The ability to discern the content of the view through a window is referred to as view clarity. It is often overlooked in the design process, and the methods of shading daylight can affect window views. We conducted a narrative review of building standards and the scientific literature to better understand how shades can be designed so as to retain the window view. View clarity was characterised by three main dimensions: (1) the shading solution, (2) the view content and (3) the observer. Each dimension and the interactions between them influence view clarity. These interactions make it difficult to predict view clarity for all the situations that can occur in buildings. Nonetheless, we highlighted the effects of different shades on the view clarity. Our insights can help designers consider these impacts within the context of overall window design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KentMSchiavonS.Evaluation of the effect of landscape distance seen in window views on visual satisfaction. Building and Environment2020; 183: 107160.
2.
VeitchJAFarleyKMJFarleyKMJVeitchJAVeitchJA.A Room With a View: A Review of the Effects of Windows on Work and Well-Being. Technical Report RR-136. Ottawa, ON: National Research Council of Canada, 2001.
3.
HeschongL.California Energy Commission Windows and Classrooms: A Study of Student Performance and the Indoor Environment. P500-03-082-A-7. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission, 2003.
4.
KuhlenengelMKonstantzosIWatersCE.The effects of the visual environment on K-12 student achievement. Buildings2021; 11: 498.
5.
KoWHSchiavonSZhangHGrahamLTBragerGMaussI, et al. The impact of a view from a window on thermal comfort, emotion, and cognitive performance. Building and Environment2020; 175: 106779.
European Committee for Standardization. Daylight in Buildings. EN 17037. Brussels, Belgium: CEN, 2018.
8.
Society of Light and Lighting. Lighting Guide 10: Daylighting – A Guide for Designers. London: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, 2014.
9.
BREEAM. BREEAM UK New Construction 2018: Technical Manual: Version SD5078. Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment, 2019.
10.
US Green Building Council. LEED v4.1: Building Design and Construction. Washington, DC: US Green Building Council, 2020.
HillARMarkusTA.Some factors influencing vision through meshes. Human Factors1968; 10: 531–551.
13.
KoWHSchiavonSAltomonteSAndersenMBatoolABrowningW, et al. Window view quality: why it matters and what we should do. LEUKOS2022; 18: 259–267.
14.
KonstantzosIChanY-CSeiboldJCTzempelikosAProctorRWProtzmanJB.View clarity index: a new metric to evaluate clarity of view through window shades. Building and Environment2015; 90: 206–214.
15.
TzempelikosAAthienitisAK.The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar Energy2007; 81: 369–382.
16.
ArensEHoytTZhouXHuangLZhangHSchiavonS.Modeling the comfort effects of short-wave solar radiation indoors. Building and Environment2015; 88: 3–9.
17.
HopkinsonRG.Glare from daylighting in buildings. Applied Ergonomics1972; 3: 206–215.
18.
KentMJakubiecJ.An examination of range effects when evaluating discomfort due to glare in Singaporean buildings. Lighting Research and Technology2022; 54: 514–528.
19.
MarkusTA.The function of windows – a reappraisal. Building Science1967; 2: 97–121.
20.
VeitchJAChristoffersenJGalasiuAD.Daylight and view through residential windows: effects on well-being. Lux Europa 2013, Krakow, Poland, 2013: 1–6.
21.
SheppardCPhillipsG.Bird-Friendly Building Design, 2nd Edition.The Plains, VA: American Bird Conservancy, 2015.
22.
LiuDSunYWilsonRWuY.Comprehensive evaluation of window-integrated semi-transparent PV for building daylight performance. Renewable Energy2020; 145: 1399–1411.
23.
LiangRKentMWilsonRWuY.The effect of thermochromic windows on visual performance and sustained attention. Energy and Buildings2021; 236: 110778.
24.
LiangRKentMWilsonRWuY.Development of experimental methods for quantifying the human response to chromatic glazing. Building and Environment2019; 147: 199–210.
Daylight Metrics Committee. Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). IES LM-83-12. New York, NY: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2012.
31.
NezamdoostAVan Den WymelenbergK.Blindswitch 2017: proposing a new manual blind control algorithm for daylight and energy simulation. IES 2017 Annual Conference Proceedings, Portland, OR, USA, 2017: 1–21.
