ArieliD.FriedmanV. J.AgbariaK. (2009). The paradox of participation in action research. Action Research, 7(3), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750309336718
2.
BartelsK. P. R.WittmayerJ. M. (2014). Symposium Introduction: How usable knowledge means in action research practice. Critical Policy Studies, 8(4), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19460171.2014.957335
3.
BartelsK. P. R.WittmayerJ. M. (Eds.). (2018). Action Research in Policy Analysis. Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions. Routledge.
4.
BradburyH.WaddellS.O’ BrienK.ApgarM.TeehankeeB.FazeyI. (2019). A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633
CookeB.KothariU. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny?Zed Books.
7.
FriedmanV. J.GrayP.Ortiz AragonA. (2018). From doing to writing action research: A plea to ARJ authors. Action Research, 16(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318763041
OspinaS.DodgeJ.GodsoeB.MinieriM.RezaJ.SchallE. (2004). From consent to mutual inquiry: Balancing democracy and authority in action research. Action Research, 2(1), 47–70.