From the early treatments focused on historical-critical methods to the interdisciplinary approaches of the social sciences today, Ruth research continues to speak to the current developments within interpretive conversations. This article briefly surveys major commentaries on Ruth, and then discusses the shifts in research from 2001 to today, highlighting future trajectories and trends.
AdelmanR. (ed.) 2012Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies and Gender Issues23 (Indiana: Indiana University Press).
2.
AlpertR.1996 ‘Finding Our Past: A Lesbian Interpretation of the Book of Ruth’, in KatesJ.A.ReimerG.T. (eds.), Reading Ruth: Contemporary Women Reclaim a Sacred Story (New York: Ballantine) 91-96.
3.
AlterR.1992The World of Biblical Literature (London: SPCK).
4.
AlterR.2015Strong as Death Is Love: The Song of Songs, Ruth, Esther, Jonah, and Daniel (New York: W.W. Norton and Company).
5.
AndersonA.A.1978 ‘The Marriage of Ruth’, JSS23.2: 171-83.
6.
AschkenasyN.2006 ‘The Book of Ruth as Comedy: Classical and Modern Perspectives’, in HawkinsP.S.StahlbergL.C. (eds.), Scrolls of Love: Ruth and the Song of Songs (New York: Fordham University Press) 31-44.
7.
AschkenasyN.2007 ‘Reading Ruth through a Bakhtinian Lens: The Carnivalesque in a Biblical Tale’, JBL126: 437-53.
8.
AtkinsonD.1985The Wings of Refuge: The Message of Ruth (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity).
9.
AuldA.G.2018 ‘Ruth: A Reading of Scripture?’, in MorganD.F. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Writings of the Hebrew Bible (New York: Oxford University Press) 215-28.
10.
AvneryO.2016 ‘Ruth and Esther: A Journey through Gender, Ethnicity, and Identity’, in EricksonA.EmbryB.J. (eds.), Issues in the Megilloth: The Shape of Current Scholarship (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic) 43-71.
11.
BarrJ.1999The Concept of Biblical Theology: An Old Testament Perspective (London: SCM Press).
12.
BaylisC.P.2004 ‘Naomi in the Book of Ruth in Light of the Mosaic Covenant’, BSac161: 413-31.
13.
BeattieD.R.G.1974 ‘The Book of Ruth as Evidence for Israelite Legal Practice’, VT24.3: 251-67.
14.
BeattieD.R.G.1978 ‘Ruth III’, JSOT5: 39-48.
15.
BeattieD.R.G.1994The Targum of Ruth (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press).
16.
BeattieD.R.G.1997Jewish Exegesis of the Book of Ruth (JSOTSup, 2; Sheffield: JSOT Press).
17.
BeattieD.R.G.1999 ‘Ruth, Book of’, in HayesJ.H. (ed.), Dictionary of Biblical Interpretation (2 vols.; Nashville: Abingdon) 2:426-28.
18.
BellisA.2007Helpmates, Harlots, and Heroes: Women’s Stories in the Hebrew Bible (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2nd edn).
19.
BergerY.2009a ‘Ruth and the David-Bathsheba Story: Allusions and Contrasts’, JSOT33.4: 433-52.
20.
BergerY.2009b ‘Ruth and Inner-Biblical Allusion: The Case of 1 Samuel 25’, JBL128.2: 253-72.
21.
BerlinA.1983Poetics and Interpretation of Biblical Narrative (Bible and Literature, 9; Sheffield: Almond).
22.
BernsteinM.J.1991 ‘Two Multivalent Readings in the Ruth Narrative’, JSOT50: 15-26.
23.
BerquistJ.L.1993 ‘Role Dedifferentiation in the Book of Ruth’, JSOT57: 23-37.
24.
BertmanS.1965 ‘Symmetrical Design in the Book of Ruth’, JBL84: 165-68.
25.
BledsteinA.J.1993 ‘Female Companionships: If the Book Were Written by a Woman…’, in Brenner (ed.) 1993: 116-33.
26.
BlockD.I.1999Judges, Ruth (New American Commentary; Nashville: Broadman & Holman).
27.
BlotzJ.W.2005 ‘Bitterness and Friendship: A Feminist Exegesis of the Book of Ruth’, Currents in Theology and Mission32: 47-54.
28.
BodaM.SchwabG.2012Judges, Ruth (The Expositor’s Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
29.
