This article provides an overview of feminist approaches to the New Testament from the period of 2000 to early 2021. Using a broad definition of ‘feminist’ (to include virtually any work focused primarily on women or female issues presented in the biblical text) and a more stringent definition of ‘New Testament’ (including only those texts that are a part of the New Testament canon, but not larger socio-historical studies or extracanonical literature), the article offers an overview of trends in feminist scholarship on the Gospels and Acts, the Pauline epistles, the General Epistles and Hebrews, and Revelation, noting that this body of scholarship may be characterized as being diverse, collaborative, and centered on female characters within the New Testament texts. With open vistas for exploration remaining, the article forecasts a rich future for feminist approaches to the New Testament.
AernieJ.W.2018Narrative Discipleship: Portraits of Women in the Gospel of Mark (Eugene, OR: Pickwick).
2.
AllenA.L.2019For Theirs is the Kingdom: Inclusion and Participation of Children in the Gospel according to Luke (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).
3.
AugaU.SchirrB.J.. 2014‘Do Not Conform to the Patterns of this World! A Postcolonial Investigation of Performativity, Metamorphoses and Bodily Materiality in Romans 12’, FT23.1: 37-54.
4.
AymerM.2016‘Outrageous, Audacious, Courageous, Willful: Reading the Enslaved Girl of Acts 12’, in ByronG.L.LovelaceV. (eds.) 2016: 265-289.
5.
BakerC.M., et al.2009‘Roundtable on the Future of Feminist Biblical Studies’, JFSR25.2: 125-129.
6.
BakerW.R.2007‘Who’s Your Daddy? Gendered Birth Images in the Soteriology of the Epistle of James (1:14-15, 18, 21)’, EQ79.3: 195-207.
7.
Bar-Asher SiegalM.DinklerM.B.. 2020‘Citing Sarah in the New Testament and Rabbinic Literature: Does Original Context Matter?’, Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses96.3: 443-457.
8.
BattenA.J.2009‘Neither Gold nor Braided Hair (1 Timothy 2.9; 1 Peter 3.3): Adornment, Gender and Honour in Antiquity’, NTS55.4: 484-501.
9.
BauckhamR.2002Gospel Women: Studies of the Named Women in the Gospels (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
10.
Bauman-MartinB.J.2004‘Women on the Edge: New Perspectives on Women in the Petrine Haustafel’, JBL123.2: 253-279.
11.
BeavisM.A. (ed.) 2002The Lost Coin: Parables of Women, Work, and Wisdom (London: Bloomsbury).
12.
BeavisM.A.KateuszA. (eds.) 2020Rediscovering the Marys: Maria, Mariamne, Miriam (London: T & T Clark).
13.
BeirneM.M. 2003Women and Men in the Fourth Gospel: A Genuine Discipleship of Equals (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
14.
BellevilleL.L.2000Women Leaders and the Church: Three Crucial Questions (Grand Rapids: Baker).
15.
BellevilleL.L.2005’lουνιαν…ἐπíσημοι ἐν τοĩς ἀποστóλοις: A Re-examination of Romans 16.7 in Light of Primary Source Materials’, NTS51.2: 231-249.
16.
BelserJ.W.2010‘Returning to Flesh: A Jewish Reflection on Feminist Disability’, JFSR26.2: 127-132.
17.
BetcherS.V.2010‘Becoming Flesh of My Flesh: Feminist and Disability Theologies on the Edge of Posthumanist Discourse’, JFSR26.2: 107-118.
18.
BetsworthS.2010The Reign of God is Such as These: A Socio-Literary Analysis of Daughters in the Gospel of Mark (London: T & T Clark).
19.
BirdJ.2008‘Rosemary Hennessy and the Circumscribed Symptomatic Symbolism of 1 Peter’s Haustafel’, in BoerR.ØklandJ. (eds.) 229-243.
20.
BirdJ.2011Abuse, Power and Fearful Obedience: Reconsidering 1 Peter’s Commands to Wives (London: T & T Clark).
21.
BoerR.ØklandJ. (eds.) 2008Marxist Feminist Criticism of the Bible (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press).
22.
BothaP.J.2003‘The Gospel of Matthew and Women’, Indie Skriflig37.3: 505-532.
23.
BottN.T.2011‘“And By Faith, Because Abraham Considered Him Faithful Who Had Promised, Sarah Herself Received Power to Conceive”: A Reconsideration of Heb 11:11’, TJ32.2: 205-219.
24.
BottN.T.2015‘Sarah as the “Weaker Vessel”: Genesis 18 and 20 in 1 Peter’s Instructions to Husbands in 1 Pet 3:7’, TJ36.2: 243-259.
25.
BrownJ.K.2004‘Silent Wives, Verbal Believers: Ethical and Hermeneutical Considerations in 1 Peter 3:1-6 and Its Context’, WW24.4: 395-403.
26.
BuellD.K.2017‘Embodied Temporalities: Health, Illness, and the Matter of Feminist Biblical Interpretation’, in SherwoodY. (ed.) 2017: 454-476.
