This study examines if simulations can be used as a valid method for lighting and brand image evaluation. Simulations could reduce cost and time compared to mock-ups in real size. Two different presentation techniques are compared to a real-size mock-up of the same situation: computer monitor and video projector. The results reveal a consistency for the lighting characteristics of brightness and contrast but not for correlated colour temperature and chromaticity. The six brand image factors of price, style, temperament, competence, attractiveness and naturalness are also consistent, with the exception of naturalness for the video projector setting. Therefore, lighting simulations could be used in the design process and for research when analysing brightness, contrast and brand image factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ward G. The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH, 1994: 459–472.
2.
MardaljevicJ. Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Lighting Research and Technology1995; 27: 181–188.
3.
RoyGG. A Comparative Study of Lighting Simulation Packages Suitable for Use in Architectural Design, Perth, Australia: School of Engineering, Murdoch University, 2000.
4.
ReinhartCBretonP-F. Experimental validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and Daysim 3.0. Leukos2009; 6: 7–35.
5.
HendrickCOsypMSpencerTJFlynnJE. Procedures for investigating the effect of light on impression: Simulation of a real space by slides. Environment and Behavior1977; 9: 491–510.
6.
CustersPde KortYIJsselsteijnWde KruiffM. Lighting in retail environments: Atmosphere perception in the real world. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 331–343.
7.
McCloughanCLBAspinallPAWebbRS. The impact of lighting on mood. Lighting Research and Technology1999; 31: 81–88.
8.
NewshamGRGRichardsonCBlanchetCVeitchJJ. Lighting quality research using rendered images of offices. Lighting Research and Technology2005; 37: 93–115.
9.
EngelkeUStokkermansMGMMurdochMJVisualizing lighting with images: converging between the predictive value of renderings and photographs. In: RogowitzBEPappasTNde RidderH (eds). Proceedings of SPIE - Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVIII, Burlingame, California, USA, 14 March 2013,. 86510L.
10.
AltmanE. Computers and lighting. Lighting Design and Application2005; 12: 57–62.
11.
GibsonJJ. The information available in pictures. Leonardo1971; 4: 27–45.
12.
Schielke T. Corporate lighting: Methods and techniques of architectural lighting for brand communication. Doctoral thesis. Darmstadt: Darmstadt University of Technology, 2014.
13.
Schielke T, Leudesdorff M. Impact of lighting design on brand image for fashion retail stores. Lighting Research and Technology. First published 1 July 2014. DOI 10.1177/1477153514541831.
14.
SchielkeT. Light and corporate identity: Using lighting for corporate communication. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 285–295.
15.
QuartierKVanrieJVan CleempoelK. As real as it gets: What role does lighting have on consumer's perception of atmosphere, emotions and behaviour?Journal of Environmental Psychology2014; 39: 32–39.
16.
SchielkeT. Influence of lighting design on marketing communication. Luekos2015; 11: 1–16.
17.
LoeDLRowlandsE. The art and science of lighting: A strategy for lighting design. Lighting Research and Technology1996; 28: 153–164.
18.
CuttleCBrandstonH. Evaluation of retail lighting. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1995; 24: 33–49.
19.
OchoaCEAriesMBCHensenJLM. State of the art in lighting simulation for building science: a literature review. Journal of Building Performance Simulation2012; 5: 209–233.
20.
MardaljevicJ. The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques. Lighting Research and Technology2001; 33: 117–134.
21.
Reinhart C, Breton PF. Experimental validation of 3DS Max Design 2009 and Daysim 3.0.: Proceedings 11th International IBPSA Conference, International Building Performance Simulation Association, Glasgow, Scotland, 2009: 1514–1521.
22.
DelahungPBBrainardDH. Color constancy under changes in reflected illumination. Journal of Vision2004; 4: 764–778.
23.
LeddaPChalmersATrosciankoTSeetzenH. Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a High Dynamic Range display. ACM Transactions on Graphics2005; 24: 640.
24.
YoshidaABlanzVMyszkowskiKSeidelH-P. In: RogowitzBEPappasTNDalySJ (eds) Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators with real-world scenes. Proceedings of SPIE, San Jose, CA, USA, 2005, pp. 192–203.
ČadíkMWimmerMNeumannLArtusiA. Evaluation of HDR tone mapping methods using essential perceptual attributes. Computers and Graphics2008; 32: 330–349.
27.
Inanici MN. Application of the state-of-the-art computer simulation and visualization in architectural lighting research: Proceedings of the 7th International Building Performance and Simulation Association (IBPSA) 2001 Conference. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2001: 1175–1182.
28.
DanielTCMeitnerMM. Representational validity of landscape visualizations: the effects of graphic realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology2000; 21: 61–72.
29.
MurdochMJStokkermansMGMEffects of image size and interactivity in lighting visualization. In: RogowitzBEPappasTNde RidderH (eds). Proceedings of the SPIE - Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XIX, San Francisco, California, USA, 25 February 2014; 90140J. International Society for Optical Engineering.
30.
NöthW. Handbuch der Semiotik, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1985.
31.
EcoU. Einführung in die Semiotik, München: Fink, 1972.
32.
VeselyD. Architecture in the Age of Divided Representation: The Question of Creativity in the Shadow of Production, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004.
33.
MessedatJ. Corporate Architecture: Development, Concepts, Strategies, Ludwigsburg: AV Edition, 2005.
34.
KotlerP. Marketing Management, London: Prentice Hall International, 2000.
35.
MeggsP. A History of Graphic Design, London: Allen Lane, 1983.