BoerR. (ed.) 2007Bakhtin and Genre Theory in Biblical Studies (SBL Semeia Studies; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
30.
BovellC.2003 ‘Symmetry, Ruth and Canon’, JSOT28.2: 175-91.
31.
BrennerA.1983 ‘Naomi and Ruth’, VT33.4: 385-97.
32.
BrennerA.1993 ‘Naomi and Ruth’, in Brenner (ed.) 1993: 77-81.
33.
BrennerA.1999 ‘Ruth as a Foreign Worker and the Politics of Exogamy’, in Brenner (ed.) 1999: 158-62.
34.
BrennerA.2005I Am: Biblical Women Tell Their Own Stories (Minneapolis: Fortress).
35.
BrennerA. (ed.) 1993A Feminist Companion to Ruth (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
36.
BrennerA. (ed.) 1999Ruth and Esther (FCB, 2/3; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
37.
BrennerA.van HentenJ.W. (eds.) 1999Food and Drink in the Biblical World (Semeia, 86; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
38.
BrittB.2004 ‘Death, Social Conflict, and the Barley Harvest in the Hebrew Bible’, Journal of Hebrew Scriptures5: 1-28.
39.
BrittB.2009 ‘Sacrifice and the Displacement of Mothers in the Book of Ruth and Coetzee’s Disgrace’, in Kirk-DugganC.A.PippinT. (eds.), Mother Goose, Mother Jones, and Mommie Dearest: Biblical Mothers and Their Children (SBL Semeia Studies; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature) 37-49.
40.
BronnerL.L.1993 ‘A Thematic Approach to Ruth in Rabbinic Literature’, in Brenner (ed.) 1993: 146-69.
41.
BronsteinH. (ed.) 1982A Passover Haggadah: The New Union Haggadah Prepared by the Central Conference of American Rabbis (New York: Viking, rev. edn).
42.
BrueggemannW.1997Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy (Minneapolis: Fortress).
43.
BushF.W.1996Ruth, Esther (WBC, 9; Dallas: Word).
44.
CampbellE.F.Jr.1975Ruth (AB, 7; Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
45.
CampbellE.F.Jr.1990 ‘Naomi, Boaz, and Ruth: Hesed and Change’, Austin Seminary Bulletin105: 64-74.
46.
CarrollR. M.D. 2012 ‘Reading the Bible through Other Lenses: New Vistas from a Hispanic Diaspora Perspective’, in KeenerC.S.CarrollM.D. R. (eds.), Global Voices: Reading the Bible in the Majority World (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson) 5-26.
47.
CarrollR. M.D. 2015 ‘Once a Stranger, Always a Stranger? Immigration, Assimilation, and the Book of Ruth’, International Bulletin of Missionary Research39: 185-88.
48.
CarrollR. M.D. 2017 ‘Latino/Latina Biblical Interpretation’, in GormanM. (ed.), Scripture and Its Interpretation: A Global, Ecumenical Introduction to the Bible (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic) 311-23.
49.
ChildsB.1979Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture (Philadelphia: Fortress).
50.
ChildsB.1993Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments: Theological Reflection on the Christian Bible (Minneapolis: Fortress).
51.
ChisholmR.B.2013A Commentary on Judges and Ruth (Grand Rapids: Kregel).
CoxonP.W.1989 ‘Was Naomi a Scold?’, JSOT45: 25-37.
54.
CundallA.MorrisL.2008Judges and Ruth (Tyndale Old Testament Commentary; Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic).
55.
DagleyK.D.2019 ‘Women’s Experience of Migration and the Book of Ruth’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary).
56.
DaviesE.W.1983 ‘Ruth IV 5 and the Duties of the Gōʾēl’, VT 33.2: 231-34.
57.
DavisA.2016 ‘Ruth and Esther as the Thematic Frame of the Megilloth’, in EricksonA.EmbryB. (eds.), Issues in the Megilloth: The Shape of Current Scholarship (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic) 7-19.
58.
DavisE.F.2003Who Are You, My Daughter? Reading Ruth through Image and Text (Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
59.
De La TorreM.A.2011Genesis (Belief: A Theological Commentary on the Bible; Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
60.
De WaardJ.EugeneA.N.1973A Translator’s Handbook on the Book of Ruth (Helps for Translators, 15; London: United Bible Societies).
61.
DonaldsonL.E.1999 ‘The Sign of Orpah: Reading Ruth through Native Eyes’, in BrennerA. (ed.), Ruth and Esther (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
62.
