Based on the idea that schools are important socializing settings for adolescents (Gottfredson, 2001), the school contextual version of General Strain Theory (Agnew, 1999) is tested in this article. The main hypothesis of this study is that strain at the school level affects individual offending by creating individual strain. Findings suggest that school contextual effects differ: convincing contextual effects are found for violent offending but not for general offending. Furthermore, although the school mean level of strain does significantly affect individual violent offending, this effect does not proceed by creating individual strain. It is therefore suggested that the school mean level of strain either has a direct effect on violent offending or influences other important individual offending mechanisms such as social learning or lifestyle risks.
AgnewR (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology30(1): 47–84.
2.
AgnewR (1999) A general strain theory of community differences in crime rates. Journal of research in crime and delinquency36(2): 123–155 [Electronic version].
3.
AgnewR (2003) An integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Youth Society34(3): 263–299 [Electronic version].
4.
AgnewR (2006a) Pressured into Crime. An Overview of General Strain Theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
5.
AgnewR (2006b) General Strain Theory. In: CullenFTWrightJPBlevinsKR (eds) Taking Stock. The Status of Criminological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 101–123.
6.
AgnewR (2009) Revitalizing Merton: General Strain Theory. In: CullenFTAdlerFJohnsonCLMeyerAJ (2009) The Origins of American Criminology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
7.
AshCHuebnerES (2001) Environmental events and life satisfaction reports of adolescents: A test of cognitive mediation. School Psychology International22: 320–336 [Electronic version].
8.
BaerveldtC (1992) Schools and the prevention of petty crime: Search for a missing link. Journal of Quantitative Criminology8(1): 79–94.
9.
BaronSW (2004) General strain, street youth and crime: A test of Agnew’s revised theory [Electronic version]. Criminology42 (2): 457–483.
10.
BaronSW (2006) Street youth, strain theory, and crime. Journal of Criminal Justice34(2), 209–223 [Electronic version].
11.
BernburgJGThorlindssonTSigfusdottirID (2009) Relative deprivation and adolescent outcomes in Iceland: A multilevel test. Social Forces87(3): 1233–1262 [Electronic version].
12.
BrezinaTPiqueroARMazerolleP (2001) Student anger and aggressive behavior in school: An initial test of Agnew’s macro-level strain theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency34(4): 362–386.
13.
BruinsmaG (1990) Schoolklaseffecten en crimineel gedrag. Een multilevel analyse van contextuele invloeden. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie32(1): 1–12.
14.
BroidyLAgnewA (1997) Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency34(3): 275–306.
15.
BurnsPJ (2009) Disadvantaged neighborhoods and anger: Implications for community-level theories of crime and delinquency. Unpublished Master’s thesis, North Carolina State University, Faculty of Sociology.
16.
CheungNWCheungYW (2009) Linking individual and contextual strains to adolescent gambling: A macro-level general strain theory assessment. Paper presented at the ASC annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 3 November 2009.
17.
De GroofSSmitsW (2006) Antisociaal gedrag bij jongeren onder de loep genomen. In: EliaertsC (ed.) Ernstige jeugddelinquentie: Mythe of realiteit?Brussels: VUB Press, 25–52.
18.
ElchardusM (2002) Op in rook? In: ElchardusMGlorieuxI (eds) De symbolische samenleving. Tielt: Lannoo, 7–30.
19.
FelsonRBLiskaAESouthSJMcNultyNL (1994) The subculture of violence and delinquency: Individual vs. school context effects. Social Forces73(1): 155–173 [Electronic version].
20.
FroggioGAgnewR (2007) The relationship between crime and ‘objective’ versus ‘subjective’ strains. Journal of Criminal Justice35(1): 81–87 [Electronic version].
21.
GoldsteinH (2010) Multilevel Statistical Models, 4th edn.Chichester (UK): John Wiley.
22.
GottfredsonDC (2001) Schools and Delinquency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HoffmannJP (2003) A contextual analysis of differential association, social control, and strain theories of delinquency. Social Forces81(3): 753–785 [Electronic version].
24.
HoffmannJPIrelandTO (2004) Strain and opportunity structures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology20(3): 263–292 [Electronic version].
25.
JangSJJohnsonBR (2005) Gender, religiosity, and reactions to strain among African Americans. The Sociological Quarterly46(2): 323–357 [Electronic version].
26.
