSAGoldbergJTsuangMT (1997) Testing a developmental taxonomy of antisocial behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July.
56.
SutherlandEHCresseyDR (1955) Principles of Criminology. Chicago: J.C. Lippincott.
57.
TheobaldDFarringtonDP (2009) Effects of getting married on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males. European Journal of Criminology6: 496–516.
58.
ThornberryTP (2005) Explaining multiple patterns of offending across the life course and across generations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science602: 156–195.
59.
ThornberryTP (2009) The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree (or does it?): Intergenerational patterns of antisocial behavior: the American Society of Criminology 2008 Sutherland Address. Criminology47: 297–325.
60.
ThornberryTPFreeman-GallantALizotteAJKrohnMDSmithCA (2003) Linked lives: the intergenerational transmission of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology31: 171–184.
61.
Van de RaktMGANieuwbeertaPDe GraafND (2008) Like father, like son: the relationships between conviction trajectories of fathers and their sons and daughters. British Journal of Criminology48: 538–556.
62.
Van der GeestVRBloklandAAJBijleveldCCJH (2009) Delinquent development in a sample of high-risk youth: Shape, content, and predictors of delinquent trajectories from age 12 to 32. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency46: 111–143.
63.
WaldmanIDLevyFHayDA (1995) Multivariate genetic analyses of the overlap among DSM-III-R disruptive behavior disorder symptoms. Behavior Genetics25: 293–294.
64.
WestDJ (1969) Present Conduct and Future Delinquency. London: Heinemann.
65.
WestDJ (1982) Delinquency: Its Roots, Careers and Prospects. London: Heinemann.
66.
WestDJFarringtonDP (1973) Who Becomes Delinquent?London: Heinemann.
67.
WestDJFarringtonDP (1977) The Delinquent Way of Life. London: Heinemann.
68.
WiesnerMWindleM (2004) Assessing covariates of adolescent delinquency trajectories: a latent growth mixture modeling approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence33: 431–442.
69.
WilsonH (1975) Juvenile delinquency, parental criminality and social handicap. British Journal of Criminology15: 241–250.
70.
ZegerSLLiangK-Y (1992) An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine11: 1825–1839.