DriesbachJ.2012Ruth (Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, 3; Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House).
63.
DubeM.W.1999 ‘The Unpublished Letters of Orpah to Ruth’, in Brenner (ed.) 1999: 145-57.
64.
DubeM.W.2001 ‘Divining Ruth for International Relations’, in AdamA.K.M. (ed.), Postmodern Interpretations of the Bible: A Reader (St. Louis: Chalice) 67-80.
65.
DuguidI.M.2005Esther and Ruth (Reformed Expository Commentary; Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R).
66.
DuncanC.M.2000 ‘The Book of Ruth: On Boundaries, Love, and Truth’, in GossR.E.WestM. (eds.), Take Back the Word: A Queer Reading of the Bible (Cleveland: Pilgrim) 92-102.
67.
EichrodtW.1967Theology of the Old Testament (OTL; 2 vols.; trans. BakerJ.A.; Philadelphia: Westminster).
68.
EmbryB. (ed.) 2016Issues in the Megilloth: The Shape of Current Scholarship (Hebrew Bible Monographs, 78; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix).
EricksonA.DavisA.R.2016 ‘Recent Research on the Megilloth (Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther)’, CBR14.3: 298-318.
71.
EskenaziT.C.Frymer-KenskyT.2011Ruth (Jewish Publication Society Bible Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society).
72.
EvansM.J.2017Judges and Ruth (Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries; Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic).
73.
ExumJ.C.1996Plotted, Shot, and Painted: Cultural Representations of Biblical Women (JSOTSup, 215; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
74.
FeldmeierR.SpieckermannH.2011God of the Living: A Biblical Theology (Waco, TX: Baylor University).
75.
Fentress-WilliamsJ.2012Ruth (Abingdon Old Testament Commentary; Nashville: Abingdon).
76.
FewellD.N.2015 ‘Space for Moral Agency in the Book of Ruth’, JSOT40.1: 79-96.
77.
FewellD.N.GunnD.M.1989a ‘Boaz, Pillar of Society: Measures of Worth in the Book of Ruth’, JSOT45: 45-59.
78.
FewellD.N.GunnD.M.1989b ‘Is Coxon a Scold? On Responding to the Book of Ruth’, JSOT45: 39-43.
79.
FewellD.N.GunnD.M.1990Compromising Redemption: Relating Characters in the Book of Ruth (Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
80.
FewellD.N.GunnD.M.1999 ‘A Son Is Born to Naomi!’: Literary Allusions and Interpretation in the Book of Ruth’, in BachA. (ed.), Women in the Hebrew Bible: A Reader (New York: Routledge) 233-39.
81.
FinitsisA. (ed.) 2019Dress and Clothing in the Hebrew Bible: ‘For All Her Household Are Clothed in Crimson’ (LHBOTS, 679; New York: T&T Clark).
82.
FischH.1982 ‘Ruth and the Structure of Covenant History’, VT32.4: 425-37.
83.
FischerI.2007 ‘The Book of Ruth as Exegetical Literature’, European Judaism40.2: 140-49.
84.
FischerI.1999 ‘The Book of Ruth: A “Feminist” Commentary to the Torah?’, in Brenner (ed.) 1999: 23-49.
85.
FlaggF.1987Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Café (New York: Ballantine).
86.
FowlS.SmitL.2018Judges and Ruth (Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible; Grand Rapids: Baker).
87.
FrankeJ.R.2005Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1–2 Samuel (Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity).
88.
Frymer-KenskyT.2002Reading the Women of the Bible: A New Interpretation of Their Stories (New York: Schocken).
89.
FuchsE.1999 ‘Status and Role of Female Heroines in the Biblical Narrative’, in BachA. (ed.), Women in the Hebrew Bible: A Reader (New York: Routledge) 77-84.
90.
Fullerton StrolloM. 2016 ‘Initiative and Agency: Towards a Theology of the Megilloth’, in EricksonA.EmbryB. (eds.), Issues in the Megilloth: The Shape of Current Scholarship (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic) 150-60.
91.
GallagherS.D.2013 ‘Blessing on the Move: The Outpouring of God’s Blessing through the Migrant Abraham’, Mission Studies30.2: 147-61.
92.
Gärtner-BreretonL.2008The Ontology of Space in Biblical Hebrew Narrative (London: Equinox).
93.
GerstenbergerE.2002Theologies of the Old Testament (Minneapolis: Fortress).