27.
BurerM.2015’EΠΙΣΗΜΟΙ ’EΝ ΤΟΙΣ ’AΠΟΣΤΟΛΟΙΣ in Rom 16:7 as “Well Known to the Apostles”: Further Defense and New Evidence’, JETS58.4: 731-755.
28.
BurerM.H.WallaceD.B.. 2002‘Was Junia Really an Apostle? A Re-Examination of Rom 16.7’, NTS47.1: 76-91.
29.
ByronG.L.2009‘Sociogeographical and Hermeneutical Differences: Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Feminist Biblical Studies’, JFSR25.2: 121-125.
30.
ByronG.L.LovelaceV. (eds.) 2016Womanist Interpretations of the Bible: Expanding the Discourse (Atlanta: SBL Press).
31.
CadwalladerA.H. 2008‘The Markan/Marxist Struggle for the Household: Juliet Mitchell and the Challenge to Patriarchal/Familial Ideology’, in BoerR.ØklandJ. (eds.) 2008: 151-181.
32.
CalpinoT.2011‘“The Lord Opened Her Heart”: Boundary Crossing in Acts 16, 13-15’, Annali di Storia dell’Esegesi28.2: 81-91.
33.
CalpinoT.2014Women, Work and Leadership in Acts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
34.
Calvert-KoyzisN.WeirH.E. (eds.) 2010Breaking Boundaries: Female Interpreters who Challenged the Status Quo (New York/London: T & T Clark).
35.
CargalT.B.2004‘When is a Prostitute Not an Adulteress?: The Language of Sexual Infidelity in the Rhetoric of the Letter of James’, in LevineA-J.RobbinsM. M. (eds.), A Feminist Companion to the Catholic Epistles and Hebrews (Edinburgh: T & T Clark International) 114-126.
36.
CarsonM.2011‘The Harlot, the Beast and the Sex Trafficker: Reflections on Some Recent Feminist Interpretations of Revelation 17—18’, ET122.5: 218-227.
37.
CharlesR.2011‘Rahab: A Righteous Whore in James’, Neo45.2: 206-220.
38.
ChoiJ.Y.2015Postcolonial Discipleship of Embodiment: An Asian and Asian American Feminist Reading of the Gospel of Mark (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
39.
ChristensenS.M.2016‘The Balch/Elliott Debate and the Hermeneutics of the Household Code’, TJ37.2: 173-193.
40.
ClarkC.A.2018‘Exploring the True Identity of Junia: Prominent among the Apostles’, Journal of Early Christian History8.3: 96-106.
41.
ClementsE.A.2014Mothers on the Margin? The Significance of the Women in Matthew’s Genealogy (Eugene, OR: Pickwick).
42.
CollinsA.Y.2009Feminine Symbolism in the Book of Revelation, in LevineA-J. (ed.) 121-130.
43.
ConnollyM.A.2018Disorderly Women and the Order of God: An Australian Feminist Reading of the Gospel of Mark (London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark).
44.
CosC.2011‘An Example of the Power of Faith: Sarah, the Subject of Hebrews 11:11’, PP25.1: 16-20.
45.
DaleM.2017‘Dismantling Socio-Sacred Hierarchy: Gender and Gentiles in Luke-Acts’, PP31.2: 19-23.
46.
DavisJ.J.2017‘First Timothy 2:12, the Ordination of Women, and Paul’s Use of Creation Narratives’, PP31.4: 15-20.
47.
DeweyJ.2006‘Women in the Gospel of Mark’, WW26: 22-29.
48.
DinklerM.B.2007‘Sarah’s Submission: Peter’s Analogy in 1 Peter 3:5-6’, PP21.3: 9-15.
49.
DouglasK.B.2001‘Marginalized People, Liberating Perspectives: A Womanist Approach to Biblical Interpretation’, Anglican Theological Review83.1: 41-47.
50.
DreyerY.2011‘Gender Critique on the Narrator’s Androcentric Point of View of Women in Matthew’s Gospel’, HTS67.1: 1-5.
51.
DubeM.W.2000Postcolonial Feminist Interpretation of the Bible (St. Louis: Chalice Press).
52.
DubeM.W.2001Other Ways of Reading: African Women and the Bible (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
53.
DubeM.W.2007‘Who Do You Say that I Am?’, FT15.3: 346-367.
54.
DunningB.H. (ed.) 2019The Oxford Handbook of New Testament, Gender, and Sexuality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
55.
EastmanS.2007Recovering Paul’s Mother Tongue: Language and Theology in Galatians (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
56.
EhrenspergerK.2004That We May Be Mutually Encouraged: Feminism and the New Perspective in Pauline Studies (New York: T & T Clark International).
57.
EhrenspergerK.2005New Perspectives on Paul: New Perspectives on Romans in Feminist Theology, in GrenholmC.PatteD. (eds.) 2005: 227-255.
58.
