Electrochromic glazing and facade photovoltaic panels: a strategic assessment of the potential energy benefits

Abstract

This article describes a methodology to compare the energy benefit that may result from the adoption of two very different facade technologies in non-domestic buildings. A comparison is made of the energy benefit that might result from: (a) replacing conventional glass with electrochromic (EC) glazing; and, (b) installing PV panels across the opaque sections of vertical facade. The energy benefit from electrochromic glazing is predicted on the basis of displaced electric lighting usage against standard glazing with blinds, whereas the energy benefit from facade PV panels is equal to their delivered electrical output. The evaluation setting is a `typical' six metre deep perimeter office space with vertical glazing. Office orientations for each of the four cardinal compass points are considered. Performance evaluations are founded on a full year's hourly meteorological data for fourteen locales across the world. The predicted energy benefit from electrochromic glazing and facade PV are related to the total annual vertical irradiation incident on the building facade. The findings indicate that the energy benefit that results from replacing standard glazing with electrochromic glazing may exceed that of facade PV for the majority of cases studied. Surprisingly, electrochromic glazings are found to provide the greatest energy benefit for those cases at the lower end of the experienced range in total annual vertical irradiation. The effectiveness of widespread deployment across multiple facades for each locale is examined. The likelihood that electrochromic glazing alone can offer sufficient solar protection without recourse to additional shading is assessed using the recently formulated useful daylight illuminance (UDI) scheme.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

IEA. Photovoltaic power systems programme—strategy document 1998—2002. Technical report, International Energy Agency, 1998.

DTI. Photovoltaics in Buildings: BIPV projects programme - strategy document 1998—2002. Technical report, Dept. of Trade and Industry, 2000.

Crisp V. , Littlefair P. , Cooper I. , McKennan GT Daylighting as a passive solar energy option: an assessment of its potential in non-domestic buildings. Building Research Establishment Report , Garston, CRC, 1988.

Selkowitz S. , Lee ES Advanced fenestration systems for improved daylight performance. Daylighting '98 Conference Proceedings Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1988.

Lee ES , DiBartolomeo DL Application issues for large-area electrochromic windows in commercial buildings . Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2002 ; 71(4): 465—91.

Nabil A. , Mardaljevic J. Useful daylight illuminace: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings . Lighting Research and Technology 2005; 37(1): 41—59.

Vartiainen E. Electricity benefits of daylighting and photovoltaics for various solar facade layouts in office buildings. Energy and Buildings 2001; 33(2): 113—20.

Mardaljevic J. Daylight simulation: validation, sky models and daylight coefficients. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK, 2000.

Foster M. , Oreszczyn T. Occupant control of passive systems: the use of venetian blinds. Building and Environment 2001; 36(2): 149—55.

10.

Nabil A. Performance modelling for advanced envelope systems. PhD thesis, De Montfort University Leicester, 2002.

11.

CIBSE. Understanding building integrated photovoltaics TM 25 chartered institution of building services engineers, London 2000.

12.

Duffie JA , Beckman WA Solar engineering of thermal processes. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1991.

13.

British Petroleum (BP). Solar, products and services, solar products. BP 585 Data Sheet.

14.

Sullivan R. , Rubin M. , Selkowitz S. Energy performance analysis of prototype electrochromic windows, Report number: LBL-39905 BS-360. Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory , 1996.

15.

Sullivan R. , Lee ES , Papamichael K. , Rubin M. , Selkowitz S. Effect of switching control strategies on the energy performance of electrochromic windows, Report number: LBL-35453 BS-324. Technical report , Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1994 .

16.

Sullivan R. , Lee ES , Rubin M. , Selkowitz S. The energy performance of electrochromic windows in heating-dominated geographic locations, Report number: LBL-38252 BS-354. Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1996.

17.

Selkowitz S. , Rubin M. , Lee E. , Sullivan R. A review of electrochromic window performance factors, Report number: LBL-35486 OM-328. Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory , 1994.

18.

Lee ES , DiBartolomeo D. , Selkowitz S. Electrochromic windows for commercial buildings - Monitored results for a full-scale testbed, Report Number: LBNL-45415 DA-414. Technical report , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2000.

19.

DiBartolomeo DL , Lee ES , Rubenstein FM , Selkowitz S. Developing a dynamic envelope/ lighting control system with field measurements. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1996; 26(1): 146—164.

20.

Papaefthimiou S. , Leftheriotis G. , Yianoulis P. , Hyde TJ , Eames PC , Fang Y. , Pennarun PY , Jannasch P. Development of electrochromic evacuated advanced glazing. Energy and Buildings 2006; 38(12): 1455—67.

21.

Schuman J. A Pentagon Advance For Solar Energy. Wall Street Journal Online , 3 August 2007.

22.

Yamaguchi M. , Ohshita Y. , Arafune K. , Sai H. , Tachibana M. Present status and future of crystalline silicon solar cells in japan. Solar Energy 2006; 80(1): 104—10.

23.

Reinhart CF Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy 2004; 77(1): 15—28.

24.

Bourgeois D. , Reinhart CF , Macdonald I. Adding advanced behavioural models in whole building energy simulation: A study on the total energy impact of manual and automated lighting control. Energy and Buildings 2006; 38(7): 814—823.

25.

Vine E. , Lee ES , Clear R. , DiBartolomeo D. , Selkowitz S. Office workers response to an automated venetian blind and electric lighting system - a pilot study. Energy and Buildings 1998; 28(2).

26.

Roche L. Summertime performance of an automated lighting and blinds control system . Lighting Research and Technology 2002; 34(1): 11—25.

27.

Morel N. , Lindelof D. Bayesian optimization of user visual comfort. Lux Europa Proceedings 2005.

28.

Gugliermetti F. , Bisegna F. A model study of light control systems operating with Electrochromic Windows. Lighting Res. Technol. 2005; 37: 3—20.

29.

Karlsson J. Control system and energy saving potential for switchable windows . Proceedings of the 7th IBSA Conference, Rio de Janeiro. Brazil, August 13—15, 2001.

30.

Hunt DRG. The use of artificial lighting in relation to daylight levels and occupancy. Bldg. Envir. 1979; 14: 21—33.

31.

Love JA Manual switching patterns observed in private offices. Lighting Research & Technology 1998; 30(1): 45—50.

32.

Reinhart CF , Voss K. Monitoring Manual Control of Electric Lighting and Blinds. Lighting Research & Technology 2003; 35(3): 243—60.

33.

Lindelof D. , Morel N. A field investigation of the intermediate light switching by users . Energy and Buildings 2006; 38(7): 790—801.

34.

Mohammadi A. , Kabir E. , Mahdavi A. , Proeglhoef C. Modeling user control of lighting and shading in office buildings: an empirical case study : Proceedings of Building Simulation 2007 (IPBSA), Beijing, China, 2007.

35.

Clear RD , Inkarojrit V. , Lee ES Subject responses to electrochromic windows. Energy and Buildings , 38(7): 758—79.

36.

Bourgeois D. , MacDonald I. , Reinhart CF Adding advanced behavioral models in whole building energy simulation: a study on the total energy impact of manual and automated lighting control. Energy and Buildings 2006; 38(7): 814—23.

37.

Osterhaus WKE. Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments. Solar Energy 2005; 79: 140—58.