32.
KimJKentMKralKDoganT.Seemo: A new tool for early design window view satisfaction evaluation in residential buildings. Building and Environment2022; 214: 108909.
33.
KoWHSchiavonSSantosLKentMGKimHKeshavarziM.View access index: the effects of geometric variables of window views on occupants’ satisfaction. Building and Environment2023; 234: 110132.
34.
Ne’EmanEHopkinsonRG.Critical minimum acceptable window size: a study of window design and provision of a view. Lighting Research and Technology1970; 2: 17–27.
AstonSMBelichambersHE.Illumination, colour rendering and visual clarity. Lighting Research and Technology1969; 1: 259–261.
39.
HashimotoKNayataniY.Visual clarity and feeling of contrast. Color Research & Application1994; 19: 171–185.
40.
ThorntonWAChenE.What is visual clarity?Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1978; 7: 85–94.
41.
Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. The International Standard CIE S 017:2020 ILV: International Lighting Vocabulary, 2nd Edition.Vienna, Austria: CIE, 2020.
42.
ReaMSOuelletteMJ.Relative visual performance: a basis for application. Lighting Research and Technology1991; 23: 135–144.
43.
WadlingerHAIsaacowitzDM.Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli. Motivation and Emotion2006; 30: 87–99.
44.
SnyderH.Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research2019; 104: 333–339.
45.
BennetIO’BrienWGunayHB.Effect of window blind use in residential buildings: observation and simulation study. Proceedings of eSIM2014, Ottawa, ON, Canada: 2014, pp. 1–14.
46.
European Committee for Standardization. Blinds and Shutters – Thermal and Visual Comfort – Performance Characteristics and Classification. EN 14501. Brussels, Belgium: CEN, 2021.
47.
FlemingRWJensenHWBülthoffHH.Perceiving translucent materials. Journal of Vision2004; 4: 119.
48.
MerilaitaSScott-SamuelNECuthillIC.How camouflage works. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences2017; 372: 20160341.
49.
TrosciankoTBentonCPLovellPGTolhurstDJPizloZ.Camouflage and visual perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences2009; 364: 449–461.
50.
BianYChenYSunYMaYYuDLengT.Simulation of daylight availability, visual comfort and view clarity for a novel window system with switchable blinds in classrooms. Building and Environment2023; 235: 110243.
51.
KimJTKimG.Advanced external shading device to maximize visual and view performance. Indoor and Built Environment2010; 19: 65–72.
52.
KarmannCChinazzoGSchülerAManwaniKWienoldJAndersenM.User assessment of fabric shading devices with a low openness factor. Building and Environment2023; 228: 109707.
53.
KentMGAltomonteSWilsonRTregenzaPR.Temporal effects on glare response from daylight. Building and Environment2017; 113: 49–64.
54.
KonstantoglouMTsangrassoulisA.Dynamic operation of daylighting and shading systems: a literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews2016; 60: 268–283.
55.
O’BrienWKapsisKAthienitisAK.Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: a critical review. Building and Environment2013; 60: 319–338.
56.
SanatiLUtzingerM.The effect of window shading design on occupant use of blinds and electric lighting. Building and Environment2013; 64: 67–76.
57.
HutchisonDKanadeTKittlerJKleinbergJMMatternFMitchellJC, et al. Seeing through obscure glass. In DaniilidisKMaragosPParagiosN, editors. Computer Vision – ECCV 2010. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2010, pp. 364–378.
58.
AndersonBL.Visual perception of materials and surfaces. Current Biology2011; 21: R978–R983.
59.
FlemingRJäkelFMaloneyL.Visual perception of thick transparent materials. Psychological Science2011; 22: 812–20.
60.
SinghMAndersonBL.Photometric determinants of perceived transparency. Vision Research2006; 46: 879–894.
61.
EldinWS.Smart glazing systems for low energy architecture. Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development (SAUD 2010), Amman, Jordan, 2010.
62.
SottileG.Cleantech daylighting using smart glass: a survey of LEED accredited professionals. TechConnect Briefs2008: 201–204.