ElkinsK.G.2013‘Biblical Studies and Childhood Studies: A Fertile, Interdisciplinary Space for Feminists’, JFSR29.2: 146-153.
59.
ElkinsK.G.2020‘Feminist Studies as the Mother of Childist Approaches to the Bible’, in GarrowayK.H.MartensJ.W. (eds.), Children and Methods: Listening To and Learning From Children in the Biblical World (Leiden: Brill) 19-34.
60.
ElveyA.F.2005An Ecological Feminist Reading of the Gospel of Luke: A Gestational Paradigm (Lewiston, NY: Mellen).
61.
ElveyA.F.2015‘Matter, Freedom and the Future: Reframing Feminist Theologies through an Ecological Materialist Lens’, FT23.2: 186-204.
62.
EppE.J.2002‘Text-Critical, Exegetical, and Socio-Cultural Factors Affecting the Junia/Junias Variation in Romans 16,7’, in DenauxA. (ed.), New Testament Textual Criticism and Exegesis: Festschrift for J. Delobel (Leuven: Leuven University Press) 227-291.
63.
EppE.J.2005Junia: The First Woman Apostle (Minneapolis: Fortress).
64.
EvansE.ChamberlainP.. 2015‘Critical Waves: Exploring Feminist Identity, Discourse and Praxis in Western Feminism’, Social Movement Studies14.4: 396-409.
65.
FletcherM.2014‘What Comes into a Woman and What Comes Out of a Woman: Feminist Textual Intervention and Mark 7:14-23’, JFSR30.1: 25-41.
66.
FingerR.H. 2005‘A Theology of Welcome: The Hospitable Hidden Women of Acts 2, 4, and 6’, Conrad Grebel Review23.1: 30-41.
67.
ForbesG.W.HarrowerS.D.. 2015Raised from Obscurity: A Narratival and Theological Study of the Characterization of Women in Luke-Acts (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock).
68.
FoxA.2017‘Decentering Paul, Contextualizing Crimes: Reading in Light of the Imprisoned’, JFSR33.2: 37-54.
69.
FoxA.2020Paul Decentered: Reading 2 Corinthians with the Corinthian Women (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).
70.
FreemanD.2002‘A Feminist Theology of Disability’, FT29: 71-85.
71.
FrilingosC.A.2007‘Wearing It Well: Gender at Work in the Shadow of Empire’, in PennerT.C.Vander SticheleC. (eds.), Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses (Leiden: Brill) 333-349.
72.
GaventaB.R.2007Our Mother Saint Paul (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
73.
GaventaB.R.RigbyC.L.. 2003Blessed One: Protestant Perspectives on Mary (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
74.
GenchF.T.2004Back to the Well: Women’s Encounters with Jesus in the Gospels (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
75.
GenchF.T.2015Encountering God in Tyrannical Texts: Reflections on Paul, Women, and the Authority of Scripture (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
76.
GlahnS.L. (ed.) 2017a Vindicating the Vixens: Revisiting Sexualized, Vilified, and Marginalized Women of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Kregel).
77.
GlahnS.L.2017b ‘Weaker Vessels and Calling Husbands “Lord”: Was Peter Insulting Wives?’, Bibliotheca Sacra174: 60-76.
78.
GlancyJ.A.2017‘The Refusal of Embodied Memory’, in SherwoodY. (ed.) 2017: 390-401.
79.
GlancyJ.A.MooreS.D.. 2011‘How Typical a Roman Prostitute Is Revelation’s “Great Whore”?’, JBL130.3: 551-569.
80.
GoodD.J.2005Mariam, the Magdalen, and the Mother (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
81.
GreenB. A.2016‘“Nobody’s Free until Everybody’s Free”: Exploring Gender and Class Injustice in a Story about Children (Luke 18:15‐17)’, in ByronG. L.LovelaceV. (eds.), 2016: 291-310.
82.
GrenholmC.PatteD. (eds.) 2005Gender, Tradition, and Romans: Shared Ground, Uncertain Borders (New York: T & T Clark).
83.
de GrootC.TaylorM.A. (eds.) 2007Recovering Nineteenth-Century Women Interpreters of the Bible (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
84.
HäfnerG.2005‘Die “Sonnenfrau” im Himmel und ihr Kind (Offb 12): Ein altes Rätsel neu bedacht’, Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift56.2: 113-133.
85.
HartmannA.2020‘Junia – A Woman Lost in Translation: The Name IOYNIAN in Romans 16:7 and its History of Interpretation’, Open Theology6: 646-660.
86.
HearonH.E. (ed.) 2004Distant Voices Drawing Near: Essays in Honor of Antoinette Clark Wire (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press).
87.
HorrellD.G.2015‘Fear, Hope, and Doing Good: Wives as a Paradigm of Mission in 1 Peter’, Estudios Bíblicos73.3: 409-429.
88.