94.
GilesT.DoanW.J.2016The Story of Naomi—The Book of Ruth: From Gender to Politics (Biblical Performance Criticism; Eugene, OR: Cascade).
95.
GitaïA. (director) 1991Golem: The Spirit of Exile (Chicago: Facets Video).
96.
GlanzmannG.1959 ‘The Origin and Date of the Book of Ruth’, CBQ21: 201-207.
97.
GloverN.2009 ‘Your People, My People: An Exploration of Ethnicity in Ruth’, JSOT33.3: 293-313.
98.
GoldingayJ.2009Old Testament Theology (3 vols.; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity).
99.
GoldingayJ.2011Joshua, Judges, Ruth (The OT for Everyone Series; Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
100.
GondaC.2007 ‘Lesbian Feminist Criticism’, in PlainG.SellersS. (eds.), A History of Feminist Literary Criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 169-86.
101.
GossR.WestM. (eds.) 2000Take Back the Word: A Queer Reading of the Bible (Cleveland: Pilgrim).
102.
GottwaldN.2009The Hebrew Bible: A Brief Socio-Literary Introduction (Minneapolis: Augsburg).
103.
GoulderM.D.1993 ‘Ruth: A Homily on Deuteronomy 22–25?’, in McKayH.A.ClinesD.J.A. (eds.), Of Prophets’ Visions and the Wisdom of Sages: Essays in Honour of R. Norman Whybray on His Seventieth Birthday (JSOTSup, 162; Sheffield: JSOT Press) 307-19.
104.
GowM.D.1992 ‘Ruth’, in VanhoozerK.J. (ed.), Theological Interpretation of the Old Testament: A Book-by-Book Survey (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic) 102-10.
105.
GrantR.1991 ‘Literary Structure in the Book of Ruth’, BSac148: 424-41.
106.
GrayJ.1986Joshua, Judges, Ruth (repr.; New Century Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
107.
GreenB.1980 ‘A Study of Field and Seed Symbolism in the Biblical Story of Ruth’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Theological Union).
108.
GreenB.1982 ‘The Plot of the Biblical Story of Ruth’, JSOT23: 55-68.
109.
GreenB.1992What Are the Targums? (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical).
110.
GrossmanJ.2007 ‘“Gleaning among the Ears”—“Gathering among the Sheaves”: Characterizing the Image of the Supervising Boy (Ruth 2)’, JBL126.4: 703-16.
111.
GrossmanJ.2015Ruth: Bridges and Boundaries (Das Alte Testament im Dialog/An Outline of an Old Testament in Dialogue; Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang).
112.
GunkelH.1905 ‘Ruth’, Deutsche Rundschau32: 50-69.
113.
HalsR.M.1969The Theology of the Book of Ruth (Facet Books; Philadelphia: Fortress).
114.
HaltonC.2012 ‘An Indecent Proposal: The Theological Core of the Book of Ruth’, SJOT26: 30-43.
115.
HamiltonJ.1988The Book of Ruth (New York: Doubleday).
116.
HarrisJ.G.BrownC.A.MooreM.2000Judges, Ruth (New International Biblical Commentary Old Testament, 5; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
117.
HarrisJ.G.BrownC.A.MooreM.2012Joshua, Judges, Ruth (Understanding the Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids: Baker).
118.
HawkL.D.2015Ruth (Apollos Old Testament Commentary; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity).
119.
HawkinsP.S.StahlbergL.C. (eds.) 2006Scrolls of Love: Ruth and the Song of Songs (New York: Fordham University Press).
120.
HolmstedtR.D.2010Ruth: A Handbook on the Hebrew Text (Baylor Handbook on the Hebrew Bible; Waco, TX: Baylor University Press).
121.
HonigB.1999 ‘Ruth, the Model Emigrée: Mourning and the Symbolic Politics of Immigration’, in Brenner (ed.) 1999: 50-74.
122.
HouseP.R.1998Old Testament Theology (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic).
123.
HubbardR.L.Jr.1988The Book of Ruth (New International Commentary on the Old Testament; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
124.
HubbardR.L.1989 ‘Theological Reflections on Naomi’s Shrewdness’, TynBul40: 283-92.
125.
HymanR.T.1984 ‘Questions and Changing Identity in the Book of Ruth’, Union Seminary Quarterly Review39: 189-201.
126.
