Lighting is a critical component in a museum environment because, together with temperature, relative humidity and pollutants, it is one of the damaging factors able to produce long‐term, cumulative and irreversible photodegradation processes. To correctly preserve artworks, limiting illuminance and exposure is recommended, allowing on one side the preservation of the object, but on the other limiting the display of the object, especially for sensitive materials. The aim of this research was to develop, evaluate and compare a new lighting method for paintings and other cultural materials to improve the experience of the objects whilst reducing the risks from exposure. The idea is based on the use of selective chromatic light where the component of the spectrum absorbed by the materials is removed. This absorption is the principal cause of photodegradation. The proposed lighting system can be obtained by combining different types of projection systems together with filtering using an appropriate light source. Six methods of light projection have been compared for two mock-ups simulating real artworks with high and medium light sensitivity. The efficiency of illumination increased from 30% to 111% compared to standard lighting systems. Light stability tests were additionally performed, finding reduced colour changes compared to traditional lighting systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ThomsonG. The Museum Environment. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1986.
2.
Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. Control of Damage to Museum Objects by Optical Radiation. CIE 157:2004. Vienna: CIE2004.
3.
CamuffoD. Microclimate for Cultural Heritage: Measurement, Risk Assessment, Conservation, Restoration, and Maintenance of Indoor and Outdoor Monuments. New York: Elsevier, 2019.
4.
del Hoyo-MeléndezJMMecklenburgMFDoménech-CarbóMT. An evaluation of daylight distribution as an initial preventive conservation measure at two smithsonian institution museums. Journal of Cultural Heritage2011; 12: 54–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.05.003.
5.
AydinliSHilbertGSKrochmannEKrochmannJ. On the deterioration of exhibited museum objects by optical radiation. CIE technical collection 1990, CIE 089-1991. Technical report. Vienna: CIE, 1991.
6.
MecklenburgMFTumosaCS. Practical guide: temperature and relative humidity effects on the mechanical and chemical stability of collections. Journal of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers1999; 41: 77–82.
7.
NazaroffWWLigockiMPSalmonLGCassGRFallTJonesMC. Airborne Particles in Museums. Research in Conservation. London: The Getty Conservation Institute, 1993.
8.
MichalskiS. Damage to museum objects by visible radiation (light) and ultraviolet radiation (uv). Lighting in Museums, Galleries and Historic Houses1987; 28: 3–16.
9.
CuttleC. Damage to museum objects due to light exposure. Lighting Research and Technology1996; 28: 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/14771535960280010301.
10.
BrommelleNS. The Russell and Abney report on the action of light on water colours. Studies in Conservation1964; 9: 140–152. DOI: 10.2307/1505213.
11.
FellerRL. Control of deteriorating effects of light upon museum objects. Museum International1964; 17: 57–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0033.1964.tb01570.x.
12.
FellerRL. Studies on the darkening of vermilion by light. Report and Studies in the History of Art1967; 1: 99–111.
13.
DuffDGSinclairRSStirlingD. Light-induced colour changes of natural dyes. Studies in Conservation1977; 22: 161–169. DOI: 10.2307/1505832.
14.
AllenNS. Photofading and light stability of dyed and pigmented polymers. Polymer Degradation and Stability1994; 44: 357–374. DOI: 10.1016/0141-3910(94)90095-7.
15.
SaundersDKirbyJ. Wavelength-dependent fading of artists’ pigments. Studies in Conservation1994; 39: 190–194. DOI: 10.1179/sic.1994.39.Supplement-2.190.
del Hoyo-MeléndezJMMecklenburgMF. Micro-fading spectrometry: a tool for real-time assessment of the light-fastness of dye/textile systems. Fibers and Polymers2012: 13: 1079–1085. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-012-1079-7.
18.
del Hoyo‐MeléndezJMŚwitPSobczykJ. Measuring photostability through glass: the application of microfading testing to the study of framed pastel artworks. Coloration Technology2018; 134: 411–422. DOI: 10.1111/cote.12365.
19.
KimbrielCS. Colour change in paintings. Journal of the Institute of Conservation2017; 40: 267–269. DOI: 10.1080/19455224.2017.1360546.
20.
WhitmorePMPanXBailieC. Predicting the fading of objects: identification of fugitive colorants through direct nondestructive lightfastness measurements. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation1999; 38: 395–409. DOI: 10.1179/019713699806113420.
21.
WhitmorePMBailieCConnorsSA. Micro-fading tests to predict the result of exhibition: progress and prospects. Studies in Conservation2000; 45: 200–205. DOI: 10.1179/sic.2000.45.Supplement-1.200.
22.
del Hoyo-MeléndezJMMecklenburgMFTeresa Doménech-CarbóM. Determination of the annual light exposure received by two-dimensional museum objects displayed on vertical surfaces using photometric measurements. Studies in Conservation2011; 56: 31–40. DOI: 10.1179/sic.2011.56.1.31.
23.
Mayorga PinillaSVázquezDÁlvarez Fernández-BalbuenaA, et al. Spectral damage model for lighted museum paintings: oil, acrylic and gouache. Journal of Cultural Heritage2016; 22: 931–939. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.005.
24.
BrillTB. Light: Its Interaction with Art and Antiquities. New York: Springer US, 1980.
25.
