The patterns of verbal agreement between the gospels have long been considered a key for solving the synoptic problem, and a subdiscipline within gospel source criticism of tabulating and interpreting these patterns of agreement has slowly emerged in the name of gathering the most objective evidence available. Studies of the verbal agreements have steadily grown in their sophistication (esp. in combinatory analysis), as well as in their appreciation for the nature of the gospel text as something more than a mere compilation. The question of whether this approach can substantially further the field, however, has yet to be answered. This article surveys and critiques all published statistical studies of the verbal agreements known to the author.
Abakuks, Andris2006a `A Statistical Study of the Triple-link Model in the Synoptic Problem' , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society169: 49-60.
2.
2006b ` The Synoptic Problem and Statistics' , Signi cance3: 153-57.
3.
2007 ` A Modi cation of Honoré's Triple-link Model in the Synoptic Problem' , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society170: 841-50.
4.
Bergemann, Thomas1993Q auf dem Prüfstand: Die Zuordnung des Mt/Lk-Stoffes zu Q am Beispiel der Bergpredigt (FRLANT, 158; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
5.
Bussmann, W.1925-31 Synoptische Studien (3 vols.; Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses).
6.
Butler, B.C.1951The Originality of St. Matthew: A Critique of the Two-Document Hypothesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
7.
Carlston, Charles E.1988`Betz on the Sermon on the Mount: A Critique' , CBQ50: 47-57.
8.
Carlston, Charles E. , and Dennis Norlin1971`Once More: Statistics and Q' , HTR64: 59-78.
9.
1999 `Statistics and Q: Some Further Observations' , NovT41: 108-23.
10.
Carmignac, Jean1971Review of Robert L. Lindsey , A Hebrew Translation of the Gospel of Mark, NovT13: 157-60.
11.
Choulakian, V. , S. Kasparian , M. Miyake , H. Akama , N. Makoshi and M. Nakagawa2006`A Statistical Analysis of the Synoptic Gospels' , Journées internationales d'Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles8: 281-88.
12.
Denaux, Adelbert1995`Criteria for Identifying Q-Passages: A Critical Review of a Recent Work by T . Bergemann', NovT37: 105-29.
13.
Dibelius, Martin1971From Tradition to Gospel (Cambridge : James Clarke).
14.
Downing, F. Gerald1988`Compositional Conventions and the Synoptic Problem' , JBL107: 69-85.
15.
Farmer, William R.1964The Synoptic Problem: A Critical Analysis ( New York: Macmillan).
16.
1969Synopticon: The Verbal Agreement between the Greek Texts of Matthew, Mark and Luke Contextually Exhibited (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).
17.
Farrer, A.M.1955`On Dispensing with Q', in D.E. Nineham (ed.), Studies in the Gospels: Essays in Memory of R.H. Lightfoot (Oxford: Basil Blackwell): 55-88.
18.
Gaston, Lloyd1973Horae Synopticae Electronicae: Word Statistics of the Synoptic Gospels (Sources for Biblical Study;Missoula, MT: Scholars Press).
19.
Grant, Frederick C.1957The Gospels: Their Origin and Growth ( New York: Harper & Bros.).
20.
Guenther, Heinz O.1992`The Sayings Gospel Q and the Quest for Aramaic Sources: Rethinking Christian Origins' , Semeia55: 41-76.
21.
Gundry, Robert H.1992`Matthean Foreign Bodies in Agreements of Luke with Matthew against Mark: Evidence that Luke used Matthew' , in F. Van Segbroeck et al. (eds.), The Four Gospels 1992: Festschrift Frans Neirynck (BETL, 100; Leuven: Leuven University Press ): 1467-95.
22.
Hawkins, John C.1909Horae Synopticae: Contributions to the Study of the Synoptic Problem (Oxford: Clarendon, 2nd edn).
23.
Hobbs, Edward C.1980`A Quarter-Century Without "Q" ' , Perkins School of Theology Journal33.4: 10-19.
24.
Holtzmann, Heinrich Julius1885Lehrbuch der historisch-kritischen Einleitung in das neue Testament (Sammlung theologischer Lehrbücher; Freiburg: Mohr-Siebeck).
25.
Honoré, A.M.1968`A Statistical Study of the Synoptic Problem' , NovT19: 95-147.
26.
Huggins, Ronald V.1992`Matthean Posteriority: A Preliminary Proposal' , NovT34: 1-22.
27.
Hultgren, Stephen2002Narrative Elements in the Double Tradition: A Study of their Place within the Framework of the Gospel Narrative (BZNW, 113;Berlin: W. de Gruyter).
28.
Kloppenborg, John S.1987The Formation of Q: Trajectories in Ancient Wisdom Collections (Studies in Antiquity and Christianity; Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
1995Review of Thomas Bergemann, Q auf dem Prüfstand , JBL114: 325-27.
31.
2000Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
32.
2007`Variation in the Reproduction of the Double Tradition and an Oral Q?' , ETL83: 53-80.
33.
Lachmann, Karl , 1835 `De ordine narrationum in evangeliis synopticis' , Theologische Studien und Kritiken8: 570-90.
34.
Lagrange, Marie-Joseph1956Synopse des quatre Evangiles en francais d'apres la synopse grecque (Paris: Gabalda ).
35.
Lasserre, Guy1996Les synopses: Élaboration et usage ( Subsidia Biblica, 19; Rome : Ponti cal Biblical Institute).
36.
Lindsey, Robert L.1963`A Modi ed Two-Document Theory of the Synoptic Dependence and Interdependence' , NovT6: 239-63.
37.
1973A Hebrew Translation of the Gospel of Mark ( Jerusalem: Dugith, rev. edn).