KangE.2009 ‘The Dialogic Significance of the Sojourner, the Fatherless, and the Widow in Deuteronomy through an Analysis of Chronotope Using Bakhtin’s Reading Strategy’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Theological Union).
127.
KatesJ.A.1994 ‘Women at the Center: Ruth and Shavuot’, in KatesJ.A.ReimerG.T. (eds.), Reading Ruth: Contemporary Women Reclaim a Sacred Story (New York: Ballantine) 187-210.
128.
KeitaS.DykJ.2006 ‘The Scene at the Threshing Floor: Suggestive Readings and Intercultural Considerations on Ruth 3’, The Bible Translator57: 17-32.
129.
KatesJ.A.ReimerG.T. (eds.) 1994Reading Ruth: Contemporary Women Reclaim a Sacred Story (New York: Ballantine).
130.
KoosedJ.L.2011Gleaning Ruth: A Biblical Heroine and Her Afterlives (Studies on Personalities of the Old Testament; Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press).
131.
KoosedJ.L.2016 ‘Sustenance and Survival in Biblical Narrative’, in KoosedJ.FewellD.N. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Narrative (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 489-97.
132.
KorpelM.C.A.2001The Structure of the Book of Ruth (Assen, Netherlands: Koninklijke van Gorcum).
133.
KorpelM.C.A.2003 ‘Theodicy in the Book of Ruth’, in LaatoA.et al. (eds.), Theodicy in the World of the Bible (Leiden: Brill) 334-50.
134.
KrugerP.1984 ‘The Hem of the Garment in Marriage: The Meaning of the Symbolic Gesture in Ruth 3:9 and Ezek. 16:8’, Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages12: 79-86.
LaCocqueA.2005The Feminine Unconventional: Four Subversive Figures in Israel’s Tradition (repr.; Overtures to Biblical Theology; Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock).
137.
LaCocqueA.2006 ‘Subverting the Biblical World: Sociology and Politics in the Book of Ruth’, in HawkinsP.et al. (eds.), Scrolls of Love: Ruth and Song of Songs (New York: Fordham) 20-30.
138.
LandyFrancis1994 ‘Ruth and the Romance of Realism, or Deconstructing History’, JAAR62: 285-317.
139.
LarkinK.J.2000Ruth and Esther (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
140.
LauP.GoswellG.2016Unceasing Kindness: A Biblical Theology of Ruth (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity).
141.
LeeE.P.2012 ‘Ruth’, in NewsomC.RingeS.LapsleyJ. (eds.), Women’s Bible Commentary (Louisville: Westminster John Knox) 142-49.
142.
LeggettD.A.1974The Levirate and Goel Institutions in the Old Testament with Special Attention to the Book of Ruth (Cherry Hill, NJ: Mack).
143.
LevineA.-J.1992 ‘Ruth’, in NewsomC.A.RingeS.H. (eds.), The Women’s Bible Commentary (Louisville: Westminster John Knox) 78-84.
144.
LevineÉ. 1973The Aramaic Version of Ruth (Analecta biblica, 58; Rome: Biblical Institute Press).
145.
LinafeltT.1999 ‘Ruth’, in LinafeltT.BealT.K. (eds.), Ruth and Esther (Berit Olam; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical) xi-90.
146.
LyonhartJ.MathenyJ. forthcoming ‘The Biblical Narrative of Ruth and the Monstrous Other’, in BallasT. (ed.), Cinema and Liberation Theology (New York: Routledge).
147.
MagonetJ.1997 ‘Rabbinic Readings of Ruth’, European Judaism40: 150-57.
148.
MaldonadoR.1995 ‘Reading Malinche Reading Ruth: Toward a Hermeneutics of Betrayal’, Semeia72: 91-109.
149.
MasenyaM.J.1998 ‘“Ngwetši” (Bride): The Naomi-Ruth Story from an African–South African Woman’s Perspective’, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion14.2: 81-90.
150.
MathenyJ.2018 ‘Judges 19–21 and Ruth: Canon as a Voice of Answerability’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kent).
151.
MathenyJ. In Progress ‘Tamar and Ruth: Dress as (Mis) Communication and Inheritance Negotiation’ in FinitsisA. (ed.), Dress and Clothing in the Hebrew Bible (paper delivered at the regional meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature Research Group on Dress and Clothing in Ellensberg, WA, 2019).
152.
MatthewsV.H.2004Judges and Ruth (New Cambridge Bible Commentary; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
153.
