This paper discusses the quality of prison life and prison size in relation to the notion of ‘Scandinavian exceptionalism’. Using the questionnaires ‘Measuring the Quality of Prison Life’ (MQPL) for prisoners and ‘Staff Measuring the Quality of Prison Life’ (SQL) for staff, data were collected from all 32 closed prisons in Norway. Based on the assumption that prison officers’ working lives, their perspectives and their values influence prisoners’ quality of life, the main focus in the paper is on the officers. Small prisons (fewer than 50 prisoners) obtain more positive results than medium-sized (50–100) and large (more than 100) prisons, on several dimensions measured. The relationship between officers and prisoners seems to be of better quality in small prisons than in medium-sized and large prisons. Officers in small prisons also report more positive relationships with senior management than their colleagues in medium-sized and large prisons. The results are discussed in light of previous studies on officers and prison working life dynamics.
AdamsWL (2010a) Norway builds the world’s most humane prison. Time magazine, 10May.
2.
AdamsWL (2010b) Sentenced to serving the good life in Norway. Time magazine, 12July.
3.
ArnoldH (2005) The effects of prison work. In: LieblingAMarunaS (eds) The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 391–420.
4.
BaldurssonE (2000) Prisoners, prisons and punishment in small societies. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention1(1): 6–15.
5.
BoedalK (1979) The Prison Staff Has the Floor. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the Police (in Norwegian).
6.
BoothS (2009) The Prison Characteristics That Predict Prisons Being Assessed as Performing ‘Well’: a Thematic Review by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons. London: HM Inspectorate of Prisons.
7.
BottomleyAKLieblingASparksR (1994) An Evaluation of Barlinnie and Shotts Units. Scottish Prison Service Occasional Papers no. 7.
8.
BrookesSSmithKBennettJ (2008) The role of middle and first-line managers. In: BennettJCreweBWahidinA (eds) Understanding Prison Staff. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 263–276.
9.
CarterP (2007) Securing the Future: Proposals for the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Custody in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice.
10.
ChristieN (1982) How Closely Knit a Society. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget (in Norwegian).
11.
CoyleA (2002) Managing Prisons in a Time of Change. London: International Centre for Prison Studies.
12.
CoyleA (2007) Governing, leadership and change. In: JewkesY (ed.) Handbook on Prisons. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 496–517.
DrakeDH (2008) Staff and order in prisons. In: BennettJCreweBWahidinA (eds) Understanding Prison Staff. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 153–167.
17.
FeeleyMSimonJ (1992) The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology30(4): 449–474.
18.
FeeleyMSimonJ (1994) Actuarial justice: the emerging new criminal law. In: NelkinD (ed.) The Futures of Criminology. London: Sage, 173–201.
19.
GaddVSheferGwith the assistance of Liebling A, Tait S and McLean C (2007) Measuring the Quality of Prison Life: Staff Survey. Institute of Criminology, Cambridge.
20.
HammerlinYMathiassenC (2006) Then and Now: On the Consequences of Increased Delegation of Tasks for the Relations between Correctional Staff and Prisoners in a Selection of Closed Prisons. Report no. 5/2006. Oslo: Correctional Service of Norway Staff Academy (KRUS) (in Norwegian only, with English abstract).
21.
JohnsenBGranheimPK (2011) Prison size and the quality of life in Norwegian closed prisons in late modernity. In: UgelvikTDullumJ (eds) Penal Exceptionalism? Nordic Prison Policy and Practice. London: Routledge (in press).
22.
KauffmanK (1988) Prison Officers and Their World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
KristoffersenR (ed.) (2007) Correctional Statistics of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, 2001–2005. Oslo: Correctional Service of Norway Staff Academy (KRUS).
24.
KristoffersenR (ed.) (2010) Correctional Statistics of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, 2004–2008. Oslo: Correctional Service of Norway Staff Academy (KRUS).
25.
LieblingA (2000) Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion. Theoretical Criminology4(3): 333–357.
26.
LieblingAArnoldH (2004a) Prisons and Their Moral Performance: A Study of Values, Quality and Prison Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
LieblingA (2004b) The late modern prison and the question of values. Current Issues in Criminal Justice16(2): 202–219.
28.
LieblingA (2006) Prisons in transition. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry29: 422–430.
29.
LieblingA (2007) Why prison staff culture matters? In: ByrneJMHummerDTaxmanFS (eds) The Culture of Prison Violence. Boston: Pearson, 105–122.
30.
LieblingA (2008) ‘Titan’ prisons: Do size, efficiency and legitimacy matter? In: HoughMAllenRSolomonE (eds) Tackling Prison Overcrowding: Build More Prisons? Sentence Fewer Offenders?Bristol: Policy Press, 63–80.
31.
LieblingAArnoldH (2002) Measuring the Quality of Prison Life. Research Findings 174. London: Home Office.
32.
LieblingAPriceD (2001) The Prison Officer. Leyhill: Prison Service Journal.
33.
LieblingATaitT (2006) Improving staff–prisoner relationships. In: DearGE (ed.) Preventing Suicide and Other Self-harm in Prison. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 103–117.
34.
LieblingAPriceDElliotC (1999) Appreciative inquiry and relationships in prison. Punishment and Society1(1): 71–98.
35.
MathiesenT (1965) The Defences of the Weak: A Sociological Study of a Norwegian Correctional Institution. London: Tavistock Publications.
36.
MathiesenT (2008) Contribution and discussion at a debate about preventive detention. Ila Prison, 2008-11-5.
37.
McLeanCLieblingA (2008) Prison staff in the public and private sector. In: BennettJCreweBWahidinA (eds) Understanding Prison Staff. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 92–114.
38.
Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the Police (2008) Punishment That Works – Less Crime – a Safer Society. Report to the Storting on the Norwegian Correctional Services (English Summary). Oslo.
39.
O’DonnellI (2005) Putting prison in its place. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Irish Association for the Study of Delinquency. URL (accessed 2 June 2011): http://www.iprt.ie/contents/1319.
40.
PrattJ (2008a) Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. British Journal of Criminology48(2): 119–37.
41.
PrattJ (2008b) Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part I: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future?British Journal of Criminology48(3): 275–292.
42.
PrattJErikssonA (2009) Scandinavian exceptionalism in criminal policy. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskap96(2): 135–151.
43.
Research Taskforce (2009) Benchmarking: Trends and Developments 2004–2008. International Roundtable for Correctional Excellence.
44.
RETURN: Recidivism in the Correctional Services in the Nordic Countries (2010) Oslo: Bjerch Trykkeri.