38.
1985 -1989A Comparative Greek Concordance of the Synoptic Gospels, collated and compiled by Elmar Camillo Dos Santos (3 vols.; Jerusalem: Dugith).
39.
1992 ` A New Approach to the Synoptic Gospels' , Mishkan17-18: 87-106.
40.
Llewelyn, Stephen Robert1991`A Stylometric Analysis of Parallel Sections of the Synoptic Gospels' (unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University ).
41.
Mann, C.S.1986Mark (AB, 27;Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
42.
Manson, T.W.1949The Sayings of Jesus: As Recorded in the Gospels according to St. Matthew and St. Luke Arranged with Introduction and Commentary ( London: SCM Press).
43.
Mattila, Sharon L.1994`A Problem Still Clouded: Yet Again-Statistics and "Q"' , NovT36: 313-29.
44.
2004`Negotiating the Clouds around Statistics and "Q": A Rejoinder and Independent Analysis' , NovT46: 105-31.
45.
McIver, Robert K. , and Marie Carroll2002`Experiments to Develop Criteria for Determining the Existence of Written Sources, and their Potential Implications for the Synoptic Problem' , JBL121: 667-87.
46.
2004 ` Distinguishing Characteristics of Orally Transmitted Material when Compared to Material Transmitted by Literary Means' , Applied Cognitive Psychology18: 1251-69.
47.
Miyake, Maki , Hiroyuki Akama , Migaku Sato , and Masanobu Nakagawa2002`Approaching to [sic] the Synoptic Problem by Factor Analysis' , Proceedings of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics48: 327-37.
48.
Miyake, Maki , Hiroyuki Akama , Migaku Sato , Masanori Nakagawa and Nobuyasu Makoshi2004`Tele-Synopsis for Biblical Research: Development of NLP Based Synoptic Software for Text Analysis as a Mediator of Educational Technology and Knowledge Discovery' , Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT `04): 931-35.
Mournet, Terence C.2005Oral Tradition and LIterary Dependency: Variability and Stability in the Synoptic Tradition and Q (WUNT, 195; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck ).
51.
Neville, David2002Mark's Gospel-Prior or Posterior?: A Reappraisal of the Phenomenon of Order (Shef eld: Shef eldAcademic Press ).
52.
O'Rourke, John J.1974`Some Observations on the Synoptic Problem and the Use of Statistical Procedures' , NovT16: 272-77.
53.
Poirier, John C.2004`Memory, Written Sources, and the Synoptic Problem: A Response to Robert K. McIver and Marie Carroll' , JBL123: 315-22.
54.
Robinson, James M.1962`Basic Shifts in German Theology' , Int16: 76-97.
55.
1998 ` The Matthean Trajectory from Q to Mark' , in Adela Yarbro Collins (ed.), Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Bible and Culture: Essays in Honor of Hans Dieter Betz (Scholars Press Homage Series, 22; Atlanta: Scholars Press): 122-54.
56.
Ronning, Halvor1989`Word Statistics and the Minor Agreements of the Synoptic Gospel' , in Actes du Second Colloque International Bible et Informatiques: Méthodes, Outils, Résultats (Travaux de Linguistique Quantitative, 43; Paris: Champion): 501-16.
57.
Rosché, Theodore R.1960`The Words of Jesus and the Future of the "Q" Hypothesis' , Bib79: 210-20.
58.
Sanders, E.P. , and Margaret Davies1989Studying the Synoptic Gospels (London: SCM Press).
59.
Schweitzer, Albert1961The Quest of the Historical Jesus ( New York: Macmillan).
60.
Simons, Eduard1880Hat der dritte Evangelist den kanonischen Mattäus benutzt? ( Bonn: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von Carl Georgi).
61.
Solages, Bruno de1959A Greek Synopsis of the Gospels: A New Way of Solving the Synoptic Problem (Leiden: E.J. Brill).
62.
1973La composition des évangiles: De Luc et de Matthieu et leurs sources (Leiden: E.J. Brill).
63.
Tuckett, Christopher M.1996Q and the History of Early Christianity: Studies on Q (Edinburgh: T&T Clark International ).
64.
Tyson, Joseph B.1976`Sequential Parallelism in the Synoptic Gospels' , NTS22: 276-308.
65.
1978`Source Criticism of the Gospel of Luke' , in Charles H. Talbert (ed.), Perspectives on Luke-Acts (PRSt Special Studies, 5; Danville, VA: Association of Baptist Professors of Religion).
66.
Tyson, Joseph B. , and Thomas R.W. Longstaff1978Synoptic Abstract (The Computer Bible, 15; Wooster, OH: Biblical Research Associates ).
67.
Wegner, Uwe1985Der Hauptmann von Kafarnaum: (Mt 7,28a; 8,5-10.13 par Lk 7,1-10): Ein Beitrag zur Q-Forschung (WUNT, 14; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck ).
68.
Weisse, Christian Hermann1838Die evangelische Geschichte kritisch und philosophisch bearbeitet (2 vols.; Leipzig : Breitkopf und Härtel).
69.
Wenham, David1972`The Synoptic Problem Revisited: Some New Suggestions about the Composition of Mark 4:1-34' , TynBul23: 3-38.
70.
Wilke, Christian Gottlob1838Der Urevangelist oder exegetisch-kritische Untersuchung über das Verwandtschaftsverhältnis der drei ersten Evangelien ( Dresden and Leipzig: Gerhard Fleischer).
71.
Young, Brad1986Review of Lindsey's A Comparative Greek Concordance of the Synoptic Gospels , Immanuel20: 44 .
