Utilizing participant action research methodology, five youth in foster care participated in the design and implementation of a pilot research study to collect data from 16 participants in foster care, highlighting their perspective of their strengths and experiences within the American foster care system. Participant action research (PAR) provides a pathway for youth in foster care to share their voice with those that influence policy and implement change in the very system that governs their lives. The participant researchers remained committed to the project for a year, creatively designed the research methodology, and contributed to the interpretation of the findings. Despite some potential validity and reliability issues, PAR methodology provided a positive framework for the voices of the participant researchers to be heard and for the voices of the participants to be interpreted by other youth in foster care.
AltshulerS. J. (1997) The educational experiences of children in foster care: The perceptions of teachers, foster parents, and children (Final Report), Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
2.
BursteinK.BryanT.ChaoP. (2005) Promoting self-determination skills among youth with special health needs using participatory action research. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities17(2): 185–201. doi:10.1007/s10882-005-3688-1.
3.
Caywood, J. (2000). Educational services for foster children. Unpublished paper, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
4.
CollinsM. E.HillN.MirandaC. (2008) Establishing positive youth development approaches in group home settings: Training implementation and evaluation. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal25(1): 43–54. doi:10.1007/s10560-008-0111-7.
5.
Collins, W. A., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal context. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (6th ed., pp. 1003–1067). New York: Wiley.
6.
CostelloJ.TolesM.SpielbergerJ.WynnJ. (2000) History, ideology and structure shape the organizations that shape youth. In Youth development: Issues, challenges and directions, Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures, pp. 185–232.
7.
CourtneyM. E.DworskyA. (2006) Early outcome for young adults transitioning from out-of-home care in the USA. Child & Family Social Work11(3): 209–219. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00433.x.
8.
CourtneyM.PiliavanI.Grogan-KaylorA.NesmithA. (2001) Foster youth transitions to adulthood: A longitudinal view of youth leaving care. Child Welfare80(6): 685–716.
9.
CrittendenP. M. (1983) The effect of mandatory protective daycare on mutual attachment in maltreating mother-infant dyads. Child Abuse and Neglect7: 297–300. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(83)90007-8.
10.
CrittendenP. M. (1985) Social networks, quality of child rearing, and child development. Child Development56(5): 1299–1313. doi:10.2307/1130245.
11.
DamonW. (2004) What is positive youth development?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science591: 13–24. doi: 10.1177/0002716203260092.
12.
DiehlD. C.HowseR. B.TrivetteC. M. (2011) Youth in foster care: Developmental assets and attitudes towards adoptions and mentoring. Child & Family Social Work16(1): 81–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00716.x.
13.
DozierM.StovallK. C.AlbusK. E.BatesB. (2001) Attachment for infants in foster care: The role of caregiver state of mind. Child Development72(5): 1467–1477. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00360.
14.
EckenrodeJ.RoweE.LairdM.BraithwaiteJ. (1995) Mobility as a mediator of the effects of child maltreatment on academic performance. Child Development66(4): 1130–1142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00927.x.
15.
EgelandB.SroufeL. A. (1981) Developmental sequelae of maltreatment in infancy. New Directions for Child Development11: 77–92. doi:10.1002/cd.23219811106.
16.
EriksonE. H. (1968) Identity, youth, and crisis, New York: Norton.
17.
FernandezE.BarthR. P. (2010) How does foster care work? International evidence on outcomes, Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
18.
FettermanD.KaftarianS.WandersmanA. (1996) Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
19.
FoxA.BerrickJ. D. (2006) A response to No One Ever Asked Us: A review of children’s experiences in out-of-home care. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal24(1): 23–51. doi: 10-1007/s10560-006-0057-6.
20.
GaventaJ. (1988) Participatory research in North America. Convergence21(2/3): 41–46.
21.
HarterS.MaroldD. B.WhitesellN. R.CobbsG. (1996) A model of the effects of parent and peer support on adolescent false self behavior. Child Development67: 360–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01738.x.
22.
KellerT. E.CusickG. R.CourtneyM. E. (2007) Approaching the transition to adulthood: Distinctive profiles of adolescents aging out of the child welfare system. Social Service Review81(3): 453–484. doi: 10.1086/519536.
23.
KellyK. (2000) The education crisis for children in the California Juvenile Court System. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly2: 757–773.
24.
KrogerJ. (1993) Ego identity: An overview. In: KrogerJ. (eds) Discussions on ego identity, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3–20.
25.
LeffS. S.CostiganT.PowerT. J. (2004) Using participatory research to develop a playground-based prevention program. Journal of School Psychology42(1): 3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2003.08.005.
26.
LongJ.DartJ. (2001) Opening-up: Engaging people in evaluation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice4(1): 71–78. doi:10.1080/13645570119680.
27.
NeedellB.Cuccaro-AlaminS.BrookhartA.JackmanW.ShlonskyA. (2002) Youth emancipating from foster care in California: Findings using linked administrative data, Berkeley: California Social Work Education Center.
28.
PecoraP. J.JensenP. S.RomanelliL. H.JacksonL. J.OrtizA. (2005) Mental health services for children placed in foster care: An overview of current challenges. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice and Program88(1): 5–26.
29.
Radke-YarrowM.CummingsE. M.KuczynskiL.ChapmanM. (1985) Patterns of attachment in two- and three-year-olds in normal families and families with parental depression. Child Development56: 884–893. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1985.tb00161.x.
30.
SmallS. A. (1995) Enhancing contexts of adolescent development: The role of community-based action research. In: CrockettL. J.CrouterA. C. (eds) Pathways through adolescence: Individual development in relation to social contexts, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, pp. 211–233.
31.
SpiekerS. J.BoothC. L. (1988) Maternal antecedents of attachment quality. In: BelskyJ.NezworskiT. (eds) Clinical implications of attachment, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
SteinM.WardH.CourtneyM. (2011) Editorial: International perspectives on young people’s transitions from care to adulthood. Children & Youth Services Review33(12): 2409–2411. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.012.
33.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Powers, L. E. (Eds.) (2007). Self-determination. Exceptionality, 15(1), 1–2.
34.
Weinberg, L. A., Zetlin, A. G., & Shea, N. M. (2001). Literature review on the education needs of children involved in family and juvenile court proceedings (contract number 997449). Judicial Council of California, Center for Families, Children & the Courts, San Francisco, CA.