KunzF (2008) Economic delinquency by the elderly in Germany: Which explanatory concepts hold? A data-based comparison of different age groups. Paper presented at the 8th conference of the European Society of Criminology, Edinburgh, UK, 2–5 September 2008.
27.
McDonaldJMPiqueroARValoisRFZulligKJ (2005) The relationship between life satisfaction, risk-taking behaviors, and youth violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence20: 1495–1518.
28.
MoodC (2010) Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review26(1): 67–82 [Electronic version].
29.
OberwittlerD (2004) A multilevel analysis of neighborhood contextual effects on serious juvenile offending: The role of subcultural values and social disorganization. European Journal of Criminology1(2): 201–235.
30.
Op de BeeckHPutJ (2011) Jongerengeweld in Brussel. Op zoek naar een contextuele verklaring. In: VettenburgNElchardusMPutJ (eds) Jong in Brussel. Bevindingen uit de JOP-monitor Brussel. Leuven: Acco, 329–348.
31.
PaternosterRMazerolleP (1994) General strain theory and delinquency: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency31(3): 235–263.
32.
PauwelsL (2007) Buurtinvloeden en jeugddelinquentie. Een toets van de Sociale Desorganisatietheorie. The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
33.
PauwelsL (2010) Disentangling neighborhood and school contextual variation in serious offending: Assessing the effect of ecological disadvantage. In: PauwelsLHardynsWVandeVeldeM (eds) Social Disorganization, Offending, Fear and Victimization. The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 121–144.
34.
PauwelsLSvenssonR (2008) How serious is the problem of item nonresponse in delinquency scales and aetiological variables? A cross-national inquiry into two classroom PAPI self-report studies in Antwerp and Halmstad. European Journal of Criminology5(3): 289–308.
35.
PayneAA (2008) A multilevel analysis of the relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency45(4): 429–455.
36.
PelleriauxK (2001) Demotie en burgerschap. De culturele constructie van ongelijkheid in de kennismaatschappij. Brussels: VUB Press.
37.
RoversB (1997) De buurt, een broeinest? Een onderzoek naar de invloed van woonomgeving op jeugdcriminaliteit. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.
38.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (1999) An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
39.
Van HoutteMStevensPAJ (2008) Sense of futility: The missing link between level position and self-reported school misconduct. Youth & Society40(2): 245–264 [Electronic version].
40.
VettenburgNElchardusMPutJ (eds) (2011) Jong in Brussel. Bevindingen uit de JOP-monitor Brussel. Leuven: Acco.
41.
VettenburgNWalgraveLVan WelzenisI (2002) Maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid: een theorie over systematische delinquentie door jongeren. In: GorisPWalgraveL (eds) Van kattenkwaad en erger. Actuele thema’s uit de jeugdcriminologie. Leuven: Garant, 39–76.
42.
VynckierGPauwelsL (2010) Exploring the role of exposure to offending and deviant lifestyles in explaining offending, victimisation and the strength of the association between offending and victimisation. In: CoolsMDe RuyverBEastonMPauwelsLPonsaersPVande WalleGVander BekenTVander LaenenFVermeulenGVynckierG (eds) Governance of Security Research Papers Series III: New Empirical Data, Theories and Analyses on Security, Societal Problems and Citizens’ Perceptions. Antwerp: Maklu, 61–84.
43.
WarehamJCochranJKDemboRSellersCS (2005) Community, strain, and delinquency: A test of a multi-level model of General Strain Theory. Western Criminology Review6(1): 177–133 [Electronic version].
44.
WarnerBDFowlerSK (2003) Strain and violence: Testing a general strain theory model of community violence. Journal of Criminal Justice31(6): 511–521.
45.
WeijtersG (2008) Youth Delinquency in Dutch Cities and Schools: A Multilevel Approach. Nijmegen: Dissertatie Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
46.
WelshWNGreeneJRJenkinsPH (1999) School disorder: The influence of individual, institutional and community factors. Criminology37(1): 73–116.
47.
WikströmPH (2006) In search of causes and explanations of crime. In: KingRDWincupE (2007) Doing Research on Crime and Justice, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117–140.
WilcoxPClaytonRR (2001) A multilevel analysis of school-based weapon possession. Justice Quarterly18(3): 509–542.
50.
ZaleskiZ (1994) Towards a psychology of the personal future. In: ZaleskiZ (ed.) Psychology of Future Orientation. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 10–20.
