This paper examines how the lighting of roads in the UK might be changed so as to preserve the benefits while minimising energy consumption. It is divided into four sections, these being changes in technology, changes in patterns of use, changes in standards and contracts and changes in the basis of design. Useful changes in technology and patterns of use are available now, but their use will raise the question as to whether or not environmental considerations can override conventional financial constraints. Changes in standards and the basis of design are much more long term. Comparisons of road lighting standards used in different countries show significant differences that deserve examination. As for the basis of design, consideration of the importance of light to fatal and personal injury accidents of different types suggests that road lighting should be concentrated where pedestrians are common, not where speeds are highest. Ultimately, considering carefully what problem road lighting is intended to solve and whether or not road lighting is the best answer is the key to minimising the energy consumption of road lighting without diminishing road safety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boyce PRLighting for Driving: Roads, Vehicles, Signs and Signals. New York: CRC Press, 2009.
2.
Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).Policy Brief: Improving the Energy Performance of Street lighting and Traffic Signals. London: DEFRA, 2008.
3.
Office of National Statistics (ONS).Electricity Supply and Consumption. London: ONS, 2008.
4.
Elexon.Unmetered Supplies Operational Information, Version 3. London: Elexon, 2007.
5.
European Standards (EN), Working document on implementation of directive 2005/32/ ec with regard to tertiary sector lighting products, 2008.
6.
British Standards Institution (BSI), BS 5489-1:2003, Code of practice for the design of road lighting - Part 1: Lighting of roads and public amenity areas. London: BSI, 2003.
7.
British Standards Institution (BSI).BS EN 13201-2:2003, Road lighting - Part 2: Performance requirements. London: BSI, 2003.
8.
Guo L., Eloholma M., Halonen L.Lighting control strategies for telemanagement road lighting control systems . Leukos2007; 4: 157-171.
9.
Lighting Research Center (LRC).Lighting Answers: Photovoltaic Lighting. Troy, NY: LRC, 2006.
10.
Fotios SA, Boyce PR, Ellis CEThe effect of pavement material on road lighting Performance. Lighting Journal2006; 71(2): 35-40.
11.
Walker T.Remote monitoring systems assessed. Lighting Journal2007; 72: 49-53.
12.
Bacelar A.The influence of dimming of road lighting on the visibility of drivers . Journal of Light and Visual Environment2005; 29: 44-49.
13.
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA).Recommended Practice RP-8-00 Roadway Lighting . New York: IESNA, 2005.
14.
Japan Road Association (JRA).Road Lighting Installation Standard 2007. Tokyo : Japan Road Association, 2007 .
15.
Fotios S., Fisher A.Lighting in local roads: a comparison of guidance in Australia and the UK on lamp colour and illuminance. Lighting Art & Science for International Designers2008; June: 28-37.
16.
Australian/New Zealand Standards, AS/NZ 1158.3.1:2005, Lighting for roads and public spaces. Part 3.1: Pedestrian area (Category P) lighting - performance and installation design requirements, 2005.
17.
Fotios SA, Cheal C.Lighting for subsidiary streets: investigations of lamps of different SPD, part 2 - brightness. Lighting Research and Technology2007; 39: 215-232.
18.
Akashi Y., Rea MSPeripheral detection while driving under a mesopic light level. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society2002; 31: 85-94.
19.
Akashi Y., Rea MSBullough JDDriver decision making in response to peripheral moving targets under mesopic light levels. Lighting Research and Technology2007; 39: 53-67.
Simons RH, Hargroves RA, Pollard NE, Simpson MDLighting criteria for residential roads and areas: Proceedings of the CIE 21st Session. Venice , Vienna: CIE, 1987.
22.
Japanese Industrial Standard Committee (JISC).JIS Z9111 Lighting for Roads 1988. Tokyo: JISC, 1988.
23.
Caminada JF , van Bommel WJM.New lighting considerations for residential areas. International Lighting Review1980; 3: 69-75.
24.
Rombauts P. , Vandewyngaerde H., Maggetto G.Minimum semi-cylindrical illuminance and modeling in residential lighting. Lighting Research and Technology1989; 21: 49-55.
25.
Waldram JMThe revealing power of street lighting installations. Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society ( London) 1938; 3: 173-186.
26.
Narisada K. , Karasawa Y., Shirao K.Design parameters of road lighting and revealing power: Proceedings of the CIE, 25th Session. San Diego, Vienna: CIE, 2003.
27.
Bacelar A.The contribution of vehicle lights in urban and peripheral urban environments . Lighting Research and Technology2004; 36: 69-78.
28.
Sullivan JM , Flannagan MJDetermining the potential safety benefit of improved lighting in three pedestrian crash scenarios. Accident Analysis and Prevention2007; 39: 638-647.
29.
Boff KR, Lincoln JEEngineering Data Compendium: Human Perception and Performance. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory , 1988.
30.
Wordenweber B., Wallaschek J., Boyce P., Hoffman DDAutomotive Lighting and Human Vision. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
31.
Wanvik POEffects of road lighting: an analysis based on Dutch accident statistics 1987-2006 . Accident Analysis and Prevention2009; 41: 123-128.
32.
Luoma J., Schumann J., Traube ECEffect of Retroreflector Positioning on Nighttime Recognition of Pedestrians, UMTRI-95-18. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute1995.
33.
Hankey JM, Kiefer RJ, Gibbons RBQuantifying the pedestrian detection benefits of the general motors night vision system. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0443, Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2005.