HorsleyR.A.2003‘Feminist Scholarship and Postcolonial Criticism: Subverting Imperial Discourse and Reclaiming Submerged Histories’, in MatthewsS.KittredgeC.Johnson-DeBaufreM. (eds.) 2003: 297-317.
89.
Houghtby-HaddonN.K.2011Changed Imagination, Changed Obedience: Social Imagination and the Bent-Over Woman in the Gospel of Luke (Eugene, OR: Pickwick).
90.
HowardM.A.2015‘Mothers in Mark: A Socio-Literary Exploration of Maternal Imagery and the Value- Reproductive Role of Mothers in the Gospel of Mark’ (PhD dissertation, Princeton Theological Seminary).
91.
HowardM.A.2019‘“Be Not Afraid”: An Essay for My Mom and Other Worried Parents’, Vision20.1: 54-60.
92.
HuberL.R.2007Like a Bride Adorned: Reading Metaphor in John’s Apocalypse (New York: T & T Clark).
93.
HuberL.R.2009Unveiling the Bride: Revelation 19.1-8 and Roman Social Discourse’, in LevineA-J. (ed.) 159-179.
94.
HuttarD.2009‘Did Paul Call Andronicus an Apostle in Romans 16:7?’, JETS52.4: 747-778.
95.
HylenS.E.2003‘The Power and Problem of Revelation 18: The Rhetorical Function of Gender’, in Kirk-DugganC.A. (ed.), Pregnant Passion: Gender, Sex, and Violence in the Bible (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature) 205-219.
96.
HylenS.E.2015A Modest Apostle: Thecla and the History of Women in the Early Church (New York: Oxford University Press).
97.
HylenS.E.2019‘Women διάκονοι and Gendered Norms of Leadership’, JBL138.3: 687-702.
98.
IrigarayL.1977Ce Sexe qui n’en est pas un (Paris: Minuit).
99.
JanssenC.2018‘Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Bereich Feministischer Bibelauslegung und Feministischer Hermeneutik: Forschungsüberlick mit dem Schwerpunkt: Paulusforschung: Ein Essay’, Theologische Rundschau83.3-4: 189-216.
100.
Johnson-DeBaufreM.NasrallahL. S.. 2011‘Beyond the Heroic Paul: Toward a Feminist and Decolonizing Approach to the Letters of Paul’, in StanleyC.S. (ed.), The Colonized Apostle: Paul through Postcolonial Eyes (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
101.
JonesF.S.2002Which Mary? The Marys of Early Christian Tradition (Leiden: Brill).
102.
JonesJ.K.2008The Women in the Gospel of John: The Divine Feminine (St. Louis: Chalice Press).
103.
JoynesC.E.RowlandC.C.. 2009From the Margins 2: Women of the New Testament and their Afterlives (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press).
104.
JuniorN.2015An Introduction to Womanist Biblical Interpretation (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
105.
KahlB.2013‘Krieg, Maskulinität und der imperiale Gottvater: das Augustusforum und die messianische Re-Imagination von “Hagar” im Galaterbrief’, in EisenU.E.GerberC.StandhartingerA., Doing Gender – Doing Religion: Fallstudien zur Intersektionalität im frühen Judentum, Christentum und Islam (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
106.
KahlB.2014‘Hagar’s Babylonian Captivity: A Roman Re-Imagination of Galatians 4:21-31’, Int68.3: 257-269.
107.
KalmanofskyA.2009‘Outside Insiders and the Future of Feminist Biblical Studies’, JFSR25.2: 129-133.
108.
KateuszA.2019Mary and Early Christian Women: Hidden Leadership (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
109.
KearneyD.2017‘“What Do You Want from Her?” Women in the Gospel of John’, The Way56.3: 101-108.
110.
KimS.H.2010Mark, Women and Empire: A Korean Postcolonial Perspective (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press).
111.
KimesaC.N.2017‘Woman and Her Clothing in the Service of God: An African Feminist Reading of 1 Corinthians 11:2-16’, in ChanY.S.L.KeenanJ.F.ZachariasR. (eds.), The Bible and Catholic Theological Ethics (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis) 161-171.
112.
Kirk-DugganC.A.PippinT. (eds.) 2009Mother Goose, Mother Jones, Mommie Dearest: Biblical Mothers and Their Children (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
113.
KitzbergerI.R.2000Transformative Encounters: Jesus and Women Re-Viewed (Leiden: Brill).
114.
KoosedJ.L.2017Reading the Bible as a Feminist (Leiden: Brill).
115.
KrauseD.2010‘Paul and Women: Telling Women to Shut Up is More Complicated than You Might Think’, in GivenM.D. (ed.), Paul Unbound: Other Perspectives on the Apostle (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
116.
KwokP.-L.2006‘Making the Connections: Postcolonial Studies and Feminist Biblical Interpretation’, in SugirtharajahR.S. (ed.), The Postcolonial Biblical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell) 45-63.
117.
KwokP.-L.2012‘Die Verbindungen Herstellen: Postkolonialismus-Studien Und Feministische Bibelinterpretation’, Interkulturelle Theologie38.1: 34-62.
