The visibility level (VL), a quality index in road lighting design, also serves to assess automotive lighting performance. Unlike illuminance levels, the VL provides a link between lighting design and driving performance. The reference performance of the VL is the detection of a small uniform target, standing on a uniform background (the road surface). Still, VL is subject to a number of caveats with regards to the driving task. We address the non-realistic nature of the reference target (a uniform square). A driving simulation experiment was conducted in a virtual night-time rural highway environment. The subjects drove along the road and came across different targets on the roadside. The detection distances were recorded and compared with the corresponding VL, showing rather good agreement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdrianW. Visibility levels under night-time driving conditions. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1987; 16: 3–12.
2.
AdrianW. Visibility of targets: model for calculation. Lighting Research and Technology1989; 21: 181–188.
3.
BlackwellHR. Contrast thresholds of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America1946; 36: 624–643.
4.
Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. An Analytic Model for Describing the Influence of Lighting Parameters upon Visual Performance, CIE publication 19/2. Vienna: CIE, 1981.
5.
Association Française de l’Eclairage. Recommendations Relatives à l’Eclairage des Voies Publiques, Lux éditions, 2002.
6.
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting, RP-8-00, New York: IESNA, 2000.
7.
OlsonPAokiTBattleDFlannaganM. Development of a Headlight System Performance Evaluation Tool, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 1990.
8.
IsingKFrickerTLawrenceJSiegmundG. Threshold visibility levels for the Adrian visibility model under night-time driving conditions: Proceedings of the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress. Detroit, USA, 2003. Paper no. 2003-01-0294. DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-0294, 2003.
9.
IsingK. Threshold visibility levels required for night-time pedestrian detection in a modified Adrian/CIE visibility model. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America2008; 5: 63–75.
10.
IsingKGreenM. The distribution of visibility levels at target detection in a modified Adrian/CIE visibility model: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas. October 2009, 2009. 1796–1800.
11.
GallenRHautièreNGlaserS. Advisory speed for intelligent speed adaptation in adverse conditions: Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. San Diego, CA, June 2010, 2010; 107–114.
12.
ReaMS. Toward a model of visual performance: foundations and data. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1986; 15: 41–57.
13.
LecocqJ. Calculation of the visibility level of spherical targets in roads. Lighting Research and Technology1999; 31: 171–175.
14.
BrémondRDumontELedouxVMayeurA. Photometric measurements for visibility level computations. Lighting Research and Technology2011; 43: 119–128.
15.
MayeurABrémondRBastienC. The effect of task and eccentricity of the target on detection thresholds in mesopic vision. Implications for road lighting. Human Factors2008; 50: 712–721.
16.
MayeurABrémondRBastienC. Effects of the viewing context on peripheral target detection. Implications for road lighting design. Applied Ergonomics2010; 41: 461–468.
17.
MayeurABrémondRBastienC. The effect of the driving activity on target detection as a function of the visibility level. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour2010; 13: 115–128.
18.
BrémondRMayeurA. Some drawbacks of the visibility level as an index of visual performance while driving: Proceedings of the 27th Session of the CIE. Sun City, South Africa, Vienna: CIE, 2011, 2011; 1140–1143.
19.
HautièreNDumontE. Assessment of visibility in complex road scenes using digital imaging: Proceedings of the 26th Session of the CIE. Beijing, China, VIenna: CIE, July 2007, D4 96–99, 2007.
20.
JoulanKHautièreNBrémondR. Contrast sensitivity functions for road visibility estimation on digital images: Proceedings of the 27th Session of the CIE. Sun City, South Africa, Vienna: CIE, 2011, 2011; 1144–1149.
21.
JoulanKHautièreNBrémondR. A unified framework for edge detection and edge visibility: Proceedings of the CVPR Workshop on Biologically-Consistent Vision. Colorado Springs, CO: CVPR, 2011, 21–26. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2011.5981679, 2011.
22.
ReaMSBulloughJDZhouY. A method for assessing the visibility benefits of roadway lighting. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 215–241.
23.
RoseyFAuberletJ-MBertrandJPlainchaultP. Impact of perceptual treatments on lateral control during driving on crest vertical curves: a driving simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention2008; 40: 1513–1523.
24.
TörnosJ. Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel – a validation study. Accident Analysis and Prevention1998; 30: 497–503.
25.
BulloughJDReaMS. Simulated driving performance and peripheral detection at mesopic and low photopic light levels. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 194–198.
26.
BellaF. Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention2008; 40: 1078–1087.
27.
MoonPSpencerDE. The visual effect of non-uniform surrounds. Journal of the Optical Society of America1945; 35: 233–247.
28.
LecocqJ. Visibility level in outdoor lighting. Adrian model applied to spherical cap targets: Proceedings of the 22th Session of the CIE. Melbourne, Australia, Vienna: CIE, 1991, 1991; 48–51.
29.
RoperVJHowardEA. Seeing with motor car headlamps. Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society1938; 30: 417–438.
30.
BacelarACariouJHammardM. Calculational visibility model for road lighting installations. Lighting Research and Technology1999; 31: 177–180.
31.
PaulmierGBrusqueCCartaVNguyenV. The influence of visual complexity on the detection of targets investigated by computer generated images. Lighting Research and Technology2001; 33: 197–205.
32.
BartelsC. SAFESPOT local dynamic maps – virtual world for safety applications: Proceedings ITS World Congress, Beijing, China. October 2007, 2007.