McKeownJ.2015Ruth (Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary; Cambridge, MA: Eerdmans).
154.
MeltonB.2018Where Is God in the Megilloth?: A Dialogue on the Ambiguity of Divine Presence and Absence (Old Testament Studies; Leiden: Brill).
155.
MerrillE.H.1985 ‘The Book of Ruth: Narration and Shared Themes’, BSac142: 130-42.
156.
MeyersC.1988In Search of Eve: Ancient Israelite Women in Context (New York: Oxford University Press).
157.
MeyersC.1992 ‘Everyday Life: Women in the Period of the Hebrew Bible’, in NewsomC.A.RingeS.H. (eds.), The Women’s Bible Commentary (Louisville: Westminster John Knox) 244-51.
158.
MeyersC.1999 ‘Returning Home: Ruth 1.8 and the Gendering of the Book of Ruth’, in Brenner (ed.) 1999: 85-114.
159.
MeyersC.2002 ‘Having Their Space and Eating There Too: Bread Production and Female Power in Ancient Israelite Households’, Nashim5: 14-44.
160.
MeyersC.2003 ‘Where the Girls Are: Archaeology and Women’s Lives in Ancient Israel’, in MorelandM.C. (ed.), In Between Text and Artifact: Integrating Archaeology in Biblical Studies Teaching (Boston: Brill) 31-51.
161.
Miller-McLemoreB.J.1991 ‘Returning to the “Mother’s House”: A Feminist Look at Orpah’, Christian Century108.1: 428-30.
162.
MoberlyW.2015Old Testament Theology: Reading the Hebrew Bible as Christian Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
163.
MooreM.S.2000 ‘Ruth’, in GordonJ.Harris BrownC.A.MooreM.S. (eds.), Joshua, Judges, Ruth (New International Biblical Commentary Old Testament Series, 5; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson) 293-373.
164.
MorrisL.1968 ‘Ruth: An Introduction and Commentary’, in CundallA.E.MorrisL. (eds.), Judges and Ruth (Tyndale Old Testament Commentary; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity) 217-318.
165.
MyersJ.M.1955The Linguistic and Literary Form of the Book of Ruth (Leiden: Brill).
166.
Nayap-PotD.1999 ‘Life in the Midst of Death: Naomi, Ruth, and the Plight of Indigenous Women’, in SugirtharajahR.S. (ed.), Vernacular Hermeneutics (The Bible and Postcolonialism, 2; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic) 52-65.
167.
NeusnerJ.1993The Mother of the Messiah in Judaism: The Book of Ruth (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International).
168.
NewsomC.A.2007 ‘Spying out the Land’, in BoerR. (ed.), Bakhtin and Genre Theory in Biblical Studies (SBL Semeia Studies; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature) 19-30.
169.
NewsomC.A.RingeS.H. (eds.) 1992The Women’s Bible Commentary (Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
170.
NiditchS.1996Oral World and Written Word: Ancient Israelite Literature (Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
171.
NielsenK.1997Ruth (OTL; Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
172.
NuR.2015 ‘A Reinterpretation of Levirate Marriage in Ruth 4:1-12 for Kachin Society’, in HaveaJ.LauP.H.W. (eds.), Reading Ruth in Asia (International Voices in Biblical Studies, 7; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature) 57-72.
173.
OstrikerA.2002 ‘The Book of Ruth and the Love of the Land’, BibInt10: 343-58.
174.
PaA.M.S.2006 ‘Reading Ruth 3:1-5 from an Asian Woman’s Perspective’, in DayL.PresslerC. (eds.), Engaging the Bible in a Gendered World (Louisville: Westminster John Knox) 47-59.
175.
PardesI.1993The Book of Ruth: Countertraditions in the Bible—A Feminist Approach (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
176.
PhillipsG.W.2004Judges, Ruth (Holman Old Testament Commentary; Nashville: Broadman and Holman).
177.
PowellS.D.2018Narrative Desire and the Book of Ruth (New York: Bloomsbury).
178.
PresslerC.2002Joshua, Judges, Ruth (Westminster Bible Commentary; Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
179.
PreussH.D.1991–92Old Testament Theology (OTL; 2 vols.; Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
180.
PrinslooW.S.1980 ‘The Theology of the Book of Ruth’, VT30: 330-41.
181.
Queen-SutherlandK.2016 ‘Ruth, Qoheleth, and Esther: Counter Voices from the Megilloth’, Perspectives in Religious Studies43: 227-42.
