There is considerable variation in public trust towards the police in different European countries. Through multilevel analysis, the article explores what lies behind this variation. It first approaches the issue at the country level through factors related to the quality and structure of government. The quality of government is looked at and measured by examining corruption in government, and the structure of government by exploring the extent to which society invests its resources in public order and safety services. Here the assumptions are, first of all, that general corruption among public officials decreases public trust in the police and, second, that big investments in public order and safety institutions also decrease trust in the police. In addition, certain individual-level factors are identified that explain public trust in the police. Finally, empirical results are presented that corroborate the above assumptions: in particular, corruption in government strongly explains the country-level variation in public trust towards the police.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2000 ). Measuring social capital: Current collection and future directions . Discussion paper.
2.
Anderson, C.J. and Tverdova, Y.V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science47, 91—109.
3.
Bowling, B., Phillips, C. and Shah, A. (2003). Policing ethnic minority communities. In T. Newburn (ed.) Handbook of policing, 528—55. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
4.
Carter, D.L. (2002). The police and the community, 7th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
5.
Engel, R.S. (2005). Citizens' perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency42, 445—81.
6.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living Conditions (2006). EurLife, electronic database; URL (accessed 13 February 2006): http://www.eurofound.eu.int/areas/qualityoflife/eurlife/index.php.
8.
European Social Survey2004/2005(ESS, round 2), electronic data. Data archive and distributor of the ESS data: Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD).
9.
Eurostat (2005). General government expenditure by function in the EU in 2003. URL (accessed 18 May 2007): http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-NJ-05-028/EN/KS-NJ-05-28-EN.PDF .
10.
Frank, J., Smith, B.V. and Novak, K.J. (2005). Exploring the basis of citizens' attitudes toward the police. Police Quarterly8, 206—28.
11.
Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. TheoreticalCriminology9, 443—70.
12.
Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
Harper, R. (2003). The measurement of social capital in the United Kingdom. Office for National Statistics; URL (accessed 18 May 2007): http://www.statistics.gov.uk/socialcapital/downloads/UK_Paper.pdf .
14.
Healy, T. and Cote, S. (2001). The well-being of nations. The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
15.
Hooghe, M. (2003). Voluntary associations and democratic attitudes: Value congruence as a causal mechanism. In M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds) Generating social capital: The role of voluntary associations, institutions and government policy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
16.
Jowell, R. and the Central Co-ordinating Team ( 2005). European Social Survey 2005/2005: Technical Report. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University.
17.
Kääriäinen, J. and Lehtonen, H. (2006). The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes — A comparative study of 21 countries. European Societies8, 27—57.
18.
Leyland, A. and Groenewegen, P. (2003). Multilevel modelling and public health policy. Scandinavian Journal ofPublic Health31, 267—74.
19.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics110, 681—712.
20.
Mawby, R.I. (1999). Policing across the world. Issues for the twenty-first century. London: UCL Press.
21.
Mawby, R.I. (2003). Models of policing. In T. Newburn (ed.) Handbook of policing, 15—40. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing .
22.
Mayer, N. (2003). Democracy in France: Do associations matter? In M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds) Generating social capital: The role of voluntary associations, institutions and government policy. New York : Palgrave/Macmillan.
23.
Montionola, G. and Jackman, R.W. (2002). Sources of corruption: A cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science32, 147—70.
24.
Putnam, R.D. (2001). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone .
25.
Rothstein, B. (2001). Social capital in social democratic state. The Swedish model and civil society. Politics and Society29, 209—40.
26.
Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2003). Social capital, impartiality, and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds) Generating social capital: The role of voluntary associations, institutions and government policy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
28.
Rothstein, B. and Toerell J. (2005). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial political institutions. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1—4 September 2005. Copyright by the American Political Science Association.
29.
Sandholtz, W. and Koetzle, W. (2000). Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy and trade. International Studies Quarterly44, 31—50.
30.
Skogan, W.G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police . Policing & Society16, 99—126.
31.
Stoutland, S.E. (2001). The multiple dimensions of trust in resident/police relations in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency38, 226—56.
32.
Sunshine, J. and Tyler, T. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review37, 513—48.
33.
Transparency International (2004). Corruption Perceptions Index 2004. URL (accessed 18 May 2007 ): http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2004.
34.
Tupman, B. and Tupman, A. (1999). Policing in Europe. Exeter : Intellect Books.
35.
Tyler, T. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions ? Behavioral Sciences and the Law19, 215—35.
36.
Tyler, T. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly8, 322—42.
37.
Uslaner, E.M. (2005). The bulging pocket and the rule of law: Corruption, inequality, and trust. Paper presented at the conference The Quality of Government: What It Is, How to Get It, Why It Matters, 17—19 November 2005, The Quality of Government Institute, Department of Political Science, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
38.
Van Oorschot, W. and Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding-out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy15, 5—26.
39.
Van Wilsem, J. (2004). Criminal victimization in cross-national perspective. An analysis of rates of theft, violence and vandalism across 27 countries . European Journal of Criminology1, 89—109.
40.
Weitzer, R. and Tuch, S.A. (2005). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police . Police Quarterly8, 279—97.
41.
Wohlfarth, T., Winkel F.W. and Ybema, J.F. (2001). The relationship between socio-economic inequality and criminal victimization: A prospective study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology36, 361—70.
42.
Wollebek, D. and Selle, P. (2003). The importance of passive membership for social capital formation. In M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds) Generating social capital: The role of voluntary associations, institutions and government policy . New York: Palgrave/ Macmillan.
43.
You, J.-S. and Khagram, S. (2005). A comparative study of inequality and corruption . American Sociological Review70, 136—57.
