Employing Reid and Frisby’s feminist participatory action research model (FPAR) as a guide, men from diverse ethno-cultural backgrounds worked with women leaders to take action on the issue of intimate partner violence. Engaging with four interconnected phases, the research team adopted shared roles of leadership which led to 29 collective actions. Through trust-building dialogues, we interrogated issues related to masculinity, gender equity, anti-racism, and decolonization. A “collective cultures approach” to men’s violence prevention work was articulated and a grassroots movement emerged. As white women situated in both academic and community spaces, we discuss knowledges, actions, and learnings from this FPAR process, underscoring the tensions and contradictions of employing FPAR in real-life contexts. The importance and limitations of inter-relational reflexivity and power accountability are emphasized as a core tenet of FPAR.
BoppM.BoppJ.LaneP. (2003). Aboriginal domestic violence in Canada. Aboriginal Healing Foundation.
3.
BoylornR. (2008). Participants as co-researchers. In GivenL. M. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 600–602). SAGE. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n310
4.
CarilloR.TelloJ. (2008). Family violence and men of color: Healing the wounded spirit (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
5.
CarlsonJ.CaseyE. A.EdlesonJ. L.TolmanR. M.WalshT. V.KimballE. (2015). Strategies to engage men and boys in violence prevention: A global perspective. Violence against Women, 21(11), 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215594888
6.
CarterS. M.LittleM. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328. https://doi.org/0.1177/1049732307306927
CornwallA.JewkesR. (1995). What is participatory research?Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676.
9.
CrantonP. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. Wiley.
10.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing intersections of race and sex: A black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and anti-racist politics. Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 137–169.
DiAngeloR. (2011). White fragility. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 54–70.
13.
DupontI. (2008). Beyond doing no harm: A call for PAR with marginalized populations. Critical Criminology, 16(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-008-9055-7
14.
EtmanskiC.HallB. L.DawsonT. (2014). Learning and doing community-based research: Linking pedagogy to practice. University of Toronto Press.
Flores-CarmonaJ.LuschenK. V. (2012). Crafting critical stories: Toward pedagogies and methodologies of collaboration, inclusion, and voice. Counterpoint.
19.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
20.
FrisbyW.ReidC.MillarS.HoeberL. (2005). Putting “participatory” into participatory forms of action research. Journal of Sport Management, 19(4), 367–386.
21.
GilbertA.SliepY. (2009). Reflexivity in the practice of social action: From self to inter-relational reflexivity. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630903900408
HudsonK. D.MountzS. E. (2016). Teaching note—Third space caucusing: Borderland praxis in the social work classroom. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(3), 379–384.
24.
JacobsonM.RugeleyC. (2007). Community-based participatory research: Group work for social justice and community change. Social Work with Groups, 30(4), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J009v30n04_03
25.
James, C., David, E., Wanda, T.B., Akua, B., Bethan, L., & Tana, T. (2010). Race and Well-Being: The Lives, Hopes and Action of African Canadians. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.
28.
Lorenzetti, L. & Walsh, C. A. (2014). Is there an ‘f’ in your PAR: Understanding, teaching and doing action research. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 15(1), 50–63.
29.
LugonesM. C.SpelmanE. V. (1983). Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism, and the demand for ‘the woman’s voice’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 6(8), 573–581.
30.
MassaquoiN. (2007). Introduction: Future imaginings of black feminist thought. In MassquoiN.WaneN. N. (Eds.), Theorizing empowerment: Canadian perspectives on black feminist thought (pp. 5–26). Inanna.
31.
National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (Canada). (2019). Reclaiming power and place: The final report of the national inquiry into missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls. Retrieved from https://www.mmiwg-ffada.ca/final-report/
32.
ParkP. (2001). Knowledge and participatory research in the US and Canada. In ReasonB.BradburyH. (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 83–93). SAGE.
ReidC.FrisbyW. (2008). Continuing the journey: Articulating dimensions of feminist participatory research (FPAR). In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 93–105). SAGE.
35.
Skokoloff, A. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(38), 38–64. doi: 10.177/1077801204271476.
36.
Statistics Canada. (2016). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Industry.
