The near-field - far-field disparity of light sources leads to discussion within the lighting community. In the far-field, light sources are approximated by a point source with a luminous intensity distribution from which other photometric quantities can be computed. In the near-field, light sources must be considered as extended sources and no closed-loop analytical solutions can be found for the illuminance in off-axis directions. The illuminance allows to compute the apparent intensity used for the assessment of the limiting photometric distance (LPD), that is, the threshold between near- and far-field regions. Numerically, the illuminance can be determined through a discretisation of the luminous surface. This approach is verified for on- and off-axis directions through direct comparison with ray tracing simulations based on near-field goniophotometric measurements. A good match is observed for Lambertian and narrow beam light sources. Using the numerical approach, the LPD in all directions is assessed. For light sources of which the luminous intensity strictly decreases while moving away from the optical axis, the LPD decreases as well until a minimal value is reached. After this, the LPD increases again, in certain scenarios up to values resulting in the invalidity of the inverse square law.
De AlmeidaASantosBBertoldiPQuicheronM. Solid state lighting review – potential and challenges in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews2014; 34: 30–48.
6.
UN/ECE. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices. UN/ECE Regulation No. 48 [2019/57], 2019.
7.
AlsalamiFMAigoroNMahmoudAA, et al. Impact of vehicle headlights radiation pattern on dynamic vehicular VLC channel. Journal of Lightwave Technology2021; 39: 3162–3168.
8.
LongXHeJZhouJ, et al. A review on light-emitting diode based automotive headlamps. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews2015; 41: 29–41.
9.
AllenJ. TrendForce 2020–2021 Global automotive LED product trend and regional market analysis. Retrieved 09 November 2021 from https://www.ledinside.com/node/32076
JacobsVAFormentSRombautsPHanselaerP.Near-field and far-field goniophotometry of focused LED arrays. Optical Modelling and Design III2014; 9131: 913104.
12.
JacobsVAGaeverRVRibbensB, et al. Quality assessment of virtual prototypes of surgical luminaires using near-field ray-data. Leukos2013; 9: 189–200.
13.
MorenoISunCCIvanovR.Far-field condition for light-emitting diode arrays. Applied Optics2009; 48: 1190–1197.
14.
ISO/CIE. Characterization of the Performance of Illuminance Meters and Luminance Meters. ISO/CIE 19476:2014. 2014.
15.
ReyerA.Light Measurement Handbook. Newburyport, MA: International Light Inc., 1998.
16.
MistrickRGEnglishCR.A study of near-field indirect lighting calculations. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1990; 19: 103–112.
LiuXCaiWLeiXDuXChenW.Far-field distance for surface light source with different luminous area. Applied Optics2013; 52: 1629.
19.
JacobsVA.Design considerations for LED based surgical luminaires. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2015.
20.
SunCCChienWTMorenoIHsiehCCLoYC.Analysis of the far-field region of LEDs. Optics Express2009; 17: 13918–13927.
21.
SimonotLReuxFCarreSMartinsonsC.The usefulness of near-field goniophotometry data to assess illuminances and discomfort glare in indoor lighting. Leukos2021; 18: 246–257.
22.
Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. Test Method for LED Lamps, LED Luminaires and LED Modules. CIE S 0.25/E:2015. Vienna: CIE, 2015.
23.
BergenASJJenkinsSE. Determining the minimum test distance in the goniophotometry of LED luminaires. Proceedings of CIE 2012 Lighting Quality & Energy Efficiency, Hangzhou, CN, 19–21September2012: 337–343.
24.
CaiWLiuXLeiXChenW.Analysis of misalignment-induced measurement error for goniophotometry of light-emitting diode arrays. Applied Optics2013; 52: 8381–8387.
25.
CaiWLiuXZhangP, et al. Analysis of far-field distance of LED arrays based on an improved error calculation formula. Proceedings SPIE: Nonimaging Optics: Efficient Design for Illumination and Solar Concentration X. San Diego, CA, USA: SPIE, 2013, vol. 8834.
