This study aims to identify the locations where unstructured socializing is related to adolescent offending. ‘Locations’ refer to private, semi-public and public spaces, which are further categorized into public entertainment, public transportation, other semi-public settings, streets, shopping centres and open spaces. Detailed longitudinal data, derived from space–time budget interviews among 615 respondents in the age range 11–20 years, about hourly activities and the whereabouts of adolescents are analysed. A random intercept panel model is used to control for selection effects that occur when crime-prone individuals prefer crime-conducive locations to other locations. Findings indicate that unstructured socializing is positively related to offending and that this relationship strongly depends on the location in which it occurs.
AgnewRPetersenDM (1989) Leisure and delinquency. Social Problems36(4): 332–350.
2.
AndersonALHughesLA (2009) Exposure to situations conducive to delinquent behavior: The effect of time use, income, and transportation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency46(1): 5–34.
3.
BernascoWWeermanFPauwelsL (2013) Situational causes of offending: A fixed effects analysis of space-time-budget data. Criminology51(4): 895–926.
4.
BernburgJGThorlindssonT (2001) Routine activities: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior. Justice Quarterly18(3): 543–567.
5.
ClarkeRV (1992) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. New York: Harrow and Heston Publishers.
6.
ClarkeRV (2002) Shoplifting, Vol 11. United States: Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
CohenLEFelsonM (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44(4): 588–608.
8.
FelsonM (1995) Those who discourage crime. In: EckJEWeisburdDL (eds) Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press, 4, 53–66.
9.
HarveyASPentlandW (2002) Time use research. In: PentlandWEHarveyASLawtonMPMcCollMA (eds) Time Use Research in the Social Sciences. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3–18.
10.
HaynieDLOsgoodDW (2005) Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces84(2): 1109–1130.
11.
HindelangMJGottfredsonMGarofaloJ (1978) Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publisher and Co.
12.
HirschiTGottfredsonM (1983) Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology89(3): 552–584.
13.
MahoneyJLStattinH (2000) Leisure activities and adolescent antisocial behavior: The role of structure and social context. Journal of Adolescence23(2): 113–127.
14.
MaimonDBrowningCR (2010) Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology48(2): 443–474.
15.
MaxfieldMG (1987) Lifestyle and routine activity theories of crime: Empirical studies of victimization, delinquency, and offender decision-making. Journal of Quantitative Criminology3(4): 275–282.
16.
MessnerSFBlauJR (1987) Routine leisure activities and rates of crime: A macro-level analysis. Social Forces65(4): 1035–1052.
17.
MillerJ (2013) Individual offending, routine activities, and activity settings: Revisiting the routine activity theory of general deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50(3): 390–416.
18.
NewmanO (1972) Defensible Space. New York: Macmillan.
19.
OsgoodDWAndersonAL (2004) Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology42(3): 519–549.
20.
OsgoodDWFinkenLLMcMorrisBJ (2002) Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology18(4): 319–347.
21.
OsgoodDWWilsonJKO’MalleyPMBachmanJGJohnstonLD (1996) Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review61(4): 635–655.
22.
RileyD (1987) Time and crime: The link between teenager lifestyle and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology3(4): 339–354.
23.
SteketeeM (2012) The lifestyles of youth and their peers. In: Junger-TasJMarshallIHEnzmannDKilliasMSteketeeMGruszczynskaB (eds) The Many Faces of Youth Crime: Contrasting Theoretical Perspectives on Juvenile Delinquency Across Countries and Cultures. New York: Springer, 237–255.
24.
SvenssonROberwittlerD (2010) It’s not the time they spend, it’s what they do: The interaction between delinquent friends and unstructured routine activity on delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice38(5): 1006–1014.
25.
SvenssonRPauwelsL (2010) Is a risky lifestyle always ‘risky’? The interaction between individual propensity and lifestyle risk in adolescent offending: A test in two urban samples. Crime and Delinquency56(4): 608–626.
26.
ThorlindssonTBernburgJG (2006) Peer groups and substance use: Examining the direct and interactive effect of leisure activity. Adolescence41(162): 321–339.
27.
VazsonyiATPickeringLEBellistonLMHessingDJungerM (2002) Routine activities and deviant behaviors: American, Dutch, Hungarian, and Swiss youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology18(4): 397–422.
28.
WeermanFBernascoWBruinsmaGJNPauwelsL (2013) When is spending time with peers related to delinquency? The importance of where, what and with whom. Crime and Delinquency. Epub ahead of print, 21March2013. DOI: 10.1177/0011128713478129.
29.
WikströmP-OH (2004) Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In: McCordJ (ed.) Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1–37.
30.
WikströmP-OH (2005) The social origins of pathways in crime: Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes. In: FarringtonDP (ed.) Integrated Developmental and Life-Course Theories of Offending. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 211–245.
WikströmP-OHSvenssonR (2008) Why are English youths more violent than Swedish youths? A comparative study of the role of crime propensity, lifestyles and their interactions in two cities. European Journal of Criminology5(3): 309–330.
33.
WikströmP-OHCeccatoVHardieBTreiberK(2010) Activity fields and the dynamics of crime: Advancing knowledge about the role of the environment in crime causation. Journal of Quantitative Criminology26(1): 55–87.
34.
WikströmP-OHOberwittlerDTreiberKHardieB(2012a) Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
WikströmP-OHOberwittlerDTreiberKHardieB (2012b) The Peterborough Adolescent and Young Adult Development Study. In: WikströmP-OHOberwittlerDTreiberKHardieB, Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67–78.