118.
LeeD.A.2001‘The Heavenly Woman and the Dragon: Rereadings of Revelation 12’, in Devlin- GlassF.McCreddenL. (eds.), Feminist Poetics of the Sacred: Creative Suspicions (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 198-220.
119.
LeeD.A.2002Flesh and Glory: Symbolism, Gender and Theology in the Gospel of John (New York: Crossroad).
120.
LeeD.A.2021The Ministry of Women in the New Testament: Reclaiming the Biblical Vision for Church Leadership (Grand Rapids: Baker).
121.
Le RouxE. 2019‘ἀπονέμοντες τιμήν: 1 Peter as Subversive Text, Challenging Predominant Gender Roles in the 1st-Century Mediterranean World’, HTS75.4: 1-11.
122.
LevineA-J. (ed.) 2001a A Feminist Companion to Mark (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
123.
LevineA-J. (ed.) 2001b A Feminist Companion to Matthew (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
124.
LevineA-J. (ed.) 2004A Feminist Companion to Paul (Cleveland: Pilgrim Press).
125.
LevineA-J. (ed.) 2009A Feminist Companion to the Apocalypse of John (New York: T & T Clark).
126.
LevineA-J.BlickenstaffM. (eds.) 2003a A Feminist Companion to the Deutero-Pauline Epistles (Cleveland: Pilgrim Press).
127.
LevineA-J.BlickenstaffM. (eds.) 2003b A Feminist Companion to John (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
128.
LevineA-J.BlickenstaffM. (eds.) 2003c A Feminist Companion to John, Volume 2 (Cleveland: Pilgrim Press).
129.
LevineA-J.BlickenstaffM. (eds.) 2004A Feminist Companion to Luke (Cleveland: Pilgrim Press).
130.
LevineA-J.BlickenstaffM. (eds.) 2009A Feminist Companion to the Acts of the Apostles (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock).
131.
LevineA-J.RobbinsM.M. (eds.) 2005a A Feminist Companion to the Catholic Epistles and Hebrews (Edinburgh: T & T Clark International).
132.
LevineA-J.RobbinsM. M. (eds.) 2005b A Feminist Companion to Mariology (Cleveland: Pilgrim Press).
133.
LinY.-J.2020‘Junia: An Apostle Before Paul’, JBL139.1: 191-209.
134.
LoveS.2009Jesus and Marginal Women: The Gospel of Matthew in Social-Scientific Perspective (Eugene, OR: Cascade).
135.
Lyons-PardueK.2020Gospel Women and the Long Ending of Mark (New York: Bloomsbury).
136.
MalickD.E.2017Narrative Art and Women in the Gospels and Acts (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock).
137.
ManyikaB.I.2019‘When Rhoda Opens the Door: Reimagining Ancient Households from the Perspective of the Least for the Least’, Neo53.2: 311-337.
138.
MarchalJ.A.2005Military Images in Philippians 1–2: A Feminist Analysis of the Rhetorics of Scholarship, Philippians, and Current Contexts, in Vander SticheleC.PennerT. (eds.) 265-286.
139.
MarchalJ.A.2006‘Imperial Intersections and Initial Inquiries: Toward a Feminist, Postcolonial Analysis of Philippians’, JFSR22.2: 5-32.
140.
MarchalJ.A.2008The Politics of Heaven: Women, Gender, and Empire in the Study of Paul (Minneapolis: Fortress).
141.
MarchalJ.A.2017‘Pinkwashing Paul, Excepting Jesus: The Politics of Intersectionality, Identification, and Respectability’, in SherwoodY. (ed.) 2017: 432-453.
142.
MarquisT.L.2019The General Epistles and Hebrews, in DunningB.H. (ed.) 2019: 333-348.
143.
MarshallJ.E.2017‘The Recovery of Paul’s Female Colleagues in Nineteenth-Century Feminist Biblical Interpretation’, JFSR33.2: 21-36.
144.
MarshallJ.W.2009Gender and Empire: Sexualized Violence in John’s Anti-Imperial Apocalypse, in LevineA-J. (ed.) 2009: 17-32.
145.
MatthewsS.2015‘A Feminist Analysis of the Veiling Passage (1 Corinthians 11:2-16): Who Really Cares that Paul was not a Gender Egalitarian After All?’, LD2015.2: 1-20.
146.
MatthewsS.KittredgeC.B.Johnson-DeBaufreM. (eds.) 2003Walk in the Ways of Wisdom: Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza (Harrisburg: Trinity Press International).
147.
MaunderC. (ed.) 2019The Oxford Handbook of Mary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
148.
MbuwayesangoD.ScholzS. (eds.) 2009‘Dialogical Beginnings: A Conversation on the Future of Feminist Biblical Studies’, JFSR25.2: 93-103.
149.
McNeelJ.H.2014Paul as Infant and Nursing Mother: Metaphor, Rhetoric, and Identity in 1 Thessalonians 2:5-8 (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
150.