63.
MoeckMLeeESRubinMDSullivanRTSelkowitzSE.Visual quality assessment of electrochromic and conventional glazings. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells1998; 54: 157–164.
64.
HedgeA.Worker reactions to electrochromic and low e glass office windows. Ergonomics International Journal2018; 2: 1–12.
65.
BoubekriMLeeJMacNaughtonPWooMSchuylerLTinianovB, et al. The impact of optimized daylight and views on the sleep duration and cognitive performance of office workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health2020; 17: 3219.
66.
LeeJESteinJJPrevorMBSeipleWHHolopigianKGreensteinVC, et al. Effect of variable tinted spectacle lenses on visual performance in control subjects. The CLAO Journal: Official Publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc2002; 28: 80–82.
67.
ShaikMMajolaPDNkgareLMNeneNBSinghCHansrajR, et al. The effect of tinted spectacle lenses on contrast sensitivity and colour vision. African Vision and Eye Health2013; 72: 61–70.
68.
WolffsohnJSCochraneALKhooHYoshimitsuYWuS.Contrast is enhanced by yellow lenses because of selective reduction of short-wavelength light. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry2000; 77: 73–81.
69.
CuttleK.Subjective assessments of the appearance of special performance glazing in offices. Lighting Research and Technology1979; 11: 140–149.
70.
TrosciankoJSkelhornJStevensM.Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance. BMC Evolutionary Biology2017; 17: 7.
71.
OwsleyCSekulerRSiemsenD.Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Research1983; 23: 689–699.
72.
MullenKT.The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. The Journal of Physiology1985; 359: 381–400.
73.
RoarkMWStringhamJM.Visual performance in the ‘real world’: contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and effects of macular carotenoids. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research2019; 63: 1801053.
PeliE.Contrast in complex images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A1990; 7: 2032–2040.
76.
KauffmannLRamanoëlSPeyrinC.The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience2014; 8: 1–14.
77.
BarM.Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience2004; 5: 617–629.
78.
WilkinsA.A physiological basis for visual discomfort: application in lighting design. Lighting Research and Technology2016; 48: 44–54.
79.
FlitcroftDIHarbENWildsoetCF.The spatial frequency content of urban and indoor environments as a potential risk factor for myopia development. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science2020; 61: 42.
80.
WilkinsAJEvansBJPlantGT.Potential uses for precision tinted lenses in a neurology clinic. touchREVIEWS in Neurology2022; 18: 93–102.
HuangLSeipleWParkRIGreensteinVCHolopigianKNaiduSS, et al. Variable tinted spectacle lenses: a comparison of aesthetics and visual preference. The CLAO Journal: Official Publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc2001; 27: 121–124.
83.
WilkinsAJHaighSMMahrooOAPlantGT.Photophobia in migraine: a symptom cluster?Cephalalgia2021; 41: 1240–1248.
84.
KalloniatisMLuuC.Visual acuity. In KolbHFernandezENelsonR, editors. Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 1995, pp. 1–25. Retrieved 8 June 2023 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11509/
85.
OwsleyCSloaneME.Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of ‘real-world’ targets. The British Journal of Ophthalmology1987; 71: 791–796.
86.
DuntleyS.The reduction of apparent contrast by the atmosphere. Journal of the Optical Society of America1948; 38: 179–191.
87.
HoughtonHG.The transmission of visible light through fog. Physical Review1931; 38: 152–158.
88.
CaltriderDGuptaATripathyK. Evaluation of visual acuity. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2023. Retrieved 27 August 2023 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564307/
89.
de JongPTVM. Myopia: its historical contexts. British Journal of Ophthalmology2018; 102: 1021–1027.
90.
SheppardALWolffsohnJS.Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmology2018; 3: e000146.
91.
WilsonMPWilsonM.Comment 2 on ‘Discomfort glare from interesting images’ by N Tuaycharoen and P Tregenza. Lighting Research and Technology2005; 37: 339–340.
92.
YapM.The effect of a yellow filter on contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics1984; 4: 227–232.
93.
KellySA.Effect of yellow-tinted lenses on brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America A1990; 7: 1905–1911.