182.
Queen-SutherlandK.2018Ruth and Esther (Smyth and Helwys Bible Commentary, 13A; Macon, GA: Smyth and Helwys).
RashkowI.1993 ‘Ruth: The Discourse of Power and the Power of Discourse’, in Brenner (ed.) 1993: 26-41.
185.
RendtorffR.2005The Canonical Hebrew Bible: A Theology of the Old Testament (trans. OrtonD.E.; Leiden: Deo).
186.
RossowF.C.1991 ‘Literary Artistry in the Book of Ruth and Its Theological Significance’, Concordia Journal17.1: 112-19.
187.
RuizJ.-P.2011Reading from the Edges: The Bible and People on the Move (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis).
188.
SakenfeldK.D.1999Ruth (Interpretation; Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
189.
SakenfeldK.D.2002 ‘Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and the Wife of Uriah: The Company Mary Keeps in Matthew’s Gospel’, in GaventaB.R.RigbyC.L. (eds.), Blessed One: Protestant Perspectives on Mary (Louisville: Westminster John Knox) 21-31.
190.
SakenfeldK.D.2003Just Wives: Stories of Power and Survival in the Old Testament and Today (Louisville: Westminster John Knox).
191.
SandovalT.J.2018 ‘Latino/a/x Biblical Interpretation Related to the Hebrew Bible’, CBR16: 236-62.
192.
SassonJ.M.1978 ‘The Issue of Geʾullāh in Ruth’, JSOT5: 52-64.
193.
SassonJ.M.1989Ruth: A New Translation with a Philological Commentary and a Formalist-Folkloric Interpretation (Biblical Seminar; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
194.
SassonJ.M.1995Ruth: A New Translation with a Philological Commentary and a Formalist-Folklorist Interpretation (Biblical Seminar, 10; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2nd edn).
195.
SaxegaardK.M.2010Character Complexity in the Book of Ruth (FAT, 2/47; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
196.
SchipperJ.2016Ruth (Yale Anchor Bible; New Haven: Yale University Press).
197.
SegoviaF.2014 ‘Introduction: Approaching Latino/a Biblical Criticisms: A Trajectory of Visions and Missions’, in LozadaF.Jr.SegoviaF. (eds.), Latino/a Biblical Hermeneutics: Problematics, Objectives, Strategies (Atlanta: SBL) 1-39.
198.
ShepherdD.J.2018 ‘Ruth in the Days of Judges: Women, Foreigners and Violence’, BibInt 26.4-5: 528-43.
199.
SiquansA.2009 ‘Foreignness and Poverty in the Book of Ruth: A Legal Way for a Poor Foreign Woman to Be Integrated into Israel’, JBL128: 443-52.
200.
SnowT.2017 ‘Agricultural Dimensions of the Book of Ruth’ (Ph.D. dissertation, The Catholic University of America).
201.
SteinbergN.2004 ‘Romancing the Widow: Economic Distinctions between the “ALMANA”, the “ISSA-ALMANA” and the “ESSET-Hammet”’, in EllensH. (ed.), God’s Word for Our World (London: T&T Clark) 1:327-46.
202.
StoneK.2001 ‘Queer Commentary and Biblical Interpretation: An Introduction’, in StoneK. (ed.), Queer Commentary and the Hebrew Bible (Cleveland: Pilgrim) 11-34.
203.
StoneT.J.2013The Compilational History of the Megilloth (Göttingen: Mohr Siebeck).
204.
StrolloM.F.2016 ‘Initiative and Agency: Towards a Theology of the Megilloth’, in EmbryB. (ed.), Issues in the Megilloth: The Shape of Current Scholarship (Hebrew Bible Monographs, 78; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix) 150-60.
205.
SunC.2019 ‘Recent Research on Asian and Asian American Hermeneutics Related to the Hebrew Bible’, CBR17: 238-65.
206.
SutskoverT.2010 ‘The Themes of Land and Fertility in the Book of Ruth’, JSOT34.3: 283-94.
207.
TaylorM. forthcoming Ruth/Esther (Story of God Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
208.
ThomasN.J.2002 ‘Weaving the Words: The Book of Ruth as Missiologically Effective Communication’, Missiology:An International Review30.2: 155-69.
209.
ThompsonT.ThompsonD.1968 ‘Some Legal Problems in the Book of Ruth’, VT18.1: 79-99.