MerzA.2012‘Gen(de)red Power: Die Macht des Genres im Streit um die Frauenrolle in Pastoralbriefen und Paulusakten’, HTS68.1: 1-9.
151.
MillerS.2004Women in Mark’s Gospel (London: T & T Clark International).
152.
MitchellJ.L.2001Beyond Fear and Silence: A Feminist-Literary Reading of Mark (New York: Continuum).
153.
MooreJ.K.2013‘Matthew’s Decolonial Desire (Matthew 12:42; 27:19): A Postcolonial Feminist Reading of the Two Royal Women’, LD1: 1-24.
154.
MyersA.D.2017Blessed Among Women? Mothers and Motherhood in the New Testament (New York: Oxford University Press).
155.
NadarS.2009‘Changing the World: The Task of Feminist Biblical Scholars’, JFSR25.2: 137-143.
156.
Navarro PuertoM.PerroniM. (eds.) 2015Gospels: Narrative and History (Atlanta: SBL).
157.
NelavalaS.2007‘Jesus Asks the Samaritan Woman for a Drink: A Dalit Feminist Reading of John 4’, LD1: 1-25.
158.
NelavalaS.2009‘“Babylon the Great Mother of Whores” (Rev 17:5): A Postcolonial Feminist Perspective’, ET121.2: 60-65.
159.
NelavalaS.2016‘God as “The King” and His Act of Reconciliation: Hope! Despair! A Postcolonial Dalit Feminist Re-interpretation of “The Vineyard and the Laborers”’, Currents in Theology and Mission43.3: 8-11.
160.
NewsomC.A.RingeS.H.LapsleyJ.E. (eds.) 2012Women’s Bible Commentary, Third Edition: Revised and Updated (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 3rd edn [1998]).
161.
NgE.Y.L.2020‘Was Junia(s) in Rom 16:7 a Female Apostle? And So What?’, JETS63.3: 517-533.
162.
Nortjé-MeyerL.2015‘Has Scientific Biblical Research Categorically Acknowledged Feminist Themes and Methods? A Review of Feminist Traditional Exegesis done on the Letter of Jude’, in FischerI. (ed.), Gender Agenda Matters: Papers of the “Feminist Section” of the International Meetings of The Society of Biblical Literature, Amsterdam 2012 – St. Andrews 2013 – Vienna 2014 (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing) 199-223.
163.
ØklandJ.2003‘Sex, Gender and Ancient Greek: A Case-Study in Theoretical Misfit’, Studia Theologica57: 124-142.
164.
ØklandJ.2005‘Why Can’t the Heavenly Miss Jerusalem Just Shut Up?’, in SticheleV.PennerT. (eds.) 2005: 311-332.
165.
ØklandJ.2014‘Facilitating Speech and Discourse: Biblical Interpretation and the Emergence of a Concept of Gender Equality’, Journal of the Bible and Its Reception1.2: 209-235.
166.
ØklandJ.2017‘Death and the Maiden: Manifestos, Gender, Self-Canonization, and Violence’, in SherwoodY. (ed.) 2005: 15-44.
167.
OmerzuH.2006‘Die Himmelsfrau in Apk 12: ein polemischer Reflex des römischen Kaiserkults’, in BeckerM.ÖhlerM. (eds.), Apokalyptik als Herausforderung neutestamentlicher Theologie (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck) 167-194.
168.
PayneP.B.2009Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul’s Letters (Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
PeppiattL.2019Rediscovering Scripture’s Vision for Women: Fresh Perspectives on Disputed Texts (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic).
171.
PillayM.2015‘Good News for All? A Feminist Perspective on the Gospel of Matthew’, Scriptura114.1: 1-11.
172.
PillayM.2019‘Reading Revelation 18: A South African Theo-Ethical Feminist Perspective in a Context of Violence against Women’, Neo53.2: 421-436.
173.
PippinT.2005‘The Heroine and the Whore: The Apocalypse of John in Feminist Perspective’, in RhoadsD., ed., From Every People and Nation: The Book of Revelation in Intercultural Perspective (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress) 127-145.
174.
PlaskowJ.2014Movement and Emerging Scholarship: Feminist Biblical Scholarship in the 1970s in the United States, in Schüssler-FiorenzaE. (ed.) 2014: 21-34.
175.
PolaskiS.H.2005A Feminist Introduction to Paul (St. Louis: Chalice Press).
176.
PriceA.L.2016‘Mothers in the Spirit: A Pneumatic Reflection on Mary the Mother of the Church and Church Mothers in the Sanctified Tradition’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology25.2: 269-286.
177.
PuntJ.2009‘Subverting Sarah in the New Testament: Galatians 4 and 1 Peter 3’, in EvansC.A.ZachariasH.D. (eds.), Early Christian Literature and Intertextuality, Volume 2, Exegetical Studies (London: T & T Clark) 155-174.
178.