26.
JaffeyAH.Solid angle subtended by a circular aperture at point and spread sources: formulas and some tables. Review of Scientific Instruments1954; 25: 349–354.
27.
SmithJHStormML.Generalized off-axis distributions from disk sources of radiation. Journal of Applied Physics1954; 25: 519–527.
28.
ClarkeRG.Off-axis illumination by a plane circular radiator. Journal of Applied Physics1962; 33: 1614–1615.
29.
KokAJFJansenFW.Adaptive sampling of area light sources in ray tracing including diffuse interreflection. Computer Graphics Forum1992; 11: 289–298.
30.
MorenoI.LED irradiance pattern at short distances. Applied Optics2020; 59: 190–195.
31.
MorenoIViveros-MendezPX.Modeling the irradiation pattern of LEDs at short distances. Optics Express2021; 29: 6845–6853.
32.
SparrowEM.A new and simpler formulation for radiative angle factors. Journal of Heat Transfer1963; 85: 81–87.
33.
ChoiAS.Practical applications of form factor computation in lighting calculations. Building and Environment2002; 37: 1107–1115.
34.
DiLauraDQuinlanJ.Nondiffuse radiative transfer I: planar area sources and point receivers. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1995; 24: 102–112.
35.
LautzenheiserTWellerGStannardS.Photometry for near field applications. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1984; 13: 262–269.
36.
ArvoJ. Applications of irradiance tensors to the simulation of non-Lambertian phenomena. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 6–11August1995: 335–342.
37.
ScheirGHHanselaerPBrackePDeconinckGRyckaertWR.Calculation of the Unified Glare Rating based on luminance maps for uniform and non-uniform light sources. Building and Environment2015; 84: 60–67.
38.
HouleCFiumeE.Light source modeling using pyramidal light maps. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing1993; 55: 346–358.
39.
PicottKP.Extensions of the linear and area lighting models. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications1992; 12: 31–38.
HeidrichWBrabecSSeidelHP. Soft shadow maps for linear lights. In PérocheBRushmeierH, editors. Rendering Techniques. Vienna: Springer, 2000: 269–280.
42.
AssarssonUAkenine-MollerT. A geometry-based soft shadow volume algorithm using graphics hardware. Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH’03 Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 27–31July2003: 511–520.
43.
Commission Internalionale de l’Éclairage. International Lighting Vocabulary. CIE S 014/E:2020. Vienna: CIE, 2020.
44.
BellRI.A method for the calculation of direct illuminance due to area sources of various distributions. Lighting Research and Technology1973; 5: 99–102.
45.
JacobsVBlattnerPOhnoY, et al. Analyses of errors associated with photometric distance in goniophotometry. Proceedings of 28th Session of the CIE, Manchester, UK, 28June to 4July2015: 458–468.
46.
HolmesJG.A reference distance for the photometry of projectors. Lighting Research and Technology1981; 13: 96–98.
47.
PalmerJMGrantBG.The Art of Radiometry. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE, 2009: 28, 30, 36.
48.
MoermanJHolmesJ.The choice of test distance to control errors in the photometry of round projectors focussed at a long distance. Lighting Research and Technology1981; 13: 87–95.
49.
HolmesJG.Photometry from the right distance. Lighting Research and Technology1990; 22: 183–187.
HowellJRMengucMP.Radiative transfer configuration factor catalog: a listing of relations for common geometries. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer2011; 112: 910–912.
ShirleyPChiuK.A low distortion map between disk and square. Journal of Graphics Tools1997; 2: 45–52.
71.
YanDMGuoJWWangBZhangXPWonkaP.A survey of blue-noise sampling and its applications. Journal of Computer Science and Technology2015; 30: 439–452.
72.
DotreppeGMCoosemansJJacobsVA. Towards an improved V-VLC optical channel modelling. Proceedings of the Midterm CIE Conference CIE 2021, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27–29September2021: 820–830.