SchaefferTT. Effects of Light on Materials in Collections: Data on Photoflash and Related Sources. Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 2001.
26.
MacchiaACampanellaLGazzoliDGravagnaEMarasANunzianteS, et al.Realgar and light. Procedia Chemistry2013; 8: 185–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.proche.2013.03.024.
27.
MilianiCMonicoLMeloMJFantacciSAngelinEMRomaniA, et al.Photochemistry of artists’ dyes and pigments: towards better understanding and prevention of colour change in works of art. Angewandte Chemie International Edition2018; 57: 7324–7334. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201802801.
28.
LerwillABrookesATownsendJHHackneySLiangH. Micro-fading spectrometry: investigating the wavelength specificity of fading. Applied Physics A2015; 118: 457–463. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-014-8645-3.
29.
TaoCWhitmorePM. Development of a microfading tester for light exposures including near-ultraviolet wavelengths. Research Technical Studies Speciality Group Postprints2010: 43.
30.
BunsenRRoscoeHE. XXXV. Photo-chemical researches-Part IV. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London1859; 149: 879–926.
31.
SaundersDKirbyJ. Light-induced damage: investigating the reciprocity principle: Proceedings of ICOM Committee for Conservation 11th Triennial Meeting, Edinburgh, 1–6 September1996, pp. 87–90.
32.
del Hoyo-MeĺendezJMMecklenburgMF. An investigation of the reciprocity principle of light exposures using microfading spectrometry. Spectroscopy Letters2011; 44: 52–62. DOI: 10.1080/00387010903508572.
33.
ManfrediMWilliamsonGKronkrightDDoehneEJacobsMMarengoE, et al.Measuring changes in cultural heritage objects with reflectance transformation imaging: 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress Digital, Marseille, France, 2013: 189–192. DOI: 10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743730.
34.
IESNAA. RP 30-17 Recommended Practice for Museum Lighting. ANSI IESNA, 2017.
35.
GarsideDCurranKKorenbergCMacDonaldLTeunissenKRobsonS. How is museum lighting selected? An insight into current practice in UK museums. Journal of the Institute of Conservation2017; 40: 3–14. DOI: 10.1080/19455224.2016.1267025.
36.
ViénotFCoronGLavédrineB. LEDs as a tool to enhance faded colours of museums artefacts. Journal of Cultural Heritage2011; 12: 431–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2011.03.007.
37.
LafontaineRH. Seeing through a Yellow Varnish: a compensating illumination system. Studies in Conservation1986; 31: 97–102. DOI: 10.2307/1506255.
38.
LawAJAliagaDYeungYH. Projecting restorations in real-time for real-world objects, 2009.
39.
PerkinsROwensHCarrC, et al.Henry VIII’s tapestries revealed: 16th Triennial Conference in Lisbon, Criterio, 19–23 September 2011.
40.
BernsRS. Designing white-light LED lighting for the display of art: a feasibility study. Color Research & Application2011; 36: 324–334. DOI: 10.1002/col.20633.
StengerJKhandekarNRaskarRCuellarSMohanAGschwindR. Conservation of a room: a treatment proposal for Mark Rothko’s harvard murals. Studies in Conservation2016; 61: 348–361. DOI: 10.1179/2047058415Y.0000000010.
46.
BernsRS. Digital color reconstructions of cultural heritage using color‐managed imaging and small‐aperture spectrophotometry. Color Research & Application2019; 44: 531–546. DOI: 10.1002/col.22371.
47.
VázquezDFernández-BalbuenaAACanabalH, et al.Energy optimization of a light projection system for buildings that virtually restores artworks. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage2020; 16: e00128. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2019.e00128.
48.
LuoMRCuiGRiggB. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Research & Application2001; 26: 340–350. DOI: 10.1002/col.1049.
49.
PretzelB. Now you see it, now you don’t: lighting decisions for the Ardabil carpet based on the probability of visual perception and rates of fading: 15th Triennial Conference, New Delhi, 2008: 759–765.
50.
KühnH. The effect of oxygen, relative humidity and temperature on the fading rate of watercolors. Reduced light-damage in a nitrogen atmosphere. Studies in Conservation1967; 12: 79–88. DOI: 10.1179/sic.1967.12.s1.011.
51.
KorenbergC. The photo-ageing behaviour of selected watercolour paints under anoxic conditions. British Museum Technical Research Bulletin2008; 2: 49–57.
52.
Doménech-CarbóMTSilvaMFAura-CastroEFuster-LópezLKrönerSMartìnez-BazánML, et al.Study of behaviour on simulated daylight ageing of artists’ acrylic and poly(vinyl acetate) paint films. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry2011; 399: 2921–2937. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-4294-3.
53.
TetreaultJ. Airborne Pollutants in Museums. Galleries and Archives: Risk Assessment, Control Strategies and Preservation Management. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute, 2003.
54.
BrokerhofAWReussMMacKinnonFLigterinkFNeevelHFekrsanatiF, et al.Optimum access at minimum risk: the Dilemma of displaying Japanese woodblock prints. Studies in Conservation2008; 53: 82–87. DOI: 10.1179/sic.2008.53.Supplement-1.82.
55.
FordBSmithN. The development of a significance-based lighting framework at the national museum of Australia. AICCM Bulletin2014; 32(1): 80–86. DOI: 10.1179/bac.2011.32.1.011.