ReederC.A.2015‘1 Peter 3:1-6: Biblical Authority and Battered Wives’, BBR25.4: 519-539.
179.
ReeseR.A.2012‘Jude: The Implications of Feminist Reading’, in SchottroffL.WackerM.-T. (eds.), Feminist Biblical Interpretation: A Compendium of Critical Commentary on the Books of the Bible and Related Literature (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans) 898-904.
180.
ReidB.A.2007Taking Up the Cross: New Testament Interpretations through Latina and Feminist Eyes (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress).
181.
ReidB.A.2016a ‘The Gospel of Luke: Friend or Foe of Women Proclaimers of the Word?’, CBQ78.1:1-23.
182.
ReidB.A.2016b Wisdom’s Feast: An Invitation to Feminist Interpretation of the Scriptures (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
183.
ReinhartzA.2021‘The Hermeneutics of Chutzpah: A Disquisition on the Value/s of “Critical Investigation of the Bible”’, JBL140.1: 8-30.
184.
ReiprichT.2008Das Mariageheimnis: Maria von Nazareth und die Bedeutung familiarer Beziehungen im Markusevangelium (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
185.
RensburgF.J. 2004‘Sarah’s Submissiveness to Abraham: A Socio-Historic Interpretation of the Exhortation to Wives in 1 Peter 3:5-6 to Take Sarah as Example of Submissiveness’, HTS60.1: 249-260.
186.
RussellL.M.1976The Liberating Word: A Guide to Nonsexist Interpretation of the Bible (Philadelphia: Westminster).
187.
RussellL.M. (ed.) 1985Feminist Interpretation of the Bible (Philadelphia: Westminster).
188.
RyanC.2018Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2016, American Community Survey Reports (Washington: U. S. Census Bureau).
189.
SamuelssonM.J. 2012‘The Final Apocalypse of Phallocentrism: Irigarayan Openings to the Matrix of Male Desire and Correction of the Non-Male Subject in the Book of Revelation’, FT21.1: 101-115.
SechrestL.L.2016‘Antitypes, Stereotypes, and Antetypes: Jezebel, the Sun Woman, and Contemporary Black Women’, in ByronG.L.LovelaceV. (eds.) 2016: 113-137.
192.
ScholzS.2014‘“Stirring Up Vital Energies”: Feminist Biblical Studies in North America (1980s- 2000s)’, in Schüssler-FiorenzaE. (ed.) 2014: 53-70.
193.
SchottroffL.WackerM.-T. (eds.) 2012Feminist Biblical Interpretation: A Compendium of Critical Commentary on the Books of the Bible and Related Literature (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
194.
Schüssler-FiorenzaE.1983In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins (London: SCM).
195.
Schüssler-FiorenzaE.1992But She Said: Feminist Practices of Biblical Interpretation (Boston: Beacon Press).
Schüssler-FiorenzaE.2013Changing Horizons: Explorations in Feminist Interpretation (Minneapolis: Fortress).
199.
Schüssler-FiorenzaE. (ed.) 2014Feminist Biblical Studies in the Twentieth Century: Scholarship and Movement (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
200.
ShanerK.A.2019Feminist Biblical Interpretation, in DunningB.H. (ed.) 2019: 19-38.
201.
SherwoodY. (ed.) 2017The Bible and Feminism: Remapping the Field (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
202.
SlaterJ.2020‘The Christian Woman as a Weaker, but Honoured Vessel (1 Pt 3:7): Forbidden to Act in Persona Christi’, In die Skriflig54.1: 1-9.
203.
SmithM.J.2011The Literary Construction of the Other in the Acts of the Apostles: Charismatics, the Jews, and Women (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock).
204.
SmithM.J. (ed.) 2015I Found God in Me: A Womanist Biblical Hermeneutics Reader (Eugene, OR: Cascade).
205.
SmithS.T.2014The Woman Babylon and the Marks of Empire: Reading Revelation with a Postcolonial Womanist Hermeneutics of Ambiveilence (Minneapolis: Fortress).
206.
SmithS.T.2019“She Did That!” Female Agency in New Testament Texts—A Womanist Response, in DunningB.H. (ed.) 2019: 157-175.
SpencerA.B.2000‘Peter’s Pedagogical Method in 1 Peter 3:6’, BBR10.1: 107-119.
209.
SpencerF.S.2004Dancing Girls, Loose Ladies, and Women of the Cloth: The Women in Jesus’ Life (New York: Continuum).
210.
SpencerF.S.2013Salty Wives, Spirited Mothers, and Savvy Widows: Capable Women of Purpose and Persistence in Luke’s Gospel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
211.
SpencerP. E.2017‘“Mad” Rhoda in Acts 12:12-17: Disciple Exemplar’, CBQ79.2: 282-298.
212.
StandhartingerA.2002‘Die Frau muss Vollmacht haben auf ihrem Haupt (1 Korinther 11,10): Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart feministischer Paulusauslegungen’, LD2002.2: 1-21.