94.
LuriaSM.Vision with chromatic filters. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry1972; 49: 818–829.
95.
Al-KodmanyK.Residential visual privacy: traditional and modern architecture and urban design. Journal of Urban Design1999; 4: 283–311.
96.
AbdelwahabSKentMGMayhoubM.Users’ window preferences and motivations of shading control: influence of cultural characteristics. Building and Environment2023; 240: 110455.
97.
ShaqiriARoinishviliMGrzeczkowskiLChkoniaEPilzKMohrC, et al. Sex-related differences in vision are heterogeneous. Scientific Reports2018; 8: 7521.
98.
MurraySOSchallmoM-PKolodnyTMillinRKaleAThomasP, et al. Sex differences in visual motion processing. Current Biology2018; 28: 2794–2799.e3.
99.
SchierzC.Lighting for the elderly: physiological basics and their consequences. Light and Engineering2011; 19: 19–27.
100.
Dutch Green Building Council. BREEAM-NL 2010: Label for Sustainable Real Estate. Version 1.11. The Hague: Dutch Green Building Council, 2010.
101.
Norwegian Green Building Council. BREEAM-NOR New Construction 2016: Technical Manual SD5075NOR – Version: 1.1. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Green Building Council, 2017.
102.
Norwegian Green Building Council. BREEAM-NOR 2016 New Construction: Technical Manual SD5075NOR – Version: 1.2. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Green Building Council, 2019.
103.
Norwegian Green Building Council. BREEAM-NOR v6.0: New Construction. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Green Building Council, 2022.
104.
Sweden Green Building Council. BREEAM®SE: BREEAM-SE New Construction 2017. Version 1.1. Stockholm, Sweden: Sweden Green Building Council, 2018.
105.
Sweden Green Building Council. BREEAM®SE: English Manual for New Construction and Refurbishment. Version 2.0. Stockholm, Sweden: Sweden Green Building Council, 2013.
106.
Green Building Index Sdn Bhd. green building index: GBI assessment criteria for non-residential new construction. First edition. Malaysia: Green Building Index, 2009.
107.
Green Building Index Sdn Bhd. green building index: GBI assessment criteria for residential construction. Version 3.0. Malaysia: Green Building Index, 2013.
108.
Green Building Council Indonesia. Greenship New Building: Version 1.1. South Jakarta, Indonesia: Green Building Council Indonesia, 2021.
109.
Green Building Council Indonesia. Greenship for New Buildings: Version 1.2 Summary of Criteria and Benefits. Version 1.2. South Jakarta, Indonesia: Green Building Council Indonesia, 2013.
110.
New Zealand Green Building Council. greenstar: Technical Manual. Office Design & Built 2009. Now Including Existing Buildings. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Green Building Council, 2014.
111.
New Zealand Green Building Council. greenstar: Technical Manual v3.1. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Green Building Council, 2016.
112.
MellerioJ.Yellowing of the human lens: nuclear and cortical contributions. Vision Research1987; 27: 1581–1587.
113.
HammondBR.The visual effects of intraocular colored filters. Scientifica2012; 2012: 424965.
114.
WealeRA.Age and the transmittance of the human crystalline lens. The Journal of Physiology1988; 395: 577–587.
115.
ShiWLockhartTEArbabM.Tinted windshield and its effects on aging drivers’ visual acuity and glare response. Safety Science2008; 46: 1223–1233.
116.
MahjoobMHeydarianSKoochiS.Effect of yellow filter on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under glare condition among different age groups. International Ophthalmology2016; 36: 509–514.
117.
PatchingGRJordanTR.Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science2005; 46: 2219–2224.
118.
DerefeldtGLennerstrandGLundhB.Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmologica1979; 57: 679–690.
119.
RossJEClarkeDDBronAJ.Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings. The British Journal of Ophthalmology1985; 69: 51–56.
120.
BrannanSDewarCSenJClarkeDMarshallTMurrayPI.A prospective study of the rate of falls before and after cataract surgery. The British Journal of Ophthalmology2003; 87: 560–562.
121.