36.
BeckerUNowakH. The everyday-life-approach as a new research perspective in opinion and marketing research: Esomar Congress (European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research), Vienna, Austria, 1982,. 269–288.
37.
BourdieuP. Die feinen Unterschiede, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1982.
KonietzkaD. Lebensstile im sozialstrukturellen Kontext: ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zur Analyse soziokultureller Ungleichheiten, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995.
40.
Diaz-BoneR. Milieumodelle und millieuinstrumente in der marktforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research2004; 5: 1–17.
GrögerM. Lifestyles and their impact on energy-related investment decisions. Low Carbon Economy2011; 2: 107–114.
45.
Wieland D. Individualisierung und Sozialstruktur – objektive und subjektive Dimensionen sozialer Ungleichheit, 2002.
46.
HradilSAlte Begriffe und neue Strukturen. Die Milieu-, Subkultur- und Lebensstilforschung der 80′er Jahre. In: HradilS (ed). Zwischen Bewußtsein und Sein: die Vermittlung “objektiver” Lebensbedingungen und “subjektiver” Lebensweisen, Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 1992, pp. 15–56.
47.
SchulzeG. Die Erlebnis-Gesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart, Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag, 1995.
48.
VesterM. Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel: Zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung, Köln: Bund-Verlag, 1993.
49.
AakerJL. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research1997; 34: 347–356.
50.
MäderR. Messung und Steuerung von Markenpersönlichkeit: Entwicklung eines Messinstruments und Anwendung in der Werbung mit prominenten Testimonials, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, 2005.
51.
ZentesJMorschettDSchramm-KleinH. Brand personality of retailers – an analysis of its applicability and its effect on store loyalty. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research2008; 18: 167–184.
52.
RaffeltU. Architectural Branding - Understanding and Measuring its Relevance for Brand Communication, München: FGM-Verlag, Verl. der Fördergemeinschaft Marketing e.V, 2012.
53.
KellyR. Light as an integral part of architecture. College Art Journal1952; 12: 24–30.
54.
SchielkeT. Tutorial: Rationale, concepts, and techniques for lighting vertical surfaces. Leukos2013; 9: 223–243.
55.
HopkinsonRG. Architectural Physics Lighting, London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1963.
56.
LikertR. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology1932; 140: 1–55.
57.
EdmondsonDR. Likert scales: A history. CHARM - the Conference on Historical Analysis and Research in Marketing, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2005, pp. 127–133.
58.
BooteAS. Reliability testing of psychographic scales. Journal of Advertising Research1981; 21: 53–60.
59.
ChangL. A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement1994; 18: 205–215.
60.
CoxEP. The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. Journal of Marketing Research1980; 17: 407–422.
61.
CicchettiDVShoinralterDTyrerPJ. The effect of number of rating scale categories on levels of interrater reliability: A Monte Carlo investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement1985; 9: 31–36.
62.
PrestonCCColmanAM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica2000; 104: 1–15.
HouserKWTillerDK. Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling. Lighting Research and Technology2003; 35: 183–198.
65.
LoeDLMansfieldKPRowlandsE. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: Experimental study. Lighting Research and Technology1994; 26: 119–133.
66.
TillerDKReaMS. Semantic differential scaling: Prospects in lighting research. Lighting Research and Technology1992; 24: 43–51.
67.
Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). DIN EN 12464-1:2011-08. Light and Lighting - Lighting of Work Places - Part 1: Indoor Work Places, Berlin: DIN, 2011.
68.
DiLauraDHouserKWMistrickRSteffyG. The Lighting Handbook, New York: IESNA Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2011.
FrickerRDSchonlauM. Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods2002; 14: 347–367.
71.
RothM. Validating the use of internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment—An empirical study from Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning2006; 78: 179–192.
72.
BishopIRohrmannB. Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning2003; 65: 261–277.
73.
BishopIDMillerDR. Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: The influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables. Renewable Energy2007; 32: 814–831.
74.
RohrmannBBishopI. Subjective responses to computer simulations of urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology2002; 22: 319–331.
75.
SprowIBaranczukZStammTZollikerPWeb-based psychometric evaluation of image quality. In: FarnandSPGaykemaF (eds). SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging2009, pp. 72420A–72420A-12.
76.
VillaCLabayradeR. Validation of an online protocol for assessing the luminous environment. Lighting Research and Technology2012; 45: 401–420.
77.
SmithFKBertoloneFJ. Bringing Interiors to Light. The Principles and Practices of Lighting Design, New York: Whitney Library of Design, 1986.
78.
IttenJ. Art of Colour, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1974.
79.
CussonRCardosoJ. Realistic Architectural Visualization with 3ds Max and Mental Ray, Waltham, MA: Focal Press, 2012.
80.
Tristiyono B. Lighting analysis for design of interior car body of first class train new generation PT. INKA: Proceedings of International Seminar on Applied Technology, Science, and Arts (2nd APTECS), Surabaya: 2010.
81.
JiaLAfshariSMishraSRadkeRJ. Simulation for pre-visualizing and tuning lighting controller behavior. Energy and Buildings2014; 70: 287–302.
82.
LouM. Light. The Shape of Space. Designing with Space and Light, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1995.
83.
EissaHMahdaviA. On the potential of computationally rendered scenes for lighting quality evaluation: Seventh International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2001.
84.
NewshamGRCetegenDVeitchJAWhiteheadL. Comparing lighting quality evaluations of real scenes with those from high dynamic range and conventional images. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception2010; 7: 1–26.