213.
St ClairR.A.2008Call and Consequences: A Womanist Reading of Mark (Minneapolis: Fortress).
214.
StenströmH.2015‘Female Imagery in the Book of Revelation’, in XeravitsG.G., Religion and Female Body in Ancient Judaism and Its Environments (Berlin: De Gruyter).
TanY.-H.2003‘The Question of Social Location and Postcolonial Feminist Hermeneutics of Liberation’, in SchroerS.BietenhardS. (eds.), Feminist Interpretation of the Bible and the Hermeneutics of Liberation (London: Sheffield Academic) 171-178.
217.
TavoF.2007Woman, Mother and Bride: An Exegetical Investigation into the ‘Ecclesial’ Notions of the Apocalypse (Leuven: Peeters).
218.
TaylorM.A. (ed.) 2012Handbook of Women Biblical Interpreters (Grand Rapids: Baker).
219.
TaylorM.A.WeirH.E. (eds.) 2016Women in the Story of Jesus: The Gospels through the Eyes of Nineteenth-Century Female Biblical Interpreters (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
220.
ThimmesP.2003‘Women Reading Women in the Apocalypse: Reading Scenario 1, the Letter to Thyatira (Rev. 2.18-29)’, Currents in Biblical Research2.1: 128-144.
221.
ThimmesP.2009‘“Teaching and Beguiling My Servants”: The Letter to Thyatira (Rev 2.18-29)’, in LevineA-J. (ed.) 2009: 69-87.
222.
TichýL.2020‘Rahab the Prostitute in the New Testament’, Studia Biblica Slovaca12.1: 43-50.
223.
TracyS.2006‘Domestic Violence in the Church and Redemptive Suffering in 1 Peter’, Calvin Theological Journal41.2: 279-296.
224.
Treacy-ColeD.2005‘Women in the Wilderness: Rereading Revelation 12’, in SugirtharajahR.S. (ed.), Wilderness: Essays in Honour of Frances Young (New York: T & T Clark International) 45-58.
225.
TribleP.1984Texts of Terror: Literary-Feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives (Philadelphia: Fortress).
226.
ValentineK.H.2015‘Cleopatra: New Insights for the Interpretation of Revelation 17’, EQ87.4: 310-330.
227.
Vander SticheleC.2000‘Just a Whore: The Annihilation of Babylon According to Revelation 17:16’, LD1: 1-11.
228.
Vander SticheleC.2009Re-membering the Whore: The Fate of Babylon According to Revelation 17.16, in LevineA-J. (ed.) 2009: 106-120.
229.
Vander SticheleC.PennerT. (eds.) 2005Her Master’s Tools? Feminist and Postcolonial Engagements of Historical-Critical Discourse (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
230.
WackerM.-T.2009‘Challenges and Opportunities in Feminist Theology and Biblical Studies in Europe’, JFSR25.2: 117-121.
231.
WainwrightE.M.2008‘Healing Ointment/Healing Bodies: Gift and Identification in an Ecofeminist Reading of Mark 14:3-9’, in HabelN.C.TrudingerP.L. (eds.), Exploring Ecological Hermeneutics (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature) 131-139.
232.
WainwrightE.M.2009‘Feminist Criticism and the Gospel of Matthew’, in PowellM.A. (ed.), Methods for Matthew (New York: Cambridge University Press) 83-117.
233.
WainwrightE.M.2015‘In Memory of Her!: Exploring the Political Power of Readings—Feminist and Ecological’, FT23.3: 205-220.
234.
WaweruH.M.2008‘Jesus and Ordinary Women in the Gospel of John: An African Perspective’, Svensk Missionstidskrift96.2: 139-159.
235.
WeaverD.J.2010‘“Wherever This Good News Is Proclaimed”: Women and God in the Gospel of Matthew’, Int64.4: 390-401.
236.
WestfallC.L.2016Paul and Gender: Reclaiming the Apostle’s Vision for Men and Women in Christ (Grand Rapids: Baker).
237.
WickerK.O.2005‘Introduction’, in WickerK.O.DubeM.W. (eds.) 2005: 1-15.
238.
WickerK.O.MillerA.S.DubeM.W. (eds.) 2005Feminist New Testament Studies: Global and Future Perspectives (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
239.
WoltersA.2008‘ΙΟΥΝΙΑΝ (Romans 16:7) and the Hebrew Name Yĕḥunnī’, JBL127.1: 397-408.
240.
WrayT.J.2016Good Girls, Bad Girls of the New Testament: Their Enduring Lessons (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
241.
YangS.A.2009‘Challenges and Opportunities in Current Feminist Biblical Studies’, JFSR25.2: 107-112.
242.
YeeG.2020‘Thinking Intersectionally: Gender, Race, Class, and the Etceteras of Our Discipline’, JBL139.1: 7-26.
243.
ZimmermannR.2003‘Nuptial Imagery in the Revelation of John’, Biblica84.2: 152-183.