210.
TiessenN.2010 ‘A Theology of Ruth: The Dialectic of Countertestimony and Core Testimony’, Direction39.2: 255-64.
211.
TribleP.1976 ‘Two Women in a Man’s World’, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal53.3: 251-79.
212.
TribleP.1978God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality (OBT; Philadelphia: Fortress).
213.
TribleP.1982 ‘A Human Comedy: The Book of Ruth’, in Gros LouisK.R.R.AckermanJ.S. (eds.), Literary Interpretations of Biblical Narratives Volume II (Nashville: Abingdon) 161-90.
214.
TribleP.1984Texts of Terror: Literary-Feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives (OBT; Philadelphia: Fortress).
215.
TribleP.2000a ‘Ruth’, in MeyersC. (ed.), Women in Scripture: A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, and the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans) 146-47.
216.
TribleP.2000b ‘Orpah’, in MeyersC. (ed.), Women in Scripture: A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, and the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans) 133-34.
217.
van WoldeE. 1997a Ruth and Naomi (London: SCM Press).
218.
van WoldeE. 1997b ‘Texts in Dialogue with Other Texts: Intertextuality in the Ruth and Tamar Narratives’, BibInt5.1: 1-28.
219.
VenterP.MinnaarW.2013 ‘Rut Wat Boas Se “Voete” Oopgemaak en by Hom Gaan le Het: Die Betekenis van Hierdie Simboliese Aksie in Rut 3:7 in Die Lig Van Eksodus 4:25’, Verbum et Ecclesia34: 108-11.
220.
von RadG.1962–65Old Testament Theology (2 vols.; New York: Harper).
221.
WagstaffB.J.2017 ‘Redressing Clothing in the Hebrew Bible: Material-Cultural Approaches’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Exeter).
222.
WaltkeB.K.2007An Old Testament Theology: An Exegetical, Canonical, and Thematic Approach (Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
223.
WaltonJ.2009Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1, 2 Samuel (Zondervan Illustrated Background Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
224.
WaltonJ.2017Old Testament Theology for Christians: From Ancient Context to Enduring Belief (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity).
225.
WayK.C.2016Judges and Ruth (Teach the Text Commentary Series; Grand Rapids: Baker).
226.
WeisbergD.E.2004 ‘The Widow of Our Discontent: Levirate Marriage in the Bible and Ancient Israel’, JSOT28.4: 403-29.
227.
WestM.1997 ‘The Book of Ruth: An Example of Procreative Strategies for Queers’, in GossE.StrongheartA. (eds.), Our Families, Our Values: Snapshots of Queer Kinship (New York: Harrington Park) 51-60.
228.
WestM.2006 ‘Ruth’, in GuestD.et al. (eds.), The Queer Bible Commentary (London: SCM Press) 190-94.
229.
WestbrookR.1991Property and the Family in Biblical Law (JSOTSup, 113; Sheffield: JSOT Press).
230.
WestermannC.1999 ‘Structure and Intention of the Book of Ruth’, Word and World19: 285-302.
231.
WoldeE. van1997a Ruth and Naomi (London: SCM).
232.
WoldeE. van1997b ‘Texts in Dialogue with Texts: Intertextuality in the Ruth and Tamar Narratives’, BibInt5.1: 1-28.
233.
WünchH.-G.1998Das Buch Rut (BKAT, 10; Neuhausen-Stuttgart: Hänssler).
234.
YeeG.A.2003Poor Banished Children of Eve: Woman as Evil in the Hebrew Bible (Minneapolis: Fortress).
235.
YeeG.A.2009 ‘“She Stood in Tears amid the Alien Corn”: Ruth the Perpetual Foreigner and Model Minority’, in BaileyR.C.LiewT.-S.B.SegoviaF.F. (eds.), They Were All Together in One Place?: Toward Minority Biblical Criticism (Semeia Studies, 57; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature) 119-40.
236.
YoungerK.L.2002Judges, Ruth (NIV Application Commentary; Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
237.
ZieglerY.2007 ‘“So Shall God Do…”: Variations of an Oath Formula and Its Literary Meaning’, JBL126.1: 59-81.
238.
ZieglerY.2008Promises to Keep: The Oath in Biblical Narrative (Leiden: Brill).
239.
ZieglerY.2015Ruth: From Alienation to Monarchy (Maggid Studies in Tanakh; Jerusalem: Koren).
