The use of light emitting diodes (LEDs) in outdoor lighting has energy-saving potential, but users’ responses to this light source are largely unknown. An intervention study in two residential areas compared conventional lighting installations (high pressure sodium in Area 1 and high pressure mercury in Area 2) to a retrofitted LED-alternative regarding residents’ perceptions of quality of light, visual accessibility and danger. Moreover, energy use was calculated. Residents’ (N = 60) visual accessibility improved and perceived danger remained low in both areas after retrofitting. In Area 2 the perceived quality of light increased, whereas in Area 1 the results were mixed. The retrofitted application reduced energy use by 41–76% and might be a feasible alternative to conventional outdoor lighting in relatively safe areas.
Mottier P. (ed) LEDs for Lighting Applications. London: Wiley-ITSE, 2009.
3.
JohanssonMRosénMKüllerR. Individual factors influencing the assessment of the outdoor lighting of an urban footpath. Lighting Research and Technology2011; 43: 31–43.
4.
ReaMS. Opinion: The future of LED lighting: Greater benefit or just lower cost. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 370–370.
KaruppannanSSivamA. Social sustainability and neighbourhood design: an investigation of resident’s satisfaction in Delhi. Local Environment2011; 16: 849–870.
7.
KüllerREnvironmental assessment from a neuropsychological perspective. In: GärlingTEvansGW (eds). Environment, Cognition and Action, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991, pp. 78–95.
8.
KüllerRBallalSLaikeTMikellidesBTonelloG. The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: A cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Ergonomics2006; 49: 1496–1507.
9.
KnightC. Field surveys of the effect of lamp spectrum on the perception of safety and comfort at night. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 313–329.
10.
PurvesD. Brains: How They Seem To Work, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc, 2010.
Rea MS. The IESNA Lighting Handbook, 9th Edition. New York: The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2000.
13.
The Institution of Lighting Engineers, Outdoor Lighting Guide, Oxford: Taylor & Francis, 2005.
14.
Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. Recommended System for Visual Performance Based on Mesopic Photometry, CIE Publication 191, Vienna: CIE, 2010.
15.
FotiosSAChealC. Predicting lamp spectrum effects at mesopic levels. Part 1: Spatial brightness. Lighting Research and Technology2011; 43: 143–157.
16.
Vidovszky-NémethASchandaJ. White light brightness-luminance relationship. Lighting Research and Technology2012; 44: 55–68.
17.
FotiosSAChealC. Lighting for subsidiary streets: investigations of lamps of different SPD. Part 2 - Brightness. Lighting Research and Technology2007; 39: 233–252.
18.
ReaMSBulloughJDAkashiY. Several views of metal halide and high-pressure sodium lighting for outdoor applications. Lighting Research and Technology2009; 41: 297–320.
19.
FotiosSChealCBoycePR. Light source spectrum, brightness perception and visual performance in pedestrian environments: a review. Lighting Research and Technology2005; 374271–294.
20.
SammarcoJJLutzT. Visual performance for incandescent and solid-state cap lamps in an underground mining environment. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications2011; 47: 2301–2306.
21.
FotiosSAChealC. Lighting for subsidiary streets: investigations of lamps of different SPD. Part 1-Visual Performance. Lighting Research and Technology2007; 39: 215–232.
22.
BoycePREklundNHHamiltonBJBrunoLD. Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 79–91.
23.
KüllerRWetterbergL. The subterranean work environment: Impact on well-being and health. Environment International1996; 22: 33–52.
24.
BlöbaumAHuneckeM. Perceived danger in urban public space. The impact of physical features and personal factors. Environment and Behavior2005; 37: 465–486.
25.
KeaneC. Evaluating the influence of fear of crime as an environmental mobility restrictor on women’s routine activities. Environment and Behavior1998; 30: 60–74.
26.
BalfourJLKaplanGA. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: Evidence from the Alameda County Study. American Journal of Epidemiology2002; 155: 507–515.
27.
LeeCMoudonAV. Neighbourhood design and physical activity. Building Research and Information2008; 36: 395–411.
28.
PainterK. The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark. Landscape and Urban Planning1996; 35: 193–201.
29.
BonnesMSecchiaroliG. Environmental Psychology. A Psycho-Social Introduction, London: Sage, 1995.
30.
FornaraFBonaiutoMBonnesM. Perceived hospital environment quality indicators: A study of orthopaedic units. Journal of Environmental Psychology2006; 26: 321–334.
31.
WinkelGSaegertSEvansGW. An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology2009; 29: 318–328.
32.
Johansson M, Kuhn L, Goven T, Laike T, Norlén N. Outdoor LED in multi-family residential areas: Energy use and residents’ perception. Final Report Project no 31702-1. Eskilstuna: The Swedish Energy Agency, 2011.
33.
RomanCGChalfinA. Fear of walking outdoors. A multilevel ecologic analysis of crime and disorder. American Journal of Preventive Medicine2008; 34: 306–312.
34.
Van der WurffAvan StaalduinenLStringerP. Fear of crime in residential environments: Testing a social psychological model. The Journal of Social Psychology2001; 129: 141–160.