NaiduSLeeJEHolopigianKSeipleWHGreensteinVCStensonSM.The effect of variably tinted spectacle lenses on visual performance in cataract subjects. Eye & Contact Lens2003; 29: 17–20.
122.
KatsnelsonA.Colour me better: fixing figures for colour blindness. Nature2021; 598: 224–225.
123.
NeitzMNeitzJ.Molecular genetics of color vision and color vision defects. Archives of Ophthalmology2000; 118: 691–700.
124.
DainSJWoodJMAtchisonDA.Sunglasses, traffic signals, and color vision deficiencies. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry2009; 86: e296-305.
125.
PunHWBrownMLuiR.Tinted contact lenses slow reaction time in colour defective observers. Clinical and Experimental Optometry1986; 69: 213–218.
KentMGSchiavonS.Predicting window view preferences using the environmental information criteria. LEUKOS2023; 19: 1–20.
128.
WilkinsANimmo-SmithITaitAMcManusCDella SalaSTilleyA, et al. A neurological basis for visual discomfort. Brain: A Journal of Neurology1984; 107: 989–1017.
129.
KonstantzosIKimMTzempelikosA.An integrated method and web tool to assess visual environment in spaces with window shades. Science and Technology for the Built Environment2018; 24: 470–482.
130.
O’BrienWGunayHB.Mitigating office performance uncertainty of occupant use of window blinds and lighting using robust design. Building Simulation2015; 8: 621–636.
131.
GunayHBO’BrienWBeausoleil-MorrisonI.A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Building and Environment2013; 70: 31–47.
132.
KonstantzosITzempelikosA.Design recommendations for perimeter office spaces based on visual performance criteria. Proceedings of CISBAT 2015 International Conference on Future Buildings and Districts, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2015: 271–276.
133.
MahdaviAMohammadiAKabirELambevaL.Occupants’ operation of lighting and shading systems in office buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation2008; 1: 57–65.
134.
DaumDMorelN.Assessing the total energy impact of manual and optimized blind control in combination with different lighting schedules in a building simulation environment. Journal of Building Performance Simulation2010; 3: 1–16.
135.
WooMMacNaughtonPLeeJTinianovBSatishUBoubekriM.Access to daylight and views improves physical and emotional wellbeing of office workers: a crossover study. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities2021; 3: 1–13.
136.
BasilioLGMorenoDJPiratelliAJ.Main causes of bird-window collisions: a review. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências2020; 92: e20180745.
137.
BordenWLockhartOJonesALyonsM.Seasonal, taxonomic, and local habitat components of bird-window collisions on an urban university campus in Cleveland, OH. Ohio Journal of Science2010; 110: 44–52.
138.
Canada Green Building Council. LEED Canada: Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction 2009. Ottawa, ON: Canada Green Building Council, 2009.
Hong Kong Green Building Council. BEAM Plus New Buildings. Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong: BEAM Society Limited, 2019.
142.
RajchardJ.Ultraviolet (UV) light perception by birds: a review. Veterinární Medicína2009; 54: 351–359.
143.
SwaddleJPEmersonLCThadyRGBoycottTJ.Ultraviolet-reflective film applied to windows reduces the likelihood of collisions for two species of songbird. PeerJ2020; 8: e9926.
Philippine Green Building Council. BERDE GBRS – New Construction. Version 2.2. Taguig, Philippines:Philippine Green Building Council, 2017.
148.
Energy & Environmental Canada Ltd. Green Globes: Design for New Buildings and Retrofits: Rating System and Program Summary. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Energy & Environment Canada Ltd., 2004.
149.
BCA. GM RB: 2016 Green Mark for residential buildings. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority, 2017.
150.
Green Building Council South Africa. Green Star SA. Version 2. Cape Town, South Africa: Green Building Council of South Africa, 2017.
151.
New Zealand Green Building Council. greenstar: Technical Manual v3.2. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Green Building Council, 2017.
152.
IGBC. IGBC Green New Buildings Rating System. Version 3.0. Hyderabad, India: Indian Green Building Council, 2014.
153.
Indian Green Building Council. LEED 2011 for India: Green Building Rating System for New Construction and Major Renovations. Hyderabad, India: Indian Green Building Council, 2011.
